盐城大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估

高明月, 吴永波, 朱嘉馨, 安玉亭, 王立波

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4) : 181-188.

PDF(1883 KB)
PDF(1883 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4) : 181-188. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412042
第二十八届中国科协年会———全球气候变化下的林草智能设计育种专题(执行主编 曹福亮 范国强 尹佟明 张怀清)
专题报道Ⅲ:生态环境对动物与鸟类的影响(执行主编 薛建辉 毛岭峰)

盐城大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估

作者信息 +

Evaluation of ecosystem service value in Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve of Yancheng

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】探究江苏大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区生态系统服务价值(ecosystem service value, ESV)对区域社会经济发展的影响,为保护区管理和生态补偿提供科学依据。【方法】基于无人机遥感技术对大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区进行航拍,获取土地利用/覆被类型与实地调查数据,通过调查和解译,分析大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区的土地利用/覆被以及不同植物群落分布情况,测定不同植物、土壤和水的理化参数,运用ArcGIS 10.8分析大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区不同土地利用/覆被的面积,综合考虑大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区实际情况,对大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区生态系统服务进行指标选取,确定评价体系,将无人机解译结果与实测结合,采用市场价值法、影子工程法、旅行费用法、替代伐木法、成果参照法、造林成本法、碳税法及土壤库养分持留法对保护区进行服务功能价值评估。【结果】2017年滩涂、裸地(光滩地)和水域是大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区主要的土地利用/覆被类型,三者面积占比89.40%,滩涂面积最大,占68.46%;第二大土地利用类型为水域,占比11.75%。生态系统服务总价值约为3.998 1×108元,生态系统服务价值从高到低依次为:固碳>休闲旅游>养分循环>水源涵养>大气调节>水质净化>维持生物多样性>科研文化价值>物质生产。不同类型植物群落生态系统服务价值由高到低依次为互花米草(Spartina alterniflora)群落>光滩地>意杨(Populus euramevicana cv. I-214)-刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia)群落>芦苇(Phragmites australis)群落>狼尾草(Pennisetum alopecuroides)群落>白茅(Imperata cylindrica)群落>碱蓬(Suaeda glauca)群落>狗牙根(Cynodon dactylon)-狼尾草混合群落。【结论】滩涂、裸地和水域是大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区的主要土地利用类型,第一、第二和第三核心区草本优势种分别为狼尾草、芦苇和互花米草。固碳和休闲旅游是保护区主要生态系统服务项目。

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to investigate the impact of the ecosystem service value (ESV) of the Dafeng Milu (Elaphurus davidianus) National Nature Reserve on regional socio-economic development, with the goal of providing a scientific basis for reserve management and ecological compensation.【Method】Aerial surveys of the reserve were conducted using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technology to acquire land use and land cover (LULC) data, complemented by ground-truthing measurements. Through integrated field investigations and image interpretation, the spatial distribution of LULC types and plant communities within the reserve was characterized. Physicochemical parameters of vegetation, soil, and water were systematically measured in situ. Spatial analysis was performed using ArcGIS 10.8 to quantify the areas of different LULC types. Based on the ecological characteristics of the reserve, an ecosystem service evaluation framework was established by selecting localized indicators and integrating UAV-derived data with field measurements. Various methods, including the market value method, shadow project method, travel cost method, replacement cost method, benefit transfer method, afforestation cost method, carbon tax method, and soil nutrient retention method were employed to assess the ecosystem service functions of the reserve.【Result】In 2017, the dominant land use types within the Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve were tidal flats, bare land, and waters, which together accounted for 89.40% of the total area. Tidal flats constituted the largest proportion, covering 68.46%, followed by waters, which accounted for 11.75%. The total ESV of the reserve was estimated at 3.998 1 × 108 CNY, with carbon sequestration being the most significant service. The service values, ranked in descending order, were: carbon sequestration > leisure tourism > nutrient cycling > water conservation > atmospheric regulation > water purification > biodiversity maintenance > scientific and cultural value > material production. The ESV of different plant communities followed by the order: Spartina alterniflora > bare land > Populus euramericana cv. I-214-Robinia pseudoacacia > Phragmites australis > Pennisetum alopecuroides > Imperata cylindrica > Suaeda glauca > Cynodon dactylon-Pennisentum alopecuroides mixed community.【Conclusion】The primary land use types in the reserve are tidal flats, bare land, and waters. The dominant herbaceous species in the first, second, and third core areas are Pennisentum alopecuroides, Phragmites australis, and S. alterniflora, respectively. Carbon sequestration and recreational tourism constitute the main ecosystem services provided by the reserve.

