亚热带常绿阔叶林群落重建过程中林下物种组成及系统发育多样性分析

吴斌飞, 肖可琴, 胡展鹏, 葛之葳, 缪子梅

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 189-198.

PDF(2831 KB)
PDF(2831 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 189-198. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202503015
研究论文

亚热带常绿阔叶林群落重建过程中林下物种组成及系统发育多样性分析

作者信息 +

Understory species composition and phylogenetic diversity during subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest restoration

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】对比浙江黄岩山自然恢复30 a的次生林与天然林的物种组成及系统发育多样性差异,探讨其林下群落重建机制,为亚热带常绿阔叶林恢复提供理论依据。【方法】采用样地调查法,基于次生林与天然林林下乔灌草群落数据,通过计算物种多样性和系统发育多样性指数,分析其变化趋势及对土壤因子的影响,进一步揭示群落重建过程中的生态学机制。【结果】研究区次生林林下植被包含42科61属82种,天然林48科71属96种;天然林乔木层物种均匀度指数显著高于次生林(P<0.05),灌木层和草本层系统发育指数存在显著差异(P<0.01);两种林分中乔木层与灌木层植物系统发育结构主要呈聚集结构[最近种间亲缘关系指数(NTI)与系统发育多样性指数(NRI)均大于0],而草本层总体呈发散结构(NRI与NTI均小于0);土壤全磷含量是影响次生林林下各层次物种多样性与系统发育谱系结构变化的重要土壤因子(P<0.05),而土壤有效钾和有机质含量则与天然林的呈显著相关(P<0.05)。【结论】研究区次生林重建过程中乔木层物种群落构建方式偏向于随机扩散,而在天然林中以环境筛选为主,两种林分中灌木层群落构建动力源于非生物的环境过滤作用,草本层则以竞争排斥为主。建议在浙江黄岩山地区次生林恢复初期优先提升土壤磷素有效性,天然林管理则需重点维持表层土壤有机质周转与养分循环。

Abstract

【Objective】This study compared species composition and phylogenetic diversity between naturally restored (30-year) secondary forests and primary forests in Huangyanshan. It analyzed differences in understory community reassembly mechanisms. 【Method】The investigation employed a plot-based survey method collecting tree, shrub, and herb community data. Calculations determined species diversity indices and phylogenetic diversity indices. Analysis assessed trends in these indices and the influence of soil factors.This approach revealed ecological 82 species, while natural forests had 48 families, 71 genera, and 96 species. Natural forests showed significantly higher tree layer species evenness than secondary forests(P<0.05). Shrub and herb layers exhibited significant differences in phylogenetic diversity indices between forest types (P<0.01). Tree and shrub layers displayed clustered phylogenetic structures (nearest relatedness index(NRI)>0, nearest taxon index (NTI)>0) in both forests. Herb layers generally maintained over dispersed structures (NRI<0, NTI<0). Soil total phosphorus drove variations in species diversity and phylogenetic structure across all understory layers in secondary forests (P<0.05). Available soil potassium and organic matter significantly influenced these patterns in natural forests (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】Tree layer assembly favored stochastic dispersal during secondary forest restoration, while environmental filtering dominated in primary forests. Abiotic environmental filtering governed shrub layer dynamics across both forest types. Herb layer assembly primarily resulted from competitive exclusion. Managers should prioritize enhancing phosphorus availability in initial secondary forest recovery. Primary forest management must focus on maintaining topsoil organic matter turnover and nutrient cycling processes.

关键词

亚热带常绿阔叶林 / 物种多样性 / 系统发育结构 / 构建机制 / 土壤环境因子

Key words

subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest / species diversity / phylogenetic structure / community assembly mechanisms / soil environmental factors

引用本文

导出引用
吴斌飞, 肖可琴, 胡展鹏, 等. 亚热带常绿阔叶林群落重建过程中林下物种组成及系统发育多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(5): 189-198 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202503015
Wu Binfei, Xiao Keqin, Hu Zhanpeng, et al. Understory species composition and phylogenetic diversity during subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest restoration[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(5): 189-198 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202503015
中图分类号: S718.5   

参考文献

[1]
Hua F Y, Bruijnzeel L A, Meli P, et al. The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches[J]. Science, 2022, 376(6595):839-844. DOI:10.1126/science.abl4649.
[2]
刘子琪, 姚良锦, 焦洁洁, 等. 亚热带次生常绿阔叶林植物功能性状及多样性对人工抚育的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(11):4733-4743.
Liu Z Q, Yao L J, Jiao J J, et al. Response of functional traits and functional diversity of woody plants to tending in a secondary subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(11):4733-4743. DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202307251589.
[3]
柴永福. 森林演替过程中的群落构建和植物资源获取策略[C]// 陕西省植物学会. 陕西省植物学会2024年学术研讨会摘要集. 2024:14-15.
Chai Y F. Community assembly and plant resource acquisition strategies during forest succession[C]// Abstracts of 2024 Academic Symposium of Shaanxi Botanical Society. Northwest University; Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, 2024: 14-15. DOI:10.26914/c.cnkihy.2024.050630.
[4]
Zhang H, Chen H Y H, Lian J Y, et al. Using functional trait diversity patterns to disentangle the scale-dependent ecological processes in a subtropical forest[J]. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32(5):1379-1389. DOI:10.1111/1365-2435.13079.
[5]
牛克昌, 刘怿宁, 沈泽昊, 等. 群落构建的中性理论和生态位理论[J]. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(6):579-593.
Niu K C, Liu Y N, Shen Z H, et al. Community assembly:the relative importance of neutral theory and niche theory[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2009, 17(6):579-593.
[6]
Lv T, Ding H, Wang N J, et al. The roles of environmental filtering and competitive exclusion in the plant community assembly at Mt.Huangshan are forest-type-dependent[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2024, 51:e02906. DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02906.
[7]
陈海辉, 黄海, 田乐宇, 等. 自然恢复下马占相思人工林植被群落特征变化[J]. 南方农业学报, 2024, 55(9):2721-2733.
Chen H H, Huang H, Tian L Y, et al. Changes of vegetation community characteristics of Acacia mangium plantation under natural restoration[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2024, 55(9):2721-2733. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2024.09.017.
[8]
马克平. 生物群落多样性的测度方法:Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(上)[J]. 生物多样性, 1994, 2(3):162-168.
[9]
赵珂萱. 内蒙古高原和青藏高原荒漠生态系统植物多样性格局及驱动力[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学, 2023.
Zhao K X. Patterns and driving forces of plant diversity in desert ecosystems of the Inner Mongolia Plateau and Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University, 2023.
[10]
郭超, 王东男, 张硕, 等. 林下植被对胡桃楸人工林细根生物量和形态特征的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2025, 45(1):82-89,101.
Guo C, Wang D N, Zhang S, et al. Effects of understory vegetation on the fine root biomass and morphological characteristics in Juglans mandshurica plantation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2025, 45(1):82-89,101. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2025.01.009.
[11]
鲁旭东, 董禹然, 李垚, 等. 中国亚热带杉木人工林不同林分发育阶段的群落构建机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(1):67-73.
Lu X D, Dong Y R, Li Y, et al. Community assembly mechanism for different planting ages of Chinese fir artificial forests in subtropical China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(1):67-73. DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202212037.
[12]
Barlow J, Lennox G D, Ferreira J, et al. Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation[J]. Nature, 2016, 535(7610):144-147. DOI:10.1038/nature18326.
[13]
冯刚. 古田山亚热带天然林和次生林群落系统发育结构和功能结构的初步研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2012.
Feng G. Preliminary study on the development structure and functional structure of subtropical natural forest and secondary forest community system in Gutian Mountain[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012.
[14]
Zhang H N, Zhang X S, Lv Y Y, et al. How topography and neighbor shape the fate of trees in subtropical forest restoration:environmental filtering and resource competition drive natural regeneration[J]. Forest Ecosystems, 2024, 11:100169. DOI:10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100169.
[15]
