甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物及土壤层的蓄水功能

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.02.014

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (02): 78-84.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.02.014

甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物及土壤层的蓄水功能

魏强,张广忠,凌雷,柴春山

甘肃省林业科学研究院,甘肃兰州 730020

出版日期:2013-04-18 发布日期:2013-04-18
基金资助:
收稿日期:2012-02-07 修回日期:2012-07-16
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31160180)
第一作者:魏强,副研究员, 硕士。E-mail: 1974weiqiang@163.com。
引文格式:魏强,张广忠,凌雷,等. 甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物及土壤层的蓄水功能[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,37(2):78-84.

Water conservation function of litter and soil layer under main forest types in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu

WEI Qiang,ZHANG Guangzhong,LING Lei,CHAI Chunshan

Gansu Provincial Academy of Forestry Sciences,Lanzhou 730020,China

Online:2013-04-18 Published:2013-04-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以甘肃兴隆山青杄林、青杄-白桦林、山杨-白桦林、灌丛林、落叶松林和油松林6种森林类型林下凋落物层和土壤层为研究对象,于2010年进行了不同森林类型蓄水功能的研究。结果表明:(1)凋落物累积量13.40～46.32 t/hm²,油松林是山杨-白桦林的2.71倍; 凋落物最大持水量为39.38～85.91 t/hm²,油松林最大,山杨-白桦林最小;(2)土壤密度随土壤深度的加大而增大,毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、饱和蓄水量、非毛管蓄水量均随土壤深度的加大而减小; 6种森林0～60 cm土壤层非毛管蓄水量为413.38～771.71 t/hm²,青杄-白桦林最大,落叶松林最小;(3)6种森林类型总蓄水量为青杄-白桦林(849.76 t/hm²)>青杄林(778.48 t/hm²)>山杨-白桦林(623.24 t/hm²)>油松林(504.80 t/hm²)>落叶松林(492.02 t/hm²)>灌丛林(462.26 t/hm²),青杄-白桦林是灌丛林的1.84倍。因此,天然林随森林的正向演替其蓄水功能先增加后减少。

Abstract: Taken the litter and soil layer under six main forests(Picea wilosonii, P. wilosonii and Betula platyphlla, Populus davidiana and B. platyphlla, Cotonester multiglorus and Rosa xanthina shrubs, Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus tabulaeformis)in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu province as research objects. The water conservation function of the different forests were studied in 2010. The results showed that:(1)The accumulation amount of litters was 13.40-46.32 t/hm² among six forests, the amount of P. tabulaeformis forest was 2.71 times larger than that of P. davidiana and B. platyphlla forest; the maximum water-holding capacity of litters varied from 39.38 t/hm² to 85.91 t/hm². Water-holding capacity of P. tabulaeformis forest was the biggest whereas P. davidiana and B. platyphlla forest was the least.(2)The bulk density of forest soil in Xinglong Mountain were augmenting with the increment of soil depth, whereas the capillary porosity, total porosity, maximum water-storage and non-capillary water-storage were all decreasing with the increment of soil depth; non-capillary water-storage of 0-60 cm soil layer was 413.38-771.71 t/hm² among six forests. Non-capillary water-storage of P. wilosonii and B. platyphlla forest was the biggest whereas L. principis-rupprechtii forest was the least.(3)Total water-storage of six forest types was P. wilsonii and B. platyphlla forest(849.76 t/hm²)>P. wilsonii forest(778.48 t/hm²)>P. davidiana and B. platyphlla forest(623.24 t/hm²)>P. tabulaeformis forest(504.80 t/hm²)>L. principis-rupprechtii forest(492.02 t/hm²)>C. multiglorus and R. xanthina shrubs(462.26 t/hm²), the amount of P. wilsonii and B. platyphlla forest was 1.84 times larger than that of C. multiglorus and R. xanthina shrubs. The water conservation function of natural forest firstly increase then decrease with the development of positive forest succession.

