不同光照条件下顶花板凳果的光合特性变化及耐阴性评价

杨欣蕊, 王庆, 李倩, 岳明, 赵雪艳, 白晶茹, 李艳

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 162-170.

PDF(1758 KB)
PDF(1758 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 162-170. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412015
研究论文

不同光照条件下顶花板凳果的光合特性变化及耐阴性评价

作者信息 +

Photosynthetic characteristics changes and evaluation on shade tolerance of Pachysandra terminalis under different light conditions

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】探究遮阴强度对顶花板凳果(Pachysandra terminalis)的形态特征、生理指标、光合参数,以及叶绿素荧光参数等方面的影响,为顶花板凳果在园林领域中的应用提供理论依据。【方法】以顶花板凳果为试验材料,设置全光照(对照组,CK)、遮阴度30%、65%、85% 4种光照条件,对其形态特征、生理指标、光合参数以及叶绿素荧光参数等进行测定,通过主成分分析和隶属函数法对顶花板凳果耐阴性进行综合评价。【结果】随着遮阴强度的增加,顶花板凳果总叶绿素含量、最大光化学量子产量、PSⅡ活性、电子传输效率,以及光化学淬灭系数均呈增加的趋势;而叶片厚度、叶面积、冠幅、比叶面积、叶片含水率,以及相对电导率则呈现先增大后减小的趋势。各遮阴处理组中,叶长、叶宽、初始荧光,以及非光化学猝灭系数均显著低于对照组。在遮阴度65%条件下,表观量子效率达到最大值,最大净光合速率显著高于其他处理组,光补偿点达到最小值,且此时光饱和点较对照组显著增大。【结论】顶花板凳果是一种耐阴性良好的植物,轻度遮阴可以促进其生长发育,遮阴度为65%较为适宜。

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to explore the effects of shading intensity on morphological characteristics, physiological indices, photosynthetic parameters, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Pachysandra terminalis. It provides a theoretical basis for the application of P. terminalis in landscaping.【Method】Taking P. terminalis as the experimental material, four light conditions were set up: full light(control group, CK), 30% shading, 65% shading, and 85% shading. Measurements were taken on its morphological characteristics, physiological indices, photosynthetic parameters, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. The shade tolerance was comprehensively evaluated through principal component analysis and the membership function method.【Result】With the increase of shading intensity,the chlorophyll content, maximal quantum yield, PS Ⅱ activity, electron transport rate and photochemical quenching coefficient all showed an increasing trend. Leaf thickness, leaf area, crown width, specific leaf area, leaf water content, and relative conductivity showed an initial increase followed by a decrease. In all shading treatment groups, leaf length, leaf width, initial fluorescence, and non-photochemical quenching coefficient were significantly lower than those in the control group. Under the 65% shading condition, the apparent quantum yield reached its maximum value, the maximum net photosynthetic rate was significantly higher than that in other treatment groups, while the light compensation point reached its minimum value. Additionally, the light saturation point increased significantly compared to the control group.【Conclusion】P. terminalis is a shade-tolerant plant. Mild shading can promote its growth and development, with 65% shading being optimal.

关键词

顶花板凳果 / 耐阴性 / 形态指标 / 生理指标 / 光合参数 / 叶绿素荧光参数

Key words

Pachysandra terminalis / shade tolerance / morphological characteristics / physiological characteristics / photosynthetic parameter / chlorophyll fluorescence paraments

引用本文

导出引用
杨欣蕊, 王庆, 李倩, . 不同光照条件下顶花板凳果的光合特性变化及耐阴性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 49(6): 162-170 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412015
YANG Xinrui, WANG Qing, LI Qian, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics changes and evaluation on shade tolerance of Pachysandra terminalis under different light conditions[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2025, 49(6): 162-170 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412015
中图分类号: S751.1   

