不同植被恢复模式对石漠化地区土壤细菌群落结构和功能的影响

章宇辰, 杨思林, 王妍

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4) : 217-226.

PDF(2034 KB)
PDF(2034 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4) : 217-226. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202501005
第二十八届中国科协年会———全球气候变化下的林草智能设计育种专题(执行主编 曹福亮 范国强 尹佟明 张怀清)
研究论文

不同植被恢复模式对石漠化地区土壤细菌群落结构和功能的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of different vegetation restoration patterns on the structure and function of soil bacterial communities in rocky desertification areas

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】研究石漠化地区不同植被恢复模式下土壤细菌的群落结构和功能的差异,探究土壤养分与细菌优势种群的耦合关系,为石漠化地区修复治理提供理论依据。【方法】本研究按土石体积比(1∶3)和坡度(30°)搭建模拟重度石漠化区的试验槽,构建3种重度石漠化地区植被恢复模式[宽叶雀稗(Paspalum virgatum)、黄背草(Themeda triandra)和鸭茅(Dactylis glomerata)],采用Illumina-Miseq高通量测序平台对不同模式下土壤微生物进行16S rRNA测序,归类细菌类别及数目,预测其功能,结合7种土壤理化性质指标(土壤有机质、全氮、全磷、速效磷、全钾、速效钾含量和pH)的测定结果,分析不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质及细菌群落结构变化与功能差异。【结果】①植被恢复显著提高土壤有机质、全氮、全钾和速效钾等养分含量(P<0.01)。②植被恢复明显提升了土壤细菌种类和数量,对细菌物种多样性与丰富度表现出明显的促进作用。植被恢复模式之间土壤细菌种类和分布具有一定的相似性,优势细菌门为变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、放线菌门(Actinobacteriota)、酸杆菌门(Acidobacteriota)、绿弯菌门(Chloroflexi)和拟杆菌门(Bacteroidota),优势细菌属为鞘氨醇单胞菌属(Sphingomonas)和Lechevalieria属。③对微生物优势群落分布影响较为显著的主要驱动因素是土壤pH、有机质、全钾和速效钾含量。④3种植被恢复模式下土壤微生物主要功能为化能异养(chemoheterotrophy)和需氧化能异养(aerobic-chemoheterotrophy)类,其中宽叶雀稗恢复模式相较无植被原土之间的变化最大。【结论】不同植被恢复模式均能显著影响土壤有机质、速效磷与全钾等土壤养分含量,并显著提升土壤细菌群落多样性与丰富度。总体来看,宽叶雀稗与鸭茅两种植被恢复模式表现更优。本研究可为石漠化地区植被恢复后土壤微生物相关研究提供相关理论依据。

Abstract

【Objective】This study investigated the differences in soil bacterial community structure and function under different vegetation restoration modes in rocky desertification areas. It aimed to elucidate the coupling relationships between soil nutrients and dominant bacterial taxa, providing a theoretical basis for the restoration and management of these degraded ecosystems.【Method】Experimental troughs simulating severe rocky desertification conditions were constructed based on a V(soil)∶V(rock) of 1∶3 and a slope of 30°. Three distinct vegetation restoration modes were established within these troughs: Paspalum virgatum, Themeda triandra, and Dactylis glomerata. Soil microbial communities were analyzed using the Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing platform targeting the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial species were categorized, and their abundances quantified. Bacterial functional profiles were predicted. Concurrently, seven soil physicochemical properties were measured: soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), total potassium (TK), available potassium (AK), and pH. The effects of the different vegetation restoration modes on soil physicochemical properties, bacterial community structure, and predicted functional profiles were then analyzed by integrating the sequencing and soil property data.【Result】(1) Vegetation restoration significantly increased the contents of key soil nutrients, including SOM, TN, TK, and AK (P<0.01). (2) Vegetation restoration markedly enhanced soil bacterial abundance and diversity, indicating a significant positive effect on both species richness and diversity indices. Soil bacterial community composition exhibited a degree of similarity across the different restoration modes. The dominant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Chloroflexi, and Bacteroidota. The dominant bacterial genera were Sphingomonas and Lechevalieria. (3) The primary drivers significantly influencing the distribution of these dominant microbial communities were soil pH, SOM, TK, and AK. (4) The predominant predicted functional categories for soil microorganisms under all three vegetation restoration modes were chemoheterotrophy and aerobic-chemoheterotrophy.【Conclusion】Different vegetation restoration modes significantly influenced the contents of soil nutrients (SOM, AP, TK) and substantially enhanced the diversity and richness of the soil bacterial community. Overall, the restoration modes employing P. wettsteinii and D. glomerata exhibited superior performance. This study provides a relevant theoretical foundation for microorganism-related research following vegetation restoration in rocky desertification areas.

