氮沉降背景下模拟硫酸型酸雨酸度对杉木幼苗根系生理特征的影响

周悦湘, 王宇浩, 张金池, 蔡祺, 廖艺, 薛仁贵, 刘鑫

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3) : 45-53.

PDF(2099 KB)
PDF(2099 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3) : 45-53. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412028
专题报道(Ⅰ):林草逆境生物学与适应性研究(执行主编 方升佐 姜姜)

氮沉降背景下模拟硫酸型酸雨酸度对杉木幼苗根系生理特征的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of simulated sulfuric acid rain on root physiological characteristics of Chinese fir seedlings under the condition of nitrogen deposition

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】明确氮沉降背景下硫酸型酸雨酸度变化对杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata)幼苗根系生理特征的影响,为酸氮沉降区杉木人工林可持续经营管理提供理论依据。【方法】采用1年生杉木幼苗进行盆栽试验,通过模拟不同水平的氮沉降[无氮添加,N0;低氮添加5 g/(m2·a),N1;高氮添加15 g/(m2·a),N2]和酸雨(无酸添加pH为7.0,S0;弱酸添加pH为4.5,S1;强酸添加pH为2.5,S2)处理,研究酸雨和氮沉降对幼苗根系生理和土壤养分变化。【结果】在无氮处理(N0)下,随着硫酸型酸雨pH降低,杉木幼苗根系活力和可溶性蛋白含量显著降低,而根系丙二醛含量、过氧化物酶活性、过氧化氢酶活性及根系生物量显著升高。同样,无酸雨处理(S0)下,氮添加显著降低了根系可溶性蛋白含量,而根系生物量随氮添加量升高而增大。其中,低氮添加对根系活力、丙二醛含量和过氧化氢酶活性不存在显著影响,而高氮添加显著降低根系活力并提升了丙二醛含量以及过氧化氢酶活性。在N1、N2处理下,弱酸处理杉木根系活力和可溶性蛋白含量显著低于强酸处理,其中N1处理下,硫酸型酸雨显著提高根系丙二醛含量、过氧化物酶和超氧化物歧化酶活性;在N2处理下,随着硫酸型酸雨pH降低,根系丙二醛含量和超氧化物歧化酶活性逐渐降低,过氧化物酶活性先降低后升高。此外,硫酸型酸雨和氮添加处理均能降低土壤pH,在弱酸处理中,氮添加显著降低土壤pH,而强酸处理中土壤pH不受氮添加显著影响。仅氮添加时,高氮添加能提高土壤硝态氮和铵态氮含量。低氮(N1)处理下,弱酸处理土壤硝态氮含量最高,显著高于强酸处理;而在高氮(N2)处理中,硫酸型酸雨处理能显著降低土壤硝态氮和铵态氮含量。在无氮(N0)处理中,硫酸型酸雨处理显著降低土壤硝态氮和有效磷含量。【结论】硫酸型酸雨和氮沉降对杉木根系生理特征存在显著的交互作用,虽然我国硫酸型酸雨强度逐渐降低,但轻度酸雨与氮沉降的协同作用仍会加剧土壤酸化,转变低氮沉降对根系生理的有利影响,降低幼苗根系活力,不利于杉木人工林的可持续经营。

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to elucidate the effects of sulfuric acid rain acidity on the physiological characteristics of Cunninghamia lanceolata (Chinese fir) seedling roots under nitrogen deposition, providing a theoretical basis for the sustainable management of Chinese fir plantations in acid-nitrogen deposition area.【Method】A pot experiment was conducted using one-year-old Chinese fir seedlings to simulate different levels of nitrogen deposition (no nitrogen addition (N0), low nitrogen addition at 5 g/(m2·a) (N1), and high nitrogen addition at 15 g/(m2·a) (N2))and acid rain (no acid addition (pH 7.0, S0), weak acid addition (pH 4.5, S1), and strong acid addition (pH 2.5, S2)). The experiment investigated the effects of these treatments on seedling root physiology and soil nutrient dynamics.【Result】Under no nitrogen treatment (N0), decreasing pH of sulfuric acid rain significantly reduced root activity and soluble protein content, while increasing root malondialdehyde (MDA) content, peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) activities, and root biomass. Similarly, under no acid rain treatment (S0), nitrogen addition significantly decreased soluble protein content, while root biomass increased with higher nitrogen addition. Low nitrogen addition (N1) had no significant effect on root activity, MDA content, or CAT activity, whereas high nitrogen addition (N2) significantly reduced root activity and increased MDA content and CAT activity. Under N1 and N2 treatments, root activity and soluble protein content were significantly lower in weak acid (S1) than in strong acid (S2) treatments. In the N1 treatment, sulfuric acid rain significantly increased root MDA content, POD, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities. Under the N2 treatment, decreasing pH of sulfuric acid rain gradually reduced root MDA content and SOD activity, while POD activity initially decreased and then increased. Additionally, both sulfuric acid rain and nitrogen addition reduced soil pH, with nitrogen addition significantly lowering soil pH under weak acid treatment but showing no significant effect under strong acid treatment. High nitrogen addition alone increased soil nitrate and ammonium nitrogen content (N${\mathrm{O}}_{3}^{-}$-N and N${\mathrm{H}}_{4}^{+}$-N). In the low nitrogen (N1) treatment, weak acid (S1) resulted in the highest soil N${\mathrm{O}}_{3}^{-}$-N content, significantly higher than strong acid (S2). Under high nitrogen (N2) treatment, sulfuric acid rain significantly reduced both nitrate and ammonium nitrogen content. In the no nitrogen (N0) treatment, sulfuric acid rain significantly decreased soil N${\mathrm{O}}_{3}^{-}$-N and available phosphorus content.【Conclusion】Sulfuric acid rain and nitrogen deposition exhibited significant interactive effects on the physiological characteristics of Chinese fir roots. Although the intensity of sulfuric acid rain in China has gradually decreased, the synergistic effect of mild acid rain and nitrogen deposition may still exacerbate soil acidification, reversing the beneficial impact of low nitrogen deposition on root physiology, reducing seedling root activity, and hindering the sustainable management of Chinese fir plantations.

