PDF(2034 KB)
PDF(2034 KB)
PDF(2034 KB)
不同植被恢复模式对石漠化地区土壤细菌群落结构和功能的影响
Effects of different vegetation restoration patterns on the structure and function of soil bacterial communities in rocky desertification areas
【目的】研究石漠化地区不同植被恢复模式下土壤细菌的群落结构和功能的差异,探究土壤养分与细菌优势种群的耦合关系,为石漠化地区修复治理提供理论依据。【方法】本研究按土石体积比(1∶3)和坡度(30°)搭建模拟重度石漠化区的试验槽,构建3种重度石漠化地区植被恢复模式[宽叶雀稗(Paspalum virgatum)、黄背草(Themeda triandra)和鸭茅(Dactylis glomerata)],采用Illumina-Miseq高通量测序平台对不同模式下土壤微生物进行16S rRNA测序,归类细菌类别及数目,预测其功能,结合7种土壤理化性质指标(土壤有机质、全氮、全磷、速效磷、全钾、速效钾含量和pH)的测定结果,分析不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质及细菌群落结构变化与功能差异。【结果】①植被恢复显著提高土壤有机质、全氮、全钾和速效钾等养分含量(P<0.01)。②植被恢复明显提升了土壤细菌种类和数量,对细菌物种多样性与丰富度表现出明显的促进作用。植被恢复模式之间土壤细菌种类和分布具有一定的相似性,优势细菌门为变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、放线菌门(Actinobacteriota)、酸杆菌门(Acidobacteriota)、绿弯菌门(Chloroflexi)和拟杆菌门(Bacteroidota),优势细菌属为鞘氨醇单胞菌属(Sphingomonas)和Lechevalieria属。③对微生物优势群落分布影响较为显著的主要驱动因素是土壤pH、有机质、全钾和速效钾含量。④3种植被恢复模式下土壤微生物主要功能为化能异养(chemoheterotrophy)和需氧化能异养(aerobic-chemoheterotrophy)类,其中宽叶雀稗恢复模式相较无植被原土之间的变化最大。【结论】不同植被恢复模式均能显著影响土壤有机质、速效磷与全钾等土壤养分含量,并显著提升土壤细菌群落多样性与丰富度。总体来看,宽叶雀稗与鸭茅两种植被恢复模式表现更优。本研究可为石漠化地区植被恢复后土壤微生物相关研究提供相关理论依据。
【Objective】This study investigated the differences in soil bacterial community structure and function under different vegetation restoration modes in rocky desertification areas. It aimed to elucidate the coupling relationships between soil nutrients and dominant bacterial taxa, providing a theoretical basis for the restoration and management of these degraded ecosystems.【Method】Experimental troughs simulating severe rocky desertification conditions were constructed based on a V(soil)∶V(rock) of 1∶3 and a slope of 30°. Three distinct vegetation restoration modes were established within these troughs: Paspalum virgatum, Themeda triandra, and Dactylis glomerata. Soil microbial communities were analyzed using the Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing platform targeting the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial species were categorized, and their abundances quantified. Bacterial functional profiles were predicted. Concurrently, seven soil physicochemical properties were measured: soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), total potassium (TK), available potassium (AK), and pH. The effects of the different vegetation restoration modes on soil physicochemical properties, bacterial community structure, and predicted functional profiles were then analyzed by integrating the sequencing and soil property data.【Result】(1) Vegetation restoration significantly increased the contents of key soil nutrients, including SOM, TN, TK, and AK (P<0.01). (2) Vegetation restoration markedly enhanced soil bacterial abundance and diversity, indicating a significant positive effect on both species richness and diversity indices. Soil bacterial community composition exhibited a degree of similarity across the different restoration modes. The dominant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Chloroflexi, and Bacteroidota. The dominant bacterial genera were Sphingomonas and Lechevalieria. (3) The primary drivers significantly influencing the distribution of these dominant microbial communities were soil pH, SOM, TK, and AK. (4) The predominant predicted functional categories for soil microorganisms under all three vegetation restoration modes were chemoheterotrophy and aerobic-chemoheterotrophy.【Conclusion】Different vegetation restoration modes significantly influenced the contents of soil nutrients (SOM, AP, TK) and substantially enhanced the diversity and richness of the soil bacterial community. Overall, the restoration modes employing P. wettsteinii and D. glomerata exhibited superior performance. This study provides a relevant theoretical foundation for microorganism-related research following vegetation restoration in rocky desertification areas.