关键词

石漠化 / 植被恢复 / 高通量测序 / 细菌群落结构

Key words

rocky desertification / vegetation restoration / high-throughput sequencing / microbial community

引用本文

导出引用
章宇辰, 杨思林, 王妍. 不同植被恢复模式对石漠化地区土壤细菌群落结构和功能的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(4): 217-226 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202501005
Zhang Yuchen, Yang Silin, Wang Yan. Effects of different vegetation restoration patterns on the structure and function of soil bacterial communities in rocky desertification areas[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(4): 217-226 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202501005
中图分类号: X321;S714   

参考文献

[1]
王德炉, 朱守谦, 黄宝龙. 贵州喀斯特石漠化类型及程度评价[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(5):1057-1063.
Wang D L, Zhu S Q, Huang B L. Preliminary study on types and quantitative assessment of Karst rocky desertification in Guizhou Province,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005,25(5):1057-1063. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.05.017.
[2]
Drew D P. Accelerated soil erosion in a Karst area:the Burren,western Ireland[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1983, 61(1/2/3):113-124. DOI:10.1016/0022-1694(83)90238-X.
[3]
王世杰. 喀斯特石漠化概念演绎及其科学内涵的探讨[J]. 中国岩溶, 2002, 21(2):101-105.
Wang S J. Concept deduction and its connotation of Karst rocky desertification[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2002, 21(2):101-105. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2002.02.006.
[4]
薛建辉, 周之栋, 吴永波. 喀斯特石漠化山地退化土壤生态修复研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6):135-145.
Xue J H, Zhou Z D, Wu Y B. Research progresses on ecological remediation of the degraded soil in Karst rocky desertification mountainous areas[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46(6):135-145. DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202207040.
[5]
李先琨, 吕仕洪, 蒋忠诚, 等. 喀斯特峰丛区复合农林系统优化与植被恢复试验[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1):92-98.
Li X K, S H, Jiang Z C, et al. Experiment on vegetation rehabilitation and optimization of agro-forestry system in Karst Fengcong depression (peak cluster) area in western Guangxi,China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005,20(1):92-98. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2005.01.013.
[6]
张叶飞, 李伞剑, 王克勤, 等. 典型石漠化植被恢复区土壤理化特征及多指标聚类研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(2):287-293.
Zhang Y F, Li S J, Wang K Q, et al. Physicochemical properties and multi-indicator clustering of soils in typical rocky desertification vegetation restoration area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 37(2):287-293. DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.033.
[7]
董天富, 邓志豪, 杨静, 等. 喀斯特退耕地不同植被恢复阶段土壤团聚体稳定性特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(2):33-42.
Dong T F, Deng Z H, Yang J, et al. Characteristics of stability of soil aggregates at different vegetation restoration stages in Karst reclaimed land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 31(2):33-42. DOI:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.02.034.
[8]
覃蒙尔, 李臻, 窦莉, 等. 喀斯特地区植物根系分泌物酶活性对根际土酶活性和养分的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2024, 44(3):465-476.
Qin M E, Li Z, Dou L, et al. Effects of plant root exudates enzyme activities on rhizosphere soil enzyme activities and nutrients in karst areas[J]. Guihaia, 2024, 44(3):465-476. DOI:10.11931/guihaia.gxzw202209060.
[9]
王进, 刘子琦, 张国, 等. 喀斯特石漠化治理不同恢复模式土壤养分分布特征:以贵州花江示范区为例[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(7):1578-1585.
Wang J, Liu Z Q, Zhang G, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil nutrients of different restoration models in Karst rocky desertification control area:taking Huajiang demonstration zone in Guizhou as example[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(7):1578-1585. DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2019.7.020.
[10]
罗娜娜, 盛茂银, 王霖娇, 等. 长期植被恢复对中国西南喀斯特石漠化土壤活性有机碳组分含量和酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6):867-881.
Luo N N, Sheng M Y, Wang L J, et al. Effects of long-term vegetation restoration on soil active organic carbon fractions content and enzyme activities in Karst rocky desertification ecosystem of southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2023, 47(6):867-881. DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2022.0216.
[11]
Cao J H, Yuan D X, Tong L Q, et al. An overview of Karst ecosystem in southwest China:current state and future management[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015, 6(4):247-256. DOI:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2015.04.008.
