PDF(1784 KB)
立地条件对长白落叶松人工林单木径向生长-干旱关系的调节效应
李瑞蓉, 王姿澄, 陈冠谋, 朱万才, 董灵波
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1) : 214-222.
PDF(1784 KB)
PDF(1784 KB)
立地条件对长白落叶松人工林单木径向生长-干旱关系的调节效应
Moderating effect of site conditions on radial growth-drought relationship of individual-tree in Larix olgensis
【目的】 量化立地条件对长白落叶松人工林单木径向生长-干旱关系的调节作用,为气候变化背景下长白落叶松人工林的科学经营提供支撑。【方法】以黑龙江省哈尔滨市宾县胜利林场36块长白落叶松人工林为对象,采用立地指数(SI)将各样地划分为3个等级,即好立地(SI≥20.0 m)7块、中等立地(17.0 m ≤SI<20.0 m)14块、差立地(SI<17.0 m)15块;采用树木年轮学方法以及抵抗力、恢复力和弹性力3个指标量化和评估不同立地条件对长白落叶松单木径向生长-干旱关系的调节作用。【结果】标准化降水蒸散发指数(SPEI)共识别到4次中等程度的干旱事件;限制长白落叶松径向生长的主要气候因子在不同立地等级间存在一定差异,其中总体组主要气候因子为非生长季降水量和SPEI,立地差组为非生长季月均最低温、降水量和SPEI,立地中等组为非生长季降水量和SPEI,而好立地组为非生长季月均最高温、降水量和SPEI;不同立地条件下的长白落叶松在抵抗力、恢复力和弹性力方面的差异不同,抵抗力表现为好立地>中等立地>差立地,而恢复力和弹性力则表现出相反趋势;随着干旱年份的延续,不同立地长白落叶松的抵抗力显著提高,恢复力呈先上升后下降变化趋势,整体趋势表现为显著降低,弹性力则整体呈现上升趋势,与抵抗力的结果一致,与恢复力的结果相反。【结论】非生长季降水以及SPEI是限制长白落叶松生长的主要因素,但立地条件对径向生长与中度干旱之间的调节效应不显著,而对其他干旱等级和干旱持续时间下的径向生长-干旱间的调节效应是否显著,仍有待于进一步研究。
【Objective】 This study aims to quantify the regulatory effects of site conditions on the tree-ring radial growth-drought relationship in Larix olgensis plantations, providing scientific support for sustainable forest management under climate change.【Method】We investigated 36 L. olgensis plantation plots in Shengli Forest Farm, Bin County, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province. The plots were classified into three site quality grades using the site index (SI): good site conditions (SI≥20.0 m, 7 plots), medium site conditions (17.0 m≤SI<20.0 m, 14 plots), and poor site conditions (SI<17.0 m, 15 plots). Dendrochronological methods combined with three drought response indices (resistance, recovery, and resilience) were employed to evaluate how site conditions modulate the growth-drought relationship.【Result】The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) identified four moderate drought events with an average duration of 1.25 years. Growth-limiting climatic factors varied across site condition grades: for overall group, non-growing season precipitation and SPEI were the primary limiting factors; poor site condition was constrained by monthly minimum temperature, precipitation and SPEI during the non-growing season; medium site condition by non-growing season precipitation and SPEI; while good site condition was mainly affected by monthly maximum temperature, precipitation and SPEI in the non-growing season. The differences in resistance, recovery of L. olgensis under different site conditions were different, and the resistance and resilience showed a comparative pattern: good site condition > medium site condition > poor site condition, while the recovery and resilience showed an opposite trend. With the continuation of drought years, the resistance of L. olgensis in different site conditions increased significantly, the trend of recovery increased first and then decreased, the overall trend showed a significant decrease, and the resilience showed an overall upward trend, which was consistent with the results of resistance and contrary to the results of recovery. 【Conclusion】Non-growing season precipitation and SPEI were identified as the primary limiting factors for L. olgensis growth. However, site conditions showed no significant moderating effect on the relationship between radial growth and moderate drought events. Further research is needed to determine whether site conditions significantly regulate radial growth-drought relationships under different drought severity levels and durations.
