PDF(1564 KB)
森林公园美景度与游憩设施满意度协同关系研究——以南京紫金山国家森林公园为例
黄静, 孙新旺
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 274-282.
PDF(1564 KB)
PDF(1564 KB)
森林公园美景度与游憩设施满意度协同关系研究——以南京紫金山国家森林公园为例
Synergy between forest scenic beauty and recreational facility satisfaction: a case study of Nanjing Mount Zijin National Forest Park
【目的】森林公园美景度和游憩设施满意度与游客审美体验及游玩舒适度直接相关,从森林美景度和游憩设施满意度角度评价公园旅游品质,为优化公园资源配置及推动公园可持续发展提供决策依据。【方法】以南京紫金山国家森林公园为研究对象,采集2013—2024年网络在线评论数据,构建耦合协调模型,分析其美景度和游憩设施满意度的协同发展水平,并使用Markov链、Dagum基尼系数及因子探测器模型,分析森林公园美景度和游憩设施满意度协同发展水平的空间演化、分异特征及影响因子。【结果】①南京紫金山国家森林公园美景度与游憩设施满意度协同发展水平总体较高,耦合协调度均值达0.7。②南京紫金山国家森林公园美景度与游憩设施满意度协同发展存在低、高水平锁定现象,低水平和高水平景区保持自身不变的概率分别为71.52%和79.74%。③南京紫金山国家森林公园美景度与游憩设施满意度协同发展水平的空间差异的主要来源是景区间差距。④旅游资源禀赋、政府调控水平、经济发展水平、环境治理能力均能够在不同程度上对南京紫金山国家森林公园美景度与游憩设施满意度协同发展水平的空间分布格局产生影响。【结论】南京紫金山国家森林公园美景度与游憩设施满意度较为耦合,达到了良好协调水平,但三大核心景区间差距显著。未来应进一步优化资源配置,确保各景区在旅游资源开发、环境治理等方面均衡发力。我国其他森林公园也可借鉴南京紫金山国家森林公园的实践经验,深化平台评价交叉分析,完善游客中心服务功能,推动美景度与游憩设施满意度协同发展水平全域提升。
【Objective】Forest scenic beauty and recreational facility satisfaction are pivotal determinants of visitors’ aesthetic experience and overall comfort, serving as core indicators of a park’s tourism quality. This study aims to establish a coupled coordination evaluation system to provide a scientific basis for enhancing visitor experiences, optimizing resource allocation, and promoting sustainable park development.【Method】Taking Nanjing Mount Zijin National Forest Park as the research site, this study collected online review data spanning 2013 to 2024. We constructed a coupled coordination model to quantify the synergistic development between scenic beauty and facility satisfaction. Furthermore, Markov chain analysis, the Dagum Gini coefficient, and Geodetector were employed to investigate the spatiotemporal evolution, sources of differentiation, and driving factors influencing this synergy.【Result】(1) The overall synergy between scenic beauty and facility satisfaction was relatively high, with a mean coupled coordination degree of 0.7, indicating a stage of “good coordination.” (2) The synergy exhibited a significant “state lock-in” effect, with steady-state probabilities for low-level and high-level coordination remaining as high as 71.52% and 79.74%, respectively. (3) Decomposition of spatial differences revealed that inter-scenic spot disparities were the primary source of the overall variation in coordination levels. (4) The spatial heterogeneity of tourism resource endowment, government regulation, regional economic development, and environmental governance capacity collectively shaped the spatial pattern of the synergy to varying degrees. 【Conclusion】While Mount Zijin National Forest Park demonstrates good coupling between scenic beauty and facility satisfaction, significant developmental imbalances persist among its three core scenic areas. Future efforts should focus on optimizing resource allocation to ensure balanced investments in resource development and environmental governance across all areas. Furthermore, other forest parks in China should draw on these findings by deepening multi-dimensional cross-analyses of online reviews and upgrading visitor center services to achieve a comprehensive, synergistic improvement in both scenic quality and tourist satisfaction.
森林公园美景度 / 游憩设施满意度 / 耦合协调模型 / 南京紫金山国家森林公园
forest scenic beauty / recreational facility satisfaction / coupled coordination model / Nanjing Mount Zijin National Forest Park
| [1] |
冉璇, 李渊, 郭宇龙, 等. 基于InVEST模型的钱江源国家公园生态系统服务评估及权衡协同关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2023, 32(9):1932-1948.
|
| [2] |
王慧, 张永存, 蒋宏飞. 基于魅力质量理论的游客森林康养旅游需求[J]. 林业经济问题, 2023, 43(5):530-538.
|
| [3] |
张文, 王伟峰, 杨建军. 城市森林公园景观美景度评价及影响因素分析[J]. 中国园林, 2023, 39(9):106-112.
|
| [4] |
胡金龙, 陈慧婷, 李佩, 等. 基于GIS和SBE法的桂林国家森林公园冬季视觉景观评价与优化研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(5):262-269.
|
| [5] |
黄静, 孙新旺. 南京紫金山国家森林公园景观美景度评价及影响因素分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2024, 44(11):146-154.
|
| [6] |
王菲, 王志泰, 邢龙, 等. 基于游客体验分析的山体公园服务设施研究:以贵阳市黔灵山公园为例[J]. 中国园林, 2020, 36(6):101-106.
|
| [7] |
闫文萱, 范晨璟, 申世广, 等. 基于社交媒体数据的多维游憩情绪评价框架研究:以南京中心城区城市公园为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2024(5):85-91.
|
| [8] |
魏峰群. 城市游憩空间规划发展的理论演进与国际经验启示[J]. 现代城市研究, 2025(2):89-95,124.
|
| [9] |
贺迎黎, 莫经梅, 张社梅. 绿色创业导向对农民专业合作社绩效的影响研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2024, 45(2):270-281.
|
| [10] |
李欣原, 徐维南, 刘丽荣, 等. 景村传导视角下景边型传统村落生态敏感性的空间解析与布局优化:以桂林旧县村为例[J]. 中国园林, 2025, 41(2):102-109.
|
| [11] |
周兵, 李艺. 绿色金融与技术创新耦合协调对低碳经济发展的影响[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2024, 45(3):3-22.
|
| [12] |
文连阳. 湘西森林生态服务功能与旅游经济发展耦合的时空分异[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(10):90-101.
|
| [13] |
陈书琳, 陈宇. 休闲农业园植物配置时空耦合协调度评价研究:以江苏省级农业园为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(12):270-278.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
杨佩卿, 白媛媛. 黄河流域数字经济与新型城镇化耦合协调及驱动机制[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 24(4):114-126.
|
| [17] |
蔡汉, 朱权, 罗云建, 等. 快速城镇化地区耕地景观生态安全格局演变特征及其驱动机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5):181-188.
|
| [18] |
孙严超, 蔡俊, 王子豪, 等. 基于InVEST-PLUS-GeoDectetor模型的环杭州湾碳储量时空演变与多情景预测[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 49(5):19-28.
|
| [19] |
吴余青, 朱奕苇. 生态美学视角下城市公共设施设计研究[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(16):440-446.
|
| [20] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |