欧盟碳边境调节机制下我国林产品贸易风险评估

罗艺璇, 陈佩欣, 张晓君

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4) : 286-294.

PDF(1510 KB)
PDF(1510 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4) : 286-294. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202505006
第二十八届中国科协年会———全球气候变化下的林草智能设计育种专题(执行主编 曹福亮 范国强 尹佟明 张怀清)
研究论文

欧盟碳边境调节机制下我国林产品贸易风险评估

作者信息 +

Risks assessment of China’s forest products trade under the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】分析欧盟碳边境调节机制(CBAM)对我国林产品贸易的潜在影响,以利于规避林产品贸易风险,保障林产品贸易的可持续性。【方法】采用全球贸易分析项目的能源-环境扩展模型,即GTAP-E模型,从林产品产出、进口、出口及市场结构等视角对CBAM框架下的我国林产品贸易进行预测。【结果】①从产出端看,CBAM实施初期林产品产出将有短期增长,但长期全产业链面临收缩风险,其中高附加值产品面临更大的下行压力;②从进口端看,CBAM冲击下林产品进口需求下降,陆运依赖型原材料进口将面临更大风险;③从出口端看,初级林产品出口降幅明显,深加工制品产业韧性则可能受限于新兴市场低附加值竞争。【结论】在欧盟碳边境调节机制下,我国需要建立高附加值林产品扶持体系,构建初级林产品原料进口的低碳供应链网络,实施分区域林产品合规认证与市场适配机制,并打造林业剩余物循环利用与应急供应双体系。

Abstract

【Objective】This study analyzed the potential impacts of the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) on China’s forest product trade. The research aims to inform strategies for mitigating trade risks and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the forestry industry’s trade activities.【Method】The GTAP-E model was employed to forecast changes in China’s forest product trade under the CBAM framework. The analysis focuses on key dimensions including domestic output, imports, exports, and market structure.【Result】(1) From the production perspective, forest product output is projected to experience short-term growth in the initial phase of CBAM implementation. However, a contraction risk emerges across the entire industry chain in the long run, with higher value-added products facing greater downward pressure. (2) Regarding imports, forest product import demand may decline under CBAM. Imports of raw materials heavily reliant on land transportation are likely to encounter heightened risks. (3) On the export front, exports of primary forest products are forecast to decrease significantly. The resilience of the deep-processed products industry may, in turn, be constrained by low-value-added competition in emerging markets.【Conclusion】Policy responses should prioritize establishing a support system for high value-added forest products, constructing low-carbon supply chain networks for importing primary raw materials, implementing region-specific compliance certification and market adaptation mechanisms for forest products, and developing dual systems for the cyclic utilization of forestry residues and emergency supply.

关键词

林产品贸易 / 碳边境调节机制(CBAM) / 全球贸易分析项目的能源-环境模型 / 贸易风险

Key words

forest product trade / carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) / GTAP-E model / trade risk

引用本文

导出引用
罗艺璇, 陈佩欣, 张晓君. 欧盟碳边境调节机制下我国林产品贸易风险评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(4): 286-294 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202505006
Luo Yixuan, Chen Peixin, Zhang Xiaojun. Risks assessment of China’s forest products trade under the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(4): 286-294 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202505006
中图分类号: F752   

