低温胁迫下梁山慈竹再生植株叶绿素荧光特性和耐寒转录因子的表达

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.04.008

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (04): 39-44.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.04.008

低温胁迫下梁山慈竹再生植株叶绿素荧光特性和耐寒转录因子的表达

陈容, 张丽, 曹颖, 卢学琴, 胡尚连^*, 段宁

西南科技大学生命科学与工程学院, 四川绵阳 621010

出版日期:2014-07-31 发布日期:2014-07-31
基金资助:
收稿日期:2013-07-07 修回日期:2013-11-05
基金项目:四川省应用基础研究基金项目(2013JY0182)
第一作者:陈容,硕士生。*通信作者:胡尚连,教授,博士。E-mail: hushanglian@126.com。
引文格式:陈容, 张丽, 曹颖,等. 低温胁迫下梁山慈竹再生植株叶绿素荧光特性和耐寒转录因子的表达[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(4):39-44.

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and expression of cold-related transcription factors in regenerated plants of Dendrocalamus farinosus under cold stress

CHEN Rong, ZHANG Li, CAO Ying, LU Xueqin, HU Shanglian^*, DUAN Ning

College of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China

Online:2014-07-31 Published:2014-07-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以生长期一致的梁山慈竹实生苗(SS)和梁山慈竹种子成熟胚离体诱导愈伤组织获得的再生植株(No.101-1c、No.42-1-B、No.90-3)为材料,分析不同低温胁迫下其叶绿素荧光参数和耐寒相关转录因子表达量的变化,研究低温胁迫对梁山慈竹再生植株耐寒性的影响。结果表明:SS可耐受0 ℃低温处理,No.90-3仅能耐受4 ℃低温处理,而No.101-1c和No.42-1-B可以耐受-10 ℃低温处理,表明不同再生植株对低温胁迫的耐受能力不同,且与实生苗也有明显差异。低温胁迫条件下, SS、No.101-1c与No.90-3的F_v/F_m、Y(Ⅱ)和qP值均下降; No.42-1-B的Y(Ⅱ)值先上升后下降,其F_v/F_m、NPQ和qP则随温度降低而下降。实生苗的WRKY与CBF1基因的表达量降低,MYB基因的表达量上升; 再生植株No.90-3和No.42-1-B的MYB、WRKY和CBF1基因的表达量均随温度降低而升高; No.101-1c的WRKY和CBF1基因表达量上升,而MYB表达量下降。相关性分析结果表明:实生苗中WRKY和CBF1的表达量与Y(Ⅱ)的值呈显著的正相关关系; No.101-1c中MYB的表达量与Y(Ⅱ)的值呈显著的正相关关系,而WRKY和CBF1的表达量与NPQ的值呈显著的负相关关系; No.42-1-B中WRKY的表达量与qP的值呈显著的负相关关系。

Abstract: In order to explore the cold-resistance of the regenerated plants from Dendrocalamus farinosus, the seedlings of D. farinosus(SS)and three regenerated plants(No.101-1c, No.42-1-B and No.90-3)induced from D. farinosus mature embryo in vitro were exposed to cold stress in this study. Their chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and expression level of cold-related transcription factors under cold stress were investigated. It aimed to the results showed that SS could be resistant to 0 ℃; No.90-3 could be resistant to 4 ℃,while No.101-1c and No.42-1-B could be resistant to-10 ℃. It indicated that the cold-resistance of three regenerated plants was different and had obvious difference with SS. Under cold stress, F_v/F_m, Y(Ⅱ)and qP of SS, No.101-1c and No.90-3 decreased with the temperature decreasing, while Y(Ⅱ) of No.42-1-B went up and then descended, but the F_v/F_m, NPQ and qP reduced. The expression level of WRKY and CBF1 from SS decreased, while the expression level of MYB increased. In No.90-3 and No.42-1-B, the increase of expression level of MYB, WRKY and CBF1 was observed, and the transcription accumulation of WRKY and CBF1 from No.101-1c increased, but the expression level of MYB reduced under the cold stress. The results of correlation analysis showed that the expression of WRKY and CBF1 from SS had a significant positive relationship with Y(Ⅱ); the relationship between MYB and Y(Ⅱ)from No.101-1c was positive significantly, while there was a significant negative relationship among NPQ, WRKY and CBF1. In addition, WRKY showed a significant negative relationship to qP of No.42-1-B.

中图分类号:

S718.46

陈容,张丽,曹颖,等. 低温胁迫下梁山慈竹再生植株叶绿素荧光特性和耐寒转录因子的表达[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 38(04): 39-44.

CHEN Rong, ZHANG Li, CAO Ying, LU Xueqin, HU Shanglian, DUAN Ning. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and expression of cold-related transcription factors in regenerated plants of Dendrocalamus farinosus under cold stress[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 38(04): 39-44.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.04.008.

