生物覆盖对银杏用材林土壤酶活性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.004

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (02): 21-26.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.004

生物覆盖对银杏用材林土壤酶活性的影响

徐宏强^1,2,3,汪贵斌^1,2*,曹福亮^1,2,曾祥东^1,2

1.南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏南京 210036;
2.南京林业大学林学院,江苏南京 210037;
3.江苏省林业局, 江苏南京 210036

出版日期:2015-03-31 发布日期:2015-03-31
基金资助:
收稿日期:2014-07-24 修回日期:2014-12-30
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201004001); “十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD21B04); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
第一作者:徐宏强,高级工程师。*通信作者:汪贵斌,教授。E-mail:gbwang@njfu.com.cn。
引文格式:徐宏强,汪贵斌,曹福亮,等. 生物覆盖对银杏用材林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(2):21-26.

Effects of biological mulching on soil enzyme activity of ginkgo(Ginkgo biloba L.)timber plantation

XU Hongqiang^1,2,3, WANG Guibin^1,2*, CAO Fuliang^1,2, ZENG Xiangdong^1,2

1. Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
2. College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
3. Forestry Bureau of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210036, China

Online:2015-03-31 Published:2015-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生物覆盖是改善土壤性质和提高作物产量的一种重要土壤管理措施。笔者以东台林场银杏(Ginkgo biloba L.)用材林地为研究对象,采用随机区组试验设计,研究了覆盖材料(小麦秸秆、稻草秸秆和玉米秸秆)和覆盖量(2、4和6 kg/m²玉米秸秆)对表层土壤(0～10 cm)中脲酶、碱性磷酸酶活性、蔗糖酶和过氧化氢酶活性的影响。结果表明:3种生物覆盖材料均不同程度地提高了土壤中脲酶、碱性磷酸酶、蔗糖酶和过氧化氢酶的活性,以玉米秸秆和稻草秸秆覆盖效果较好。玉米秸秆覆盖量也显著影响了4种土壤酶的活性,总体来说覆盖量越大酶活性越强。土壤脲酶、碱性磷酸酶和蔗糖酶的活性与一年中的气候变化有关,随着土壤温度的升高而提高,7月份酶活性均达到最高,而土壤过氧化氢酶与其他3种酶相比,受温度的影响相对较小,10月份酶活性最大。因此,生物覆盖显著增加了银杏用材林土壤中脲酶、碱性磷酸酶、过氧化氢酶和蔗糖酶的活性,可用于提高银杏用材林地土壤的熟化程度和肥力水平。

Abstract: Biological mulching is an important soil management measurement for improving soil properties and crop yield, and it is widely used in forestry. In this paper, a randomized block design was used, the effect of mulching materials(wheat straw, rice straw and corn straw)and mulching amount(2, 4, 6 kg/m²)on enzyme activity of surface soil(0-10 cm)in ginkgo(Ginkgo biloba L.)timber plantation were studied. We found that urease, alkaline phosphatase, sucrase and catalase activities were increased in a different degree under three mulching materials, and the mulching effect of corn straw and rice straw were better. Mulching amount of corn straw had a significant effect on the activity of four soil enzymes, and the activities of four enzymes had an enhancing tendency with the increasing of mulching amount. The activity of urease, alkaline phosphatase and sucrase were identical with variation of temperature in a year, and they reached the highest activity in July. But catalase owned the highest activity in October, indicating that temperature has more effect on the activity of urease, alkaline phosphatase and sucrase than that of catalase. Overall, biological muching increased the activity of soil enzymes in ginkgo timber plantation, and improved soil fertility.

中图分类号:

S718

徐宏强,汪贵斌,曹福亮,等. 生物覆盖对银杏用材林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(02): 21-26.

XU Hongqiang, WANG Guibin, CAO Fuliang, ZENG Xiangdong. Effects of biological mulching on soil enzyme activity of ginkgo(Ginkgo biloba L.)timber plantation[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(02): 21-26.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.004.

