胡桃楸不同种源生长及种实变异与选择研究

方玉凤, 徐连峰, 张强, 吴晓微, 付玉祺, 林蔚, 宋莉昕

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3) : 180-188.

PDF(1360 KB)
PDF(1360 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3) : 180-188. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412034
研究论文

胡桃楸不同种源生长及种实变异与选择研究

作者信息 +

Variation and selection in growth and seed traits among different provenances of Juglans mandshurica

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】综合分析与评价黑龙江省胡桃楸(Juglans mandshurica)种源试验林植株生长和果核性状指标的差异,揭示群体变异水平,通过早期选择为该地区胡桃楸种质资源收集与保存、优良品种选育与利用提供理论支撑。【方法】以黑龙江省东部山区胡桃楸10 年生不同种源试验林为研究对象,对7个果核描述性表型性状和17个数量性状(6个生长性状、6个果实相关性状、5个果核相关性状)进行每木测量,以基础数据、变异系数、现实增益为评价指标,采用方差分析、主成分分析、布雷津多性状综合评定法,分析胡桃楸不同种源之间生长性状、种实相关性状变异规律,筛选优良种源。【结果】胡桃楸果核描述性表型性状变异系数的变化范围为9.54%~59.23%,脊分布的变异系数(57.29%)和脊突出程度的变异系数(59.23%)最大,顶尖突出程度的变异系数(9.54%)最小,表型性状相对稳定。除分枝角外,其余数量性状在种源间差异极显著(P<0.01)。胡桃楸生长性状中材积的变异系数(45.36%)最大,其余相关指标的变异系数变化范围为11.08%~23.35%;果实性状中单鲜果质量的变异系数(17.46%)最大,其余相关指标的变异系数变化范围为6.75%~8.69%;果核性状中单核质量的变异系数(18.11%)最大,其余相关指标的变异系数变化范围为7.14%~9.97%。相关性分析显示,生长性状的胸径与株高、地径均呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),单鲜果质量与果实三径(纵径、横径、侧径)、单核质量与果核三径(纵径、横径、侧径)均存在极显著正相关性(P<0.01)。以主成分分析法提取到4个主成分,累积贡献率达到95.779%。【结论】黑龙江省东部山区不同种源胡桃楸的生长性状和种实相关性状在种源间存在丰富变异,初步筛选出虎林(HL)种源为果材兼用型优良种源,各性状现实增益均高于遗传增益,其株高、冠幅、地径、胸径和材积的现实增益分别为19.93%、16.63%、0.18%、12.23%、45.34%;分枝角比种源群体平均值低0.66%;果实三径现实增益分别为3.23%、5.21%、3.10%;果核三径现实增益分别为3.36%、5.33%、3.55%;单鲜果质量、单核质量分别比种源群体平均值高8.94%、12.23%;鲜果含水率、果形指数及核形指数分别比种源群体平均值低0.29%、2.13%、1.94%。

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to comprehensively analyze and evaluate the differences in plant growth and kernel traits in provenance test forest of Juglans mandshurica in Heilongjiang Province,and reveal the level of population variation. Provide theoretical support for the collection and preservation,breeding and utilization by early provenance selection.【Method】Taking a 10-years-old J. mandshurica experimental forest from eastern mountainous areas in Heilongjiang Province as the research object,seven descriptive phenotypic traits,six growth traits,six fruit related traits and five nut related traits were measured for each tree. Utilizing the basic data,coefficient of variation and reality gain as evaluation indexes,analysis of variance,principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of Brezin multiple traits were used to analyze the variation of growth traits and related traits of seed among different provenances of J. mandshurica,and select excellent provenances.【Result】The variation coefficient of descriptive phenotypic traits ranged from 9.54% to 59.23%,the variation coefficient of ridge distribution(57.29%)and ridge protrusion(59.23%)were the largest,and the variation coefficient of top prominence(9.54%)was the smallest,the phenotypic traits were relatively stable. Except for the branching angle,the other quantitative traits were significantly different among provenances(P<0.01). Among the growth traits,the variation coefficient of volume(45.36%)was the largest,and other related indicators ranged from 11.08% to 23.35%. Among the fruit traits,the coefficient of variation of single fruit mass(17.46%)was the largest,and other related indexes ranged from 6.75% to 8.69%. The variation coefficient of single nut mass(18.11%)was the largest,and other related indexes ranged from 7.14% to 9.97%. Correlation analysis showed that DBH of growth traits was positively correlated with tree height and basal diameter(P<0.01),single fruit mass was positively correlated with three paths of fruit,and single nut mass was positively correlated with three paths of nut(P<0.01). Four principal components were extracted by principal component analysis,and the cumulative contribution rate reached 95.779%.【Conclusion】The growth traits and related traits of J. mandshurica seeds have rich variations within different provenances in eastern mountainous areas of Heilongjiang Province. By using the comprehensive evaluation method of multiple traits,Hulin provenance(HL)was selected as excellent provenance. The reality gain of tree height,crown width,basal diameter,DBH and volume were 19.93%,16.63%,0.18%,12.23% and 45.34%,respectively. The branch angle was 0.66% lower than the mean of provenance population. The reality gain of three paths of fruit were 3.23%,5.21% and 3.10%,respectively. The reality gain of three paths of nut were 3.36%,5.33% and 3.55%,respectively. The single fruit mass and single nut mass were 8.94% and 12.23% higher than the average of provenance population,respectively. Moisture content of fruit,fruit shape index(FSI)and nut shape index(NSI)were 0.29%,2.13% and 1.94% lower than the average of provenance population,respectively.

关键词

胡桃楸 / 种源 / 生长性状 / 表型性状 / 早期选择

Key words

Juglans mandshurica / provenance / growth traits / phenotypic traits / early provenance selection

引用本文

导出引用
方玉凤, 徐连峰, 张强, . 胡桃楸不同种源生长及种实变异与选择研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(3): 180-188 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412034
FANG Yufeng, XU Lianfeng, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Variation and selection in growth and seed traits among different provenances of Juglans mandshurica[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(3): 180-188 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412034
中图分类号: S718.4;S792.13   

参考文献

[1]
中国科学院植物研究所. 中国植物志:第21卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979: 31.
Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Flora of China: Volume 21[M]. Beijing: Science Press,1979: 31.
[2]
PALMA-SILVA C, FERRO M, BACCI M, et al. De novo assembly and characterization of leaf and floral transcriptomes of the hybridizing bromeliad species (Pitcairnia spp.) adapted to Neotropical Inselbergs[J]. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2016, 16(4): 1012-1022. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12504.
[3]
张晓林, 刘超, 刘剑, 等. 核桃楸研究现状及育种策略[J]. 吉林林业科技, 2019, 48(1):14-17.
ZHANG X L, LIU C, LIU J, et al. Research status and breeding strategy of Juglans mandshurica[J]. Journal of Jilin Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 48(1):14-17. DOI:10.16115/j.cnki.issn.1005-7129.2019.01.004.
[4]
李佳娜, 高瑞馨. 我国胡桃楸的遗传育种研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(17):4-7.
LI J N, GAO R X. Research progress on the genetic breeding of Juglans mandshurica in China[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(17):4-7. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2020.17.002.
[5]
袁显磊, 祁永会, 逄宏扬, 等. 珍贵树种胡桃楸杂交育种研究概述[J]. 中国林副特产, 2022(3):69-71,74.
YUAN X L, QI Y H, PANG H Y, et al. Research progress in cross breeding of Juglans mandshurica[J]. Forest By-Product and Speciality in China, 2022( 3):69-71,74. DOI:10.13268/j.cnki.fbsic.2022.03.027.
[6]
王玉娇. 胡桃楸与红松混交对土壤特性和细根性状的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2021.
WANG Y J. Effects of Juglans mandshurica and Pinus koraiensis mixture on soil characteristics and fine root traits[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2021. DOI:10.27009/d.cnki.gdblu.2021.000151.
[7]
罗也, 王君, 杨雨春, 等. 东北胡桃楸次生林生长随林龄和林分密度的变化规律[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(6):10-19.
LUO Y, WANG J, YANG Y C, et al. Growth patterns of Juglans mandshurica secondary forest with stand age and stand density in northeast China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(6):10-19. DOI:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230171.
[8]
马万里, 罗菊春, 荆涛, 等. 珍贵树种核桃楸的生态学问题及培育前景[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版), 2005, 34(4):489-492.
MA W L, LUO J C, JING T, et al. Ecological studies and prospect of cultivation on Juglans mandshurica population[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 34(4):489-492. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8735.2005.04.024.
[9]
罗也, 杨雨春, 赵珊珊, 等. 东北中东部胡桃楸天然次生林产区区划[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(12):2299-2305.
LUO Y, YANG Y C, ZHAO S S, et al. Production area division of secondary forest of Juglans mandshurica in the central and eastern regions of northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41(12):2299-2305. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202211.008.
[10]
周彦超. 辽东地区胡桃楸优树选择与果核表型多样性研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2019.
ZHOU Y C. Study on selection of superior trees and kernel phenotypic diversity of Juglans mandshurica in eastern Liaoning[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2019. DOI:10.27327/d.cnki.gshnu.2019.000463.
[11]
颜廷武, 于世河, 王骞春, 等. 辽宁地区核桃楸半同胞家系间苗期生长差异分析[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2020(6):13-15.
YAN T W, YU S H, WANG Q C, et al. Differences in seedling growth among half-sibling families of Juglans mandshurica in Liaoning area[J]. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology, 2020(6):13-15. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2020.06.003.
[12]
张海啸, 李爱清, 张含国, 等. 核桃楸种实性状变异规律及优良单株选择[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2017, 45(3):1-7.
ZHANG H X, LI A Q, ZHANG H G, et al. Juglans mandshurica fruits and seeds variation and plus tree selection[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2017, 45(3):1-7. DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2017.03.001.