rocky desertification / vegetation restoration / high-throughput sequencing / microbial community
| [1] |
王德炉, 朱守谦, 黄宝龙. 贵州喀斯特石漠化类型及程度评价[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(5):1057-1063.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
王世杰. 喀斯特石漠化概念演绎及其科学内涵的探讨[J]. 中国岩溶, 2002, 21(2):101-105.
|
| [4] |
薛建辉, 周之栋, 吴永波. 喀斯特石漠化山地退化土壤生态修复研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6):135-145.
|
| [5] |
李先琨, 吕仕洪, 蒋忠诚, 等. 喀斯特峰丛区复合农林系统优化与植被恢复试验[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1):92-98.
|
| [6] |
张叶飞, 李伞剑, 王克勤, 等. 典型石漠化植被恢复区土壤理化特征及多指标聚类研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(2):287-293.
|
| [7] |
董天富, 邓志豪, 杨静, 等. 喀斯特退耕地不同植被恢复阶段土壤团聚体稳定性特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(2):33-42.
|
| [8] |
覃蒙尔, 李臻, 窦莉, 等. 喀斯特地区植物根系分泌物酶活性对根际土酶活性和养分的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2024, 44(3):465-476.
|
| [9] |
王进, 刘子琦, 张国, 等. 喀斯特石漠化治理不同恢复模式土壤养分分布特征:以贵州花江示范区为例[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(7):1578-1585.
|
| [10] |
罗娜娜, 盛茂银, 王霖娇, 等. 长期植被恢复对中国西南喀斯特石漠化土壤活性有机碳组分含量和酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6):867-881.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
张紧紧, 熊康宁, 李瑞. 喀斯特石漠化综合治理植被恢复技术研究进展[J]. 中国饲料, 2020(5):5-10.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
王杰, 邵光辉, 丁嘉. 微生物分解硅酸盐矿物增黏对砂土强度的影响[J]. 林业工程学报, 2024, 9(4):154-161.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
陈浮, 赵姣, 马静, 等. 植被恢复对黄土高原露天矿区土壤碳氮磷功能微生物类群的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(5):1507-1519.
|
| [24] |
冯汉华, 吴斌, 伍国清, 等. 喀斯特不同植被类型土壤细菌群落与功能特征[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2024, 44(2):148-156.
|
| [25] |
魏媛, 张金池, 俞元春, 等. 退化喀斯特植被恢复对土壤微生物数量及群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2010, 42(2):230-235.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
侯超, 张成富, 张孙健, 等. FAST周边喀斯特峰丛洼地不同演替阶段土壤微生物群落变化[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2024, 47(8):174-185.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
王宇, 张贵. 滇东岩溶石山地区石漠化特征及成因[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(6):933-938.
|
| [32] |
张信宝, 王世杰, 贺秀斌, 等. 西南岩溶山地坡地石漠化分类刍议[J]. 地球与环境, 2007, 35(2):188-192.
|
| [33] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
| [34] |
苏生, 黄瑞, 韩永芬, 等. 贵州石漠化地区不同能源草对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(14):206-209.
|
| [35] |
舒田, 熊康宁, 陈丽莎, 等. 石漠化治理土壤有机质和全氮含量的变异特征[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(6):1323-1329.
|
| [36] |
周福健, 严友进, 戴全厚, 等. 喀斯特石漠化治理措施的土壤养分响应:以贵州省六枝特区为例[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(5):469-472.
|
| [37] |
闫丰, 赵鑫, 赵玉璞, 等. 矿山修复模式对刺槐根际土壤微生物群落结构和功能的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(5):3272-3286.
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
王莎莎, 蓝家程, 祁雪, 等. 喀斯特峡谷石漠化区造林对土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(3):848-856.
|
| [40] |
李继琼, 雷艳婷, 江星玉, 等. 喀斯特高原峡谷石漠化植被恢复对土壤微生物群落结构和有机碳的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2025, 45(6):1019-1033.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
段倩倩, 杨晓红, 黄先智. 石漠化地区生态桑林根际土壤微生物资源多样性研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(7):25-29.
|
| [43] |
唐婧, 李欲轲, 何馨竹, 等. 基于高通量测序分析白云岩喀斯特土壤微生物多样性[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(5):20-28.
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
连宾. 碳酸盐岩风化成土过程中的微生物作用[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2010, 29(1):52-56.
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
陈佩, 李士伟, 程宇, 等. 秸秆还田对水稻土固氮微生物群落结构与功能活性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2025, 62(4):1149-1161.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |