板栗童期向成年期转变过程中叶片形态及结构差异分析

孙文娟, 郭素娟

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 219-226.

PDF(4779 KB)
PDF(4779 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 219-226. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202501026
研究论文

板栗童期向成年期转变过程中叶片形态及结构差异分析

作者信息 +

Differences in leaf morphology and structure between juvenile and adult phase of chestnut (Castanea mollissima)

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】分析板栗童期向成年期转变过程中叶片形态、结构的变化规律及差异,探明板栗的生长阶段转变期及叶片变化特征,为采用外源调控技术促进板栗提早开花结实提供理论依据。【方法】以河北省迁西地区板栗主栽品种‘燕山早丰’(Castanea mollissima ‘Yanshanzaofeng’)1、3、6和10 a树龄的实生幼树叶片为试验材料,于2023年8月下旬使用叶面积仪测定叶片形态指标;使用指甲油印迹法观察叶片气孔结构;同时制作叶片、叶柄的石蜡切片,并利用光学显微镜观察拍照,使用Image J软件测定叶片及叶柄解剖结构指标。【结果】①不同树龄板栗之间叶片的长度和宽度、叶面积和叶形指数差异不显著,但叶柄长度、叶片栅栏组织厚度、海绵组织厚度和叶片厚度大小依次为10 a、6 a、3 a、1 a;②叶片结构指标在1与3 a树龄间存在差异,但不显著,而3 a与6、10 a树龄间气孔密度、下表皮厚度和上表皮厚度、组织结构紧密度、组织结构疏松度、栅海比以及木质部厚度、韧皮部厚度、木质部与韧皮部之比、维管束比例、导管直径和导管数量等各指标存在显著差异。叶片上表皮厚度、栅海比随树龄增加而增大,而组织结构疏松度和气孔密度随树龄增加而降低;③叶片与叶柄的形态指标间和结构指标间均存在显著的相关性,而结构指标间的相关性更强(P<0.001);④主成分分析结果显示,叶形指数和叶面积、叶柄长度、叶柄粗度等形态指标以及叶片气孔密度、上表皮厚度、下表皮厚度、栅栏组织厚度、叶片厚度、栅海比、叶柄木质部厚度、导管数量和叶柄韧皮部厚度等结构指标贡献率较大。【结论】3 a树龄为板栗‘燕山早丰’阶段转变期,叶柄长度、叶柄粗度等形态指标可作为判定其实生树通过童期的参考指标,建议对3 a树龄板栗采用外源调控技术促进其提早开花结实。

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to analyze the changing patterns and differences in leaf morphology and anatomical structure during the transition from the juvenile to the adult phase in chestnut (Castanea mollissima) trees, to identify the critical stage transition periods as well as the characteristics of leaf changes, and to provide a theoretical basis for promoting early flowering and fruiting through exogenous regulation techniques.【Method】Leaf samples were collected from seedling trees of the dominant chestnut cultivar ‘Yanshanzaofeng’ in Qianxi County, Hebei Province, China, including one-year-old (1 a), three-year-old (3 a), six-year-old (6 a) and ten-year-old (10 a) trees. In late August, leave area were employed to measure leaf morphological traits. At the same time, the nail polish impression method was used to observe the stomatal structure of the leaves. Paraffin sections of leaves and petioles were prepared, observed, and photographed under an optical microscope. Meanwhile, leaf anatomical structure indicators and petiole anatomical structure indicators were measured using Image J software.【Result】(1) No significant differences are found in leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, or leaf shape index among Chinese chestnut trees of different ages. However, petiole length, palisade tissue thickness, spongy tissue thickness, and leaf thickness follow a pattern of ten-year-old trees > six-year-old trees > three-year-old trees > one-year-old trees. (2) Differences in leaf structure indices between one-year-old and three-year-old trees are observed but are not significant. Nevertheless, significant differences are observed in various indices, such as stomatal density, lower epidermal thickness, upper epidermal thickness, tissue structure tightness, tissue structure porosity, ratio of palisade to spongy tissue thickness, xylem thickness, phloem thickness, ratio of xylem to phloem thickness, vascular bundle ratio, vessel diameter, and number of vessels, between three-year-old trees and both six-year-old and ten-year-old trees. Upper epidermal thickness and ratio of palisade to spongy tissue thickness increase with tree age, whereas tissue structure porosity and stomatal density decrease with tree age. (3) Significant correlations are found both among the morphological indices and among the anatomical indices of leaves and petioles. Moreover, the correlations among the anatomical indices are stronger (P < 0.001). (4) The results of principal component analysis indicate that morphological indices such as leaf shape index, leaf area, petiole length, and petiole thickness, along with anatomical indices such as stomatal density, upper epidermal thickness, lower epidermal thickness, palisade tissue thickness, leaf thickness, ratio of palisade to spongy tissue thickness, petiole xylem thickness, vessel number, and petiole phloem thickness, have relatively high contribution rates.【Conclusion】The three-year-old stage represents the growth stage transition period of the‘Yanshanzaofeng’cultivar of Chinese chestnut. Morphological indices such as petiole length and petiole thickness can serve as reference indicators for determining whether seedling trees have passed the juvenile phase. It is recommended that exogenous regulation techniques be applied to three-year-old trees to promote early flowering and fruiting.