[13]
芦贤博, 徐连峰, 庞忠义, 等. 胡桃楸种源家系幼龄期生长变异及选择研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(1):20-30.
LU X B, XU L F, PANG Z Y, et al. Variation and selection of seedling growth traits among Juglans mandshurica provenances and families[J]. Forest Research, 2022, 35(1):20-30. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2022.01.003.
[14]
刘劲宏, 李志新, 张含国, 等. 胡桃楸不同种源及家系间生长性状的遗传变异[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2023, 51(8):9-17,64.
LIU J H, LI Z X, ZHANG H G, et al. Analysis of variation in growth traits of different species and families of Juglans mandshurica[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2023, 51(8):9-17,64. DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2023.08.006.
[15]
段成琳. 2年生胡桃楸幼苗种源差异分析[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2023.
DUAN C L. Analysis of the seed source differences of 2 years old Juglans mandshurica source[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2023. DOI: 10.27163/d.cnki.gjlnu.2023.001020.
[16]
代伟昭. 核桃楸种源及家系变异分析与早期选择研究[J]. 林业勘查设计, 2023, 52(2):58-62.
DAI W Z. Variation analysis and early selection of Juglans mandshurica provenance and family[J]. Forest Investigation Design, 2023, 52(2):58-62. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4505.2023.02.015.
[17]
李志新. 胡桃楸天然群体种实与营养性状变异分析和评价[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2022.
LI Z X. Analysis and evaluation on seeds and fruits,nutritional characters variation of Juglans mandshurica natural populations[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2022. DOI:10.27009/d.cnki.gdblu.2022.001921.
[18]
张丹丹, 李翔, 王璧莹, 等. 长白落叶松种子园亲本无性系生长性状变异研究[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(1):130-137.
ZHANG D D, LI X, WANG B Y, et al. Variation analysis of growth traits of Larix olgensis parental clones in seed orchards[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(1):130-137. DOI:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2022.01.014.
[19]
魏嘉彤, 陈思琪, 芦贤博, 等. 基于生长与木材性状的红松优良种源评价选择[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(3):12-23.
WEI J T, CHEN S Q, LU X B, et al. Evaluation and selection of excellent provenances of Pinus koraiensis based on growth and wood properties[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(3):12-23. DOI:10.12171/j.1000?1522.20210247.
[20]
刘庆忠. 核桃种质资源描述规范和数据标准:NY/T2935—2016[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
LIU Q Z. Descriptorsanddatastandardforwalnut:NY/T2935—2016[S]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.
[21]
中国林业科学研究院林业研究所. 植物新品种特异性、一致性、稳定性测试指南核桃属:GB/T26909—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社,2011:2. Institute of Forestry, CAF.Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness,uniformity and stability—Juglans
Institute of Forestry, CAF. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness,uniformity and stability—Juglans(Juglans L.):GB/T 26909—2011[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China,2011:2.
[22]
柏广新. 长白山西坡天然次生林水曲柳和胡桃楸材积表的编制[J]. 林业资源管理, 2009(4):35-40,84.
BAI G X. Volume table of Fraxinus mandshurica and Juglans mandshurica in second growth in western slope of Changbai Mountains,Jilin,China[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2009( 4):35-40,84. DOI:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2009.04.013.
[23]
METOUGUI M L, MOKHARI M, MAUGHAN P J, et al. Morphological variability, heritability and correlation studies within an argan tree population (Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels) preserved in situ[J]. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2017, 7(2): 42-51. DOI: 10.5923/j.ijaf.20170702.02
[24]
RAZAFIMAHATRATRA A R, RAMANANANTOANDRO T, RAZAFIMAHARO V, et al. Provenance and progeny performances and genotype × environment interactions of Eucalyptus robusta grown in Madagascar[J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2016, 12(3):38. DOI:10.1007/s11295-016-0999-6.
[25]
潘艳艳, 梁德洋, 郭婧, 等. 日本落叶松不同种源及家系生长性状变异分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(11):19-27.
PAN Y Y, LIANG D Y, GUO J, et al. Variance analyses on growth traits of Larix kaempferi in different seed sources[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(11):19-27. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170478.
[26]