参考文献

[1]
罗必雄, 顾阿伦, 陈向东, 等. 欧盟碳边境调节机制与国际产业格局:基于全球可计算一般均衡模型的影响评估[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(8):1492-1501.
Luo B X, Gu A L, Chen X D, et al. EU carbon border adjustment mechanism and international industrial landscape:impact assessment based on a global computable general equilibrium model[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2024, 64(8):1492-1501. DOI:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2023.26.050.
[2]
Magacho G, Espagne E, Godin A. Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners:consequences for developing countries[J]. Climate Policy, 2024, 24(2):243-259. DOI:10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758.
[3]
施正煌, 侯方淼. 助力“碳中和”:中国木质林产品碳储量测算与增长路径[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 50(1):274-283.
Shi Z H, Hou F M. Supporting carbon neutrality:estimation and growth pathways of China’s harvested wood products carbon stock[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2026, 50(1):274-283. DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202405021.
[4]
叶泉. 欧盟碳边境调节机制:合法性争议与中国因应[J]. 南京社会科学, 2024(12):109-122.
Ye Q. EU carbon border adjustment mechanism:legitimacy debate and China’s response[J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 2024(12):109-122. DOI:10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2024.12.011.
[5]
Zhong J R, Pies I. The fairness controversy over cbam and its policy implications[J]. Climate Change Economics (CCE), 2024, 15(1):1-22.
[6]
Corvino F. The compound injustice of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM)[J]. Ethics,Policy & Environment, 2025, 28(1):26-45. DOI:10.1080/21550085.2023.2272237.
[7]
Sun X L, Mi Z F, Cheng L, et al. The carbon border adjustment mechanism is inefficient in addressing carbon leakage and results in unfair welfare losses[J]. Fundamental Research, 2024, 4(3):660-670. DOI:10.1016/j.fmre.2023.02.026.
[8]
Lin B Q, Zhao H S. Threatening the Poor?The economic impacts of carbon border adjustment mechanism on developing countries[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2024, 71:582-593. DOI:10.1016/j.strueco.2024.09.005.
[9]
汪惠青, 王有鑫. 欧盟碳边境调节机制的外溢影响与我国的应对措施[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2022(8):111-118.
Wang H Q, Wang Y X. The spillover effects of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism and China’s countermeasures[J]. Financial Theory & Practice, 2022(8):111-118.
[10]
龙凤, 董战峰, 毕粉粉, 等. 欧盟碳边境调节机制的影响与应对分析[J]. 中国环境管理, 2022, 14(2):43-48.
Long F, Dong Z F, Bi F F, et al. Impact and countermeasures of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 14(2):43-48. DOI:10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2022.02.043.
[11]
许英明, 李晓依. 欧盟碳边境调节机制对中欧贸易的影响及中国对策[J]. 国际经济合作, 2021, 37(5):25-32.
Xu Y M, Li X Y. Potential implications of EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism for Sino-EU trade and suggested policies for China[J]. Journal of International Economic Cooperation, 2021, 37(5):25-32.
[12]
康文梅, 王谋. 基于不同提案比较分析欧盟碳边境调节机制未来走向及其经济影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024, 34(9):45-53.
Kang W M, Wang M. A comparative analysis on the future direction and economic impact of EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism based on different proposals[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2024, 34(9):45-53.
[13]
陈诗一, 朱渝铖. 欧盟碳边境调节机制对我国绿色低碳转型的动态影响分析[J]. 江淮论坛, 2024(6):21-28,2.
Chen S Y, Zhu Y C. Analysis of the dynamic impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China’s green and low carbon transition[J]. Jiang-huai Tribune, 2024(6):21-28,2. DOI:10.16064/j.cnki.cn34-1003/g0.2024.06.021.
[14]
王谋, 吉治璇, 康文梅, 等. 欧盟“碳边境调节机制”要点、影响及应对[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(12):45-52.
Wang M, Ji Z X, Kang W M, et al. Key points and impact of EU’s ‘carbon border adjustment mechanism’ and China’s responses[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(12):45-52.
[15]
刘斌, 赵飞. 欧盟碳边境调节机制对中国出口的影响与对策建议[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 36(6):185-194,210.