长白落叶松 / 人工林 / 立地条件 / 径向生长 / 干旱
Larix olgensis / plantations / site conditions / radial growth / drought
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
阎弘, 孙滢洁, 周婉莹, 等. 大兴安岭不同纬度兴安落叶松生长对干旱适应性及生长衰退的差异[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43 (10): 3958-3970.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
吴梁厚, 周宏权. 甘蒙柽柳径向生长对环境变化的响应[J]. 四川林业科技, 2024, 45 (5): 99-105.
|
| [6] |
王强, 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉, 徐栋, 等. 气候对天山中部不同海拔天山云杉径向生长的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2024, 44 (5): 530-538.
|
| [7] |
王国蕊, 徐丽宏, 于澎涛, 等. 六盘山南坡不同密度华北落叶松人工林年内径向生长动态及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学研究, 2024, 37(2): 72-80.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
申佳艳, 李帅锋, 黄小波, 等. 金沙江流域不同海拔处云南松生态弹性及生长衰退过程[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(6): 1-11.
|
| [17] |
陈振举, 孙雨, 何兴元, 等. 沈阳市区古油松年轮宽度年表的建立[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006 (12): 2241-2247.
|
| [18] |
郑瞳. 树木生长弹性在干旱胁迫下的时间趋势及其影响因素[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2023.
|
| [19] |
陈祥伟, 胡海波. 林学概论[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2005: 182.
|
| [20] |
周小东, 常顺利, 王冠正, 等. 天山雪岭云杉径向生长响应气候变化的海拔分异[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(3): 45-56.
|
| [21] |
李晓琴, 张凌楠, 曾小敏, 等. 黄土高原中部针叶树与灌木径向生长对气候的响应差异[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(16): 5685-5697.
|
| [22] |
张晓, 潘磊磊,
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
于健, 徐倩倩, 刘文慧, 等. 长白山东坡不同海拔长白落叶松径向生长对气候变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(1): 24-35.
|
| [26] |
王鹤智. 东北林区林分生长动态模拟系统的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2012.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
中国气象局政策法规司. 气象标准汇编, 气象干旱等级:GB/T20481—2006[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2006: 33-34.
Department of Policies and Regulations, China Meteorological Administration. Compilation of meteorological standards, meteorological drought grade:GB/T20481—2006[M]. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2006: 33-34.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
许方岳, 陈帅威, 王立夫, 等. 干旱对庐山日本柳杉径向生长量的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2020, 42(4): 811-820.
|
| [36] |
赵学鹏, 白学平, 李俊霞, 等. 气候变暖背景下不同海拔长白落叶松对气候变化的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(3): 637-647.
|
| [37] |
雷帅, 张劲松, 孟平, 等. 中国北部不同地点樟子松人工林径向生长对气候响应的差异[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(13): 4479-4492.
|
| [38] |
张博奕, 李雪, 张先亮. 干旱事件对华北落叶松和油松生态弹性的影响差异[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2023, 46(4): 65-73.
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
张晓英, 王飞, 铁牛. 兴安落叶松林径向生长与气候因子的关系[J]. 林业调查规划, 2021, 46(6): 106-113.
|
| [43] |
张子航, 王恒, 贾建恒, 等. 不同密度华北落叶松径向生长对干旱事件的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(5): 1169-1176.
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
钟元, 郑嘉诚, 邱红岩, 等. 西藏东部阳坡和阴坡主要建群树种径向生长对极端干旱的响应差异[J]. 生态学报 2024, 44(3): 1-10.
|
| [46] |
管增艳, 石松林, 金亚宁, 等. 四川峨眉山不同年龄冷杉径向生长对气候变化的响应差异[J]. 山地学报, 2023, 41(1): 56-67.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |