甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物及土壤层的蓄水功能

魏强,张广忠,凌雷,柴春山

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (02) : 78-84.

PDF(910786 KB)
PDF(910786 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (02) : 78-84. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.02.014
研究论文

甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物及土壤层的蓄水功能

  • 魏 强,张广忠,凌 雷,柴春山
作者信息 +

Water conservation function of litter and soil layer under main forest types in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu

  • WEI Qiang,ZHANG Guangzhong,LING Lei,CHAI Chunshan
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

以甘肃兴隆山青杄林、青杄-白桦林、山杨-白桦林、灌丛林、落叶松林和油松林6种森林类型林下凋落物层和土壤层为研究对象,于2010年进行了不同森林类型蓄水功能的研究。结果表明:(1)凋落物累积量13.40~46.32 t/hm2,油松林是山杨-白桦林的2.71倍; 凋落物最大持水量为39.38~85.91 t/hm2,油松林最大,山杨-白桦林最小;(2)土壤密度随土壤深度的加大而增大,毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、饱和蓄水量、非毛管蓄水量均随土壤深度的加大而减小; 6种森林0~60 cm土壤层非毛管蓄水量为413.38~771.71 t/hm2,青杄-白桦林最大,落叶松林最小;(3)6种森林类型总蓄水量为青杄-白桦林(849.76 t/hm2)>青杄林(778.48 t/hm2)>山杨-白桦林(623.24 t/hm2)>油松林(504.80 t/hm2)>落叶松林(492.02 t/hm2)>灌丛林(462.26 t/hm2),青杄-白桦林是灌丛林的1.84倍。因此,天然林随森林的正向演替其蓄水功能先增加后减少。

Abstract

Taken the litter and soil layer under six main forests(Picea wilosonii, P. wilosonii and Betula platyphlla, Populus davidiana and B. platyphlla, Cotonester multiglorus and Rosa xanthina shrubs, Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus tabulaeformis)in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu province as research objects. The water conservation function of the different forests were studied in 2010. The results showed that:(1)The accumulation amount of litters was 13.40-46.32 t/hm2 among six forests, the amount of P. tabulaeformis forest was 2.71 times larger than that of P. davidiana and B. platyphlla forest; the maximum water-holding capacity of litters varied from 39.38 t/hm2 to 85.91 t/hm2. Water-holding capacity of P. tabulaeformis forest was the biggest whereas P. davidiana and B. platyphlla forest was the least.(2)The bulk density of forest soil in Xinglong Mountain were augmenting with the increment of soil depth, whereas the capillary porosity, total porosity, maximum water-storage and non-capillary water-storage were all decreasing with the increment of soil depth; non-capillary water-storage of 0-60 cm soil layer was 413.38-771.71 t/hm2 among six forests. Non-capillary water-storage of P. wilosonii and B. platyphlla forest was the biggest whereas L. principis-rupprechtii forest was the least.(3)Total water-storage of six forest types was P. wilsonii and B. platyphlla forest(849.76 t/hm2)>P. wilsonii forest(778.48 t/hm2)>P. davidiana and B. platyphlla forest(623.24 t/hm2)>P. tabulaeformis forest(504.80 t/hm2)>L. principis-rupprechtii forest(492.02 t/hm2)>C. multiglorus and R. xanthina shrubs(462.26 t/hm2), the amount of P. wilsonii and B. platyphlla forest was 1.84 times larger than that of C. multiglorus and R. xanthina shrubs. The water conservation function of natural forest firstly increase then decrease with the development of positive forest succession.

引用本文

导出引用
魏强,张广忠,凌雷,柴春山. 甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物及土壤层的蓄水功能[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2013, 37(02): 78-84 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.02.014
WEI Qiang,ZHANG Guangzhong,LING Lei,CHAI Chunshan. Water conservation function of litter and soil layer under main forest types in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2013, 37(02): 78-84 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.02.014
中图分类号: S715   

