影响桃嫁接体差异性状形成的基因和lncRNA的鉴定与分析

冯璐莹; 张蒙蒙; 陈卓; 智照坤; 刘艺腾; 贾文庆; 张树林; 朱高浦

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202510028

冯璐莹, 张蒙蒙, 陈卓, 智照坤, 刘艺腾, 贾文庆, 张树林, 朱高浦

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 85-98.

PDF(55446 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：706523156

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(55446 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 85-98. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202510028

专题报道Ⅰ：第二十八届中国科协年会———全球气候变化下的林草智能设计育种专题Ⅱ（执行主编　曹福亮　范国强尹佟明　张怀清）

影响桃嫁接体差异性状形成的基因和lncRNA的鉴定与分析

冯璐莹 ¹ ,
张蒙蒙 ¹ ,
陈卓 ¹ ,
智照坤 ² ,
刘艺腾 ¹ ,
贾文庆 ² ,
张树林 ² ,
朱高浦 ¹^,²^,^*

作者信息 +

Identification and analysis of genes and lncRNAs influencing the formation of differential traits in peach grafted hybrids

Feng Luying ¹ ,
Zhang Mengmeng ¹ ,
Chen Zhuo ¹ ,
Zhi Zhaokun ² ,
Liu Yiteng ¹ ,
Jia Wenqing ² ,
Zhang Shulin ² ,
Zhu Gaopu ¹^,²^,^*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】鉴定影响桃嫁接体差异性状形成的差异表达基因和长链非编码RNA(long non-coding RNA, lncRNA),构建共表达的“lncRNA-mRNA”调控模块,为探索lncRNA在桃、杏嫁接体差异性状形成过程中的作用提供参考。【方法】分别采集桃(Prunus persica)/杏(P. armeniaca)嫁接体(P/A)、杏/桃嫁接体(A/P)和桃本砧嫁接体(SP)中的桃器官(叶、花蕾和完全盛开花)混样后进行RNA-Seq分析,鉴定与嫁接体差异性状相关的差异表达基因(DEGs)和lncRNAs,并进行GO和KEGG功能富集分析,利用Cytoscape构建差异“lncRNA-mRNA”对的共表达网络,并利用qRT-PCR技术对10个差异mRNAs和8个lncRNAs的表达量进行分析。【结果】①与SP相比,从A/P和P/A中分别鉴定到1 115和624个差异基因。其中,特异表达的差异基因分别为942和451个,主要富集在细胞核、质膜、膜的整体成分、叶绿体和细胞质等功能分区。②在A/P vs SP中,富集在植物病原体互作通路上的差异基因最多;而在P/A vs SP中,富集在戊糖和葡萄糖醛酸的相互转化通路上的差异基因最多。③在A/P和P/A中分别有29和26个差异表达的lncRNAs,其中在A/P和P/A特异表达的分别为21和18个。④构建24个差异表达的“lncRNA-mRNA”对,其中A/P和P/A中分别有14和10个。⑤通过基因的功能注释发现,A/P中的MSTRG.17020.2-XM_007210198.2可能参与氨酰的生物合成,MSTRG.8395.1-XM_007217967.2可能参与半乳糖代谢,P/A中的MSTRG.6365.3-XM_020556240.1/XM_020556234.1可能参与嫁接体的防御反应过程。【结论】从桃嫁接体中鉴定出与其差异性状相关的差异mRNAs和lncRNAs,并发现关键的共表达“lncRNA-mRNA”调控模块,为进一步研究lncRNAs调控嫁接体差异性状的功能作用奠定基础。

