不同抚育强度下人工林水源涵养特征及功能树种筛选

王珂晗; 卞正平; 杨安娜; 李东宾; 李修鹏; 余敏芬; 许洺山; 杨晓东

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202602014

王珂晗, 卞正平, 杨安娜, 李东宾, 李修鹏, 余敏芬, 许洺山, 杨晓东

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 119-130.

PDF(2073 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：706523156

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(2073 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5) : 119-130. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202602014

专题报道Ⅱ：森林生态系统水分调控与水土保持功能（执行主编　张金池　姜姜）

不同抚育强度下人工林水源涵养特征及功能树种筛选

王珂晗 ¹ ,
卞正平 ² ,
杨安娜 ² ,
李东宾 ² ,
李修鹏 ² ,
余敏芬 ² ,
许洺山 ¹^,³^,⁴ ,
杨晓东 ¹^,³^,⁴^,^*

作者信息 +

Impacts of varied tending intensities on water conservation capacity of plantations and screening of functional species

Wang Kehan ¹ ,
Bian Zhengping ² ,
Yang Anna ² ,
Li Dongbin ² ,
Li Xiupeng ² ,
Yu Minfen ² ,
Xu Mingshan ¹^,³^,⁴ ,
Yang Xiaodong ¹^,³^,⁴^,^*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】探究不同抚育强度对森林土壤持水能力的影响,为森林水源涵养功能提升和抚育经营优化提供科学依据。【方法】以宁波四明山典型人工林为研究对象,对未抚育、轻度、中度和重度抚育4种样地测定土壤持水指标与植物功能性状,通过单因素方差分析、主成分分析(PCA)和线性混合效应模型(LMM)分析抚育强度对土壤持水能力及群落功能性状组合的影响及其调控机制,并筛选水源涵养优势树种。【结果】①土壤最大、最小及毛管持水量均在轻度抚育下达到最高,分别为332.06、232.73和273.18 t/hm²,随抚育强度增加显著下降(P <0.05);非毛管持水量则随抚育强度增加而升高,重度抚育下最高(106.82 t/hm²);②抚育强度对基径、树高、树冠面积和单叶面积等生长结构性状影响显著(P <0.05),而对比叶面积、叶片干物质含量等资源利用性状的影响不显著;③林分生长结构性状与资源利用性状对综合持水能力均有正向效应,且轻度抚育样地最高;④物种间水源涵养潜力差异明显,日本扁柏(Chamaecyparis obtusa)标准化水源涵养能力得分最高(1.00),黄山松(Pinus hwangshanensis)(0.79)和橉木(Prunus buergeriana)(0.67)次之。【结论】抚育强度通过调控群落功能性状组合影响森林土壤持水能力,轻度抚育下土壤持水能力最优,表明适度抚育是提升人工林水源涵养功能的有效经营措施;日本扁柏、黄山松和橉木具有较高水源涵养潜力,可作为水源涵养型人工林营建的优选树种。

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to investigate the effects of different tending intensities on forest soil water-holding capacity, so as to provide a scientific basis for enhancing water conservation functions and optimizing tending management.【Method】Typical plantation forests in the Siming Mountain area of Ningbo were selected. Soil water-holding capacity indicators and plant functional traits were measured in four tending treatments: unmanaged, light tending, moderate tending, and heavy tending. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA), and linear mixed-effects models (LMM) were employed to evaluate the effects of tending intensity on soil water-holding capacity, community functional trait composition, and the underlying regulatory mechanisms, and to identify species with high water conservation potential.【Result】(1) Maximum water-holding capacity, minimum water-holding capacity, and capillary water-holding capacity all attained their highest values under light tending, reaching 332.06, 232.73, and 273.18 t/hm², respectively, and declined significantly with increasing tending intensity (P < 0.05). In contrast, non-capillary water-holding capacity increased with tending intensity and reached its maximum under heavy tending (106.82 t/hm²). (2) Tending intensity significantly affected growth-structural traits, including basal diameter, tree height, crown area, and individual leaf area (P < 0.05), whereas resource-use traits such as specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content did not differ significantly among treatments. (3) Both growth-structural traits and resource-use traits exerted positive effects on the integrated soil water-holding capacity, with the strongest positive effect observed under light tending. (4) Water conservation potential varied considerably among species. Chamaecyparis obtusa exhibited the highest standardized water conservation score (1.00), followed by Pinus hwangshanensis (0.79) and Prunus buergeriana (0.67).【Conclusion】Tending intensity influences forest soil water-holding capacity by regulating community functional trait combinations. Soil water-holding capacity was optimal under light tending, indicating that appropriate tending is an effective management strategy for improving the water conservation function of plantation forests. Chamaecyparis obtusa, Pinus hwangshanensis, and Prunus buergeriana possess high water conservation potential and can be recommended as preferred species for the establishment of water-conservation-oriented plantations.