关键词

硫酸型酸雨 / 氮沉降 / 杉木 / 根系活力 / 土壤养分

Key words

sulfuric acid rain / nitrogen deposition / Cunninghamia lanceolata (Chinese fir) / root activity / soil nutrients

引用本文

导出引用
周悦湘, 王宇浩, 张金池, . 氮沉降背景下模拟硫酸型酸雨酸度对杉木幼苗根系生理特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(3): 45-53 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412028
ZHOU Yuexiang, WANG Yuhao, ZHANG Jinchi, et al. Effects of simulated sulfuric acid rain on root physiological characteristics of Chinese fir seedlings under the condition of nitrogen deposition[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(3): 45-53 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412028
中图分类号: S718.5   

参考文献

[1]
蔡朋程. 浅析中国的酸雨分布现状及其成因[J]. 科技资讯, 2018, 16(15):127-128.
CAI P C. Analysis on the distribution and causes of acid rain in China[J]. Science & Technology Information, 2018, 16(15):127-128. DOI: 10.16661/j.cnki.1672-3791.2018.15.127.
[2]
徐仁扣, 李九玉, 周世伟, 等. 我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2):160-167.
XU R K, LI J Y, ZHOU S W, et al. Scientific issues and controlling strategies of soil acidification of croplands in China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(2):160-167. DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.02.005.
[3]
2023年中国生态环境状况公报(摘录)[J]. 环境保护, 2024, 52(11):53-65.
China ecological environment status bulletin 2023(excerpt)[J]. Environmental Protection, 2024,52(11):53-65. DOI: 10.19864/j.cnki.jxye.2024.05.009.
[4]
WEN Z, XU W, LI Q, et al. Changes of nitrogen deposition in China from 1980 to 2018[J]. Environment International, 2020, 144:106022. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106022.
[5]
顾峰雪, 黄玫, 张远东, 等. 1961—2010年中国区域氮沉降时空格局模拟研究[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(12):3591-3600.
GU F X, HUANG M, ZHANG Y D, et al. Modeling the temporal-spatial patterns of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China during 1961—2010[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(12):3591-3600. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201409211868.
[6]
ZHENG S, BIAN H F, QUAN Q, et al. Effect of nitrogen and acid deposition on soil respiration in a temperate forest in China[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 329:82-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.022.
[7]
孙佳慧, 史海兰, 陈科宇, 等. 植物细根功能性状的权衡关系研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8):1055-1070.
SUN J H, SHI H L, CHEN K Y, et al. Research advances on trade-off relationships of plant fine root functional traits[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2023, 47(8):1055-1070. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0456.
[8]
朱君琳, 侯瑞萍, 王云琦, 等. 重庆缙云山植物幼苗根系及土壤对酸雨的响应机制[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2023, 21(6):121-130.
ZHU J L, HOU R P, WANG Y Q, et al. Response mechanism of plant seedling roots and soil to acid rain in Jinyun Mountain,Chongqing[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 21(6):121-130. DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2023.06.013.
[9]
杨凤, 刘安芳, 王云琦, 等. 酸雨对三峡库区4种植物幼苗光合生理及根际土壤的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2022, 42(2):280-292.
YANG F, LIU A F, WANG Y Q, et al. Effects of acid rain on photosynthetic physiology and rhizosphere soil of four plant seedlings in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2022, 42(2):280-292. DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2022.02.0280.
[10]
周思婕, 王平, 张敏, 等. 大气酸沉降对马尾松幼苗根系生理特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(4):111-118.
ZHOU S J, WANG P, ZHANG M, et al. Effects of atmospheric acid deposition on root physiological characteristics of Pinus massoniana seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44(4):111-118. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201907002.
[11]
王涓, 边妍妍, 朱玉璘, 等. 氮添加和干旱对亚热带4种幼树生长的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2024, 32(4):475-482.
WANG J, BIAN Y Y, ZHU Y L, et al. Effects of nitrogen addition and drought on sapling growth of four subtropical tree species[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2024, 32(4):475-482. DOI: 10.11926/jtsb.4792.
[12]
沙涛, 张玲卫, 刘会良, 等. 降水、氮沉降对尖喙牻牛儿苗隔代生理可塑性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(10):1753-1766.
SHA T, ZHANG L W, LIU H L, et al. Effects of precipitation and nitrogen deposition on transgenerational plasticity in alternate generations of Erodium oxyrhinchum[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(10):1753-1766. DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.10.13.
[13]
朱乐洋, 张西哲, 陶江, 等. 氮沉降对土壤呼吸影响的研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(10):1-11.
ZHU L Y, ZHANG X Z, TAO J, et al. Research progress on the impact of nitrogen deposition on soil respiration[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(10):1-11. DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2024.10.001.