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) associated with phenotypic variation in peach grafting hybrids, and to construct ‘lncRNA-mRNA’ co-expression regulatory modules, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for understanding the role of lncRNAs in the formation of differential traits in peach-apricot grafting systems.【Method】The mixed tissue samples of peach leaves, flower buds, and fully bloomed flowers were collected from three grafting combinations: Prunus persica (peach)/P. armeniaca (apricot) grafted hybrid (P/A), apricot/peach grafted hybrid (A/P), and self-rooted peach (SP). Transcriptome sequencing was performed to identify DEGs and lncRNAs related to grafting-induced phenotypic variation. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were conducted to elucidate their biological functions. Co-expression networks of ‘lncRNA-mRNA’ pairs were constructed using Cytoscape software, and the expression levels of ten DEGs and eight lncRNAs were validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).【Result】Analysis of transcriptome sequencing data revealed that 1 115 DEGs were identified in A/P vs SP, and there are 734 upregulated and 381 downregulated genes in A/P compared to SP, respectively. In P/A vs SP, 624 DEGs were detected, with 415 upregulated and 209 downregulated genes in P/A compared to SP, respectively. Venn analysis revealed that a total of 173 common DEGs between the two comparisons, while 942 and 451 DEGs were specifically expressed in A/P and P/A, respectively. GO enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs were significantly enriched in 25 biological processes (BPs), 15 cellular components (CCs), and 10 molecular functions (MFs). In A/P vs SP, 833 DEGs were concentrated in the functional regions of nucleus, plasma membrane, integral component of membrane, chloroplast and cytoplasm, with the highest number of DEGs likely participating in nuclear regulation. A total of 401 DEGs were potentially involved in BPs, including biological process, regulation of DNA-templated transcription, DNA-templated transcription, oxidation-reduction process, and defense response. Regarding MFs, the DEGs were predominantly enriched in functional categories such as molecular function, protein binding, and D binding transcription factor activity, accounting for 52.37% of the total. Other significant MFs categories included metal ion binding, ATP binding, and sequence-specific D binding. In P/A vs SP, 537 DEGs were potentially associated with CCs, including nucleus, plasma membrane, integral component of membrane, cytoplasm, extracellular region, chloroplast, and cytosol, with the highest number of DEGs participating in nuclear regulation. For BPs, the DEGs mainly participated in biological process, regulation of DNA-templated transcription, DNA-templated transcription, defense response, and oxidation-reduction processes. In MFs, DEGs were primarily involved in molecular function, protein binding, and ATP binding, collectively representing over 50% of the functional distribution. KEGG analysis indicated that DEGs in A/P were primarily involved in plant-pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction, starch and sucrose metabolism, MAPK signaling pathway-plant, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. In contrast, DEGs in P/A were mainly enriched in pentose and glucuronate interconversions, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and starch and sucrose metabolism. A total of 29 and 26 differentially expressed lncRNAs (DElncRNAs) were identified in A/P vs SP and P/A vs SP, respectively, including 16 upregulated and 13 downregulated lncRNAs in A/P vs SP, and 17 upregulated and 9 downregulated lncRNAs in P/A vs SP. Venn analysis showed that there are 8 common DElncRNAs between the two comparisons, with 21 and 18 DElncRNAs specifically expressed in A/P and P/A, respectively. A total of 24 lncRNA-mRNA pairs were identified, including 14 lncRNA-mRNA pairs in A/P vs SP and 10 lncRNA-mRNA pairs in P/A vs SP, with 13 positive and 11 negative regulatory relationships. For example, MSTRG.18445.1 was downregulated, while its target gene XM_007207084.2 was upregulated in A/P compared to SP. MSTRG.17020.2 was downregulated in A/P compared to SP, XM_007210198.2 and XM_00721476.2 were upregulated in A/P compared to MSTRG.8395.1 and XM_007217967.2 both were upregulated in A/P compared to SP. In P/A vs SP, MSTRG.6365.3 was downregulated, while its targets XM_020556240.1 and XM_020556234.1 were upregulated. Based on functional annotation of the DEmRNAs, it was revealed that MSTRG.17020.2 might participate in aminoacyl biosynthesis by negatively regulating the expression level of XM_007210198.2 in A/P, while MSTRG.8395.1 could be involved in galactose metabolism through positive regulation of XM_007217967.2 expression. In P/A, MSTRG.6365.3 appeared to contribute to plant defense responses by negatively regulating the expression of either XM_020556240.1 or XM_020556234.1. qRT-PCR validation of randomly selected 10 DEmRNAs and 8 DElncRNAs from the co-expressed lncRNA-mRNA pairs demonstrated that both the results of RNA-Seq and the constructed lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network were reliable, which provides a solid foundation for further exploration and analysis of key genes involved in the growth and development of apricot-peach grafting hybrids. 【Conclusion】 In this study, some key differentially expressed genes and lncRNAs associated with phenotypic variation in peach grafting hybrids were identified, and key lncRNA-mRNA co-expression regulatory modules were constructed. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying grafting-induced trait formation, and lay a foundation for further research on the functional roles of lncRNAs in fruit tree grafting.