参考文献

[1] 刘久俊, 方升佐, 谢宝东, 等. 生物覆盖对杨树人工林根际土壤微生物, 酶活性及林木生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(6):1204-1210.Liu J Z, Fang S Z, Xie B D, et al.Effects of bio-mulching on rhizosphere soil microbial population,enzyme activity and tree growth in poplar plantation [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(6):1204-1210.
[2] 徐雁, 向成华, 李贤伟. 土壤酶的研究概况[J]. 四川林业科技, 2010, 31(2):14-19.Xu Y, Xiang C H, Li X W. Advances in soil enzymology [J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2010, 31(2):14-19.
[3] Balota E L, Machineski O, Truber P V, et al. Effect of tillage systems and permanent groundcover intercropped with orange trees on soil enzyme activities [J]. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 2011, 54(2):221-228.
[4] 林诚, 王飞, 林新坚, 等. 不同紫云英翻压量对土壤酶活性及微生物生物量碳氮的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2011, 32(6):1020-1023.Lin C, Wang F,Lin X J, et al. The effect of Astragalus sinicus manure application on soil enzyme activities and level of microbial biomass C and N [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2011, 32(6):1020-1023.
[5] 张桂玲. 秸秆和生草覆盖对桃园土壤养分含量、微生物数量及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(12):1236-1244.Zhang G L. Effects of straw and living grass mulching on soil nutrients, soil microbial quantities and soil enzyme activities in a peach orchard [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(12):1236-1244.
[6] 李春勃, 范丙全, 孟春香, 等. 麦秸覆盖旱地棉田少耕培肥效果[J]. 生态农业研究, 1995, 3(3):52-55.Li C B, Fang B Q, Meng C X, et al. Effects of straw mulching on soil fertility under minimum tillage system in rainfed cotton field [J]. Eco-Agrilculture Research, 1995, 3(3):52-55.
[7] 王资生, 阮成江, 郑怀平. 盐城滩涂资源特征及可持续利用对策[J]. 海洋通报, 2001, 20(4):64-69.Wang Z S, Ruan C J, Zheng H P.Features of tida1-flat resource of Yancheng and measures of sustainable utilization [J]. Marine Science Bulletih, 2001, 20(4):64-69.
[8] 张建兵, 杨劲松, 姚荣江, 等. 有机肥与覆盖方式对滩涂围垦农田水盐与作物产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(15):116-125.Zhang J B, Yang J S, Yao R J, et al. Dynamics of soil water, salt and crop growth under farmyard manure and mulching in coastal tidal flat soil of northern Jiangsu Province [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(15):116-125.
[9] 谢宝东. 南方山地杨树人工林生物覆盖效应研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2006.Xie B D. A study on bio-mulching effects of poplar plantation in southern mountainous region [D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2006.
[10] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
[11] Burns R G. Soil enzymes [M]. New York:Academic Press, 1978.
[12] 崔荟萍, 赵桂琴, 刘欢. 除草剂对燕麦田土壤脲酶和碱性磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(1):37-43.Cui H P, Zhao G Q, Liu H.Effects of herbicide on the activities of urease and alkaline phosphatase in oat field [J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(1):37-43.
[13] 曹慧, 孙辉, 杨浩, 等. 土壤酶活性及其对土壤质量的指示研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2003, 9(1):105-109.Cao H, Sun H, Yang H, et al.A review: soil enzyme activity and its indication for soil quality [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2003, 9(1):105-109.
[14] 贾继文, 聂俊华, 李絮花, 等. 蔬菜大棚土壤理化性状与土壤酶活性关系的研究[J]. 山东农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2001, 32(4):427-432.Jia J W, Nie J H, Li X H, et al.Study on the relationship between the soil physical-chemical properties and soil enzymatic activity of plastic greenhouse [J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University:Natural Science, 2001, 32(4):427-432.
[15] 方晰, 田大伦, 秦国宣, 等. 杉木林采伐迹地连栽和撂荒对林地土壤养分与酶活性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 49(12):65-71. Fang X, Tian D L, Qin G X, et a1. Nutrient contents andenzyme activities in the soil of Cunninghamia lanceolata forests of successive rotation and natural restoration with follow after clear-cutting [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 49(12):65-71.
[16] 季立声, 贾君永, 张圣武. 秸秆直接还田的土壤生物学效应[J]. 山东农业大学学报, 1992, 23(4):375-379.Ji L S, Jia J Y, Zhang S W. Biologican effects of straw direct application into soil [J].Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 1992, 23(4):375-379.
[17] 王磊. 秸秆还田对土壤养分. 微生物量与酶活性的影响研究[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学, 2011.Wang L. The effects of straw turnover on soil nutrition,microbial biomass and enzyme activity [D]. Hefei:Anhui Agricultural University, 2011.
[18] 罗珠珠, 黄高宝, Li Guangdi, 等. 保护性耕作对旱作农田耕层土壤肥力及酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(5):1085-1092.Luo Z Z, Huang G B, Li G D, er al.Effects of conservation tillage on soil nutrients and enzyme activities in rainfed area [J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(5):1085-1092.
[19] 彭娜,王凯荣, 王开峰, 等. 不同水分条件下施用稻草对土壤有机酸和有效磷的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(2):347-351.Peng N, Wang K R, Wang K F, et al.Effect of rice straw incorporation on concentration of organic acids and available phosphorus in soil under different water regimes [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2006, 43(2):347-351.
[20] 李倩, 张睿, 贾志宽. 玉米旱作栽培条件下不同秸秆覆盖量对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(4):152-154.Li Q, Zhang R, Jia Z K.Effect of different amount of straw mulching on soil enzyme activities in dry land [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2009, 27(4):152-154.
[21] 刘秀英, 黄国勤. 不同覆盖条件下旱稻土壤微生物区系及酶活性研究[J]. 长江大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 6(2):15-20.Liu X Y, Huang G Q. Study on soil micro-organism community and enzyme activity of upland rice field under different mulch conditions [J]. Journal of Yangtze University:Nat Sci Edit, 2009, 6(2):15-20.
[22] 朱越雄, 曹广力, 尚加飞, 等. 桑园土壤酶活性与化能异养细菌的年变化[J]. 江苏蚕业, 2000(1):7-9.Zhu Y X, Cao G L, Shang J F, et al. Annual variation of soil enzyme activity and chemoheterotrophy bacteria in mulberry plantation [J]. Jiangsu Sericulture, 2000(1):7-9.

