间伐对长江滩地杨树人工林土壤有效氮素的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.009

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (04): 45-50.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.009

间伐对长江滩地杨树人工林土壤有效氮素的影响

囤兴建¹,曲宏辉²,田野¹,方升佐^1*,徐锡增¹

1.南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院,江苏南京 210037;
2.烟台市林业局,山东烟台 264000

出版日期:2013-08-18 发布日期:2013-08-18
基金资助:
收稿日期:2013-01-03 修回日期:2013-03-26
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB416904); 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新基金(CXZZ11_0535)
第一作者:囤兴建,博士生。*通信作者:方升佐,教授。E-mail: fangsz@njfu.edu.cn。
引文格式:囤兴建,曲宏辉,田野,等. 间伐对长江滩地杨树人工林土壤有效氮素的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(4):45-50.

Effects of thinning treatments on soil available nitrogen of the poplar plantations in flooding land of Yangtze River

DUN Xingjian¹, QU Honghui², TIAN Ye¹, FANG Shengzuo^1*, XU Xizeng¹

1.College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
2. Yantai Bureau of Forestry, Yantai 264000, China

Online:2013-08-18 Published:2013-08-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以南京长江滩地6年生杨树人工林为研究对象,设计了5种间伐处理(对照、30%、40%、50%强度的下层伐和50%强度的机械伐),分析了不同间伐处理对杨树人工林土壤无机氮、土壤水溶性有机氮(DON)和土壤微生物量氮(SMBN)含量的影响以及这三者之间的关系。结果表明:不同间伐处理对土壤无机氮素含量、土壤微生物量氮和土壤水溶性有机氮含量均有显著影响,且50%强度的下层伐和机械伐处理下三者的含量较高,其含量随季节的动态变化均呈先上升后下降的动态变化; 不同间伐处理下的3个层次中土壤有效氮素含量均表现出明显的表聚性,0～5 cm土层的有效氮素含量明显较高; 土壤有效氮素之间的相关性不显著,仅SMBN与DON、土壤硝态氮呈正相关关系。

Abstract: In order to improve the quality of the poplar plantations, the 6-year-old poplar plantations located in the Nanjing beach of Yangtze River were chosen to study thinning effects. Five thinning treatments(contrast, 30% intensity of the lower thinning, 40% intensity of the lower thinning, 50% intensity of the lower thinning and 50% intensity of the mechanical thinning)were designed in this experiment. The effects of soil available nitrogen supply, including inorganic nitrogen, DON(soil dissolved organic nitrogen)and SMBN(soil microbial biomass nitrogen)under different thinning treatments were investigated. The results showed that:(1)Soil available nitrogen was significantly affected by thinning treatments and the contents of available nitrogen, DON and SMBN were the highest in the treatments of 50% thinning intensities.(2)The contents of inorganic nitrogen, DON and SMBN showed a seasonal dynamic, and the highest contents of soil available nitrogen were in August.(3)The surface gathering of the available nitrogen was found for all the treatments, and the content at the soil depth of 0-5 cm was significantly higher than that of other two soil depths.(4)The correlation analysis showed a poor correlation among the contents of different types of soil available nitrogen within the experimental period. However, a significant and positive correlation between SMBN and DON as well as soil nitrate nitrogen was found during August. Results from the present study would provide a theoretical basis for the cultivating poplar large-diameter timber.

中图分类号:

S714

囤兴建,曲宏辉,田野,等. 间伐对长江滩地杨树人工林土壤有效氮素的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(04): 45-50.

DUN Xingjian, QU Honghui, TIAN Ye, FANG Shengzuo, XU Xizeng. Effects of thinning treatments on soil available nitrogen of the poplar plantations in flooding land of Yangtze River[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 37(04): 45-50.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.009.

