银杏的复合经营对土壤动物多样性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.005

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (02): 27-32.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.005

银杏的复合经营对土壤动物多样性的影响

张林杰^1,2,汪贵斌^1,2*,曹福亮^1,2

1.南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏南京 210037;
2.南京林业大学林学院,江苏南京 210037

出版日期:2015-03-31 发布日期:2015-03-31
基金资助:
收稿日期:2014-10-08 修回日期:2014-12-30
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(20104001); “十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD21B04); 江苏省科技支撑计划(BE2013443)
第一作者:张林杰,硕士生。*通信作者:汪贵斌,教授。E-mail:guibinwang99@163.com。
引文格式:张林杰,汪贵斌,曹福亮. 银杏的复合经营对土壤动物多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(2):27-32.

The effect of ginkgo agroforestry patterns on soil fauna diversity

ZHANG Linjie^1,2, WANG Guibin^1,2*, CAO Fuliang^1,2

1.Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
2.College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Online:2015-03-31 Published:2015-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对江苏省东台林场5种不同经营模式,包括银杏(G)、银杏+小麦(GW)、银杏+油菜(GR)、小麦(W)和油菜(R)土壤动物多样性进行调查,以了解不同经营模式对土壤动物群落的影响。试验中每种模式设置10 m×10 m样方,每个样方采用品字形取0～5 cm、≥5～10 cm、≥10～15 cm 3个层次的混合样,3月和6月共采集土壤样本90个,经Tullgren土壤动物分离漏斗分离并用75%酒精固定后获土壤动物7 069头,分属于5门9纲21类。通过对物种丰富度(S)、多样性指数(H)、均匀度指数(J)、相似度指数(Q)和密度-类群指数(I_DG)5个多样性指数进行分析,结果表明不同经营模式的多样性指数存在显著差异,土壤动物的优势种群为弹尾目和蜱螨目。G、GW、GR的丰富度、均匀度、密度-类群指数都高于W和R模式,优势度指数较小。丰富度指数与密度-类群指数显著正相关,季节只对R模式的多样性指数存在显著影响。G与GW和GR模式的土壤动物群落相似性指数较大,与W和R模式的土壤动物群落相似性较小,W与R模式的相似性较小。试验表明,不同经营模式对土壤动物群落具有一定的影响,与纯农模式相比,银杏复合模式提高了土壤动物的多样性,优化了土壤环境。

Abstract: In order to understand soil fauna diversity of different planting patterns, the soil fauna diversity of five planting patterns, including Ginkgo biloba (G), G. biloba+Triticum aestivuml (GW), G. biloba+Brassica campestris (GR), T. aestivuml (W)and B. campestris (R), were investigated in March and June 2014 at Dongtai Forest Farm, Jiangsu Province, China. There were 7 069 soil animals obtained from 90 soil samples by Tullgren funnel and 75% alcohol, which belong to 5 phyla and 9 classes. Diversity indexes of soil animals in five planting patterns were analyzed, including species abundance(S), diversity(H), evenness(J), similarity(Q)and density-group(I_DG), and the results showed that the diversity indexes of soil animals in five planting patterns had significant variation, and the dominant animal groups were Collembola and Acarina. H, j and I_DG indexes in G, GW and GR planting systems were higher than that in W and R systems, while Q index was lower. There was significant positive correlation between H and I_DG indexs. Season only affected diversity indexes of R pattern significantly. The Q index of G pattern was similar to GW and GR patterns, and it had significant variation with W and R patterns. So Ginkgo biloba agroforestry systems had significant effect on soil fauna communities, and interrcopping in Ginkgo biloba forest could protect the biodiversity of soil fauna.

中图分类号:

S725.2

张林杰,汪贵斌,曹福亮. 银杏的复合经营对土壤动物多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(02): 27-32.

ZHANG Linjie, WANG Guibin, CAO Fuliang. The effect of ginkgo agroforestry patterns on soil fauna diversity[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(02): 27-32.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.005.