导出引用

王珂晗, 卞正平, 杨安娜, 等. 不同抚育强度下人工林水源涵养特征及功能树种筛选[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2026, 50(5): 119-130 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202602014

Wang Kehan, Bian Zhengping, Yang Anna, et al. Impacts of varied tending intensities on water conservation capacity of plantations and screening of functional species[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition）. 2026, 50(5): 119-130 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202602014

中图分类号： S718.5

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]

刘世荣, 代力民, 温远光, 等. 面向生态系统服务的森林生态系统经营:现状、挑战与展望[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(1):1-9.

Liu

S R

, Dai

L M

, Wen

Y G

, et al. A review on forest ecosystem management towards ecosystem services:status,challenges,and future perspectives[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(1):1-9. DOI:10.5846/-stxb201411142252.

本文引用 [1]

[2]	郑学良, 陈丽华, 李洪洋, 等. 基于水源涵养功能的辽东防护林体系健康评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(2):102-110. Zheng X L, Chen L H, Li H Y, et al. Health assessment of Liaodong shelterbelt system based on water conservation[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 18(2):102-110. DOI:10.16843/j.sswc.2020.02.013. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	Liu Y X, Shi W J, Tao F L, et al. A global synthesis of multi-factors affecting water storage capacity in forest canopy,litter and soil layers[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2023, 50(3):e2022GL099888. DOI:10.1029/2022GL099888. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	王作枭, 贺康宁. 祁连山东部地区不同林分水源涵养能力综合评估[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(17):7662-7672. Wang Z X, He K N. Comprehensive assessment of water conservation capacity in different forest stands in the eastern Qilian Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(17):7662-7672. DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202312192763. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	Zhang W J, Zhu X A, Xiong X, et al. Changes in soil infiltration and water flow paths:insights from subtropical forest succession sequence[J]. CATENA, 2023, 221:106748. DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2022.106748. 本文引用 [1]

[6]

卢德浩, 冯铭淳, 邱展鹏, 等. 间伐保留密度对杉木人工林凋落物与土壤持水特性的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2025, 45(3):141-149.

D H

, Feng

M C

, Qiu

Z P

, et al. Effects of thinning retention density on litter and soil water retention characteristics of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 2025, 45(3):141-149.

本文引用 [1]

[7]

程唱, 蔡有柱, 赵丽娟, 等. 祁连山林区基于水源涵养能力的人工林近自然度评价体系建立[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(7):2971-2980.

Cheng

, Cai

Y Z

, Zhao

L J

, et al. Establishing near-naturalness evaluation system of artificial forest based on water conservation ability in the outer edge of Qilian Mountains in Qinghai Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(7):2971-2980. DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202305151022.

本文引用 [1]

[8]	白星雯. 森林抚育对森林综合成效影响分析研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022(6):117-123. Bai X W. Analysis and study on the effects of forest tending on comprehensive forest performance[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2022(6):117-123. DOI:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.06.018. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	朱玉杰, 董希斌. 大兴安岭地区落叶松用材林不同抚育间伐强度经营效果评价[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(12):29-38. Zhu Y J, Dong X B. Evaluation of the effects of different thinning intensities on larch forest in great Xing’an Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(12):29-38. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161204. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	李春义, 马履一, 徐昕. 抚育间伐对森林生物多样性影响研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2006, 19(6):27-32. Li C Y, Ma L, Xu X. Reviews on research progress of effect of tending on forest biodiversity[J]. World Forestry Research, 2006, 19(6):27-32. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-4900.2023.01.015. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	李春明, 杜纪山, 张会儒. 抚育间伐对森林生长的影响及其模型研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2003, 16(5):636-641. Li C M, Du J S, Zhang H R. The effects of thinning on forest growth and model study[J]. Forest Research, 2003, 16(5):636-641. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2003.05.018. 本文引用 [1]

[12]

陈百灵, 朱玉杰, 董希斌, 等. 抚育强度对大兴安岭落叶松林枯落物持水能力及水质的影响1)[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43(8):46-49,70.