[12]
张紧紧, 熊康宁, 李瑞. 喀斯特石漠化综合治理植被恢复技术研究进展[J]. 中国饲料, 2020(5):5-10.
Zhang J J, Xiong K N, Li R. Study on vegetation restoration technology of Karst rocky desertification comprehensive control[J]. China Feed, 2020(5):5-10. DOI:10.15906/j.cnki.cn11-2975/s.20200503.
[13]
Gao L, Wang W H, Liao X Y, et al. Soil nutrients,enzyme activities,and bacterial communities in varied plant communities in Karst rocky desertification regions in Wushan County,southwest China[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14:1180562. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1180562.
[14]
Vieira S, Sikorski J, Dietz S, et al. Drivers of the composition of active rhizosphere bacterial communities in temperate grasslands[J]. The ISME Journal, 2020, 14(2):463-475. DOI:10.1038/s41396-019-0543-4.
[15]
王杰, 邵光辉, 丁嘉. 微生物分解硅酸盐矿物增黏对砂土强度的影响[J]. 林业工程学报, 2024, 9(4):154-161.
Wang J, Shao G H, Ding J. Effects of clay content increasement by microbial decomposition of silicate minerals on the strength characteristics of sand[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2024, 9(4):154-161.DOI:10.13360/j.issn.2096-1359.202306020.
[16]
Geisen S, Heinen R, Andreou E, et al. Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth-defence relationships between early-and mid-successional plant communities[J]. New Phytologist, 2022, 233(3):1345-1357. DOI:10.1111/nph.17609.
[17]
Massaccesi L, Bardgett R D, Agnelli A, et al. Impact of plant species evenness,dominant species identity and spatial arrangement on the structure and functioning of soil microbial communities in a model grassland[J]. Oecologia, 2015, 177(3):747-759. DOI:10.1007/s00442-014-3135-z.
[18]
Zhu L, Huang C H, Li W, et al. Ammonia assimilation is key for the preservation of nitrogen during industrial-scale composting of chicken manure[J]. Waste Management, 2023, 170:50-61. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2023.07.028.
[19]
Janpum C, Pombubpa N, Monshupanee T, et al. Advancement on mixed microalgal-bacterial cultivation systems for nitrogen and phosphorus recoveries from wastewater to promote sustainable bioeconomy[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2022, 360:198-210. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.11.008.
[20]
Zhang J Y, Yang X M, Song Y H, et al. Revealing the nutrient limitation and cycling for microbes under forest management practices in the Loess Plateau-Ecological stoichiometry[J]. Geoderma, 2020, 361:114108. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114108.
[21]
Liang T Y, Yang G, Ma Y X, et al. Seasonal dynamics of microbial diversity in the rhizosphere of Ulmus pumila L.var.sabulosain a steppe desert area of Northern China[J]. PeerJ, 2019, 7:e7526. DOI:10.7717/peerj.7526.
[22]
Santonja M, Rancon A, Fromin N, et al. Plant litter diversity increases microbial abundance,fungal diversity,and carbon and nitrogen cycling in a Mediterranean shrubland[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 111:124-134. DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.006.
[23]
陈浮, 赵姣, 马静, 等. 植被恢复对黄土高原露天矿区土壤碳氮磷功能微生物类群的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(5):1507-1519.
Chen F, Zhao J, Ma J, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on functional groups related to soil carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in open-pit mining area of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023, 60(5):1507-1519. DOI:10.11766/trxb202203170117.
[24]
冯汉华, 吴斌, 伍国清, 等. 喀斯特不同植被类型土壤细菌群落与功能特征[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2024, 44(2):148-156.
Feng H H, Wu B, Wu G Q, et al. Characteristics and functions of soil microbial communities under different vegetation types in Karst areas[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2024, 44(2):148-156. DOI:10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2024.02.005.
[25]
魏媛, 张金池, 俞元春, 等. 退化喀斯特植被恢复对土壤微生物数量及群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2010, 42(2):230-235.
Wei Y, Zhang J C, Yu Y C, et al. Effects of degraded Karst vegetation restoration on soil microbial amount and functional diversity[J]. Soils, 2010, 42(2):230-235. DOI:10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2010.02.007.
[26]
Mazhaysky Y, Guseva T, Miseckaite O. Integrated melioration measures on restoration of polluted and degraded soils fertility[C]// Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2015.November 19-20,2015.Aleksandras Stulginskis University,Lithuania.Aleksandras Stulginskis University,2017. 2015. DOI:10.15544/rd.2015.044..
[27]
