华南3种人工林土壤有机质和养分含量及其综合评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.02.016

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 81-85.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.02.016

华南3种人工林土壤有机质和养分含量及其综合评价

刘飞鹏¹,储双双²,裴向阳²,莫罗坚³,陈颉颖²,曾曙才^2*

1.广东省林业调查规划院, 广东广州 510520;
2.华南农业大学林学院, 广东广州 510642;
3.广东省东莞市林业科学研究所,广东东莞 523106

出版日期:2014-03-10 发布日期:2014-03-10
基金资助:
收稿日期:2013-01-11 修回日期:2013-10-16
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31270675); 广东省科技计划项目(2012B020310004); 东莞市高等院校科研机构科技计划资助项目(200910810174)
第一作者:刘飞鹏,高级工程师,硕士。*通信作者:曾曙才,教授。E-mail: sczeng@scau.edu.cn。
引文格式:刘飞鹏,储双双,裴向阳,等. 华南3种人工林土壤有机质和养分含量及其综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科

Soil organic matter and nutrient contents and integrated evaluation of them under three typical planted forests in south China

LIU Feipeng¹, CHU Shuangshuang², PEI Xiangyang²,MO Luojian³, CHEN Jieying²,ZENG Shucai^2*

1. Guangdong Forest Investigation and Planning Institute, Guangzhou 510520, China;
2. College of Forestry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;
3. Dongguan City Forest Research Institute of Guangdong Province, Dongguan

Online:2014-03-10 Published:2014-03-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于广东省第6次森林资源清查土壤调查数据,对华南地区3种重要的用材林(桉树(Eucalyptus spp.)、马尾松(Pinus massoniana)和杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata))林分土壤有机质和养分含量进行了综合评价。结果表明:桉树人工林A层土壤有机质、速效磷含量显著高于杉木人工林和马尾松人工林,A、B层土壤全钾、速效钾含量显著低于杉木人工林和马尾松人工林(p<0.05); 3种林分土壤(A、B层)全氮、碱解氮、全磷、有效铜和有效锌含量均无显著差异(p>0.05); 各林分A层土壤有机质、全氮、碱解氮、速效磷、速效钾、有效锌含量显著高于B层,A层全磷、全钾和有效铜含量与B层无显著差异。土壤综合评价系数在A层以桉树人工林最高、杉木人工林较小,B层则为杉木人工林最高、桉树人工林较小,马尾松人工林在A、B层均居中。

Abstract: Based on the soil data of the 6^th forest resource inventory of Guangdong province, this paper analyzed the soil organic matter(SOM)and nutrient contents of three important plantations, Eucalyptus spp.(ES), masson pine(MP)and Chinese fir(CF)plantations,in south China, and conducted integrated evaluation of SOM and soil nutrients. Results showed that SOM and available phosphorus(P)contents in soil horizon A under ES were significantly higher than that under CF and MP, but total and available potassium(K)contents in horizons A and B under ES were significantly lower than that under CF and MP(p<0.05).The three plantations did not significantly differ from each other in total and available nitrogen(N), total P, available copper(Cu)or available zinc(Zn)in horizons A and B(p>0.05). Under the three plantations, the SOM, total N, available N, P and Zn contents in soil horizon A were significantly higher than that in horizon B, but total P, total K and available Cu were not significantly different between the two horizons.Soil integrated evaluation coefficients of horizon A followed an order of ES>MP> CF, while those of horizon B exhibited an order of CF> MP> ES.

中图分类号:

S718

刘飞鹏,储双双,裴向阳,等. 华南3种人工林土壤有机质和养分含量及其综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 38(02): 81-85.

LIU Feipeng, CHU Shuangshuang, PEI Xiangyang,MO Luojian, CHEN Jieying,ZENG Shucai. Soil organic matter and nutrient contents and integrated evaluation of them under three typical planted forests in south China[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 38(02): 81-85.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.02.016.