参考文献

[1] 邓江明, 简令成. 植物抗冻机理研究新进展:抗冻基因表达及其功能[J]. 植物学通报, 2001, 18(5): 521-530. Deng J M, Jian L C. Advances of studies on plant freezing-tolerance mechanism: freezing tolerance gene expression and its function[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2001, 18(5): 521-530.
[2] Ying J, Lee E A, Tollenaar M. Response of maize leaf photosynthesis to low temperature during the grain-filling period[J]. Field Crops Research, 2000, 68(10): 87-96.
[3] 武辉, 周艳飞, 侯丽丽,等. 低温弱光胁迫对棉花幼苗叶绿素荧光特性及能量分配的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2012, 49(3): 393-399. WU H, Zhou Y F, Hou L L, et al. Effects of low temperature and weak light stress on chlorophyll fluorescence characterisitics and energy allocation in cotton seedlings[J]. Xingjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 49(3): 393-399.
[4] Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses[J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2006, 57: 781-803.
[5] Vannini C, Locatelli F, Bracale M, et al. Over-expression of the rice Osmby4 gene increases chilling and freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant J, 2004, 37: 115-127.
[6] Huang T, Duman J G. Cloning and characterization of a thermal hysteresis(antifreeze)protein with DNA-binding activity from winter bittersweet nightshade, Solanum dulcamara[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2002, 48(4): 339-350.
[7] 曹云飞, 张海娜, 肖凯. CBF转录因子介导的植物低温信号转导研究进展[J]. 棉花学报, 2007, 19(4): 304-311. Cao Y F, Zang H N, Xiao K. The signal transduction pathways under low temperature mediated by CBF transcription factor in plants[J]. Cotton Science, 2007, 19(4): 304-311.
[8] Ito Y, Katsura K, Maruyama K, et al. Functional analysis of rice DREB1/CBF-type transcription factors involved in cold-responsive gene expression in transgenic rice[J]. Plant and Cell Physiol, 2006, 47(1): 141-153.
[9] Hsieh T, Lee J T, Charng Y Y, et al. T1 Tomato plants ectopically expressing Arabidopsis CBF1 show enhanced resistance to water deficit stress[J].Plant Physiology, 2002, 30: 618-626.
[10] 李蕾, 谢丙炎,戴小枫,等. WRKY转录因子及其在植物防御反应中的作用[J]. 分子植物育种, 2005, 3(3): 401-408. LI L, Xie B Y, Dai X F, et al. WRKY transcription factors and their roles in plant defense responses[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2005, 3(3): 401-408.
[11] Ulker B, Somssich I E. WRKY transcription factors: from DNA binding towards biological function[J]. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2004, 7(5): 491-498.
[12] Agarwal M, HAO Y J, Kapoor A, et al. A R2R3 type MYB transcription factor is involved in the cold regulation of CBF genes and in acquired freezing tolerance[J]. J Biol Chem, 2006, 281(49): 37636-37645.
[13] 胡尚连, 陈其兵, 孙霞,等. 丛生竹生理生化特性与遗传改良[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
[14] Hu S L, Zhou J Y, Cao Y, et al. In vitro callus induction and plant regeneration from mature seed embryo and young shoots in a giant sympodial bamboo, Dendrocalamus farinosus(Keng et Keng f.)Chia et H.L. Fung[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2011, 10(16): 3210-3215.
[15] Pfaffl M W, Horgan G W, Dempfle L. Relative expression software tool(RESTc)for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, 30(9): 36.
[16] 陈建明, 俞晓平, 程家安. 叶绿素荧光动力学及其在植物抗逆生理研究中的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2006, 18(1): 51-55.Chen J M, Yu X P, Chen J A. The application of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics in the study of physiological responses of plants to environmental stresses[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2006, 18(1):51-55.
[17] 周蕴薇, 刘艳萍, 戴思兰. 用叶绿素荧光分析技术鉴定植物抗寒性的剖析[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2006, 42(5): 945-950.Zhou Y W, Liu Y P, Dai S L. Identification of cold resistant plants by chlorophyll fluorescence analysis technique[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2006, 42(5): 945-950.
[18] 周建, 杨立峰, 郝峰鸽,等. 低温胁迫对广玉兰幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2009, 29(1): 136-142. Zhou J, Yang L F, Hao F G, et al. Photosynthesis and chlorophyll-fluorescence of Magnolia grandiflora seedlings under low temperature stress[J]. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2009, 29(1): 136-142.
[19] Fracheboud Y, Haldimann P, Leipner J, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection tool for cold tolerance of photosynthesis in maize[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1999, 50: 1533-1540.
[20] 李晓, 冯伟, 曾晓春. 叶绿素荧光分析技术及应用进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(10): 2186-2196. Li X, Feng W, Zeng X C. Advances in chlorophyll fluorescence analysis and its uses[J]. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2006, 26(10): 2186-2196.
[21] 敖金成, 苏文华, 张光飞,等. 不同光强下对马耳蕨叶绿素荧光参数的日变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 35(1): 135-138. Ao J C, Su W H, Zhang G F, et al. Diurnal changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Polystichum tsus-sinense(Hook)J. Sm. under different light intensities[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2011, 35(1): 135-138.
[22] 冯建灿, 胡秀丽, 毛训甲. 叶绿素荧光动力学在研究植物逆境生理中的应用[J]. 经济林研究, 2002, 20(4): 14-18.Feng J C, Hu X L, Mao X J. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics to plant physiology in adverse circumstance[J]. Economic Forest Researches, 2002, 20(4): 14-18.
[23] 陈儒钢, 巩振辉, 逯明辉,等. 植物抗逆反应中的转录因子网络研究进展[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2010, 18(1): 126-134.Chen R G, Gong Z H, Lu M H, et al. Research advance of the transcription factors networks related to plant adverse environmental stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2010, 18(1): 126-134.
[24] Chen Y H, Yang X Y, He K. The MYB transeription factor superfamily of Arabidopsis: expression analysis and phylogenetic comparison with the rice MYB family[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2006, 60: 107-124.
[25] 张颖. 黄瓜低温胁迫应答转录因子CsWRKY46和CsWRKY21的表达特征与功能分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012.Zhang Y. Expression characteristics and functional analysis of CsWRKY46 and CsWRKY21 response to chilling in cucumber[D]. Beijing: The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012.
[26] Orvar B L, Sangwan V, Omann F, et al. Early steps in cold sensing by plant cells: the role of actin cytoskeleton and membrane fluidity[J]. Plant J, 2000, 23(6): 785-794.
[27] 刘蕾, 杜海, 唐晓凤,等. MYB转录因子在植物抗逆胁迫中的作用及其分子机理[J]. 遗传, 2008, 30(10): 1265-1271.Liu L, Du H, Tang X F, et al. The roles of MYB transcription factors on plant defense responses and its molecular mechanism[J]. Hereditas, 2008, 30(10): 1265-1271.
[28] Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Seki M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses[J]. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2003, 6(5): 410-417.
[29] Fowler S, Thomashow M F. Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway[J]. Plant Cell, 2002, 14(8): 1675-1690.