Yang Y, Cheng H, Liu L X, et al. Comparison of soil microbial community between planted woodland and natural grass vegetation on the Loess Plateau[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 460:117817. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117817.
[28]
侯超, 张成富, 张孙健, 等. FAST周边喀斯特峰丛洼地不同演替阶段土壤微生物群落变化[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2024, 47(8):174-185.
Hou C, Zhang C F, Zhang S J, et al. Changes of soil microbial communities in different succession stages in Karst peak cluster depression around FAST[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2024, 47(8):174-185. DOI:10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.0647.24.338.
[29]
Li Y, Liu X M, Yin Z Y, et al. Changes in soil microbial communities from exposed rocks to arboreal rhizosphere during vegetation succession in a Karst mountainous ecosystem[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2021, 16(1):550-563. DOI:10.1080/17429145.2021.2002955.
[30]
Wang G Z, Liu Y G, Cui M, et al. Effects of secondary succession on soil fungal and bacterial compositions and diversities in a karst area[J]. Plant and Soil, 2022, 475(1):91-102. DOI:10.1007/s11104-021-05016-6.
[31]
王宇, 张贵. 滇东岩溶石山地区石漠化特征及成因[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(6):933-938.
Wang Y, Zhang G. On the desertification and genesis of Karst stone mountain area in east Yunnan[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2003, 18(6):933-938. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2003.06.015.
[32]
张信宝, 王世杰, 贺秀斌, 等. 西南岩溶山地坡地石漠化分类刍议[J]. 地球与环境, 2007, 35(2):188-192.
Zhang X B, Wang S J, He X B, et al. A preliminary discussion on the rocky desertification classification for slope land in Karst mountain areas of southwest China[J]. Earth and Environment, 2007, 35(2):188-192. DOI:10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2007.02.016.
[33]
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
Bao S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[34]
苏生, 黄瑞, 韩永芬, 等. 贵州石漠化地区不同能源草对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(14):206-209.
Su S, Huang R, Han Y F, et al. Effects of different energy grasses on soil physical and chemical properties in rocky desertification areas of Guizhou Province[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(14):206-209. DOI:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.14.055.
[35]
舒田, 熊康宁, 陈丽莎, 等. 石漠化治理土壤有机质和全氮含量的变异特征[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(6):1323-1329.
Shu T, Xiong K N, Chen L S, et al. Variation characteristics of soil organic matter and total nitrogen under rocky desertification control[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(6):1323-1329. DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2019.6.019.
[36]
周福健, 严友进, 戴全厚, 等. 喀斯特石漠化治理措施的土壤养分响应:以贵州省六枝特区为例[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(5):469-472.
Zhou F J, Yan Y J, Dai Q H, et al. Soil nutrient response to Karst rocky desertification control measures:a case study of Liuzhi Special District,Guizhou Province[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(5):469-472. DOI:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2016.05.134.
[37]
闫丰, 赵鑫, 赵玉璞, 等. 矿山修复模式对刺槐根际土壤微生物群落结构和功能的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(5):3272-3286.
Yan F, Zhao X, Zhao Y P, et al. Effects of mine remediation mode on microbial community structure and function in the rhizosphere soil of Robinia pseudoacacia[J]. Environmental Science, 2025, 46(5):3272-3286. DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202405188.
[38]
Kaur T, Devi R, Kour D, et al. Plant growth promoting soil microbiomes and their potential implications for agricultural and environmental sustainability[J]. Biologia, 2021, 76(9):2687-2709. DOI:10.1007/s11756-021-00806-w.
[39]
王莎莎, 蓝家程, 祁雪, 等. 喀斯特峡谷石漠化区造林对土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(3):848-856.
Wang S S, Lan J C, Qi X, et al. Influence of afforestation on soil bacterial community structure in Karst canyon rocky desertification area[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2025, 44(3):848-856. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202503.047.
[40]
李继琼, 雷艳婷, 江星玉, 等. 喀斯特高原峡谷石漠化植被恢复对土壤微生物群落结构和有机碳的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2025, 45(6):1019-1033.
Li J Q, Lei Y T, Jiang X Y, et al. Effects of rocky desertification vegetation restoration on soil microbial community structure and organic carbon in Karst plateau canyons[J]. Guihaia, 2025, 45(6):1019-1033.
[41]
Spain A M, Krumholz L R, Elshahed M S. diversity and novelty of soil Proteobacteria[J]. The ISME Journal, 2009, 3(8):992-1000. DOI:10.1038/ismej.2009.43.
[42]