导出引用

冯璐莹, 张蒙蒙, 陈卓, 等. 影响桃嫁接体差异性状形成的基因和lncRNA的鉴定与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2026, 50(5): 85-98 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202510028

Feng Luying, Zhang Mengmeng, Chen Zhuo, et al. Identification and analysis of genes and lncRNAs influencing the formation of differential traits in peach grafted hybrids[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition）. 2026, 50(5): 85-98 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202510028

中图分类号： S662:Q78

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]

张新, 刘用生, 王清连, 等. 中国嫁接技艺起源的考辨与勘误[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 19(1):65-71.

Zhang

, Liu

Y S

, Wang

Q L

, et al. Textual research and correction on the origin of grafting techniques in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Sciences), 2020, 19(1):65-71. DOI:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019125.

本文引用 [2]

[2]	Turnbull C, Carrington S. A hard graft problem solved for key global food crops[J]. Nature, 2022, 602(7896):214-215. DOI:10.1038/d41586-022-00050-5. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	Stegemann S, Bock R. Exchange of genetic material between cells in plant tissue grafts[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5927):649-651. DOI:10.1126/science.1170397. 本文引用 [2]

[4]	Liu F Q, Marquardt S, Lister C, et al. Targeted 3' processing of antisense transcripts triggers Arabidopsis FLC chromatin silencing[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5961):94-97. DOI:10.1126/science.1180278. 本文引用 [3]

[5]	Zhao H, Diao S F, Liu P F, et al. The communication of endogenous biomolecules (RNA,DNA,protein,hormone) via graft union might play key roles in the new traits formation of graft hybrids[J]. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2018, 50(2):717-726. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	Wang T, Xiong B, Tan L P, et al. Effects of interstocks on growth and photosynthetic characteristics in ‘Yuanxiaochun’ Citrus seedlings[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2020, 47(11):977-987. DOI:10.1071/FP20079. 本文引用 [1]

[7]	Dong Y H, Ye X L, Xiong A S, et al. The regulatory role of gibberellin related genes DKGA2ox1 and MIR171f_3 in persimmon dwarfism[J]. Plant Science, 2021, 310:110958. DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110958. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	Cober E R, Curtis D F. Both promoters and inhibitors affected flowering time in grafted soybean flowering-time isolines[J]. Crop Science, 2003, 43(3):886-891. DOI:10.2135/cropsci2003.8860. 本文引用 [2]

[9]	Li W J, Chen X Y, Zhao S, et al. Effect of grafting on the growth and flowering of sprays chrysanthemums[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 291:110607. DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110607. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	Musa I, Rafii M Y, Ahmad K, et al. Effects of grafting on morphophysiological and yield characteristic of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) grafted onto wild relative rootstocks[J]. Plants, 2020, 9(11):1583. DOI:10.3390/plants9111583. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	Qiao J Y, Jiang H Z, Lin Y Q, et al. A novel miR167a-OsARF6-OsAUX3 module regulates grain length and weight in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2021, 14(10):1683-1698. DOI:10.1016/j.molp.2021.06.023. 本文引用 [1]

[12]	Riga P, Benedicto L, García-Flores L, et al. Rootstock effect on serotonin and nutritional quality of tomatoes produced under low temperature and light conditions[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2016, 46:50-59. DOI:10.1016/j.jfca.2015.11.003. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	Khadivi-Khub A, Anjam K. Prunus scoparia,a suitable rootstock for almond (Prunus dulcis) under drought condition based on vegetative and fruit characteristics[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2016, 210:220-226. DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.07.028. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	He L, Wang H T, Zhao Q, et al. Tomato grafting onto Torubamu (Solanum melongena):mir166a and miR395b reduce scion Cd accumulation by regulating sulfur transport[J]. Plant and Soil, 2020, 452(1):267-279. DOI:10.1007/s11104-020-04564-7. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	Colla G, Cardona Suárez C M, Cardarelli M, et al. Improving nitrogen use efficiency in melon by grafting[J]. HortScience, 2010, 45(4):559-565. DOI:10.21273/hortsci.45.4.559. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	Ulas A. Crossbreeding rootstocks improve nitrogen efficiency of grafted watermelon by inducing leaf physiological and root morphological responses[J]. Horticulturae, 2022, 8(10):879. DOI:10.3390/horticulturae8100879. 本文引用 [1]

