杉木人工林不同根序的一级根形态差异及其对间伐的响应

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.04.013

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (04): 69-74.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.04.013

杉木人工林不同根序的一级根形态差异及其对间伐的响应

王东,李瑞霞,陈信力,关庆伟^*

南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院,江苏南京 210037

出版日期:2014-07-31 发布日期:2014-07-31
基金资助:
收稿日期:2013-07-25 修回日期:2013-12-15
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201104075); 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB416904); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
第一作者:王东,硕士。*通信作者:关庆伟,教授。E-mail:guanjapan999@163.com。
引文格式:王东,李瑞霞,陈信力,等. 杉木人工林不同根序的一级根形态差异及其对间伐的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(4):69-74.

Variations of morphology among first order roots in different branch orders and the effect of thinning on its’ morphology in Chinese fir plantation

WANG Dong, LI Ruixia, CHEN Xinli, GUAN Qingwei^*

College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Online:2014-07-31 Published:2014-07-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以江苏南京溧水林场实施了4种间伐强度(CK(不间伐)、弱度间伐(LIT,比例30%)、中度间伐(MIT,比例50%)、强度间伐(HIT,比例70%))的25年生杉木人工林为研究对象,探讨了不同根序上一级根直径、根长和比根长的差异及间伐(6年)对其生长的影响。将一级根按着生位置的不同分为4类:Ar(2级根上的一级根)、Br(3级根上的一级根)、Cr(4级根上的一级根)、Dr(5级根上的一级根)。结果表明:杉木人工林不同根序上一级根数量和根长存在显著差异(p<0.05),而直径和比根长无显著差异(p>0.05)。随着一级根着生根序的增加,一级根数量极显著减小(p<0.01),所占总根数比例从大到小为Ar(79%)>Br(13%)>Cr(6%)>Dr(2%); Dr类根的根长显著大于其余3类根的根长(p<0.05)。与对照相比,间伐仅对Br类根的直径及Dr类根的直径和根长有显著影响(p<0.05)。其中,Br类根的直径在LIT和HIT中显著减小; Dr类根的直径在MIT中显著增大,而根长却在LIT中显著减小。相关分析表明,土壤表层(0～10 cm)林下非目的树种活细根生物量、土壤亚表层(≥10～20 cm)全氮分别与Br类、Dr类根的直径呈显著的负相关关系,土壤表层(0～10 cm)的全氮则与Dr类根的根长呈显著正相关关系。

Abstract: The number, diameter, length and sepecific root length(SRL)of first order roots in different branch orders among four thinning intensities(CK. 0, LIT. 30%, MIT. 50%, HIT. 70%)of Chinese fir(25years)plantation were studied in Nanjing Lishui Forest Farm of Jiangsu province. First-order root samples from plantations were separated into four categories: Ar(from 2nd-order), Br(from 3rd-order), Cr(from 4th-order)and Dr(from 5th-order). Results showed that: The first order roots in different branch orders showed significant differences in numbers and root length(p<0.05), whereas there were no significant differences observed in both root diameter and SRL. The numbers of first-order root in different root orders significantly increased with increasing root order(p<0.05):Ar(79%)>Br(13%)>Cr(6%)>Dr(2%). And Dr was significantly longer than the others in length(p<0.05). Compared with the control plots, only the diameter of Br and Dr and the length of Dr had a significant response to thinning practice.The mean diameter of Dr significantly increased in MIT plot, but the length of it significantly decreased in LIT plot. The mean diameter of Br both LIT and HIT markedly decreased. Correlation analysis showed, the non-target live fine root in 0-10 cm soil depth and soil total N in ≥10-20 cm depth had a significantly negative effect on the diameter of Br and Dr, whereas a significantly positive relationship was observed between soil total N at 0-10 cm depth and the root length of Dr.

中图分类号:

S718

王东,李瑞霞,陈信力,等. 杉木人工林不同根序的一级根形态差异及其对间伐的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 38(04): 69-74.

WANG Dong, LI Ruixia, CHEN Xinli, GUAN Qingwei. Variations of morphology among first order roots in different branch orders and the effect of thinning on its’ morphology in Chinese fir plantation[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 38(04): 69-74.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.04.013.