参考文献

[1]
王庆, 李倩, 刘国宇, 等. 水果兰耐阴性研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35(4):56-60.
WANG Q, LI Q, LIU G Y, et al. Shade tolerance of Teucrium fruitcans[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2020, 35(4):56-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2020.04.10.
[2]
李立婷, 张鸽香, 苏同向, 等. 3种唇形科野生花卉在遮光下的光合特性变化及耐阴性评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2023, 54(5):1436-1445.
LI L T, ZHANG G X, SU T X, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics changes and evaluation on shade tolerance of three kinds of Lamiaceae wild flowers under shading[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2023, 54(5):1436-1445.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2023.05.016.
[3]
赵雪瑶, 赵丹丹, 张鸽香. 3种毛茛科地被植物对遮阴的生理响应及耐阴性评价[J]. 草业科学, 2024, 41(12):2880-2890.
ZHAO X Y, ZHAO D D, ZHANG G X. Physiological response and shade tolerance of three Ranunculaceae ground cover plants under different shading treatments[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(12):2880-2890.
[4]
安定国. 甘肃省小陇山高等植物志[M]. 兰州: 甘肃民族出版社, 2002.
AN D G. Higher flora of Xiaolongshan Mountain in Gansu Province[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu Nationality Press, 2002.
[5]
何士洋, 沈超强, 顾亮, 等. 优良耐阴地被植物富贵草的繁殖及园林应用[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017(16):144.
HE S Y, SHEN C Q, GU L, et al. Propagation and garden application of fine shade-tolerant ground cover plant Fugui grass[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(16): 144.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2017.16.089.
[6]
马祥瑞, 焦丽华, 朱永强. 顶花板凳果特性及繁育应用[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2016(31):129.
MA X R, JIAO L H, ZHU Y Q. Characteristics and breeding application of top-flowering bench fruit[J]. Agricultural Science-Technology and Information, 2016(31): 129.DOI: 10.15979/j.cnki.cn62-1057/s.2016.31.080.
[7]
王小平, 张婷婷, 赵文英. 富贵草扦插繁育技术[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2008, 27(2):64-65.
WANG X P, ZHANG T T, ZHAO W Y. Cutting propagation techniques of Fugui grass[J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2008, 27(2):64-65.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9690.2008.02.018.
[8]
刘辰旺, 丁超, 孙玉, 等. 板凳果属植物化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2022, 41(8):65-76.
LIU C W, DING C, SUN Y, et al. Chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of genus Pachysandra:a review[J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2022, 41(8):65-76.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9690.2022.08.010.
[9]
许红娟, 高雅晴, 唐玲涵, 等. 3种观赏草的耐阴性研究[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2023, 43(2):19-25.
XU H J, GAO Y Q, TANG L H, et al. Studies on the shade-tolerance of three ornamental grass and sedge cultivars[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2023, 43(2):19-25.DOI: 10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2023.02.037.
[10]
沈娟, 李谦盛, 倪迪安. 两种大吴风草的耐荫特性研究[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50(7):967-972.
SHEN J, LI Q S, NI D A. Study on the shade tolerance characters of two Farfugium japonicum plants[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2014, 50(7):967-972.DOI:10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2014.0077.
[11]
李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
LI H S. Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[12]
陈建勋, 王晓峰. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 2版. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2006.
CHEN J X, WANG X F. Experimental instruction of plant physiology[M]. 2nd ed. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology Press, 2006.
[13]
叶子飘, 王建林. 植物光合-光响应模型的比较分析[J]. 井冈山大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 30(2):9-13.
YE Z P, WANG J L. Comparison and analysis of light-response models of plant photosynthesis[J]. Journal of Jinggangshan University (Natural Science), 2009, 30(2):9-13.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8085.2009.02.002.
[14]
EVANS J R, POORTER H. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance:the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain[J]. Plant,Cell & Environment, 2001, 24(8):755-767.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00724.x.
[15]
朱玉菲, 刘冬云, 郭思佳. 两种野生地被植物耐阴性研究[J]. 西部林业科学, 2017, 46(2):133-138.
ZHU Y F, LIU D Y, GUO S J. Shade tolerance of two kinds of wild ground cover plants[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2017, 46(2):133-138.DOI: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2017.02.023.
[16]
KITAJIMA K, MULLKEY S S, WRIGHT S J. Variation in crown light utilization characteristics among tropical canopy trees[J]. Annals of Botany, 2005, 95(3):535-547.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci051.
[17]
尹慧, 安莹, 陈雅君, 等. 不同遮阴强度下白三叶形态特征和生长动态[J]. 中国草地学报, 2015, 37(5):86-91.
YIN H, AN Y, CHEN Y J, et al. Effect of light intensity on morphological characteristic and growth index of Trifolium repens l.cv.‘Longping No.1'[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2015, 37(5):86-91.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5021.2015.05.015.
[18]
王黎, 赵丹丹, 张鸽香. 遮阴对猫爪草光合特性及叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2024, 44(7):1055-1063.
WANG L, ZHAO D D, ZHANG G X. Effects of shading on the photosynthetic characteristics and leaf structure of Ranunculus ternatus Thunb[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2024, 44(7):1055-1063.DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.20230640.
[19]
杨淑红, 王齐瑞, 刘艳萍, 等. 不同林冠环境下顶花板凳果生理适应性研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(12):110-115.
YANG S H, WANG Q R, LIU Y P, et al. Physiological adaptation of Pachysandra terminalis sieb.et Zucc under different canopy conditions[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 46(12):110-115.DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2017.12.020.
[20]
胡肖肖, 段玉侠, 金荷仙, 等. 4个杜鹃花品种的耐荫性[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(1):88-95.