[17]	Kawaguchi K, Nakaune M, Ma J F, et al. Plant hormone and inorganic ion concentrations in the xylem exudate of grafted plants depend on the scion-rootstock combination[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(19):2594. DOI:10.3390/plants11192594. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	Zhu R J, Yuan Q, Du G H, et al. Morpho-physiological traits,antioxidant capacity and nutrient accumulation in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) under varying levels of nitrogen nutrition[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2022, 45(6):854-865. DOI:10.1080/01904167.2021.1994596. 本文引用 [1]

[19]

韩敏, 曹逼力, 刘树森, 等. 低温胁迫下番茄嫁接苗根穗互作对叶片光合作用及氮代谢的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(5):897-907.

Han

, Cao

B L

, Liu

S S

, et al. Effects of rootstock and scion interaction on photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism of grafted tomato seedlings leaves under low temperature stress[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2018, 45(5):897-907. DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2017-0600.

本文引用 [1]

[20]	Shen Y Y, Zhuang W B, Tu X T, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of interstock-induced dwarfism in sweet persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb.)[J]. Horticulture Research, 2019, 6:51. DOI:10.1038/s41438-019-0133-7. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	Askari-Khorasgani O, Jafarpour M, Hadad M M, et al. Fruit yield and quality characteristics of “Shahmiveh” pear cultivar grafted on six rootstocks[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2019, 42(4):323-332. DOI:10.1080/01904167.2018.1555592. 本文引用 [1]

[22]	Kundariya H, Yang X D, Morton K, et al. MSH1-induced heritable enhanced growth vigor through grafting is associated with the RdDM pathway in plants[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11:5343. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-19140-x. 本文引用 [1]

[23]	Tedesco S, Fevereiro P, Kragler F, et al. Plant grafting and graft incompatibility:a review from the grapevine perspective[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 299:111019. DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111019. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	Huang Y, Kong Q S, Chen F, et al. The history,current status and future prospects of vegetable grafting in China[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2015(1086):31-39. DOI:10.17660/actahortic.2015.1086.2. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	Rasool A, Mansoor S, Bhat K M, et al. Mechanisms underlying graft union formation and rootstock scion interaction in horticultural plants[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11:590847. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2020.590847. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	Taller J, Yagishita N, Hirata Y. Graft-induced variants as a source of novel characteristics in the breeding of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)[J]. Euphytica, 1999, 108(2):73-78. DOI:10.1023/A:1003681913996. 本文引用 [1]

[27]	Vahdati K, Sarikhani S, Arab M M, et al. Advances in rootstock breeding of nut trees:objectives and strategies[J]. Plants, 2021, 10(11):2234. DOI:10.3390/plants10112234. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	Yang Z C, Zhao L X, Sang Y Q, et al. Aggregation-induced emission luminogens:a new possibility for efficient visualization of RNA in plants[J]. Plants, 2024, 13(5):743. DOI:10.3390/plants13050743. 本文引用 [2]

[29]	Ham B K, Brandom J L, Xoconostle-Cázares B, et al. A polypyrimidine tract binding protein,pumpkin RBP50,forms the basis of a phloem-mobile ribonucleoprotein complex[J]. The Plant Cell, 2009, 21(1):197-215. DOI:10.1105/tpc.108.061317. 本文引用 [1]

[30]	Hou S A, Zhu Y L, Wu X F, et al. Scion-to-rootstock mobile transcription factor CmHY5 positively modulates the nitrate uptake capacity of melon scion grafted on squash rootstock[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 24(1):162. DOI:10.3390/ijms24010162. 本文引用 [1]

[31]	Luo K R, Huang N C, Chang Y H, et al. Arabidopsis cyclophilins direct intracellular transport of mobile mRNA via organelle hitchhiking[J]. Nature Plants, 2024, 10(1):161-171. DOI:10.1038/s41477-023-01597-5. 本文引用 [1]

[32]	Jeynes-Cupper K, Catoni M. Long distance signalling and epigenetic changes in crop grafting[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14:1121704. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1121704. 本文引用 [1]

[33]	Yang H W, Yu T S. Arabidopsis floral regulators FVE and AGL24 are phloem-mobile RNAs[J]. Botanical Studies, 2010, 51(1):17-26. 本文引用 [1]