关键词

生态系统服务 / 价值评估 / 土地利用 / 无人机遥感 / 大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区

Key words

ecosystem service / values evaluation / land use / unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing / Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve, Jiangsu Province

引用本文

导出引用
高明月, 吴永波, 朱嘉馨, . 盐城大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(4): 181-188 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412042
Gao Mingyue, Wu Yongbo, Zhu Jiaxin, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem service value in Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve of Yancheng[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(4): 181-188 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202412042
中图分类号: Q948;S718.5   

参考文献

[1]
Phelps J, Jones C l A, Pendergrass J A, et al. Environmental liability: a missing use for ecosystem services valuation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(39): E5359.DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514893112.
[2]
Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26: 152-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
[3]
Feng Q, Duan B L, Zhang X. Relationship between ecosystem-services trade-offs and supply-demand balance along a precipitation gradient: a case study in the central Loess Plateau of China[J]. Land, 2024, 13(7): 1057. DOI: 10.3390/land13071057.
[4]
薛媛媛, 闫丹丹, 戚丽萍, 等. 江苏大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区互花米草对水盐梯度的生态响应[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022, 42(1): 28-35.
Xue Y Y, Yan D D, Qi L P, et al. Ecological response of Spartina alterniflora to hydrosalinity gradients in Jiangsu Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2022, 42(1): 28-35. DOI: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2021.0489.
[5]
Rodrigues A S L, Cazalis V. The multifaceted challenge of evaluating protected area effectiveness[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11: 5147. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18989-2.
[6]
邹兴红, 吴永波, 朱晓成, 等. 基于高光谱反射率的江苏大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区水体营养状态评价[J]. 湿地科学, 2020, 18(2): 219-227.
Zou X H, Wu Y B, Zhu X C, et al. Hyperspectral reflectance-based assessment of aquatic trophic state dynamics in Jiangsu Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve.[J]. Wetland Science, 2020, 18(2): 219-227. DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2020.02.011.
[7]
袁红平, 解生彬, 薛丹丹, 等. 湿地生态监测系统设计与应用研究:以江苏省大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2022, 34(1): 18-20.
Yuan H P, Xie S B, Xue D D, et al. Design and application of wetland ecological monitoring system: a case study of Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Abstracts—Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 34(1):18-20. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5103.2022.01.006.
[8]
常虎, 杨晋炜, 左平, 等. 外来物种互花米草除治成本与除治策略的权衡[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2025, 41(7): 841-851.
Chang H, Yang J W, Zuo P, et al. Cost and strategy trade-offs in the control of the invasive species spartina alterniflora[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2025, 41(7): 841-851. DOI: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2024.0999.
[9]
王立波, 姜慧, 安玉亭, 等. 中国麋鹿种群现状分析及保护对策探讨[J]. 野生动物学报, 2020, 41(3): 806-813.
Wang L B, Jiang H, An Y T, et al. Current status and conservation measures for Père Milu in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 2020, 41(3): 806-813. DOI: 10.19711/j.cnki.issn2310-1490.2020.03.034.
[10]
中华人民共和国人力资源和社会保障部. 2017年度人力资源和社会保障事业发展统计公报[R]. 北京: 人力资源和社会保障部, 2018.
Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the People’s Republic of China. Statistical communiqué on human resources and social security development in 2017[R]. Beijing: Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, 2018.
[11]
GB/T 21010-2017 土地利用现状国家分类标准[S].
GB/T 21010-2017 National Land Use Classification Standard[S].
[12]
江胜国. 国内土壤容重测定方法综述[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58 (增刊2): 82-86,91.
Jiang S G. Review on soil bulk density determination method[J]. Hubei Agriculture Science, 2019, 58 (S2): 82 86,91.
[13]
王火焰, 周健民. 土壤钾素形态转化机制与测定方法优化的研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2023, 42(6): 35-42.
Wang H Y, Zhou J M. Research progress on the transformation mechanism of soil potassium morphology and optimization of measurement methods[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2023, 42(6): 35-42. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2023.06.006.
[14]
李朝英, 郑路. 流动分析仪同时快速测定植物全氮、全磷含量的方法改进[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(2): 336-342.
Li Z Y, Zheng L. Improvement of simultaneous and rapid determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in plants by flow analyzer[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(2): 336-342. DOI: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6357.20064.
[15]
崔丽娟, 庞丙亮, 李伟, 等. 扎龙湿地生态系统服务价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(3):828-836.
Cui L J, Pang B L, Li W, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem services in the Zhalong wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(3): 828-836. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201405161006.
[16]
王磊, 何冬梅, 江浩, 等. 江苏滨海湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态科学, 2016, 35(5):169-175.
Wang L, He D M, Jiang H, et al. Evaluation of coastal wetland ecosystem services in Jiangsu Province[J]. Ecological Science, 2016, 35(5): 169-175. DOI: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2016.05.023.
[17]
GB HJ636-2012 水质总氮的测定碱性过硫酸钾消解紫外分光光度法[S].
[18]