关键词

板栗 / 童期 / 成年期 / 形态特征 / 解剖结构

Key words

chestnut (Castanea mollissima) / juvenile phase / adult phase / morphological characteristics / anatomical structure

引用本文

导出引用
孙文娟, 郭素娟. 板栗童期向成年期转变过程中叶片形态及结构差异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(5): 219-226 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202501026
Sun Wenjuan, Guo Sujuan. Differences in leaf morphology and structure between juvenile and adult phase of chestnut (Castanea mollissima)[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(5): 219-226 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202501026
中图分类号: S664.2;S718   

参考文献

[1]
李莹. 枣树阶段转变相关miRNA家族的鉴定及关键miRNA的功能初探[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2021.
Li Y. Identification of miRNA families associated with phase transition and preliminary study on the functions of key miRNA in Chinese jujube[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2021.DOI: 10.27109/d.cnki.ghbnu.2021.000680.
[2]
楚乐乐, 刘海强, 盛星星, 等. 果树成花转变途径与调控研究进展[J]. 植物科学学报, 2022, 40(02):281-290.
Chu L L, Liu H Q, Shen X X, et al. Research progress on the pathways and regulation of flowering transformation in fruit trees[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2022, 40(02):281-290.DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2022.20281.
[3]
Steynen Q J, Bolokoski D A, Schultz E A. Alteration in flowering time causes accelerated or decelerated progression through Arabidopsis vegetative phases[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 2001, 79(6):657-665.DOI: 10.1139/cjb-79-6-657.
[4]
Willmann M R, Poethig R S. The effect of the floral repressor FLC on the timing and progression of vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis[J]. Development, 2011, 138(4):677-685.DOI: 10.1242/dev.057448.
[5]
Poethig R S, Fouracre J. Temporal regulation of vegetative phase change in plants[J]. Developmental Cell, 2024, 59(1):4-19.DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.11.010.
[6]
李晓刚, 杨青松, 蔺经, 等. 梨杂种后代结果习性及童区与成年区叶片光合作用差异比较[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(12):160-163.
Li X G, Yang Q S, Lin J, et al. Differential leaf photosynthesis and fruiting traits between juvenile and mature zones in Pyrus hybrid progeny[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 41(12):160-163.DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2013.12.122.
[7]
谢兆森, 杜鸿儒, 李建宝, 等. 组织透明法观察葡萄叶片生长过程中气孔与叶脉形态结构特征变化[J]. 植物生理学报, 2018, 54(2):237-246.
Xie Z S, Du H R, Li J B, et al. Revealing dynamics of stomatal and venation morphology in Vitis vinifera leaves during development using tissue clearing technique[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2018, 54(2):237-246.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2017.0413.
[8]
Lawrence E H, Leichty A R, Doody E E, et al. Vegetative phase change in Populus tremula × alba[J]. New Phytologist, 2021, 231(1):351-364.DOI: 10.1111/nph.17316.
[9]
赵建国, 崔佳雯, 金飚. 树木幼年向成年转变的发育调控机制研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(11):1765-1774.
Zhao J G, Cui J W, Jin B. Research advances of developmental changes of juvenile to adult transition in woody plants[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2015, 51(11):1765-1774.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2015.0432.
[10]
张宇和, 柳鎏, 梁维坚, 等. 中国果树志·板栗· 榛子卷[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2005:38-39.
Zhang Y H, Liu L, Liang W J, et al. Monograph of chinese fruit trees·volume on chestnut and hazelnut[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2005:38-39.
[11]
王广鹏, 刘庆香, 孔德军, 等. 几种化学调节剂对板栗实生树阶段转变和提早开花的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(6):2335-2336.
Wang G P, Liu Q X, Kong D J, et al. Effects of some chemical regulators on phase change and promoting early flowering in chestnut seedlings[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 36(6):2335-2336.DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2008.06.105.
[12]
张新忠, 赵胜建, 赵永波, 等. 一种缩短果树童期的方法:中国,CN200710002557.9[P].2010-10-13.
Zhang X Z, Zhao S J, Zhao Y B, et al. Method for shortening the juvenile period of fruit trees:China,CN200710002557.9[P].2010-10-13.
[13]
张新忠, 孔德军, 王广鹏, 等. 一种调控板栗实生树阶段转变的方法:CN200710002556.4[P].2008-07-30.
Zhang X Z, Kong D J, Wang G P, et al. A method for regulating phase transition of chestnut seedling trees:CN200710002556.4[P].2008-07-30.
[14]
张亦弛, 郭素娟. 2种生长延缓剂对板栗枝条生长和叶片碳氮代谢物积累的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(5):29-36.
Zhang Y C, Guo S J. Effects of two growth retardants on branch growth and leaf carbon/nitrogen metabolite accumulation in Castanea mollissima[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(5):29-36.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200504.
[15]
范志霞, 陈越悦, 付荷玲. 成都地区10种园林灌木叶片结构与抗旱性关系研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2019, 37(1):70-78.
