对海口市主要城市公园分布的观花树种进行了实地调查,共统计到常见观花树种78种,隶属于27科61属。以观花树种的花色、花型、花香、花期、叶色、叶型、株型和果实特性等作为评价指标,利用层次分析法(AHP)进行观赏价值的量化评价,确定各观花树种的分值并进行排序, 为海口市城市绿地系统的树种规划提供技术支撑。
Abstract
Based on the investigation of resources of flowering trees and shrubs in the main urban parks of Haikou, 78 species were observed which belonging to 27 families and 61 genuses. Meanwhile, the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)was taken to quantitative evaluation based on flower color, flower type, flower scent, blooming period, blade profile, plant type and the characters of fruit, and then the results of evaluation scores and sorting were reported in this paper.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 刘孟霞,张延龙,张庆春,等. 运用层次-关联分析法综合评价加拿大引种草本花卉[J]. 西北农业学报,2009(4):261-266.Liu M X, Zhang Y L, Zhang Q C, et al. The comprehensive evaluation of the ornamental flower plants introduced fromCanada by the application of hierarchy-relation analysis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2009(4): 261-266.
[2] 刘新宪,朱道立. 选择与判断-AHP(层次分析法)决策[M]. 上海:上海科学普及出版社,1990:5-8.Liu X X, Zhu D L. Choice and judgment-AHP(analytic hierarchy process)decisions[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Popular Science Press, 1990: 5-8.
[3] 杜晓华,刘会超,张凤娟,等. 层次分析法在三色堇观赏性评价中的应用[J]. 东北农业大学学报,2012,43(10):166-171.Du X H, Liu H C, Zhang F J, et al. Analytic hierarchy process on pansy ornamental evaluation[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2012, 43(10): 166-171.
[4] 陈仲芳,张霖,尚富德. 利用层次分析法综合评价湖北省部分桂花品种[J]. 园艺学报,2004(6):825-828.Chen Z F, Zhang L, Shang F D, Use analytic hierchy process to appraise some Osmanthus fragrans cultivars in Hubei province[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2004(6): 825-828.
[5] 杨芳绒,陈培玉. 不同刺槐品种的观赏性评价与园林应用[J]. 江西农业学报,2010,22(11):45-47.Yang F R, Chen P Y. Evaluation and gargens application for namental characters of different locus tree varieties[J]. Acta Agriculture Jiangxi, 2010, 22(11): 45-47.
[6] 成夏岚,陈红峰,欧阳婵娟. 海口市城市绿地常见植物多样性调查及特征研究[J]. 风景园林植物,2013(3):105-108. Cheng X L, Chen H F, Ouyang C J. The investigation and character study of common plants diversity in Haikou urban green spaces[J]. Landscape Plants, 2013(3): 105-108.
[7] 宫春亭,许先升. 海口综合性城市公园对游憩行为支持的调查研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2011(8):68-71.Gong C T, Xu X S. Survey on the support of recreational behavior from the comprehensive park inHaikou city[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011(8): 68-71.
[8] 兰思仁. 福建省野生观赏植物资源调查与观花树木的观赏特性评价[J]. 中国园林,2010(12):63-67.Lan S R. Studies on the resources of wild ornamental plants and evaluation of ornamental characters for flower plants in Fujian province[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2010(12): 63-67.
[9] 曾怡. 广州市天河公园的园林景观评价与优化建议[D]. 广州:华南师范大学,2010.Zeng Y. Landscape architecture evaluation and tuning recommendation of Tianhe Park in Guangzhou[D]. Guangzhou: South China Normal University, 2010.
[10] 骆正清,杨善林. 层次分析法中几种标度的比较[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(9):51-60.Luo Z Q, Yang S L. Comparative study on several scales in AHP[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2004, 24(9):51-60.
[11] 黄清平. 利用层次分析法评价三明市野生观赏植物的引种驯化效果[J]. 中国园林,2009(12):93-96.Huang Q P. Evaluation on the introduction and domestication of wild ornamental plants by analytic hierarchy process(ahp)in Sanming city[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2009(12): 93-96.
[12] 芦建国,李舒仪. 公园植物景观综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(6):139-142.Lu J G, Li S Y. Study on the synthetical assessment of park plant landscape and its application[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2009, 33(6): 139-142.
[13] 方燕鸿. 野生观赏植物观赏特性数量化评价[J]. 华东森林经理,2005,19(4):45-50.Fang Y H. Quantitative assessment for the appreciated characteristic of wild ornamental plant[J]. East china Forest Management, 2005, 19(4): 45-50.
基金
收稿日期:2014-09-10
基金项目:海南省重大科技项目(ZDZX2013012)和海南大横向项目(HD-KYH-2013087)
第一作者:史佑海,副教授。E-mail:shiyouhai@163.com。
引文格式:史佑海,祝晓航. 海口市城市公园主要观花树种资源及观赏特性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(S1):118-124.
PDF(1376581 KB)