参考文献

[1] 王向荣,谷加存,梅莉,等. 水曲柳和落叶松细根形态及母根与子根比例关系[J]. 生态学报, 2006,26(6): 1686-1692.Wang X R, Gu J C, Mei L,et al. Fine root order morphology and proportion between mother roots and daughter roots in Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(6): 1686-1692.
[2] Guo D L, Mitchell R J, Withington J M,et al. Endogenous and exogenous controls of root life span, mortality and nitrogen flux in a longleaf pine forest: root branch order predominates[J]. J Ecol, 2008, 96(4): 737-745.
[3] Pregitzer K S, DeForest J L, Burton A J,et al. Fine root architecture of nine North American trees[J]. Ecol Monogr, 2002, 72(2): 293-309.
[4] 宋森, 谷加存, 全先奎,等. 水曲柳和兴安落叶松人工林细根分解研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008,32(6): 1227-1237.Song S, Gu J C, Quan X K,et al. Fine root decomposition of Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008,32(6): 1227-1237.
[5] Majdi H, Damm E, Nylund J E. Longevity of mycorrhizal roots depends on branching order and nutrient availability[J]. New Phytol, 2001, 150(1): 195-202.
[6] 刘颖, 谷加存, 卫星,等. 树木不同根序上一级根的形态、解剖结构和氮含量[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010,34(11): 1336-1343.Liu Y, Gu J C, Wei X, et al. Variations of morphology, anatomical structure and nitrogen content among first-order roots in different positions along branch orders in tree species[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(11): 1336-1343.
[7] López B, Sabaté S, Gracia C. Fine roots dynamics in a mediterranean forest: effects of drought and stem density[J]. Tree Physiol, 1998, 18(8-9): 601-606.
[8] Noguchi K, Han Q M, Araki M G,et al. Fine-root dynamics in a young hinoki cypress(Chamaecyparis obtusa)stand for 3 years following thinning[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2011, 16(4): 284-291.
[9] Dighton J, Helmisaari H S, Maghirang M,et al. Impacts of forest post thinning residues on soil chemistry, fauna and roots: Implications of residue removal in Finland[J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2012, 60: 16-22.
[10] de Miranda M S L, de Moraes G J L, Gava J L. Pre-and post-harvest fine root growth in Eucalyptus grandis stands installed in sandy and loamy soils[J]. Forest Ecol Manag, 2007, 246(2-3): 186-195.
[11] Wang Z Q, Guo D L, Wang X R, et al. Fine root architecture, morphology, and biomass of different branch orders of two Chinese temperate tree species[J]. Plant Soil, 2006, 288(1-2): 155-171.
[12] 刘佳, 项文化, 徐晓,等. 湖南会同5个亚热带树种的细根构型及功能特征分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010,34(8): 938-945.Liu J, Xiang W H, Xu X, et al. Analysis of architecture and functions of fine roots of five subtropical tree species in Huitong, Hunan Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010,34(8): 938-945.
[13] 潘瑞炽. 植物生理学[M].北京, 高等教育出版社, 2001.
[14] 王祖华, 李瑞霞, 郝俊鹏,等. 间伐对杉木人工林不同根序细根形态的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011,39(6): 13-15,19.Wang Z H, Li R X, Hao J P, et al. Effects of thinning on fine root morphology in Chinese fir plantations[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2011, 39(6):13-15,19.
[15] Curt T, Coll L, Prévosto B,et al. Plasticity in growth, biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition[J]. Ann Forest Sci, 2005, 62(1): 51-60.
[16] Fujii S, Kasuya N. Fine root biomass and morphology of Pinus densiflora under competitive stress by Chamaecyparis obtusa[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2008, 13(3): 185-189.
[17] 王祖华, 李瑞霞, 王晓杰,等. 间伐对杉木人工林林下植被多样性及生物量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010,19(12): 2778-2782. Wang Z H, Li R X, Wang X J,et al. Effects of thinning on biomass and species diversity of understory in Chinese fir plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(12): 2778-2782.
[18] Krasowski M J, Owens J N. Tracheids in white spruce seedling’s long lateral roots in response to nitrogen availability[J]. Plant and Soil, 1999, 217(1-2): 215-228.
[19] Huang G, Zhao X Y, Zhao H L, et al. Linking root morphology, longevity and function to root branch order: a case study in three shrubs[J]. Plant Soil, 2010, 336(1-2): 197-208.
[20] Domisch T, Finér L, Lehto T. Effects of soil temperature on biomass and carbohydrate allocation in Scots pine(Pinus sylvestris)seedlings at the beginning of the growing season[J]. Tree Physiol, 2001, 21(7): 465-472.
[21] Walker M D, Walker D A, Welker J M,et al. Long-term experimental manipulation of winter snow regime and summer temperature in arctic and alpine tundra[J]. Hydrol Process, 1999, 13(1415): 2315-2330.
[22] Drennan P M, Nobel P S. Root growth dependence on soil temperature for Opuntia ficus‐indica: influences of air temperature and a doubled CO₂ concentration[J]. Funct Ecol, 1998, 12(6): 959-964.
[23] 李彩霞, 孙景生, 周新国,等. 隔沟交替灌溉条件下玉米根系形态性状及结构分布[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(14): 3956-3963.Li C X, Sun J S, Zhou X G, et al. Root morphology characteristics under alternate furrow irrigation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011,31(14): 3956-3963.
[24] 孙玥, 全先奎, 贾淑霞,等. 施用氮肥对落叶松人工林一级根外生菌根侵染及形态的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007,18(8): 1727-1732.Sun Y, Quan X K, Jia S X, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on ectomycorrhizal infection of first order roots and root morphology of Larix gmelinii plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007,18(8): 1727-1732.
[25] 李瑞霞, 凌宁, 郝俊鹏, 等. 林龄对侧柏人工林碳储量以及细根形态和生物量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2013,37(2):21-27. Li R X, Ling N, Hao J P, et al. Effects of stand ages on carbon storage, fine root morphology and biomass in Platycladus orientalis plantation[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Nature Sciences Edition, 2013,37(2):21-27.