参考文献

[1] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物[M].北京: 科学出版社, 2000.
[2] 邓晓保, 邹寿青, 付先惠, 等. 西双版纳热带雨林不同土地利用方式对土壤动物个体数量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2003,23(1): 130-138.Deng X B, Zou S Q, Fu X H, et al. The impacts of land use practices on the communities of soil fauna in the Xishuangbanna rainforest, Yunnan, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003,23(1): 130-138.
[3] Nakamura Y. The effects of soil management on the soil faunal makeup of a cropped andosol in central Japan[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 1988,12(2): 177-186.
[4] 吴廷娟. 全球变化对土壤动物多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013,24(2): 581-588.Wu T J. Effect of global change on soil fauna diversity: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013,24(2): 581-588.
[5] Blankinship J C, Niklaus P A, Hungate B A. A meta-analysis of responses of soil biota to global change[J]. Oecologia, 2011,165(3): 553-565.
[6] Simmons B L, Wall D H, Adams B J,et al. Long-term experimental warming reduces soil nematode populations in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009,41(10): 2052-2060.
[7] Jucevica E, Melecis V. Global warming affect Collembola community: a long-term study[J]. Pedobiologia, 2006,50(2): 177-184.
[8] Landesman W J, Treonis A M, Dighton J. Effect of a one-year rainfall manipulation on soil nematode abundances and community composition[J]. Pedobiologia, 2010,54(2): 87-91.
[9] Lindberg N, Engtsson J B, Persson T. Effects of experimental irrigation and drought on the composition and diversity of soil fauna in a coniferous stand[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002,39(6): 924-936.
[10] 范换, 王邵军, 阮宏华, 等. 苏北沿海不同土地类型土壤动物群落及其对凋落物分解的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2014,38(3): 1-7.Fan H, Wang S J, Ruan H H, et al. Effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition and its community stucture under different land use patterns in coastal region of northern Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2014,38(3): 1-7.
[11] 李晓强, 殷秀琴, 孙立娜. 松嫩草原不同演替阶段大型土壤动物功能类群特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(2): 442-450.Li X Q, Yin X Q, Sun L N. Soil macro-faunal guild characteristics at different successional stages in the Songnen grassland of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(2): 442-450.
[12] 汪贵斌, 曹福亮, 程鹏, 等. 不同银杏复合经营模式土壤酶活性及综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2010,34(4): 1-6.Wang G B, Cao F L, Cheng P, et al. The activities and integrated evaluation of soil enzymes of different agroforestry patterns of Ginkgo biloba[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2010,34(4): 1-6.
[13] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图谱[M].北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[14] 廖崇惠, 陈茂乾. 热带人工林土壤动物群落的次生演替和发展过程研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 1990,1(1): 53-59.Liao C H, Chen M Q. The research of secondary succession and development of tropical plantation soil fauna[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1990,1(1): 53-59.
[15] 廖崇惠, 李健雄, 黄海涛. 南亚热带森林土壤动物群落多样性研究[J]. 生态学报, 1997,17(5): 549-555.Liao C H, Li J X, Huang H T. Soil animal community diversity in the forest of the southern subtropical region, China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1997,17(5): 549-555.
[16] Shannon C E, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication[M]. Urbana:University of Illinois Press, 1949.
[17] Peet R K. The measurement of species of diversity[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1974,5: 285-307.
[18] Pielou E C. Mathematical Ecology[M]. New York:Wiley-Interscience, 1985.
[19] Pielou E C. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collection[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1966,13: 131-144.
[20] Simpson E H. Measurement of diversity[J]. Nature, 1949,163: 688.
[21] Whittaker R H. Evolution and measurement of species diversity[J]. Taxon, 1972,21(2/3): 213-251.
[22] 朱登强, 王军辉, 张守攻, 等. 西藏色季拉山西坡急尖长苞冷杉林物种多样性及群落结构的垂直分布格局[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2008,23(5): 1-6.Zhu D Q, Wang J H, Zhang S G, et al. Changes in species diversity and community structure of Abiesgeorgei var. smithii forest along altitudinal gradients on the western slope of Sejila Mountain in Tibet[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2008,23(5): 1-6.
[23] 李志伟, 童晓立, 张维球, 等. 广东石门台自然保护区森林土壤无脊椎动物群落多样性[J]. 华南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2004,25(1): 80-84.Li Z W, Tong X L, Zhang W Q, et al. Diversity of soil invertebrate assemblages in the forest of Shimentai Nature Reserve, Guangdong Province[J].Journal of South China Agricultural University:Natural Science Edition, 2004,25(1): 80-84.
[24] 黄秋娴, 王志刚, 黄大庄, 等. 保定市不同绿地类型土壤动物群落结构特征研究[J]. 河北林果研究, 2007,22(1): 74-78.Huang Q X, Wang Z G, Huang D Z, et al. Comparison of the community structure of soil animals from different greenbelts in Baoding city[J]. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard research, 2007,22(1): 74-78.
[25] 王广力, 王勇, 韩立亮, 等. 洞庭湖区不同土地利用方式下的土壤动物群落结构[J]. 生态学报, 2005,25(10): 2630-2636.Wang G L, Wang Y, Han L L, et al. Soil animal communities of variously utilized in the Dongting Lake region[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005,25(10): 2630-2636.
[26] 朱强根, 朱安宁, 张佳宝, 等. 华北潮土区不同耕作方式下土壤动物丰富度与多样性[J]. 土壤, 2010,42(2): 236-242.Zhu Q G, Zhu A N, Zhang J B, et al. Abundance and diversity of soil fauna under different tillage systems in fluvor aquic soil in north China[J]. Soils, 2010,42(2): 236-242.
[27] 张志罡, 孙继英, 胡波, 等. 土壤动物研究综述[J]. 生命科学研究, 2006,10(4): 72-75.Zhang Z G, Sun J Y, Hu B, et al. Review on edaphic zoology research[J]. Life Science Research,2006,10(4): 72-75.
[28] 刘扬, 张岸, 严莹, 等. 崇明岛不同土地利用类型下土壤动物群落多样性研究[J]. 复旦学报:自然科学版, 2011,50(3): 288-295.Liu Y, Zhang A, Yan Y, et al. Diversity of soil animal community under different land-use types in Chongming Island[J]. Journal of Fudan University: Natural Science, 2011,50(3): 288-295.
[29] 宗跃光, 周尚意, 彭萍, 等. 道路生态学研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(11): 2396-2405.Zong Y G, Zhou S Y, Peng P,et al. Perspective of road ecology development[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(11):2396-2405.
[30] 刘仁涛, 赵哈林, 赵学勇. 半干旱区草地土壤动物多样性的季节变化及其与温湿度的关系[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013,27(1): 97-101.Liu R T, Zhao H L, Zhao X Y. Seasonal changes of soil faunal diversity and its relation to temperature and moisture in semi-arid grassland, north China[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2013,27(1): 97-101.
[31] 王振中, 张友梅, 李忠武, 等. 有机磷农药对土壤动物毒性的影响研究[J]. 应用生态报,2002,13(12):1663-1666.Wang Z Z, Zhang Y M, Li Z W, et al. Effect of organophosphorus pesticide toxicity on soil animal[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002,13(12):1663-1666.
[32] 战丽莉, 许艳丽, 张兴义, 等. 耕作方式对中小型土壤动物多样性影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012,31(9): 2371-2377.Zhan L L,Xun Y L, Zhang X Y, et al. Effects of tillage mode on the diversity of soil meso-and micro-fauna[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012,31(9): 2371-2377.

银杏的复合经营对土壤动物多样性的影响

The effect of ginkgo agroforestry patterns on soil fauna diversity

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