Liu B, Zhao Fei. The impact of EU carbon tariff policy on China’s export and suggestions for China[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2021, 36(6):185-194,210. DOI:10.13613/j.cnki.qhdz.003114.
[16]
杨波, 王勇. 欧盟碳边境调节机制对我国出口贸易的影响研究:以对欧盟制造业出口为例[J]. 金融经济, 2024(6):82-92.
Yang B, Wang Y. Research on the impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China’s export trade:a case study on exports to the EU manufacturing sector[J]. Finance Economy, 2024(6):82-92. DOI:10.14057/j.cnki.cn43-1156/f.20240802.001.
[17]
国家林业和草原局. 中国林业和草原统计年鉴-2023[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2024.
State Forestry and Grassland Administration. China forestry and grassland statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2024.
[18]
Nijkamp P, Wang S L, Kremers H. Modeling the impacts of international climate change policies in a CGE context:the use of the GTAP-E model[J]. Economic Modelling, 2005, 22(6):955-974. DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2005.06.001.
[19]
Ianchovichina E I, Walmsley T L. Dynamic modeling and applications for global economic analysis[M]. Washington,DC: Cambridge University Press,2012:136—157.
[20]
Hertel T W. Global trade analysis: modeling and applications[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996:i-vi.
[21]
Yang F, Zou C X, Li C T. The impact of carbon tariffs on China’s agricultural trade[J]. Agriculture, 2023, 13(5):1013. DOI:10.3390/agriculture13051013.
[22]
陈庆能, 沈满洪, 孙泽生. 中国完全碳排放的行业特征分析[J]. 企业经济, 2017, 36(4):12-17.
Chen Q N, Shen M H, Sun Z S. Analysis on the industry characteristics of total carbon emissions in China[J]. Enterprise Economy, 2017, 36(4):12-17. DOI:10.13529/j.cnki.enterprise.economy.2017.04.002.
[23]
朱启荣. 中国出口贸易中的CO2排放问题研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010(1):55-64.
Zhu Q R. Research on the CO2 emissions produced by China’s exports[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2010(1):55-64.
[24]
屠新泉, 金兴雪, 秦若冰. 欧盟碳边境调节机制及贸易影响分析[J]. 东南学术, 2023(5):67-76.
Tu X Q, Jin X X, Qin R B. EU carbon border adjustment mechanism and trade impact analysis[J]. Southeast Academic Research, 2023(5):67-76.
[25]
丁纯, 曹雪琳. 欧盟碳边境调节机制对中国贸易的影响:基于动态递归GTAP-E模型的模拟分析[J]. 世界经济研究, 2024(2):18-33.
Ding C, Cao X L. Study on the impact of EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on China’s trade:GTAP-E model simulation analysis based on dy-namic recursion[J]. World Economy Study, 2024(2):18-33.
[26]
Shih S. The smile curve:A new management model for the knowledge economy[J]. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2010, 38(3):119-126.DOI:10.1109/EMR.2010.00113.
[27]
Hovelaque V, Duvaleix-Tréguer S, Cordier J. Effects of constrained supply and price contracts on agricultural cooperatives[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 199(3):769-780. DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.08.005.
[28]
Cristea A, Hummels D, Puzzello L, et al. Trade and the greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2013, 65(1):153-173. DOI:10.1016/j.jeem.2012.06.002.
[29]
丁浩员, 董文娟, 余心玎. 贸易政策冲击下的跨国供应链断裂与重构研究[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(8):95-113.
Ding H Y, Dong W J, Yu X D. Global supply chain disruption and restructuring under trade policy shocks[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2024, 59(8):95-113.
[30]
Jose M S. Trade barriers: Impact and mitigation approaches[J]. K4DD Rapid Evidence Review, 2024, 103.DOI: 10.19088/K4DD.2024.070
[31]
陈俭, 肖功为, 罗朝艳, 等. 中国与东盟林产品贸易现状及发展潜力分析[J]. 世界农业, 2018(7):178-185.
Chen J, Xiao G W, Luo C Y, et al. Analysis on the present situation and development potential of forest products trade between China and ASEAN[J]. World Agriculture, 2018(7):178-185. DOI:10.13856/j.cnll-1097/s.2018.07.027.
[32]
潘磊, 熊立春, 姚瑜晨, 等. 中国对RCEP成员国的林产品出口效率以及潜力预测研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(1):237-247.
Pan L, Xiong L C, Yao Y C, et al. The export efficiency and potential capacity of China’s forest products to RCEP member countries[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(1):237-247. DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202208058.

基金

国家社会科学基金青年项目(24CJY088)

责任编辑: 李燕文
PDF(1510 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/