[34]	Pant B D, Musialak-Lange M, Nuc P, et al. Identification of nutrient-responsive Arabidopsis and rapeseed microRNAs by comprehensive real-time polymerase chain reaction profiling and small RNA sequencing[J]. Plant Physiology, 2009, 150(3):1541-1555. DOI:10.1104/pp.109.139139. 本文引用 [1]

[35]	Lin S I, Chiang S F, Lin W Y, et al. Regulatory network of microRNA399 and PHO₂ by systemic signaling[J]. Plant Physiology, 2008, 147(2):732-746. DOI:10.1104/pp.108.116269. 本文引用 [1]

[36]	Pant B D, Buhtz A, Kehr J, et al. MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis[J]. The Plant Journal, 2008, 53(5):731-738. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03363.x. 本文引用 [1]

[37]	Haroldsen V M, Szczerba M W, Aktas H, et al. Mobility of transgenic nucleic acids and proteins within grafted rootstocks for agricultural improvement[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2012, 3:39. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2012.00039. 本文引用 [1]

[38]	Khaldun A B, Huang W J, Lv H Y, et al. Comparative profiling of miRNAs and target gene identification in distant-grafting between tomato and Lycium (Goji berry)[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7:1475. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2016.01475. 本文引用 [1]

[39]	Kodama H, Miyahara T, Oguchi T, et al. Effect of transgenic rootstock grafting on the omics profiles in tomato[J]. Food Safety, 2021, 9(2):32-47. DOI:10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.D-20-00032. 本文引用 [1]

[40]	Rubio B, Stammitti L, Cookson S J, et al. Small RNA populations reflect the complex dialogue established between heterograft partners in grapevine[J]. Horticulture Research, 2022,9:uhab067. DOI:10.1093/hr/uhab067. 本文引用 [1]

[41]	Tamiru M, Hardcastle T J, Lewsey M G. Regulation of genome-wide DNA methylation by mobile small RNAs[J]. New Phytologist, 2018, 217(2):540-546. DOI:10.1111/nph.14874. 本文引用 [1]

[42]	Tsaballa A, Xanthopoulou A, Madesis P, et al. Vegetable grafting from a molecular point of view:the involvement of epigenetics in rootstock-scion interactions[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11:621999. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2020.621999. 本文引用 [1]

[43]	Liu J, Wang H, Chua N H. Long noncoding RNA transcriptome of plants[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2015, 13(3):319-328. DOI:10.1111/pbi.12336. 本文引用 [2]

[44]	Rinn J L, Chang H Y. Long noncoding RNAs:molecular modalities to organismal functions[J]. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 2020, 89:283-308. DOI:10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012708. 本文引用 [2]

[45]	Wen Z, Hong Y, Qiu Z L, et al. Identification of miRNAs mediating shoot growth of grafted sweet cherry through small RNA and degradome sequencing[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 291:110557. DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110557. 本文引用 [2]

[46]	Shuai P, Liang D, Tang S, et al. Genome-wide identification and functional prediction of novel and drought-responsive lincRNAs in Populus trichocarpa[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65(17):4975-4983. DOI:10.1093/jxb/eru256. 本文引用 [2]

[47]	Deng F N, Zhang X P, Wang W, et al. Identification of Gossypium hirsutum long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) under salt stress[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2018, 18(1):23. DOI:10.1186/s12870-018-1238-0. 本文引用 [2]

[48]	Zhang X P, Dong J, Deng F N, et al. The long non-coding RNA lncRNA973 is involved in cotton response to salt stress[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19(1):459. DOI:10.1186/s12870-019-2088-0. 本文引用 [2]

[49]	Sun Y Q, Hao P B, Lv X M, et al. A long non-coding apple RNA,MSTRG.85814.11,acts as a transcriptional enhancer of SAUR32 and contributes to the Fe-deficiency response[J]. The Plant Journal, 2020, 103(1):53-67. DOI:10.1111/tpj.14706. 本文引用 [1]

[50]	Zhang S L, Feng L Y, Jia W Q, et al. Identification of miRNA-mRNA pairs involved in the development of grafted peach hybrids by integrating sRNAome and transcriptome[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2023, 321:112302. DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112302. 本文引用 [3]

[51]	Liu J, Jung C, Xu J, et al. Genome-wide analysis uncovers regulation of long intergenic noncoding RNAs in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2012, 24(11):4333-4345. DOI:10.1105/tpc.112.102855. 本文引用 [1]