段倩倩, 杨晓红, 黄先智. 石漠化地区生态桑林根际土壤微生物资源多样性研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(7):25-29.
Duan Q Q, Yang X H, Huang X Z. The diversity of microbial resources in ecological mulberry rhizosphere soil in a rocky desertification area[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 39(7):25-29. DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2017.07.004.
[43]
唐婧, 李欲轲, 何馨竹, 等. 基于高通量测序分析白云岩喀斯特土壤微生物多样性[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(5):20-28.
Tang J, Li Y K, He X Z, et al. The diversity analysis of soil microbial community based on the high throughput sequencing under the Dolomite Karst rocky desertification environment[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2020, 38(5):20-28. DOI:10.16614/j.gznuj.zrb.2020.05.004.
[44]
Kim H S, Lee S H, Jo H Y, et al. Diversity and composition of soil acidobacteria and proteobacteria communities as a bacterial indicator of past land-use change from forest to farmland[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 797:148944. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148944.
[45]
Zhang R F, Vivanco J M, Shen Q R. The unseen rhizosphere root-soil-microbe interactions for crop production[J]. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 2017, 37:8-14. DOI:10.1016/j.mib.2017.03.008.
[46]
Tian P, Razavi B S, Zhang X C, et al. Microbial growth and enzyme kinetics in rhizosphere hotspots are modulated by soil organics and nutrient availability[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 141:107662. DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107662.
[47]
Islam Z F, Cordero P R F, Feng J, et al. Two Chloroflexi classes independently evolved the ability to persist on atmospheric hydrogen and carbon monoxide[J]. The ISME Journal, 2019, 13(7):1801-1813. DOI:10.1038/s41396-019-0393-0.
[48]
连宾. 碳酸盐岩风化成土过程中的微生物作用[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2010, 29(1):52-56.
Lian B. Microbial roles in the genesis of soil from carbonate rock weathering[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry, 2010, 29(1):52-56.
[49]
Yang Y, Cheng H, Gao H, et al. Response and driving factors of soil microbial diversity related to global nitrogen addition[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2020, 31(2):190-204. DOI:10.1002/ldr.3439.
[50]
Deng J J, Bai X J, Zhou Y B, et al. Variations of soil microbial communities accompanied by different vegetation restoration in an open-cut iron mining area[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 704:135243. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135243.
[51]
Shen C C, Xiong J B, Zhang H Y, et al. Soil pH drives the spatial distribution of bacterial communities along elevation on Changbai Mountain[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 57:204-211. DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.013.
[52]
Lu Z X, Wang P, Ou H B, et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration on soil nutrients,enzyme activities,and microbial communities in degraded Karst landscapes in southwest China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 508:120002. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.120002.
[53]
Xun W B, Yan R R, Ren Y, et al. Grazing-induced microbiome alterations drive soil organic carbon turnover and productivity in meadow steppe[J]. Microbiome, 2018, 6(1):170. DOI:10.1186/s40168-018-0544-y.
[54]
Zou H. Study on soil ecological environment restoration strategy of abandoned mining area[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12(23):717. DOI:10.1007/s12517-019-4873-3.
[55]
Liang S C, Jiang Y, Li M B, et al. Improving plant growth and alleviating photosynthetic inhibition from salt stress using AMF in alfalfa seedlings[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2019, 14(1):482-491. DOI:10.1080/17429145.2019.1662101.
[56]
Liang Y M, Pan F J, He X Y, et al. Effect of vegetation types on soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities in a Karst region[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(18):18482-18491. DOI:10.1007/s11356-016-7022-5.
[57]
陈佩, 李士伟, 程宇, 等. 秸秆还田对水稻土固氮微生物群落结构与功能活性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2025, 62(4):1149-1161.
Chen P, Li S W, Cheng Y, et al. Impacts of straw return on the community structure and functional activity of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms in paddy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2025, 62(4):1149-1161.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(32260420)
云南省科技计划重点项目(202401AS070014)

责任编辑: 孟苗婧
PDF(2034 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/