参考文献

[1] 康金花,黄子蔚. 滴灌随水施肥对土壤有效氮动态的影响[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(2):270-273. Kang J H, Huang Z W. Fertilization through drip irrigation systems on the dynamic change of soil available nitrogen [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2005, 22(2):270-273.
[2] Neff J C, Chapin F S, Vitousek P M. Breaks in the cycle: dissolved organic nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Nitrogen in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 2003, 1(4):205-211.
[3] 孙志高,刘景双,陈小兵.三江平原典型小叶章湿地土壤中硝态氮和铵态氮的空间分布格局[ J].水土保持通报, 2009,29(3):66-72. Sun Z G, Liu J S, Chen X B. Spatial distribution patterns of nitrate nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen in typical Calamagrostis angustifolia wetland soils of Sanjiang plain[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 29(3):66-72.
[4] 莫江明,郁梦德,孔国辉.鼎湖山马尾松人工林土壤硝态氮和铵态氮动态研究[J].植物生态学报, 1997,21(4):335-341. Mo J M, Yu M D, Kong G H. The dynamics of soil NH₄⁺-N and NO^-₃-N in a pine forest of Dinghushan, as assessed by ion exchange resin bag method [J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 1997,21(4):335-341.
[5] 唐罗忠,葛晓敏,吴麟,等. 马鞍山江滩3个杨树无性系的生长比较[J].林业科技开发,2012(3):70-72. Tang L Z, Ge X M, Wu L, et al. Comparisons to the three poplar clones planted on riparian area of Yangtse river,Ma’ anshan city[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2012(3):70-72.
[6] 江波,袁位高,戚连忠,等.江河滩地优质大径杨木培育关键技术研究[J].林业科学,2002, 1(1):68-75. Jang B, Yuan W G, Qi L Z, et al. Studies on key techniques for culturing fine large timber of poplar in flood land [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2002, 1(1):68-75.
[7] 孙启祥,吴泽民, 韦朝领, 等. 有螺江滩林农复合生态系统不同调控模式的综合效益研究[J].应用生态学报, 2001, 4(2):195-198. Sun Q X, Wu Z M, Wei C L, et al. Evaluation on comprehensive benefits of different regulation models of agroforestry ecosystem in snail river beach [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 4(2):195-198.
[8] 曲宏辉. 间伐对杨树人工林生态因子和氮素循环的影响[D].南京:南京林业大学,2012. Qu H H. Effects of thinning treatments on ecological factors and nitrogen cycling of the poplar plantations[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2012.
[9] 张甘霖,龚子同. 土壤调查实验室分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[10] 陈立新,段文标. 模拟氮沉降对温带典型森林土壤有效氮形态和含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(8):2005-2012. Chen L X, Duan W B. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on soil available nitrogen forms and their contents in typical temperate forest stands [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(8):2005-2012.
[11] 李志宏,张福锁,郭素英. 菜田土壤有效氮的动态研究[J].土壤通报,2001,32(1):19-22. Li Z H, Zhang F S, Guo S Y. The available nitrogen dynamics of vegetable soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2001,32(1):19-22.
[12] 吴金水,林启美,黄巧云,等. 土壤微生物生物量测定方法及其应用[M]. 北京:气象出版社,2006.
[13] Wilson D J, Jefferioes R L. Nitrogen mineralization, plant growth and goose herb ivory in an arctic coastal ecosystem[J].Journal of Ecology,1996,84(6):841-851.
[14] Sachse A, Babenzien D, Ginzel G, et al. Characterization of dissolved organic carbon(DON)in a dystrophic lake and an adjacent fen [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2001, 54:279-296.
[15] 李世清,凌莉,李生秀. 影响土壤中微生物体氮的因子[J].土壤与环境, 2000, 9(2):158-162. Li S Q, Ling L, Li S X. Review on the factors affecting soil microbial biomass nitrogen [J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 2000, 9(2):158-162.
[16] 庞欣,张福锁,王敬国.不同供氮水平对根际微生物量氮及微生物活度的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2000, 6(4):476-480. Pang X, Zhang F S, Wang J G. Effect of different nitrogen levels on SMB-N and microbial activity[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2000, 6(4):476-480.
[17] 李世清,任书杰,李生秀.土壤微生物体氮的季节性变化及其与土壤水分和温度的关系[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2004,10(1):18-23. Li S Q, Ren S J, Li S X. Seasonal change of soil microbial biomass and the relationship between soil microbial biomass and soil moisture and temperature[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2004,10(1):18-23.
[18] Chen G C, He Z L. Effect of land use on microbial biomass-C, -N and -P in red soils [J].Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 2003,4(4):480-484.
[19] 莫江明,彭少麟,方运霆,等. 鼎湖山马尾松针阔叶混交林土壤有效氮动态的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 2001,21(3):492-497. Mo J M, Peng S L, Fang Y T, et al. A preliminary study on the dynamics of bio-available nitrogen in soils of pine-broadleaf mixed forest in Dinghuashan Biosphere Reserve[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 21(3):492-497.
[20] Pastor J, Aber J D, Mcclaugherty C A. Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Wisconsin [J].Ecology, 1984,65(1):256-268.
[21] 胡小飞,陈伏生,胡岸峰,等.氮磷添加对麦冬根部养分浓度及其化学计量比的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报, 2007,15(5):377-382. Hu X F, Chen F S, Hu A F, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on nutrients and N,P stoichiometry in dwarf lilyturf roots[J].Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2007,15(5):377-382.
[22] 方升佐,田野.人工林生态系统生物多样性与生产力的关系[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(4):1-6. Fang S Z, Tian Y. The relationship between biodiversity and productivity in the artificial plantation ecosystem [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Science Edition,2012,36(4):1-6.
[23] 张鼎华, 叶章发, 范必有, 等. 抚育间伐对人工林土壤肥力的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2001, 12(5):672-676. Zhang D H, Ye Z F, Fan B Y, et al. Influence of thinning on soil fertility in artificial forest [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 12(5):672-676.
[24] 于海群, 刘勇, 李国雷, 等. 油松幼龄人工林土壤质量对间伐强度的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2008, 28(3):65-70. Yu H Q, Liu Y, Li G L, et al. Response of soil quality to thinning intensity in young Pinus tabulaeformis plantations[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 28(3):65-70.
[25] Likens C E, Bormann F H and Johnson N M. Nitrification: importance to nutrient losses from a cutover forested ecosystem [J]. Science, 1969, 163: 1205-1206.
[26] Adams M A, Attiwill P M. Nutrient balance in forests of northern Tasmania. 2:Alteration of nutrient availability and soil water chemistry as a result of logging, slash burning and fertilizer application [J].Forest Ecology and Management, 1991,44: 115-131.
[27] Kutiel P, Naveh Z. The effect of fire on nutrients in a pine forest soil [J]. Plant Soil,1987,104(2):269 -274.
[28] Rashid G. Effects of fire on soil carbon and nitrogen in a Mediterranean oak forest of Algeria [J]. Plant Soil,1987,103(1):89 -93.
[29] 丁九敏,徐涵湄,刘胜,等. 雪灾对武夷山常绿阔叶林土壤有效氮的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(3):136-140. Ding J M, Xu H M, Liu S, et al. Effects of snow storm on soil available nitrogen in evergreen broad leaf forest in Wuyi Mountain[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2010,34(3):136-140.
[30] Raghubanshi A S. Effect of topography on selected soil properties and nitrogen mineralization in a dry tropical forest [J].Soil Biochemistry, 1992, 24: 145-150.
[31] Zhang H Y, Xiao Y H, Zhang X D. Microbial biomass as an indicator for evaluation of soil fertility properties [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2006, 37(3):422-425.
[32] Jia G M, Can J, Wang C Y, et al. Microbial biomass and nutrients in soil at the different stages of secondary forest succession in Ziwuling, northwest China [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2005,217(1):117-125.
[33] Neff J C, Chapin F S, Vitousek P M. Breaks in the cycle: dissolved organic nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Nitrogen in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 2003, 1(4):205-211.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