中图分类号:

S715

魏强,张广忠,凌雷,等. 甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物及土壤层的蓄水功能[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(02): 78-84.

WEI Qiang,ZHANG Guangzhong,LING Lei,CHAI Chunshan. Water conservation function of litter and soil layer under main forest types in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 37(02): 78-84.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.02.014.

参考文献

[1] 时忠杰,王彦辉,于彭涛,等.宁夏六盘山林区几种主要森林植被生态水文功能研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2005,19(3):134-138. Shi Z J, Wang Y H, Yu P T, et al. Study on different forestry vegetations eco-hydrological function in Liupan Mountain of Ningxia, China[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2005, 19(3):134-138.
[2] 张彪,李文华,谢高地,等.北京市森林生态系统的水源涵养功能[J].生态学报,2008,28(11):619-624. Zhang B, Li W H, Xie G D, et al. Characteristics of water conservation of forest ecosystem in Beijing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(11):619-624.
[3] 马雪华. 森林水文学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,1987. Ma X H. Forest Hydrology[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 1993.
[4] 王香亭.甘肃兴隆山国家级自然保护区资源本底调查研究[M]. 兰州:甘肃民族出版社,1996. Wang X T. Investigation of Resource Background in Administration Bureau of Xinglong Mountain Preserve Region of Gansu Province[M]. Lanzhou:Gansu National Publishing House, 1996.
[5] 魏强,凌雷,张广忠,等.甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物累积量及持水特性[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(10):2589-2598. Wei Q,Ling L,Zhang G Z,et al. Water-holding characteristics and accumulation amount of the litters under main forest types in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011,22(10):2589-2598.
[6] 卢洪健,李金涛,刘文杰.西双版纳橡胶林枯落物的持水性能与截留特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(4): 67-73. Lu H J,Li J T,Liu W J. Study on water-holding capability and interception characteristics of litter layers under rubber plantations in Xishuangbanna, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2011,35(4): 67-73.
[7] 马雪华,王淑元.森林生态系统定位研究方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994. Ma X H, Wang S Y. Methodological Guidelines for Forest Ecosystem Location Research[M]. Beijing:Chinese Science and Technology Press, 1994.
[8] 高国雄,李文忠,周心澄,等.北川河流域退耕还林不同配置模式的水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报,2006,20(4):11-15. Gao G X, Li W Z, Zhou X C, et al. Hydrological effects of different species arrangement models of converted farmland to forest in Beichuanhe watershed[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(4):11-15.
[9] 龚伟,胡庭兴,王景燕,等.川南天然常绿阔叶林人工更新后枯枝落物层持水特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):51-55. Gong W, Hu T X, Wang J Y, et al. Water holding characteristics of litter layer after natural evergreen broadleaved forest artificial regeneration in southern Sichuan province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(3):51-55.
[10] 高人,周广柱.辽宁东部山区几种主要森林植被类型凋落物层持水性能研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2002,33(2):115-118. Gao R, Zhou G Z. A study on mineral soil water-storage for six forest vegetation types in east Liaoning Mountainous region[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2002, 33(2):115-118.
[11] 柴亚凡,王恩姮,陈祥伟.未经干扰黑土的贮水能力及水分入渗特征[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(3):159-160. Chai Y F, Wang E H, Chen X W. Water storage capacity and permeability of undisturbed typical black soil[J]. Journal Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(3):159-160.
[12] 郑郁善,陈礼光,洪伟.毛竹杉木混交林生产力和土壤性状研究[J].林业科学,1998,34(1):16-25. Zheng Y S, Chen L G, Hong W. Study on production and soil properties of mixed forests of Chinese fir and Phyllostachys pubescens[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1998, 34(1):16-25.
[13] 李德生,张萍,张水龙,等.黄前库区森林土壤蓄水能力研究[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2004, 28(1):25-28. Li D S,Zhang P,Zhang S L,et al. A study on water conservation capacity of forest soil in Huangqian Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2004, 28(1):25-28.
[14] 陈礼光,郑郁善,林金国,等.突脉青冈林分水文效应研究[J].福建林学院学报,1999,19(2):170-173. Chen L G, Zhen Y S, Lin J G, et al. Study on hydrologic effects of Cyclobalanopsis elevaticostata forest[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry,1999, 19(2):170-173.
[15] 黄进,张金池,杨会.桐庐生态公益林主要森林类型水源涵养功能综合评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(1):46-50. Huang J, Zhang J C, Yang H. Comprehensive evaluation on water conservation function of main stand types of ecological protection forest in Tonglu county[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 8(1):46-50.
[16] 周泽福,张光灿,林富荣.太行山水源涵养林研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006. Zhou Z F, Zhang G C, Lin F R. Researches on Water conservation Forest in Taihang Mountains[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 2006.
[17] 余新晓,甘敬.水源涵养林研究与示范[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2007. Yu X X, Gan J. Researches and Demonstrates of the Water Conservation Forest[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 2007.
[18] 贺淑霞,李叙勇,莫菲,等.中国东部森林样带典型森林水源涵养功能[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3285-3295. He S X, Li X Y, Mo F, et al. The water conservation study of typical forest ecosystems in the forest transect of eastern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(12):3285-3295.

