碳中和背景下森林碳汇特征及适应性经营路径

王懿祥

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2) : 1-8.

PDF(1520 KB)
PDF(1520 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2) : 1-8. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202507025
特邀专论

碳中和背景下森林碳汇特征及适应性经营路径

作者信息 +

Characteristics of forest carbon sinks and management implications in the context of carbon neutrality

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

随着碳达峰、碳中和战略的推进,森林碳汇功能正在由传统生态服务上升为国家气候治理的核心支柱,然而,适应应对气候变化需求的森林适应性经营体系尚未有效构建。本研究针对森林碳汇管理中普遍存在的认知偏差与实践困境,提出碳汇的“整体性、饱和性、波动性、持续性”核心特征框架,系统揭示制约森林碳汇功能有效发挥的关键生态约束机制。其中,“整体性”阐释森林碳汇对生态系统完整性的深度依赖关系;“饱和性”表征生物与非生物碳库的物理容量极限特征;“波动性”凸显多重因子扰动下碳汇稳定性的高度敏感性风险特征;“持续性”界定碳封存时效覆盖至碳中和目标年份的关键时效边界。在此基础上,构建基于碳汇特征的适应性森林经营策略体系,涵盖生态系统完整性保护与林分结构优化、碳汇容量提升与阈值响应调控、碳汇风险防控与系统韧性增强、长效固碳与全周期经营保障等。研究指出,亟待突破碳汇特征约束下的精准调控技术,以持续提升森林碳汇在碳中和进程中的稳定性与有效贡献。

Abstract

Motivated by the strategic goals of carbon peak and carbon neutrality, the carbon sink function of forest ecosystems has been transitioned from a conventional ecological service to a cornerstone of national climate governance. However, an adaptive forest management system capable of effectively addressing climate change challenge remains under developed. To tackle widespread cognitive misconceptions and practical challenges in forest carbon sink management, this study introduces a framework defining four core characteristics of forest carbon sinks: integrity, saturation, fluctuation and persistence. This framework clarifies the key ecological mechanisms that constrain forest carbon sink functionality. Specifically, integrity reveals the profound reliance of forest carbon sinks on ecosystem integrity; saturation characterizes the physical capacity limits of both biotic and abiotic carbon pools; fluctuation highlights the high sensitivity and risks of carbon sink stability under various disturbances; and persistence defines the critical time scale for which carbon sequestration must be maintained to align with carbon neutrality targets. Based on this framework, the study constructs a comprehensive adaptive forest management strategy system. Key strategies include: (1) conserving ecosystem the integrity and optimizing stand structures; (2) enhancing carbon sink capacity and threshold-based response regulation; (3) preventing carbon sink risks and strengthening system resilience; (4) safeguarding the long-term carbon sequestration through the full-cycle management. Our findings emphasize the urgent need to develop precision regulation technologies that address these inherent carbon sink constraints. Such a technological advances are essential for enhancing the stability and effectiveness of forest carbon sinks in supporting the carbon neutrality process.

关键词

碳中和 / 森林经营 / 碳汇 / 生态系统 / 碳库

Key words

carbon neutrality / forest management / carbon sink / ecosystem / carbon pool

引用本文

导出引用
王懿祥. 碳中和背景下森林碳汇特征及适应性经营路径[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(2): 1-8 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202507025
WANG Yixiang. Characteristics of forest carbon sinks and management implications in the context of carbon neutrality[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(2): 1-8 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202507025
中图分类号: S719   