[14]
李晓东, 苏连波, 王克勤, 等. 模拟氮沉降对云南中部亚高山华山松林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024, 44(5):38-47.
LI X D, SU L B, WANG K Q, et al. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on soil enzyme activities in subalpine Pinus armandii forest in central Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 44(5):38-47. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20240729.002.
[15]
李沁宇, 刘鑫, 张金池. 长三角区域酸雨类型转变趋势研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1):168-174.
LI Q Y, LIU X, ZHANG J C. Changing trends of acid rain types in the Yangtze River delta region[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2021, 45(1):168-174. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201908029.
[16]
DING Y, SUN L H, LI C, et al. Effects of short-term simulated acid rain and nitrogen deposition on soil nutrients and enzyme activities in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2024, 12:1365954. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1365954.
[17]
盛炜彤. 关于我国人工林长期生产力的保持[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(1):1-14.
SHENG W T. On the maintenance of long-term productivity of plantation in China[J]. Forest Research, 2018, 31(1):1-14. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2018.01.001.
[18]
LIU X, LI C, MENG M J, et al. Comparative effects of the recovery from sulfuric and nitric acid rain on the soil enzyme activities and metabolic functions of soil microbial communities[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 714:136788. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136788.
[19]
任丽红, 索沛蘅, 唐楚珺, 等. 不同连栽代数杉木人工林土壤氮素季节变化特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(5):22-28,34.
REN L H, SUO P H, TANG C J, et al. Seasonal dynamics of soil nitrogen in the continuously cultivated Chinese fir plantations[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(5):22-28,34. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20210322.001.
[20]
裴昊斐, 高卫东, 方娇阳, 等. 模拟氮沉降对一年生香椿幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(10):1546-1552.
PEI H F, GAO W D, FANG J Y, et al. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of one-year-old Toona sinensis seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(10):1546-1552. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.190168.
[21]
GIANNOPOLITIS C N, RIES S K. Superoxide dismutase I:occurrence in higher plants[J]. Plant Physiology, 1977, 59(2):309-314. DOI: 10.1104/pp.59.2.309.
[22]
MAEHLY A C, CHANCE B. The assay of catalases and peroxidases[J]. Methods of Biochemical Analysis, 1954, 1:357-424. DOI: 10.1002/9780470110171.ch14.
[23]
HESSINI K, BEN HAMED K, GANDOUR M, et al. Ammonium nutrition in the halophyte Spartina alterniflora under salt stress:evidence for a priming effect of ammonium?[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 370(1):163-173. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1616-1.
[24]
郝建军, 康宗利, 于洋. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007.
HAO J J, KANG Z L, YU Y. Experimental technology of plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007.
[25]
JOSLIN J D, HENDERSON G S. The determination of percentages of living tissue in woody fine root samples using triphenyltetrazolium Chloride Free[J]. Forest Science, 1984, 30(4):965-970. DOI: 10.1093/forestscience/30.4.965.
[26]
中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1978.
Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Physical and chemical analysis of soil[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1978.
[27]
丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 等. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3):90-98.
DING Y, LIU X, ZHANG J C, et al. Effects of acid rain-based transformation on Cunninghamia lanceolata fine root growth and soil nutrient content[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(3):90-98. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202211030.
[28]
赵英, 吴敏, 周兴文. 模拟酸雨胁迫对罗汉果幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2020, 49(3):62-66.
ZHAO Y, WU M, ZHOU X W. Effects of simulated acid rain stress on the physiological characteristics of Siraitia grosvenorii seedlings[J]. South China Fruits, 2020, 49(3):62-66. DOI: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20190754.
[29]
ZHANG C Y, YI X Q, GAO X Z, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of tea seedlings (Camellia sinensis) to simulated acid rain conditions[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 192:110315. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110315.
[30]
FRANCIS B, ARAVINDAKUMAR C T, BREWER P B, et al. Plant nutrient stress adaptation:a prospect for fertilizer limited agriculture[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2023, 213:105431. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105431.