[52]	Heo J B, Sung S. Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA[J]. Science, 2011, 331(6013):76-79. DOI:10.1126/science.1197349. 本文引用 [1]

[53]	Kim D H, Sung S. Vernalization-triggered intragenic chromatin loop formation by long noncoding RNAs[J]. Developmental Cell, 2017, 40(3):302-312.e4. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2016.12.021. 本文引用 [1]

[54]	Li R, Fu D Q, Zhu B Z, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of lncRNA1459 alters tomato fruit ripening[J]. The Plant Journal, 2018, 94(3):513-524. DOI:10.1111/tpj.13872. 本文引用 [1]

[55]	Cui J, Jiang N, Hou X X, et al. Genome-wide identification of lncRNAs and analysis of CeRNA networks during tomato resistance to Phytophthora infestans[J]. Phytopathology, 2020, 110(2):456-464. DOI:10.1094/PHYTO-04-19-0137-R. 本文引用 [2]

[56]	Tang Y J, Qu Z P, Lei J J, et al. The long noncoding RNA FRILAIR regulates strawberry fruit ripening by functioning as a noncanonical target mimic[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2021, 17(3):e1009461. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009461. 本文引用 [1]

[57]

C B

, Li

J L

, Wang

H L

, et al. Whole-transcriptome sequencing reveals a CeRNA regulatory network associated with the process of periodic albinism under low temperature in baiye No.1 (Camellia sinensis)[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(8):7162. DOI:10.3390/ijms24087162.

本文引用 [1]

[58]	Gao C, Sun J L, Dong Y M, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis uncovers regulatory roles of long non-coding RNAs involved in resistance to powdery mildew in melon[J]. BMC Genomics, 2020, 21(1):125. DOI:10.1186/s12864-020-6546-8. 本文引用 [1]

[59]	Jiang N, Cui J, Hou X X, et al. Sl-lncRNA15492 interacts with Sl-miR482a and affects Solanum lycopersicum immunity against Phytophthora infestans[J]. The Plant Journal, 2020, 103(4):1561-1574. DOI:10.1111/tpj.14847. 本文引用 [1]

[60]	Smith M A, Mattick J S. Structural and functional annotation of long noncoding RNAs[M]//Bioinformatics:Volume II:Structure,Function,and Applications. NY: Springer, 2017:65-85. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-6613-4_4. 本文引用 [1]

[61]	Jamet E, Dunand C. Plant cell wall proteins and development[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 21(8):2731. DOI:10.3390/ijms21082731. 本文引用 [1]

[62]	Cosgrove D J. Structure and growth of plant cell walls[J]. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2024, 25(5):340-358. DOI:10.1038/s41580-023-00691-y. 本文引用 [1]

[63]	Liang Y Q, Li X S, Lei F Y, et al. Transcriptome profiles reveals ScDREB10 from Syntrichia caninervis regulated phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and starch/sucrose metabolism to enhance plant stress tolerance[J]. Plants, 2024, 13(2):205. DOI:10.3390/plants13020205. 本文引用 [1]

[64]	Chen L F, Meng Y, Bai Y, et al. Starch and sucrose metabolism and plant hormone signaling pathways play crucial roles in Aquilegia salt stress adaption[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(4):3948. DOI:10.3390/ijms24043948. 本文引用 [1]

[65]	Zhang C, Chen L, Hou S W. The emerging roles of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in plant development and stress responses[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2024, 295:154189. DOI:10.1016/j.jplph.2024.154189. 本文引用 [1]

[66]	Jiménez A, Sevilla F, Martí M C. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and circadian rhythms in plants[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 72(16):5825-5840. DOI:10.1093/jxb/erab318. 本文引用 [1]

[67]	Zhou X S, He J N, Velanis C N, et al. A domesticated Harbinger transposase forms a complex with HDA6 and promotes histone H3 deacetylation at genes but not TEs in Arabidopsis[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2021, 63(8):1462-1474. DOI:10.1111/jipb.13108. 本文引用 [1]

[68]	Huh S U. New function of Hypoxia-responsive unknown protein in enhanced resistance to biotic stress[J]. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2021, 16(3):1868131. DOI:10.1080/15592324.2020.1868131. 本文引用 [1]