Chen

B L

, Zhu

Y J

, Dong

X B

, et al. Water conservation under different fostering intensity in timber forest of Daxing’an Mountains[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2015, 43(8):46-49,70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2015.08.011.

本文引用 [1]

[13]

姬文慧, 牟长城, 崔雅如, 等. 透光抚育强度对长白山“栽针保阔”林分凋落物截留和土壤蓄水动态的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2025, 47(7):61-72.

W H

, Mu

C C

, Cui

Y R

, et al. Effects of release cutting intensity on dynamics of litter interception and soil water storage in“planting conifer and preserving broadleaved tree”stand in Changbai Mountain,northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2025, 47(7):61-72.

本文引用 [1]

[14]	Diaz S, Cabido M. Vive la différence:plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2001, 16(11):646-655. DOI:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2. 本文引用 [1]

[15]

周荣磊, 温仲明, 刘洋洋, 等. 延河流域不同植被带植物功能性状变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(14):6045-6057.

Zhou

R L

, Wen

Z M

, Liu

Y Y

, et al. Responses of plant functional traits to environmental variables across different vegetation zones in the Yanhe River basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(14):6045-6057. DOI:10.5846/stxb202207111972.

本文引用 [1]

[16]

许洺山, 黄海侠, 史青茹, 等. 浙东常绿阔叶林植物功能性状对土壤含水量变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(9):857-866.

M S

, Huang

H X

, Shi

Q R

, et al. Responses of soil water content to change in plant functional traits in evergreen broadleaved forests in eastern Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(9):857-866. DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0082.

本文引用 [1]

[17]

赵恩辉, 吴磊, 赵生华. 黄河三角洲不同植被类型土壤水源涵养功能综合评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(6):255-263.

Zhao

E H

, Wu

, Zhao

S H

. Comprehensive evaluation of soil water conservation function of different vegetation types in the Yellow River delta[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(6):255-263. DOI:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.06.033.

本文引用 [1]

[18]	周笛轩, 林永标, 汪雁佳, 等. 南亚热带不同人工林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(5):907-919. Zhou D X, Lin Y B, Wang Y J, et al. Assessment of main ecosystem services in subtropical plantations[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(5):907-919. 本文引用 [1]

[19]

林晓瑜, 万晓华, 贾辉, 等. 亚热带21个树种人工林功能性状与凋落物养分归还特征的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6):1455-1462.

Lin

X Y

, Wan

X H

, Jia

, et al. Relationships between functional traits and litterfall nutrient return characteristics across 21 tree species in subtropical plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(6):1455-1462. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202406.006.

本文引用 [1]

[20]

赖承义, 左舒翟, 郑小曼, 等. 基于生态系统健康指数的宁波四明山区域森林服务功能价值评估[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(10):111-121.

Lai

C Y

, Zuo

S Z

, Zheng

X M

, et al. Evaluation of forest service function at the Siming mountain area in Ningbo based on ecosystem health index[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2021, 41(10):111-121. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2021.10.013.

本文引用 [1]

[21]	明安刚, 张治军, 谌红辉, 等. 抚育间伐对马尾松人工林生物量与碳贮量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(10):1-6. Ming A G, Zhang Z J, Chen H H, et al. Effects of thinning on the biomass and carbon storage in Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(10):1-6. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20131001. 本文引用 [1]

[22]

王祖华, 李瑞霞, 王晓杰, 等. 间伐对杉木人工林林下植被多样性及生物量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(12):2778-2782.

Wang

Z H

, Li

R X

, Wang

X J

, et al. Effects of thinning on biomass and species diversity of understory in Chinese fir plantations[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2010, 19(12):2778-2782. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2010.12.002.