[31]
王梅, 王智慧, 石孝均, 等. 长期不同施肥量对全程氨氧化细菌丰度的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(10):4727-4734.
WANG M, WANG Z H, SHI X J, et al. Long-term fertilization effects on the abundance of complete ammonia oxidizing bacteria(comammox Nitrospira) in a neutral paddy soil[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(10):4727-4734. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201802032.
[32]
杨仕明, 蔡乾坤, 刘文飞, 等. 杉木人工林土壤氮矿化对长期氮添加和季节的响应[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(5):945-952.
YANG S M, CAI Q K, LIU W F, et al. Response of soil N mineralization to long-term N addition and season in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2021, 38(5):945-952. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210403.
[33]
ZHU H Q, ZHAO J J, GONG L. The morphological and chemical properties of fine roots respond to nitrogen addition in a temperate Schrenk’s spruce (Picea schrenkiana) forest[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11:3839. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83151-x.
[34]
刘灵芝, 钟广蓉, 熊莲, 等. 过氧化氢酶的研究与应用新进展[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2009, 26(3):15-18.
LIU L Z, ZHONG G R, XIONG L, et al. Research and application progress of catalase[J]. Chemistry & Bioengineering, 2009, 26(3):15-18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5425.2009.03.004.
[35]
LIU G C, XING Y J, SUN H, et al. Effects of long-term nitrogen addition on the fine root morphology and anatomy of four main shrub species in an old-growth forest[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2023, 38(7/8):475-485. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2023.2273273.
[36]
GONG L, ZHAO J J. The response of fine root morphological and physiological traits to added nitrogen in Schrenk’s spruce (Picea schrenkiana) of the Tianshan mountains,China[J].PeerJ, 2019, 7:e8194. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8194.
[37]
LIU M H, SHI M J, GAO H L, et al. Nitrogen addition alleviates cadmium toxicity in Eleocarpus glabripetalus seedlings[J]. Forests, 2023, 14(6):1264. DOI: 10.3390/f14061264.
[38]
YU F, YI L T, MAO X Y, et al. Nitrogen addition alleviated sexual differences in responses to cadmium toxicity by regulating the antioxidant system and root characteristics,and inhibiting Cd translocation in mulberry seedlings[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2022, 232:113288. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113288.
[39]
HUANG J, WANG H Y, ZHONG Y D, et al. Growth and physiological response of an endangered tree,Horsfieldia hainanensis merr.,to simulated sulfuric and nitric acid rain in Southern China[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2019, 144:118-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.029.
[40]
李一凡, 王玉杰, 王彬, 等. 西南酸雨区重庆缙云山常绿阔叶林土壤氮矿化特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6):1-12.
LI Y F, WANG Y J, WANG B, et al. Soil nitrogen mineralization characteristics of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Jinyun Mountain in Chongqing in the acid rain zone,southwest China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(6):1-12. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190601.
[41]
王硕, 张进如, 姚晓东, 等. 亚热带常绿阔叶林根系生物量和形态特征对长期施氮的响应[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2025, 33(1):65-73.
WANG S, ZHANG J R, YAO X D, et al. Response of root biomass and root morphology to long-term nitrogen application in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2025, 33(1):65-73. DOI: 10.11926/jtsb.4855.
[42]
LI C, DING Y, ZHANG S F, et al. The short-term effect of simulated acid rain and nitrogen deposition on the soil microbial functional profile targeting C,N,and P cycling[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2024, 197:105327. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105327.
[43]
麦志宏. 浅析酸雨对菜园土硝态氮淋失的影响[J]. 广东化工, 2023, 50(18):137-139.
MAI Z H. Effect of simulated acid rain on nitrate nitrogen leaching loss in vegetable soil with application of compound fertilizer[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2023, 50(18):137-139. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1865.2023.18.042.
[44]
沈凌, 丁贵杰, 李默然. 一二代马尾松林土壤养分特点及其对幼苗生长的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2012, 40(5):153-156.
SHEN L, DING G J, LI M R. Nutrient characteristics of soil from the first and second generation of Pinus massoniana forests and the effects on seedling growth[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(5):153-156. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2012.05.041.

基金

江苏省自然科学基金青年基金项目(BK20200785)
江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX23_1240)
国家自然科学基金项目(32271844)
江苏省科技计划项目(BE2022420)

责任编辑: 孟苗婧
PDF(2099 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/