参考文献

[1] 赵筱青,和春兰,易琦.大面积桉树引种区土壤水分及水源涵养性能研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2012,26(3):205-210. Zhao X Q, He C L, Yi Q. Soil moisture and water conservation in Eucalyptus uraphylla spp. introduction mountain area[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,26(3):205-210.
[2] Miehle P, Grote R, Battaglia M, et al. Evaluation of a process-based ecosystem model for long-term biomass and stand development of Eucalyptus globulus plantations[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2010, 129(3): 377-391.
[3] Chen F L, Zheng H, Zhang K, et al. Changes in soil microbial community structure and metabolic activity following conversion from native Pinus massoniana plantations to exotic Eucalyptus plantations[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 291:65-72.
[4] Zohar Y, Gafni A, Morris J, et al. Eucalyptus plantations in Israel: an assessment of economic and environmental viability[J]. New Forests, 2008, 36(2): 135-157.
[5] 吴琼辉,张浩. 广东省桉树人工林发展现状与可持续发展对策[J]. 广东林业科技, 2006, 22(3):133-136. Wu Q H,Zhang H. The presentconditionofdevelopment and sustainable management of Eucalyptus plantation in Guangdong province[J]. Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology,2006, 22(3):133-136.
[6] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[7] 钟继洪,骆伯胜. 短轮伐林地土壤肥力的数值化综合评价[J]. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2003,19(1):75-80. Zhong J H, Luo B S. Integrated digitization evaluation on soil fertility of short rotation Eucalyptus land[J]. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture, 2003,19(1):75-80.
[8] 司志国,彭志宏,俞元春,等.徐州城市绿地土壤肥力质量评价[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(3):60-64. Si Z G, Peng Z H, Yu Y C, et al. Fertility quality assessment of urban green space soils in Xuzhou city[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2013,37(3):60-64.
[9] 熊毅,李庆逵. 中国土壤[M]. 2版.北京:科学出版社,1988.
[10] Liu Z P, Shao M, Wang Y Q, et al.Effect of environmental factors on regional soil organic carbon stocks across the Loess Plateau region, China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2011, 142(3):184-194.
[11] Yuan Z Q, Gazol A, Lin F, et al. Soil organic carbon in an old-growth temperate forest: spatial pattern, determinants and bias in its quantification[J].Geoderma, 2013, 195: 48-55.
[12] 林开敏,章志琴,叶发茂,等.杉木人工林下杉木、楠木和木荷叶凋落物分解特征及营养元素含量变化的动态分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2010, 19(2):34-39. Lin K M, Zhang Z Q, Ye F M, et al. Dynamic analysis of decomposition characteristics and content change of nutrient elements of leaf litter of Cunninghamia lanceolata, Phoebe bournei and Schima superb under C. lanceolata artificial forest[J].Journal of Plant Resources and Environment,2010, 19(2):34-39.
[13] 王淑平,周广盛,吕育财,等. 中国东北样带(NECT)土壤碳、氮、磷的梯度分布及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(5):513-517. Wang S P,Zhou G S,Lv Y C, et al. Distribution of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus along northeast China transect(NECT)and their relationships with climatic factors[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2002, 26(5):513-517.
[14] 陈刚才,甘露, 王仕禄,等. 土壤氮素及其环境效应[J]. 地质地球化学, 2001, 29(1):63-67. Chen G C,Gan L, Wang S L, et la. Soil nitrogen and its environmental effects[J]. Geology-geochemistry, 2001, 29(1):63-67.
[15] 欧勇胜,张世熔,余琼,等. 横断山北部生态脆弱区土壤磷素空间分布特征[J].生态学报,2005,25(10):2776-2781. Ou Y S, Zhang S R, Yu Q, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of the soil phosphorus in the ecological fragile area in the north of Hengduan Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(10):2776-2781.
[16] 田大伦,方晰,项文化.湖南会同杉木人工林生态系统碳素密度[J].生态学报,2004,24(11):2382-2386. Tian Da L, Fang X, Xiang W H. Carbon density of the Chinese fir plantation ecosystem at Huitong, Hunan province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,24(11):2382-2386.
[17] 陶贞,沈承德,高全洲,等. 高寒草甸土壤有机碳储量及其垂直分布特征[J]. 地理学报,2006,61(7):720-728. Tao Z, Shen C D, Gao Q Z, et al. Soil organic carbon storage and vertical distribution of alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006,61(7):720-728.
[18] 纪浩,董希斌.大兴安岭低质林改造后土壤肥力综合评价[J].林业科学, 2012, 48(11):117-123. Ji H, Dong X B. Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility after transformation of the low-quality forest in the Daxing'anling Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(11):117-123.
[19] 高志勤,傅懋毅.经营方式对毛竹林土壤肥力指数的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2008,32(4):81-85. Gao Z Q, Fu M Y. Effects of management styles on soil fertility index of different structure Phyllostachys edulis stands[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2008,32(4):81-85.
[20] 许晓伟,万福绪,杨东,等.3种中山杉种植模式对上海沿海土壤肥力的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(1):163-167. Xu X W, Wan F X, Yang D, et al. Effects of three planting patterns of Ascendens mucronatum on soil fertility in Shanghai costal areas[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2013,37(1):163-167.