2762

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	2762

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	545	2217
比例	20%	80%

摘要

4732

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	4732

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	189	4543
比例	4%	96%

本文评价

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

通信地址：南京市龙蟠路南京林业大学《南京林业大学学报》编辑部
电子邮件：njlyzrb@vip.163.com
联系电话：025-85428247
邮政编码：210037
备案号：苏ICP备-010872

间伐对长江滩地杨树人工林土壤有效氮素的影响

Effects of thinning treatments on soil available nitrogen of the poplar plantations in flooding land of Yangtze River

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	谢燕燕, 郭子武, 林树燕, 左珂怡, 杨丽婷, 徐森, 谷瑞, 陈双林. 毛竹林下植被演替过程中土壤颗粒组成与水分入渗特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 108-116.
[2]	武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 99-107.
[3]	左壮, 张韫, 崔晓阳. 火烧对兴安落叶松林土壤氮形态和含量的初期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 147-154.
[4]	孙劲伟, 王圣燕, 范弟武, 朱咏莉. C源与NP添加对Cd胁迫下林地土壤呼吸作用的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 140-146.
[5]	陈明, 刘亮. 采样间隔对城市表土剖面磁化率变化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 61-69.
[6]	张相, 丁鸣鸣, 林杰, 李卓远, 崔琳琳, 郭赓, 杨皓. 水蚀作用下红壤丘陵区土壤特性的空间分异特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 77-84.
[7]	杨瑞, 吴朝明, 朱骊, 胡海波. 苏南丘陵区坡面经济林土壤侵蚀特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 70-76.
[8]	徐子涵, 王磊, 崔明, 刘玉国, 赵紫晴, 李嘉豪. 南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 173-181.
[9]	杜志琦, 孟庆繁, 冯立超, 葛佳荣, 黄劲斌, 史晶晶, 李洪锐, 岑祖才. 冷藏条件下土样保存时间对甲螨(甲螨亚目)和跳虫(弹尾纲)类物种分离的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 213-218.
[10]	卢伟伟, 胡嘉欣, 陈思桦, 陈玮铃, 冯思宇. 苏北滨海土壤无机碳含量的测定方法比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 76-82.
[11]	杨永超, 段文标, 陈立新, 曲美学, 王亚飞, 王美娟, 石金永, 潘磊. 模拟氮磷沉降和凋落物处理对两种林型红松林土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 57-66.
[12]	薛建辉, 周之栋, 吴永波. 喀斯特石漠化山地退化土壤生态修复研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 135-145.
[13]	林杰, 张相, 姜姜, 蒯杰, 郭赓, 孟苗婧, 李肖. 水力侵蚀过程中土壤有机碳循环研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 187-194.
[14]	李惠芝, 关庆伟, 赵家豪, 李俊杰, 王磊, 李凤凤, 左兴平, 陈斌. 地形对麻栎人工林土壤肥力质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 161-168.
[15]	赵凯歌, 周正虎, 金鹰, 王传宽. 长期氮添加对落叶松和水曲柳人工林土壤碳、氮、磷含量和胞外酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 177-184.