GB/T 11893-1989 水质总磷的测定钼酸铵分光光度法[S].
[19]
游惠明, 韩建亮, 潘德灼, 等. 泉州湾河口湿地生态系统服务价值的动态评价及驱动力分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4286-4292.
You H M, Han J L, Pan D Z, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of ecosystem service values in Quanzhou Bay estuarine wetlands, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(12): 4286-4292. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201912.040.
[20]
王妍, 李欣茹, 张甜甜, 等. 基于不同游客视角的百花山自然保护区生态系统服务社会价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(22): 9446-9458.
Wang Y, Li X R, Zhang T T, et al. Social value assessment of ecosystem services in Baihuashan Nature Reserve from multi-stakeholder visitor perspectives[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(22): 9446-9458. DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202211153298.
[21]
丁冬静, 李玫, 廖宝文, 等. 海南省滨海自然湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(9): 1472-1477.
Ding D J, Li M, Liao B W, et al. Valuation of ecosystem service functions in coastal natural wetlands of Hainan Province, China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(9): 1472-1477. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.09.008.
[22]
谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.
Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. Improvement of ecosystem service valuation methodology based on Per-Unit-Area Value Equivalent Factors[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001.
[23]
韩爽, 张华兵, 刘玉卿, 等. 盐城滨海湿地芦苇群落和互花米草群落对碱蓬群落挤压的时空变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(22):10309-10321.
Han S, Zhang H B, Liu Y Q, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of Phragmites australis and Spartina alterniflora communities in displacing Suaeda salsa communities across Yancheng coastal wetlands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(22): 10309-10321. DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202302210290.
[24]
左雪燕, 窦志国, 蔡杨, 等. 江苏盐城滨海湿地优势植物功能性状分析[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2019, 15(3):59-62.
Zuo X Y, Dou Z G, Cai Y, et al. The functional trait analysis of dominant plants in the coastal wetland of Yancheng, Jiangsu[J]. Wetland Science and Management, 2019, 15(3): 59-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3290.2019.03.14.
[25]
曹牧, 薛建辉. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能与价值评估研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5): 163-169.
Cao M, Xue J H. Review of service function and value research on Chongming Dongtan wetland ecosystem[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(5): 163-169. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.026.
[26]
高文佳, 吴永波, 邹兴红. 江苏大丰滨海湿地麋鹿春夏秋季生境选择[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(11): 2682-2689.
Gao W J, Wu Y B, Zou X H. Habitat selection of Père Milu in spring, summer, and autumn in Dafeng coastal wetland of Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42(11): 2682-2689. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202311.022.
[27]
江波, 张路, 欧阳志云. 青海湖湿地生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(10):3137-3144.
Jiang B, Zhang L, Ouyang Z Y. Ecosystem services valuation of Qinghai Lake[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(10): 3137-3144. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150921.019.
[28]
蔡爱军, 马随随. 中国滨海湿地蓝色碳汇研究进展[J]. 湿地科学, 2022, 20(6): 846-851.
Cai A J, Ma S S. Research progress of blue carbon sink of coastal wetlands in China[J]. Wetland Science, 2022, 20(6): 846-851. DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2022.06.015.
[29]
Xiao D R, Deng L, Kim D G, et al. Carbon budgets of wetland ecosystems in China[J]. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25(6): 2061-2076. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14621.
[30]
Villa J A, Bernal B. Carbon sequestration in wetlands, from science to practice: an overview of the biogeochemical process, measurement methods, and policy framework[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2018, 114: 115-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.037.
[31]
何舢, 韩少杰, 王丹彤, 等. 典型黑土区坡耕地表层土壤活性有机碳变化特征[J]. 森林工程, 2024, 40(2):85-91.
He S, Han S J, Wang D T, et al. Characteristics of changes in active organic carbon in surface soil of sloping farmland in typical black soil areas[J]. Forest Engineering, 2024, 40(2):85-91. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2024.02.010
[32]
万安娜, 韩其飞, 李超凡, 等. 江苏滨海盐沼湿地碳动态时空差异及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(11): 3433-3442.
Wan A N, Han Q F, Li C F, et al. Spatial-temporal variations of carbon dynamics and their responses to climate change in Jiangsu coastal salt marshes[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2024, 43(11): 3433-3442. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202411.006.
[33]
么秀颖. 大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区滨海湿地土壤碳储量时空变化[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2022. DOI: 10.27242/d.cnki.gnjlu.2022.000207.
Yao X Y. Spatial-temporal changes of soil carbon storage in coastal wetland of Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2022. DOI: 10.27242/d.cnki.gnjlu.2022.000207.
[34]
李沁园, 张思九, 林育青, 等. 近十年青海湖水生态系统生产总值变化及其影响因素[J]. 湖泊科学, 2024, 36(3): 963-974.
Li Q Y, Zhang S J, Lin Y Q, et al. Decadal changes in gross ecosystem product of Qinghai Lake water ecosystem and their driving factors[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2024, 36(3): 963-974. DOI: 10.18307/2024.0347.

基金

江苏省林业科技创新与推广揭榜挂帅项目(LYKJ[2022]02)
国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0502704)

责任编辑: 王国栋
PDF(1883 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/