相关文章 15

[1]	丛明珠, 刘琪璟, 孙震, 董淳超, 钱尼澎. 长白山北坡植物群落β多样性及其组分驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 99-106.
[2]	曹荔荔, 阮宏华, 李媛媛, 倪娟平, 王国兵, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 徐亚明. 不同林龄水杉人工林地表大型土壤动物群落特征比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 91-98.
[3]	张怡婷, 夏念和, 林树燕, 丁雨龙. 我国寒竹属空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 107-114.
[4]	胡衍平, 刘卫东, 张珉, 陈明皋, 程勇, 魏志恒, 庞文胜, 吴际友. 山乌桕家系叶片叶色参数和色素含量及其解剖结构研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 123-133.
[5]	王一洁, 王璐冕, 丁真慧, 钱程, 曹加杰. 城市滨水绿地空间夏季微气候效应研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 233-241.
[6]	赵国扬, 洪波, 高俊平, 赵鑫, 黄洪峰, 徐彦杰. 菊属新品种‘雀欢’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 254-255.
[7]	任佳辉, 高捍东, 陈哲楠, 李浩, 刘强, 陈澎军. 杂交新美柳苗对盐涝胁迫的生长和生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 57-66.
[8]	董亚文, 陈双林, 谢燕燕, 郭子武, 张景润, 汪舍平, 徐勇敢. 林下植被演替过程中毛竹和主要优势树种叶片建成成本变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 179-186.
[9]	徐薪璐, 孔淑鑫, 吕卓, 江帅君, 赵婉琪, 林树燕. 靓竹叶色表型叶片形态、结构与光合特性相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 145-154.
[10]	曹永慧, 陈庆标, 周本智, 葛晓改, 王小明. 不同截雨干旱时间对毛竹叶片氮含量时空分布的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 155-161.
[11]	隋夕然, 李军, 陈娟, 华军, 沈谦, 杨洪胜, 何前程, 李由, 王伟, 彭冶, 葛之葳, 张增信. 徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 171-178.
[12]	尹华康, 张晋东, 黄金燕, 蒲冠桦, 毛泽恩, 周材权, 黄耀华, 付励强. 四川马边大风顶自然保护区大熊猫主食竹空间分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 187-193.
[13]	孔凡斌, 金晨涛, 徐彩瑶. 罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 245-254.
[14]	龚霞, 吴银明, 王海峰, 曾攀, 唐亚, 温铿, 焦文献. 花椒新品种‘蜀椒1号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 265-266.
[15]	吴桐, 王贤荣, 伊贤贵, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 陈祥珍, 高书成. 樱花新品种‘胭脂雪’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 267-268.

杉木人工林不同根序的一级根形态差异及其对间伐的响应

Variations of morphology among first order roots in different branch orders and the effect of thinning on its’ morphology in Chinese fir plantation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