生物覆盖对银杏用材林土壤酶活性的影响

Effects of biological mulching on soil enzyme activity of ginkgo(Ginkgo biloba L.)timber plantation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	杨永. 裸子植物的系统分类:历史、现状和展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 14-26.
[2]	张瑞, 周正虎, 王传宽, 金鹰. 东北温带森林不同材性树种木质部解剖和水力性状[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 229-236.
[3]	黄永健, 荀航, 张保, 尤俊昊, 姚曦, 汤锋. HPLC同时测定竹笋中8种酚酸类物质含量的方法研究及其应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 237-244.
[4]	邓云飞. 安息香科的系统学研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 27-35.
[5]	李家亮, 巫大宇, 毛康珊. 柏木属的分类地位和物种多样性研究现状与建议[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 36-45.
[6]	李涌福, 杨庆华, 陈林, 张敏, 向其柏, 王贤荣, 段一凡. 木犀属内分组关系的分类修订[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 58-62.
[7]	杨皓, 刘超, 庄家尧, 张树同, 张文韬, 毛国豪. 不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.
[8]	丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 王宇浩, 陈美玲, 李涛, 刘孝武, 周悦湘, 孙连浩, 廖艺. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 90-98.
[9]	武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 99-107.
[10]	卜晓婷, 付威, 李淑娴, 徐志标, 彭大庆, 徐林桥. 幼化和外源激素对娜塔栎嫩枝扦插生根的影响及其生根解剖学观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 129-136.
[11]	杜晋城, 李欣欣, 王泽亮, 刘偲, 钟毅, 王丽华. 聚乙二醇胁迫下3个油橄榄品种生理指标响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 137-143.
[12]	方静, 张书曼, 严善春, 武帅, 赵佳齐, 孟昭军. 两种丛枝菌根真菌复合接种对青山杨叶片抗美国白蛾的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 144-154.
[13]	张馨方, 王广鹏, 张树航, 李颖, 郭燕. 不同抗螨性板栗差异次生代谢物筛选与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 234-240.
[14]	杨宏, 伊贤贵, 王贤荣, 吴桐, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 朱兆青. 樱花新品种‘元春’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 275-276.
[15]	田梦阳, 朱树林, 窦全琴, 季艳红. 薄壳山核桃-茶间作对‘安吉白茶’速生期光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 86-96.