李建, 李晓宇, 曹静, 等. 长白山次生针阔混交林群落结构特征及群落动态[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4):1195-1206.
Li J, Li X Y, Cao J, et al. Community structure and dynamics of secondary coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest in Changbai Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(4):1195-1206. DOI:10.5846/stxb201812232788.
[16]
霍雪莹. 秦岭两种典型次生林群落构建及其稳定性研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2024.
Huo X Y. Community construction and stability of two typical secondary forests in Qinling Mountains[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2024.
[17]
李玉滢, 陈向向, 应益山, 等. 浙江省龙游县野猪种群密度和活动节律研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2024, 41(6):1142-1149.
Li Y Y, Chen X X, Ying Y S, et al. Study on the population density and activity rhythm of wild boar in Longyou County,Zhejiang,China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(6):1142-1149. DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240170.
[18]
浙江省龙游县志编纂委员会. 龙游县志[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1991.
[19]
LY/T 1239-1999森林土壤pH值的测定[S].
[20]
LY/T 1237-1999森林土壤有机质的测定及碳氮比的计算[S].
[21]
LY/T 1228-2015森林土壤氮的测定[S].
[22]
LY/T 1232-2015森林土壤磷的测定[S].
[23]
LY/T 1234-2015森林土壤钾的测定[S].
[24]
Zhang J L, Liu B, Liu S, et al. Plantlist: looking up the status of plant scientific names based on the plant list database[J]. R package version 0.3.0. Retrieved from https://github.com/helixcn/plantlist, 2022.
[25]
Qian H, Jin Y. An updated megaphylogeny of plants,a tool for generating plant phylogenies and an analysis of phylogenetic community structure[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 9(2):233-239.
[26]
Smith S A, Brown J W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2018, 105(3):302-314. DOI:10.1002/ajb2.1019.
[27]
Kembel S W, Cowan P D, Helmus M R, et al. Picante:R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology[J]. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26(11):1463-1464. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166.
[28]
吕自立, 刘彬, 常凤, 等. 巴音布鲁克高寒草甸物种多样性与系统发育多样性沿海拔梯度分布格局及驱动因子[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(7):12-22.
Lyu Z L, Liu B, Chang F, et al. Species diversity and phylogenetic diversity in Bayinbrook alpine grasslands:elevation gradient distribution patterns and drivers[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7):12-22.
[29]
李梦佳, 何中声, 江蓝, 等. 戴云山物种多样性与系统发育多样性海拔梯度分布格局及驱动因子[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(3):1148-1157.
Li M J, He Z S, Jiang L, et al. Distribution pattern and driving factors of species diversity and phylogenetic diversity along altitudinal gradient on the south slope of Daiyun Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(3):1148-1157. DOI:10.5846/stxb201910082091.
[30]
何中声, 陈佳嘉, 朱静, 等. 戴云山南坡不同海拔森林土壤微生物功能多样性特征及影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(9):3504-3515.
He Z S, Chen J J, Zhu J, et al. Characteristics of microbial functional diversity and its influencing factors of forest soils at different elevations on the southern slope of Daiyun Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(9):3504-3515.
[31]
Dixon P. VEGAN,a package of R functions for community ecology[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2003, 14(6):927-930. DOI:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x.
[32]
Kemp F. Modern applied statistics with S[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series D (The Statistician), 2003, 52(4):704-705. DOI:10.1046/j.1467-9884.2003.t01-19-00383_22.x.
[33]
司彬, 姚小华, 任华东, 等. 桂西喀斯特植被恢复演替过程中物种多样性变化[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(3):113-118.
Si B, Yao X H, Ren H D, et al. Species diversity in the process of vegetation succession in Karst area in western Guangxi[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 30(3):113-118.
[34]
黄庆荣, 施逸啸, 江蓝, 等. 格氏栲天然林植物功能性状与系统发育对林窗大小的响应[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2023, 43(5):449-456.
Huang Q R, Shi Y X, Jiang L, et al. Responses of plant functional traits and phylogeny to gap size in Castanopsis kawakamii natural forest[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2023, 43(5):449-456. DOI:10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2023.05.001.
[35]
李宸钟, 李淑静, 王新杰. 格氏栲天然林群落结构特征及多样性分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(4):44-50.
Li C Z, Li S J, Wang X J. Community structure and diversity analysis of Castanopsis kawakamii natural forest[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2023, 38(4):44-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2023.04.06.
[36]
付靖媛, 张谦, 苏文华. 元江锥群落垂直结构的构建机制初探[J]. 广西植物, 2022, 42(6):1040-1048.
Fu J Y, Zhang Q, Su W H. A preliminary study on construction mechanism of vertical structure in Castanopsis orthacantha community[J]. Guihaia, 2022, 42(6):1040-1048. DOI:10.11931/guihaia.gxzw202011043.
[37]
郑维艳, 曾文豪, 唐一思, 等. 中国大陆北热带及亚热带地区樟科、壳斗科物种多样性及其生物地理格局分析[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(24):8676-8687.
Zheng W Y, Zeng W H, Tang Y S, et al. Species diversity and biogeographical patterns of Lauraceae and Fagaceae in northern tropical and subtropical regions of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(24):8676-8687. DOI:10.5846/stxb201808281841.
[38]
陈博, 江蓝, 谢子扬, 等. 格氏栲天然林林窗植物物种多样性与系统发育多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(4):439-448.
Chen B, Jiang L, Xie Z Y, et al. Taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of plants in a Castanopsis kawakamii natural forest[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2021, 29(4):439-448. DOI:10.17520/biods.2020399.
[39]
杨志汝, 张建鹏. 秦岭太白山巴山冷杉天然林群落物种多样性[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(2):140-146,192.
Yang Z R, Zhang J P. Species diversity of Abies fargesii natural forest community in Mt.Taibai of Qinling[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2023, 38(2):140-146,192. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2023.02.19.
[40]
李婧怡, 陈晓霞, 李梦玮, 等. 川西亚高山森林不同恢复途径物种组成和群落结构动态变化[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(8): 3471-3482.
Li J Y, Chen X X, Li M W, et al. Species composition and community structure dynamics under different restoration approaches in subalpine forests of western Sichuan[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(8): 3471-3482. DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202308151766.
[41]
湛斌. 紫金山两种林型灌木层植被功能性状和系统发育多样性[D]. 南京林业大学, 2018.
Zhan B. Functional traits and phylogenetic diversity of shrub layer vegetation in two forest types of Zijin Mountain[D]. Nanjing Forestry University, 2018.
[42]
曾晓敏, 高金涛, 范跃新, 等. 中亚热带森林转换对土壤磷积累的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(13):4879-4887.
Zeng X M, Gao J T, Fan Y X, et al. Effect of soil factors after forest conversion on the accumulation of phosphorus species in mid-subtropical forests[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(13):4879-4887. DOI:10.5846/stxb201706231141.
[43]
赵亮, 杨治春, 周卷华, 等. 秦岭北麓典型栓皮栎天然次生林群落结构与物种组成[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12):3214-3222.
Zhao L, Yang Z C, Zhou J H, et al. Community structure and species composition of typical Quercus variabilis natural secondary forest at the northern foothills of the Qinling Mountains,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(12):3214-3222. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.001.
[44]
刘爱平, 王小红, 孙杰, 等. 湿润亚热带森林类型转换对土壤有机碳矿化的影响及其非生物调控因素[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(5):1371-1379.
Liu A P, Wang X H, Sun J, et al. Effect of forest type conversion on soil organic carbon mineralization and its abiotic regulation factors in humid subtropics[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(5):1371-1379. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202505.014.
[45]
陈会玲, 勾蒙蒙, 刘常富, 等. 鄂中丘陵区不同林龄马尾松人工林林下植物多样性与土壤理化性质关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(10):1525-1533.
Chen H L, Gou M M, Liu C F, et al. Relationship between understory plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties of different aged Pinus massoniana plantations in hilly region of central Hubei Province[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2024, 33(10):1525-1533. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.10.004.

基金

江苏省林业科技创新(揭榜挂帅)项目(LYKJ[2022]02)
江苏省林业科技创新与推广项目(LYKJ[2022]16)

责任编辑: 孟苗婧
PDF(2831 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