本文引用 [1]

[23]	李瑞霞, 闵建刚, 彭婷婷, 等. 间伐对马尾松人工林植被物种多样性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(3):61-68. Li R X, Min J G, Peng T T, et al. Effects of thinning on understory species diversities of Pinus massoniana forests[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 41(3):61-68. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, et al. Corrigendum to:new handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide[J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 2016, 64(8):715-716. DOI:10.1071/bt12225_co. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	王政权, 王庆成. 森林土壤物理性质的空间异质性研究[J]. 生态学报, 2000, 20(6):945-950. Wang Z Q, Wang Q C. The spatial heterogeneity of soil physical properties in forests[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20(6):945-950. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2000.06.007. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	农海勤, 陆明路, 易弘韬, 等. 亚热带人工林凋落物和土壤层水源涵养功能[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(17):8599-8613. Nong H Q, Lu M L, Yi H T, et al. Water conservation function of litter and soil layer in subtropical artificial forests[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2025, 45(17):8599-8613. DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202404100779. 本文引用 [1]

[27]	Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, et al. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession[J]. Ecology, 2004, 85(9):2630-2637. DOI:10.1890/03-0799. 本文引用 [1]

[28]

王有良, 宋重升, 彭丽鸿, 等. 间伐对杉木人工林土壤碳氮及其组分特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(5):204-212.

Wang

Y L

, Song

C S

, Peng

L H

, et al. Effects of thinning on soil carbon and nitrogen fractions in a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(5):204-212. DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.028.

本文引用 [1]

[29]

焦泽南, 王瑞辉, 刘凯利, 等. 抚育间伐对杉木人工林地被层的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2025, 45(5):113-122.

Jiao

Z N

, Wang

R H

, Liu

K L

, et al. Effect of thinning on ground cover of Chinese fir plantation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2025, 45(5):113-122. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2025.05.011.

本文引用 [1]

[30]

简永旗, 吴家森, 盛卫星, 等. 间伐和林分类型对森林凋落物储量和土壤持水性能的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(2):320-328.

Jian

Y Q

, Wu

J S

, Sheng

W X

, et al. Effects of thinning and stand types on litter stock and soil water-holding capacity[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(2):320-328. DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200355.

本文引用 [1]

[31]

王亚飞, 祝维, 曲冠博, 等. 间伐对毛白杨水碳生理及土壤水碳分布特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 50(3):112-120.

Wang

Y F

, Zhu

, Qu

G B

, et al. Responses of water-carbon physiology and soil water-carbon distribution characteristics to thinning in Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2026, 50(3):112-120. DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202409009.

本文引用 [1]

[32]

王亚萍, 刘庆安, 庞军柱, 等. 秦岭南坡不同林分类型枯落物层和土壤层水文功能综合评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2024, 39(3):50-58.

Wang

Y P

, Liu

Q A

, Pang

J Z

, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of hydrological function of litter and soil layers in different stand types in the south slope of the Qinling Mountains[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2024, 39(3):50-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2024.03.07.

本文引用 [1]

[33]

管惠文, 董希斌, 张甜, 等. 间伐强度对大兴安岭落叶松天然次生林水文性能的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(6):68-76.

Guan

H W

, Dong

X B

, Zhang

, et al. Effects of thinning on hydrological properties of the natural secondary Larix gmelinii forest in the Daxing’an Mountains[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 42(6):68-76. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201712004.

本文引用 [1]

[34]

张期奇, 董希斌, 张甜, 等. 抚育间伐强度对兴安落叶松林不同演替阶段水源涵养的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(10):55-63.

Zhang

Q Q

, Dong

X B

, Zhang

, et al. Effects of tending thinning intensity on water conservation in different succession stages of Larix gmelinii forest[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2019, 47(10):55-63. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2019.10.012.

本文引用 [1]

[35]

祁金虎, 杨会侠, 丁国泉, 等. 抚育间伐对辽东山区人工红松林土壤物理性质及持水特性的影响1)[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(5):48-51.