Fan Z X, Chen Y Y, Fu H L. Study on drought resistance and leaf structure in 10 species of garden shrubs in Chengdu[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019, 37(1):70-78.DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.10070.
[16]
李琴, 王磊, 张雪, 等. 不同种植年限中间锦鸡儿叶片功能性状的差异性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2023, 36(4):173-182.
Li Q, Wang L, Zhang X, et al. Differences in leaf functional traits of Caragana intermedia planted in different years[J]. Forest Research, 2023, 36(4):173-182.DOI: 10.12403/j.1001-1498.20230082.
[17]
郭学民, 刘建珍, 翟江涛, 等. 16个品种桃叶片解剖结构与树干抗寒性的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(8):33-43.
Guo X M, Liu J Z, Zhai J T, et al. Relationship between leaf anatomical structures of 16 Prunus persica cultivars and trunk cold hardiness[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(8):33-43.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150805.
[18]
张冬勤, 贾文庆, 何松林, 等. 不同牡丹叶片解剖结构及其环境适应性[J]. 西北植物学报, 2024, 44(7):1153-1163.
Zhang D Q, Jia W Q, He S L, et al. Leaf anatomy of different peony and its environmental adaptability[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2024, 44(7):1153-1163.DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.20230774.
[19]
郑婷, 张克坤, 张培安, 等. 葡萄营养生长与生殖生长间的转变研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(7):1361-1372.
Zheng T, Zhang K K, Zhang P A, et al. Recent progress in the study of transition between vegetative and reproductive growth in Vitis vinifera[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2020, 56(7):1361-1372.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2019.0589.
[20]
Meng X, Liu Z, Dai L, et al. Shikimic acid accelerates phase change and flowering in Chinese jujube[J]. Horticultural Plant Journal, 2024, 10(02):413-424.DOI:10.1016/j.hpj.2023.02.004.
[21]
王丽敏, 陈洁珍, 欧良喜, 等. 果树童期研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(10):46-50.
Wang L M, Chen J Z, Ou L X, et al. Research progress on the juvenile period of fruit trees[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 39(10):46-50.DOI: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2012.10.054
[22]
吴建波, 王小丹. 高寒草原优势种紫花针茅叶片解剖结构对青藏高原高寒干旱环境适应性分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(3):265-273.
Wu J B, Wang X D. Analyzing leaf anatomical structure of dominant species Stipa purpurea adapting to alpine and drought environment at Qingzang Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2021, 45(3):265-273.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0322.
[23]
任玲芸, 王新莹, 徐源, 等. 刺五加10个居群叶片表型性状多样性分析[J]. 森林工程, 2025, 41(6):1218-1229.
Ren L Y, Wang X Y, Xu Y, et al. Analysis of leaf phenotypic trait diversity among 10 populations of Acanthopanax senticosus[J]. Forest Engineering, 2025, 41(6): 1218-1229. DOI:10.7525/j.issn.1006-8023.2025.06.012.
[24]
高新生, 胡欣欣, 李廷, 等. 巴西橡胶树5个主栽品种幼苗叶片的解剖结构及光合特性研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 41(3):31-36.
Gao X S, Hu X X, Li T, et al. Research on characteristics of leaf anatomical structure and photosynthesis of 5 widely-used Hevea brasiliensis clones seedlings[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 41(3):31-36.DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201909058.
[25]
Moreno-Alías I, León L, Rosa L D R, et al. Morphological and anatomical evaluation of adult and juvenile leaves of olive plants[J]. Trees, 2009, 23(1):181-187.DOI: 10.1007/s00468-008-0266-z.
[26]
刘万鹏, 李悦煊, 李志勇, 等. 内蒙古四种不同生态类型扁蓿豆叶片解剖性状与抗旱性关系的研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2023, 45(6):32-43.
Liu W P, Li Y X, Li Z Y, et al. Study on relationship between leaf anatomical traits and drought resistance of four different ecological types of Medicago ruthenica in Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2023, 45(6):32-43.DOI: 10.16742/j.zgcdxb.20220353.
[27]
Sperry J S, Hacke U G, Pittermann J. Size and function in conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2006, 93(10):1490-1500.DOI: 10.3732/ajb.93.10.1490.
[28]
孙永华, 陈学森. 杏杂种实生树叶片童性的研究[J]. 果树学报, 2005, 22(4):327-330,439.
Sun Y H, Chen X S. Study on the juvenile trait of leaf in apricot hybrid seedlings[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2005, 22(4):327-330,439.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2005.04.006.
[29]
张玉. 新疆早实核桃童期与成年期叶片生理生化特性研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2022.
Zhang Y. Study on physiological and biochemical characteristics in juvenile phase and adulthood of Xinjiang precocious walnut leaves[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2022.DOI: 10.27431/d.cnki.gxnyu.2022.000402.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2022YFD2200400)
林业和草原科技成果国家级推广项目(2020133118)

责任编辑: 王国栋
PDF(4779 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