相关文章 15

[1]	王云霓, 曹恭祥, 徐丽宏, 陈胜楠. 内蒙古大青山华北落叶松人工林蒸散特征及其影响因子[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 148-156.
[2]	林雯淇, 贾国栋. 基于稳定同位素的SPAC系统水分转化研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 234-242.
[3]	盛后财, 姚月锋, 蔡体久, 郭娜, 琚存勇. 物候变化对落叶松人工林降雨分配过程中钾和钠离子迁移的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 143-150.
[4]	惠昊, 关庆伟, 王亚茹, 林鑫宇, 陈斌, 王刚, 胡月, 胡敬东. 不同森林经营模式对土壤氮含量及酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 151-158.
[5]	任世奇, 朱原立, 梁燕芳, 陈健波, 卢翠香, 伍琪, 韦振道. 基于PM模型的广西南宁尾巨桉中龄林蒸散特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 127-134.
[6]	于松平, 刘泽彬, 郭建斌, 王彦辉, 于澎涛, 王蕾. 六盘山华北落叶松林分蒸腾特征及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 131-140.
[7]	吴丹,曹巍,邵全琴,赵志平. 三江源地区草地退化对土壤含水量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(03): 182-186.
[8]	刘延惠,丁访军,舒德远,崔迎春,侯贻菊,赵文君. 茂兰喀斯特原生林细叶青冈树干液流环境响应特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(03): 77-85.
[9]	俞正祥,韩广忠,蔡体久,琚存勇,朱宾宾. 基于GF-1遥感数据的大兴安岭林区雪水当量反演[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(03): 105-111.
[10]	石磊,盛后财,满秀玲,蔡体久. 兴安落叶松林降雨再分配及其穿透雨的空间异质性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(02): 90-96.
[11]	万艳芳,刘贤德,于澎涛,马瑞,王顺利,王彦辉,李晓青. 祁连山鲜黄小檗灌丛穿透雨特征及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(02): 97-102.
[12]	陶吉兴,王文武,徐达,张国江,季碧勇,吴伟志,谭莹. 基于固定样地连续监测数据的林木蓄积生长率月际分布[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(02): 111-116.
[13]	朱宾宾,满秀玲,俞正祥,胡悦,马培文. 大兴安岭北部森林小流域融雪径流特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(06): 69-75.
[14]	刘玉杰,满秀玲. 修正Gash模型在兴安落叶松天然林林冠截留中的应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(04): 81-88.
[15]	石磊,盛后财,满秀玲,蔡体久. 不同尺度林木蒸腾耗水测算方法述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(04): 149-156.

甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物及土壤层的蓄水功能

Water conservation function of litter and soil layer under main forest types in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