J H

, Yang

H X

, Ding

G Q

, et al. Effect of thinning on soil physicla pro perties and water-holding capacity of Pinus okraeinsis plantation in Liaodong Mountain arae[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2016, 44(5):48-51. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2016.05.011.

本文引用 [1]

[36]

李丹阳, 吕宝磊, 姜雨, 等. 抚育间伐对塞罕坝自然保护区人工林植被生态位特征和种间关联性的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2025, 39(1):139-149.

D Y

, Lü

B L

, Jiang

, et al. Effects of tending thinning on niche characteristics and interspecific association of plantations in Saihanba Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2025, 39(1):139-149. DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2025.013.

本文引用 [1]

[37]

郭文俊, 李鑫豪, 田赟, 等. 北京东北部山区不同生活型木本植物叶功能性状特征及其权衡关系[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9):70-80.

Guo

W J

, Li

X H

, Tian

, et al. Characteristics and trade-offs of leaf functional traits of woody plants with different life forms in mountainous areas of northeastern Beijing[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(9):70-80. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240342.

本文引用 [1]

[38]	李善家, 李来周, 缪潆祥, 等. 河西走廊荒漠植物优势种叶片功能性状变异及权衡[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(3):480-488. Li S J, Li L Z, Miao Y X, et al. Variation and trade-offs in leaf functional traits of dominant desert plant species in Hexi Corridor[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2025, 42(3):480-488. DOI:10.13866/j.azr.2025.03.08. 本文引用 [1]

[39]

熊玲, 龙翠玲, 梁盛, 等. 喀斯特森林木本植物叶片功能性状对土壤特性的响应[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2024, 32(3):310-318.

Xiong

, Long

C L

, Liang

, et al. Response of leaf functional traits of woody plants to soil characteristics in Karst forests[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2024, 32(3):310-318. DOI:10.11926/jtsb.4765.

本文引用 [1]

[40]

吴陶红, 龙翠玲, 熊玲, 等. 茂兰喀斯特森林不同演替阶段植物叶片功能性状与土壤因子的关系[J]. 广西植物, 2023, 43(3):463-472.

T H

, Long

C L

, Xiong

, et al. Relationship between plant leaf functional traits and soil factors at different succession stages in Karst forest of Maolan[J]. Guihaia, 2023, 43(3):463-472. DOI:10.11931/guihaia.gxzw202202003.

本文引用 [1]

[41]	王德彩, 郭丹丹, 吴桂藏, 等. 杨树人工林表层土壤水分及养分特征对森林抚育的响应[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2017, 51(2):163-169. Wang D C, Guo D D, Wu G Z, et al. Effects of forest tending on soil surface water and nutrients of Populus plantation forest[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2017, 51(2):163-169. 本文引用 [1]

[42]

刘子琪, 姚良锦, 焦洁洁, 等. 亚热带次生常绿阔叶林植物功能性状及多样性对人工抚育的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(11):4733-4743.

Liu

Z Q

, Yao

L J

, Jiao

J J

, et al. Response of functional traits and functional diversity of woody plants to tending in a secondary subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(11):4733-4743. DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202307251589.

本文引用 [1]

[43]

杨志坚, 魏静, 张俊鹏, 等. 红壤侵蚀区马尾松恢复林分发育对持水能力的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(23):11793-11809.

Yang

Z J

, Wei

, Zhang

J P

, et al. Influence of development on water-holding capacity of Pinus massoniana restoration stand in red soil erosion area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2025, 45(23):11793-11809. DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202501240184.

本文引用 [1]

[44]

Laughlin

D C

, Chalmandrier

, Joshi

, et al. Generating species assemblages for restoration and experimentation:a new method that can simultaneously converge on average trait values and maximize functional diversity[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 9(7):1764-1771. DOI:10.1111/2041-210x.13023.

本文引用 [1]

[45]

许洺山, 曾剑, 阎恩荣. 基于植物功能性状的海岛研究:以舟山群岛中街山列岛为例[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(7):3316-3329.

M S

, Zeng

, Yan

E R

. Plant functional trait-based island vegetation restoration:a case study of Zhongjieshan Islands in Zhoushan Archipelago[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2025, 45(7):3316-3329. DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202403090479.

本文引用 [1]