低温胁迫下梁山慈竹再生植株叶绿素荧光特性和耐寒转录因子的表达

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and expression of cold-related transcription factors in regenerated plants of Dendrocalamus farinosus under cold stress

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	张曦文, 陈旭, 吴军, 孙国飞, 吴力国, 赵长海, 代伟昭, 刘桂丰. 彩叶桦新品种幼龄期生长适应性早期分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 124-130.
[2]	教忠意, 田雪瑶, 郑纪伟, 王保松, 何开跃, 何旭东. 灌木柳耐盐SNP位点的快速鉴定与标记开发[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 107-113.
[3]	廖焕琴, 杨会肖, 徐放, 潘文, 张卫华, 陈新宇, 朱报著, 徐斌, 王裕霞, 杨晓慧. 尾叶桉不同无性系组培生根相关基因的表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 114-122.
[4]	李婷婷, 国靖, 汪贵斌. 外源ABA对银杏叶黄酮类化合物体内合成的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 88-94.
[5]	何旭东, 隋德宗, 王红玲, 黄瑞芳, 郑纪伟, 王保松. 中国柳树遗传育种研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 51-63.
[6]	孙荣卿, 董李勤, 张昆, 刘宏强, 王耠熠, 胡昭佚. 四川若尔盖湿地国家级自然保护区水体氢氧同位素与水化学特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 169-178.
[7]	何旭东, 郑纪伟, 孙冲, 何开跃, 王保松. 33个杨柳品种指纹图谱构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 35-42.
[8]	欧阳芳群, 祁生秀, 范国霞, 蔡启山, 陈海庆, 高万里, 胡长寿, 王军辉. 青海云杉自由授粉家系遗传变异与基于BLUP的改良代亲本选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(6): 53-59.
[9]	冯源恒, 李火根, 杨章旗, 黄永利, 陈虎. 广西马尾松三个优良种源的遗传多样性及生长性状变异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(6): 67-72.
[10]	李昌荣,陈健波,郭东强,翁启杰,卢翠香,李建凡,周维,甘四明. 锯材大花序桉生长和材性的综合指数选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(01): 1-8.
[11]	伊贤贵,陈洁,尤禄祥,从睿,王华辰,段一凡,王贤荣. 山樱花群体遗传多样性的SSR分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(05): 25-31.
[12]	冯源恒,杨章旗,李火根,罗群凤,吴东山,黄永利. 不同时期广西马尾松优良种源的遗传多样性变化趋势[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(05): 41-46.
[13]	谢一青. 小果油茶农家品种花粉形态及亲缘关系分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(03): 26-32.
[14]	吴晓宇,胡尚连,曹颖,卢学琴,任鹏,周美娟,李晓瑞. 慈竹CCoAOMT基因的克隆及生物信息学分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(03): 17-22.
[15]	徐立安. 栎属群体与进化遗传研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2002, 26(06): 73-77.