参考文献

[1]
方精云, 于贵瑞, 任小波, 等. 中国陆地生态系统固碳效应:中国科学院战略性先导科技专项“应对气候变化的碳收支认证及相关问题”之生态系统固碳任务群研究进展[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2015, 30(6):848-857,875.
FANG J Y, YU G R, REN X B, et al. Carbon sequestration in China’s terrestrial ecosystems under climate change:progress on ecosystem carbon sequestration from the CAS strategic priority research program[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015, 30(6):848-857,875. DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2015.06.019.
[2]
《第四次气候变化国家评估报告》编写委员会. 第四次气候变化国家评估报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022.
[3]
董丝雨, 庞革平. 我国森林覆盖率已超过25% 成为全球增绿最多的国家[EB/OL]. 人民日报, 2024-11-25. [2025-08-30]. https://www.peopleapp.com/column/30047474457-500005946335.
[4]
王秋凤, 刘颖慧, 何念鹏, 等. 中国区域陆地生态系统碳收支综合研究的科技需求与重要科学问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(1):78-87.
WANG Q F, LIU Y H, HE N P, et al. Demands and key scientific issues in the synthesis research on regional terrestrial ecosystem carbon budget in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(1):78-87. DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.01.011.
[5]
朴世龙, 岳超, 丁金枝, 等. 试论陆地生态系统碳汇在“碳中和”目标中的作用[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2022, 52(7):1419-1426.
PIAO S L, YUE C, DING J Z, et al. On the role of carbon sink in terrestrial ecosystem in the goal of “carbon neutrality”[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 2022, 52(7):1419-1426. DOI: 10.1360/SSTe-2022-091.
[6]
刘世荣, 王晖, 李海奎, 等. 碳中和目标下中国森林碳储量、碳汇变化预估与潜力提升途径[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(4):157-172.
LIU S R, WANG H, LI H K, et al. Projections of China’s forest carbon storage and sequestration and ways of their potential capacity enhancement[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(4):157-172. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230206.
[7]
TANSLEY A G. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms[J]. Ecology, 1935, 16(3):284-307. DOI: 10.2307/1930070.
[8]
BOND-LAMBERTY B, PECKHAM S D, AHL D E, et al. Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance[J]. Nature, 2007, 450(7166):89-92. DOI: 10.1038/nature06272.
[9]
PREGITZER K S, EUSKIRCHEN E S. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests:biome patterns related to forest age[J]. Global Change Biology, 2004, 10(12):2052-2077. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00866.x.
[10]
王锴, 朴世龙, 何悦, 等. 中国陆地生态系统碳汇稳定性的空间分布特征及驱动机制[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2023, 53(2):216-226.
WANG K, PIAO S L, HE Y, et al. Spatial variations and mechanisms for the stability of terrestrial carbon sink in China[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 2023, 53(2):216-226. DOI: 10.1360/N072021-0345.
[11]
ALLEN C D, MACALADY A K, CHENCHOUNI H, et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259(4):660-684. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001.
[12]
ODUM E P. The Strategy of Ecosystem Development:an understanding of ecological succession provides a basis for resolving man’s conflict with nature[J]. Science, 1969, 164(3877):262-270. DOI: 10.1126/science.164.3877.262.
[13]
LIKENS G E, BORMANN F H, JOHNSON N M, et al. Effects of forest cutting and herbicide treatment on nutrient budgets in the Hubbard brook watershed-ecosystem[J]. Ecological Monographs, 1970, 40(1):23-47. DOI: 10.2307/1942440.
[14]
LUYSSAERT S, SCHULZE E D, BÖRNER A, et al. Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks[J]. Nature, 2008, 455(7210):213-215. DOI: 10.1038/nature07276.
[15]
FIELD C B, BEHRENFELD M J, RANDERSON J T, et al. Primary production of the biosphere:integrating terrestrial and oceanic components[J]. Science, 1998, 281(5374):237-240. DOI: 10.1126/science.281.5374.237.
[16]
PAN Y D, BIRDSEY R A, FANG J Y, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6045):988-993. DOI: 10.1126/science.1201609.
[17]
DONATO D C, KAUFFMAN J B, MURDIYARSO D, et al. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2011, 4(5):293-297. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1123.
[18]
LIANG J J, CROWTHER T W, PICARD N, et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests[J]. Science, 2016, 354(6309):aaf8957. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf8957.
[19]
SIX J, CONANT R T, PAUL E A, et al. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter:implications for C-saturation of soils[J]. Plant and Soil, 2002, 241(2):155-176. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016125726789.
[20]
BALDOCCHI D. ‘Breathing’ of the terrestrial biosphere:lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems[J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 2008, 56(1):1-26. DOI: 10.1071/bt07151.
[21]
CIAIS P, REICHSTEIN M, VIOVY N, et al. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003[J]. Nature, 2005, 437(7058):529-533. DOI: 10.1038/nature03972.
[22]
PHILLIPS O L, ARAGAO L E O C, LEWIS S L, et al. Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest[J]. Science, 2009, 323(5919):1344-1347. DOI: 10.1126/science.1164033.
[23]
ZHENG B, CIAIS P, CHEVALLIER F, et al. Record-high CO2 emissions from boreal fires in 2021[J]. Science, 2023, 379(6635):912-917. DOI: 10.1126/science.ade0805.
[24]
MACKEY B, PRENTICE I C, STEFFEN W, et al. Untangling the confusion around land carbon science and climate change mitigation policy[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3(6):552-557. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1804.
[25]
BRIENEN R J W, PHILLIPS O L, FELDPAUSCH T R, et al. Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink[J]. Nature, 2015, 519(7543):344-348. DOI: 10.1038/nature14283.
[26]
IPCC. Global warming of 1.5 ℃: an IPCC special report[R]. Geneva,Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018.
[27]
PIAO S L, HE Y, WANG X H, et al. Estimation of China’s terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink:methods,progress and prospects[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2022, 65(4):641-651. DOI: 10.1007/s11430-021-9892-6.
[28]
BONAN G B. Forests and climate change:forcings,feedbacks,and the climate benefits of forests[J]. Science, 2008, 320(5882):1444-1449. DOI: 10.1126/science.1155121.
[29]
XU H, YUE C, ZHANG Y, et al. Forestation at the right time with the right species can generate persistent carbon benefits in China[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023, 120(41):e2304988120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2304988120.
[30]
THOMPSON I, MACKEY B, MCNULTY S, MOSSELER A. Forest Resilience, biodiversity, and climate change: a synthesis of the aiodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems[R]. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2009:1-67.
[31]
NUNERY J S, KEETON W S. Forest carbon storage in the northeastern United States:net effects of harvesting frequency,post-harvest retention,and wood products[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259(8):1363-1375. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.12.029.
[32]
刘世荣, 王晖, 栾军伟. 中国森林土壤碳储量与土壤碳过程研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19):5437-5448.
LIU S R, WANG H, LUAN J W. A review of research progress and future prospective of forest soil carbon stock and soil carbon process in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19):5437-5448. DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.2011.19.005.
[33]
孔令桥, 郑华, 欧阳志云, 等. 基于生态系统服务视角的山水林田湖草生态保护与修复:以洞庭湖流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23):8903-8910.
KONG L Q, ZHENG H, OUYANG Z Y, et al. Ecological protection and restoration of forest,wetland,grassland and cropland based on the perspective of ecosystem services:a case study in Dongting Lake Watershed[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(23):8903-8910. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201905301137.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2022YFD2200504)

责任编辑: 吴祝华
PDF(1520 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/