参考文献

[1] 时忠杰,王彦辉,于彭涛,等.宁夏六盘山林区几种主要森林植被生态水文功能研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2005,19(3):134-138. Shi Z J, Wang Y H, Yu P T, et al. Study on different forestry vegetations eco-hydrological function in Liupan Mountain of Ningxia, China[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2005, 19(3):134-138.
[2] 张彪,李文华,谢高地,等.北京市森林生态系统的水源涵养功能[J].生态学报,2008,28(11):619-624. Zhang B, Li W H, Xie G D, et al. Characteristics of water conservation of forest ecosystem in Beijing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(11):619-624.
[3] 马雪华. 森林水文学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,1987. Ma X H. Forest Hydrology[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 1993.
[4] 王香亭.甘肃兴隆山国家级自然保护区资源本底调查研究[M]. 兰州:甘肃民族出版社,1996. Wang X T. Investigation of Resource Background in Administration Bureau of Xinglong Mountain Preserve Region of Gansu Province[M]. Lanzhou:Gansu National Publishing House, 1996.
[5] 魏强,凌雷,张广忠,等.甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物累积量及持水特性[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(10):2589-2598. Wei Q,Ling L,Zhang G Z,et al. Water-holding characteristics and accumulation amount of the litters under main forest types in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011,22(10):2589-2598.
[6] 卢洪健,李金涛,刘文杰.西双版纳橡胶林枯落物的持水性能与截留特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(4): 67-73. Lu H J,Li J T,Liu W J. Study on water-holding capability and interception characteristics of litter layers under rubber plantations in Xishuangbanna, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2011,35(4): 67-73.
[7] 马雪华,王淑元.森林生态系统定位研究方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994. Ma X H, Wang S Y. Methodological Guidelines for Forest Ecosystem Location Research[M]. Beijing:Chinese Science and Technology Press, 1994.
[8] 高国雄,李文忠,周心澄,等.北川河流域退耕还林不同配置模式的水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报,2006,20(4):11-15. Gao G X, Li W Z, Zhou X C, et al. Hydrological effects of different species arrangement models of converted farmland to forest in Beichuanhe watershed[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(4):11-15.
[9] 龚伟,胡庭兴,王景燕,等.川南天然常绿阔叶林人工更新后枯枝落物层持水特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):51-55. Gong W, Hu T X, Wang J Y, et al. Water holding characteristics of litter layer after natural evergreen broadleaved forest artificial regeneration in southern Sichuan province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(3):51-55.
[10] 高人,周广柱.辽宁东部山区几种主要森林植被类型凋落物层持水性能研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2002,33(2):115-118. Gao R, Zhou G Z. A study on mineral soil water-storage for six forest vegetation types in east Liaoning Mountainous region[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2002, 33(2):115-118.
[11] 柴亚凡,王恩姮,陈祥伟.未经干扰黑土的贮水能力及水分入渗特征[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(3):159-160. Chai Y F, Wang E H, Chen X W. Water storage capacity and permeability of undisturbed typical black soil[J]. Journal Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(3):159-160.
[12] 郑郁善,陈礼光,洪伟.毛竹杉木混交林生产力和土壤性状研究[J].林业科学,1998,34(1):16-25. Zheng Y S, Chen L G, Hong W. Study on production and soil properties of mixed forests of Chinese fir and Phyllostachys pubescens[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1998, 34(1):16-25.
[13] 李德生,张萍,张水龙,等.黄前库区森林土壤蓄水能力研究[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2004, 28(1):25-28. Li D S,Zhang P,Zhang S L,et al. A study on water conservation capacity of forest soil in Huangqian Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2004, 28(1):25-28.
[14] 陈礼光,郑郁善,林金国,等.突脉青冈林分水文效应研究[J].福建林学院学报,1999,19(2):170-173. Chen L G, Zhen Y S, Lin J G, et al. Study on hydrologic effects of Cyclobalanopsis elevaticostata forest[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry,1999, 19(2):170-173.
[15] 黄进,张金池,杨会.桐庐生态公益林主要森林类型水源涵养功能综合评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(1):46-50. Huang J, Zhang J C, Yang H. Comprehensive evaluation on water conservation function of main stand types of ecological protection forest in Tonglu county[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 8(1):46-50.
[16] 周泽福,张光灿,林富荣.太行山水源涵养林研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006. Zhou Z F, Zhang G C, Lin F R. Researches on Water conservation Forest in Taihang Mountains[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 2006.
[17] 余新晓,甘敬.水源涵养林研究与示范[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2007. Yu X X, Gan J. Researches and Demonstrates of the Water Conservation Forest[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 2007.
[18] 贺淑霞,李叙勇,莫菲,等.中国东部森林样带典型森林水源涵养功能[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3285-3295. He S X, Li X Y, Mo F, et al. The water conservation study of typical forest ecosystems in the forest transect of eastern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(12):3285-3295.

基金

收稿日期:2012-02-07 修回日期:2012-07-16
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31160180)
第一作者:魏强,副研究员, 硕士。E-mail: 1974weiqiang@163.com。
引文格式:魏强,张广忠,凌雷,等. 甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物及土壤层的蓄水功能[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,37(2):78-84.

PDF(910786 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/