相关文章 15

[1]	丛明珠, 刘琪璟, 孙震, 董淳超, 钱尼澎. 长白山北坡植物群落β多样性及其组分驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 99-106.
[2]	曹荔荔, 阮宏华, 李媛媛, 倪娟平, 王国兵, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 徐亚明. 不同林龄水杉人工林地表大型土壤动物群落特征比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 91-98.
[3]	张怡婷, 夏念和, 林树燕, 丁雨龙. 我国寒竹属空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 107-114.
[4]	胡衍平, 刘卫东, 张珉, 陈明皋, 程勇, 魏志恒, 庞文胜, 吴际友. 山乌桕家系叶片叶色参数和色素含量及其解剖结构研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 123-133.
[5]	王一洁, 王璐冕, 丁真慧, 钱程, 曹加杰. 城市滨水绿地空间夏季微气候效应研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 233-241.
[6]	赵国扬, 洪波, 高俊平, 赵鑫, 黄洪峰, 徐彦杰. 菊属新品种‘雀欢’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 254-255.
[7]	任佳辉, 高捍东, 陈哲楠, 李浩, 刘强, 陈澎军. 杂交新美柳苗对盐涝胁迫的生长和生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 57-66.
[8]	董亚文, 陈双林, 谢燕燕, 郭子武, 张景润, 汪舍平, 徐勇敢. 林下植被演替过程中毛竹和主要优势树种叶片建成成本变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 179-186.
[9]	徐薪璐, 孔淑鑫, 吕卓, 江帅君, 赵婉琪, 林树燕. 靓竹叶色表型叶片形态、结构与光合特性相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 145-154.
[10]	曹永慧, 陈庆标, 周本智, 葛晓改, 王小明. 不同截雨干旱时间对毛竹叶片氮含量时空分布的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 155-161.
[11]	隋夕然, 李军, 陈娟, 华军, 沈谦, 杨洪胜, 何前程, 李由, 王伟, 彭冶, 葛之葳, 张增信. 徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 171-178.
[12]	尹华康, 张晋东, 黄金燕, 蒲冠桦, 毛泽恩, 周材权, 黄耀华, 付励强. 四川马边大风顶自然保护区大熊猫主食竹空间分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 187-193.
[13]	孔凡斌, 金晨涛, 徐彩瑶. 罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 245-254.
[14]	龚霞, 吴银明, 王海峰, 曾攀, 唐亚, 温铿, 焦文献. 花椒新品种‘蜀椒1号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 265-266.
[15]	吴桐, 王贤荣, 伊贤贵, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 陈祥珍, 高书成. 樱花新品种‘胭脂雪’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 267-268.

华南3种人工林土壤有机质和养分含量及其综合评价

Soil organic matter and nutrient contents and integrated evaluation of them under three typical planted forests in south China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