ZHAO X Y, PAN Y Y, PEI X N, et al. Forward,backward selection and variation analysis of growth traits in half-sib Larix kaempferi families[J]. Silvae Genetica, 2019, 68(1):1-8. DOI:10.2478/sg-2019-0001.
[27]
DE VIENNE D. What is a phenotype?History and new developments of the concept[J]. Genetica, 2022, 150(3):153-158. DOI:10.1007/s10709-021-00134-6.
[28]
高张莹, 张海峰, 陈国平, 等. 核桃楸种群果核形态及地理变异[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(4):609-615.
GAO Z Y, ZHANG H F, CHEN G P, et al. Fruit stone morphology and geographic variation in Juglans mandshurica populations[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2017, 23(4):609-615. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2016.09040.
[29]
WANG F, ZHANG Q H, TIAN Y G, et al. Comprehensive assessment of growth traits and wood properties in half-sib Pinus koraiensis families[J]. Euphytica, 2018, 214(11):202. DOI:10.1007/s10681-018-2290-4.
[30]
张秦徽. 东北地区胡桃楸种质资源评价及干旱响应表达和代谢机制研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2024.
ZHANG Q H. Evaluation of Juglans mandshurica germplasm resources and study on drought response expression and metabolic mechanism in northeast China[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2024. DOI:10.27009/d.cnki.gdblu.2024.000088.
[31]
SAFAVI S A, POURDAD S S, TAEB M, et al. Assessment of genetic variation among safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) accessions using agro-morphological traits and molecular markers[J]. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 2010, 8(3/4): 616-625. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2790
[32]
赵阳, 毕泉鑫, 句娇, 等.[J]. 林业科学研究, 2019, 32(1): 160-168.
ZHAO Y, BI Q X, JU J, et al. Geographic variation of seed and seedling growth traits in Xanthoceras sorbifolium[J]. Forest Research, 2019, 32(1): 160-168. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2019.01.022.
[33]
余青富, 王正德, 葛婉婷, 等. 不同种源香椿无性系苗期表型性状变异及其与地理-气候因子的相关性[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2024, 33(5):13-21.
YU Q F, WANG Z D, GE W T, et al. Phenotypic trait variations of Toona sinensis clones from different provenances at seedling stage and their correlations with geographical-climatic factors[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2024, 33(5):13-21. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2024.05.02.
[34]
夏德安, 许忠志, 侯丹, 等. 胡桃楸种源遗传变异规律的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(31):10956-10958.
XIA D A, XU Z Z, HOU D, et al. Study on genetic variation law of Juglans mandshurica provenances[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(31):10956-10958. DOI:10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2014.31.047.
[35]
董明亮, 高嘉玥, 孙文婷, 等. 北京市华北落叶松优树群体遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(4):616-624.
DONG M L, GAO J Y, SUN W T, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of elite Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr in Beijing[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(4):616-624. DOI:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.04.005.
[36]
贾春红, 张利, 魏晓, 等. 主成分分析法在毛叶木姜子优树选择中的应用[J]. 中药材, 2016, 39(5):943-947.
JIA C H, ZHANG L, WEI X, et al. Plus tree selection of Litsea mollis by principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2016, 39(5):943-947. DOI:10.13863/j.issn1001-4454.2016.05.001.
[37]
袁显磊. 核桃楸优良种源和家系早期选择及苗期环境因子影响评价[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2013.
YUAN X L. The early Juglans mandshurica Maxim.excellent provenance and pedigree selection and seedling environmental factors impact assessment[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2013.
[38]
佘诚棋, 杨万霞, 方升佐, 等. 青钱柳种源间苗期性状变异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(1):34-38.
SHE C Q, YANG W X, FANG S Z, et al. Variation analysis of seedling characters among provenances of Cyclocarya paliurus[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2010, 34(1):34-38. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2010.01.008.
[39]
杨袁木, 李娜, 陈新宇, 等. 红锥种源与无性系的材性变异研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(6):41-50.
YANG Y M, LI N, CHEN X Y, et al. Study on wood variation of provenances and clones of Castanopsis hystrix[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(6):41-50. DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202207026.

基金

黑龙江省省属科研院所科研业务费项目(CZKYF2024Q002)
中央财政林业科技推广示范项目(黑[2025]TG17)
林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201304704)

责任编辑: 郑琰燚
PDF(1360 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/