HU X X, DUAN Y X, JIN H X, et al. Shade tolerance of four Rhododendron cultivars[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2018, 35(1):88-95.DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.01.012.
[21]
温冰消, 刘卫国, 杨文钰. 植物面对荫蔽的两种策略:避荫与耐荫反应机制研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(3):1028-1033.
WEN B X, LIU W G, YANG W Y. Two strategies for plants to face shading:advances in the mechanism of shade avoidance and shade tolerance response[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019, 17(3):1028-1033.DOI: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.001028.
[22]
刘雯雯, 饶丹丹, 吴二焕, 等. 遮阴对桫椤幼苗的叶片性状及光合特性的影响[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 44(2):52-62.
LIU W W, RAO D D, WU E H, et al. Effects of shading on leaf traits and photosynthetic characteristics of Alsophila spinulosa seedlings[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 44(2):52-62.DOI: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202311002.
[23]
张银凤, 蔡洪月, 彭金银, 等. 深圳城市公园不同栽植环境对毛棉杜鹃生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(2):197-204.
ZHANG Y F, CAI H Y, PENG J Y, et al. Effects of different planting environments on the growth of Rhododendron moulmainense in Shenzhen urban parks[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2023, 47(2):197-204.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203044.
[24]
彭琦. 弱光胁迫对三种栀子生理特性的影响[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2022.
PENG Q. Effect of low light stress on physiological characteristics of three Gardenia jasminoides[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2022.DOI: 10.27662/d.cnki.gznlc.2022.000369.
[25]
汪小飞, 靳文文. 扇脉杓兰耐阴性的测定与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(S1):57-61.
WANG X F, JIN W W. Determination and analysis of Cypripedium japonicum shade tolerance[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2014, 38(S1):57-61.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.S1.012.
[26]
杜春辉, 胡金丽, 杨柳青, 等. 不同光照对粗肋草生理特性及荧光参数的影响[J]. 热带农业科学, 2024, 44(10):80-86.
DU C H, HU J L, YANG L Q, et al. Effects of different lights on the physiological characteristics and fluorescence parameters of Aglaonema commutatun[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2024, 44(10):80-86.DOI: 10.12008/j.issn.1009-2196.2024.10.012.
[27]
王博轶, 王齐, 吴训锋, 等. 遮阴对景东翅子树幼苗光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 西部林业科学, 2022, 51(1):22-28.
WANG B Y, WANG Q, WU X F, et al. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Pterospermum kingtungense seedlings[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2022, 51(1):22-28.DOI: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2022.01.004.
[28]
张冉, 韩博, 杨蔚, 等. 遮阴对建植初期混播草坪草光响应曲线的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(10):2507-2515.
ZHANG R, HAN B, YANG W, et al. Effect of shading on light response curve of mixed lawn grass during the initial stage of establishment[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(10):2507-2515.DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2018-0089.
[29]
方赞山, 钟才荣, 程成, 等. 遮阴对莲叶桐幼苗生长及生物量分配的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(23):7837-7844.
FANG Z S, ZHONG C R, CHENG C, et al. Effect of shading on growth and biomass allocation of Hernandia nymphaeifolia seedlings[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2024, 22(23):7837-7844.DOI: 10.13271/j.mpb.022.007837.
[30]
唐星林, 姜姜, 金洪平, 等. 遮阴对闽楠叶绿素含量和光合特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9):2941-2948.
TANG X L, JIANG J, JIN H P, et al. Effects of shading on chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics in leaves of Phoebe bournei[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(9):2941-2948.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201909.002.
[31]
孔鑫, 王爱英, 郝广友, 等. 水曲柳幼苗水力结构和光合生理对光强梯度变化的耦合响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(1):83-91.
KONG X, WANG A Y, HAO G Y, et al. Effects of different planting environments on the growth of Rhododendron moulmainense in Shenzhen urban parks[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2023, 47(1):83-91.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202106018.
[32]
张学星, 胡济民, 陈海云, 等. 18种滇产地被植物光合-光响应曲线的比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(16):148-151,199.
ZHANG X X, HU J M, CHEN H Y, et al. Comparison of light-photosynthetic response curves of 18 species of ground cover plants from Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(16):148-151,199.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2019.16.043.
[33]
BAKER N R. Chlorophyll fluorescence:a probe of photosynthesis in vivo[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59:89-113.DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759.
[34]
吴玲利, 雷小林, 龚春, 等. 干旱胁迫对白木通光合生理特性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(11):68-73.
WU L L, LEI X L, GONG C, et al. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Akebia trifoliate[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015, 35(11):68-73.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.11.013.
[35]
代大川, 胡红玲, 陈洪, 等. 遮阴对桢楠幼苗生长和光合生理特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(4):56-64,74.
DAI D C, HU H L, CHEN H, et al. Effects of shading on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Phoebe zhennan seedlings[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(4):56-64,74.DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2020.04.008.
[36]
LACOUR T, BABIN M, LAVAUD J. Diversity in xanthophyll cycle pigments content and related nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) among microalgae:implications for growth strategy and ecology[J]. Journal of Phycology, 2020, 56(2):245-263.DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12944.

基金

陕西省重点产业链项目(2022ZDLNY03-09)
西安市第一次野生植物资源调查项目(KRDL-K6-2207039)
陕西省科学院重点项目(2023k-01)

编辑: 李燕文
PDF(1758 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/