杨麦间作系统中树木对土壤3种形态磷淋溶的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.006

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (02): 33-39.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.006

杨麦间作系统中树木对土壤3种形态磷淋溶的影响

金梅娟^1,2,褚军^1,2,侍昊³,薛建辉^1,2*,吴永波^1,2,庄雪青^1,2,孙嘉曼^1,2

1.南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏南京 210037;
2,江苏省林业生态工程重点实验室,南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏南京 210037;
3.江苏省环境监测中心,江苏南京 210036

出版日期:2015-03-31 发布日期:2015-03-31
基金资助:
收稿日期:2014-03-10 修回日期:2014-04-10
基金项目:江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目(12KJA180003); 国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201104002); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD); 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(CXZZ13_0513)
第一作者:金梅娟,硕士生。*通信作者:薛建辉,教授。E-mail: jhxue@njfu.edu.cn。
引文格式:金梅娟,褚军,侍昊,等. 杨麦间作系统中树木对土壤3种形态磷淋溶的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(2):33-39.

Effects of poplar-wheat intercropping systems on three forms of phosphorus in soil eluvial water

JIN Meijuan^1,2, CHU Jun^1,2, SHI Hao³, XUE Jianhui^1,2*, WU Yongbo^1,2, ZHUANG Xueqing^1,2, SUN Jiaman^1,2

1.Co-Innovotion Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
2.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecological Engineering,College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037,China;
3.Jiangsu Province Environmental Monitoring Center, Nanjing 210036,China

Online:2015-03-31 Published:2015-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用田间试验的方法,研究了杨麦间作系统中树木对土壤磷素淋溶流失的影响,设定株行距分别为:2 m×5 m(L_Ⅰ)、2 m×15 m(L_Ⅱ)的2种密度间作系统以及单作小麦地(CK),测定距地表60 cm深处淋溶液体积与淋溶液总磷(TP)、可溶性总磷(TDP)以及总颗粒附着态磷(PP)的质量浓度及其淋失量。结果表明:① 2 种密度间作模式对淋溶液体积控制效果优劣均为:L_Ⅰ、L_Ⅱ、CK。在同一间作密度(L_Ⅱ)下,距离杨树越近,淋溶液体积降低越明显。② 2 种密度间作模式对淋溶液中TP、TDP以及PP质量浓度控制效果优劣均为:L_Ⅰ、L_Ⅱ、CK。在同一间作密度(L_Ⅱ)下,距离杨树越近,淋溶液中3 种形态磷质量浓度降低越明显。③ 土壤淋溶液中磷素流失形态以TDP为主。间作密度越高,距离杨树越近,淋溶液中TP、TDP以及PP流失量就越低。实验表明,株行距为2 m×5 m(L_Ⅰ)的间作系统对农田土壤磷淋溶的削减作用较强。

Abstract: Farmland phosphorus loss is one of the important factors that lead to the water pollution of Tai Lake area. Study on the characters of farmland phosphorus loss in Tai Lake area is of great significance. In the present study,the characters of soil phosphorus element loss were investigated based on field experiments from two types of poplar-wheat intercropping systems(spacing: L_Ⅰ. 2 m×5 m, L_Ⅱ. 2 m×15 m respectively)during November,2012 to June,2013. The volume, concentration and leaching loss of TP, TDP and PP in soil eluvial water at 60cm depth of different intercropping systems were measured after each precipitation events. The results showed the followings:① The control effects of the soil leaching volume could be ordered as L_Ⅰ> L_Ⅱ> CK. The volume declined obviously when the sampling point near the poplar tree under the same density. ② The control effects of the concentrations of TP,TDP,PP could be ordered as:L_Ⅰ> L_Ⅱ> CK. The concentration increased with the increasing distance from the poplar tree. ③ TDP was the main form of phosphorus loss in soil eluvial water. Larger intercropping spacing and closer distance from the polar tree had better effects on alleviating the leaching loss of TP,TDP and PP. Within the scope of this study,the alleviated effects of L_Ⅰwas presented as the optimum phosphorus alleviation effects. All these results provided an important reference for the construction of agroforestry systems.

中图分类号:

S718
S714

金梅娟,褚军,侍昊,等. 杨麦间作系统中树木对土壤3种形态磷淋溶的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(02): 33-39.

JIN Meijuan, CHU Jun, SHI Hao, XUE Jianhui, WU Yongbo, ZHUANG Xueqing, SUN Jiaman. Effects of poplar-wheat intercropping systems on three forms of phosphorus in soil eluvial water[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(02): 33-39.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.006.

参考文献

[1] 张红举,陈方. 太湖流域面源污染现状及控制途径[J]. 水资源保护,2010,26(5):87-90.Zhang H J,Chen F. Non-point pollution statics and control measures in Taihu Basin[J]. Water Resource Production,2010,26(5):87-90.
[2] 秦忠,耿清蔚,臧贵敏. 太湖流域平原水网区面源污染现状与控制对策[J]. 中国工程科学,2010,12(6):113-116. Qin Z,Geng Q W,Zang G M. Statistics and countermeasures of non-point source pollution in plain river network of Taihu Basin [J]. Engineering Science,2010,12(6):113-116.
[3] 王道涵, 梁成华. 农业磷素流失途径及控制方法研究进展[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 11(2): 183-188.Wang D H, Liang C H. Transportation of agriculture phosphorus and control to reduce the phosphorus loss to water: A review [J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 2002, 11(2): 183-188.
[4] 姜翠玲, 崔广柏. 湿地对农业非点源污染的去除效应[J]. 农业环境保护, 2002, 21(5): 471-473,476.Jiang C L, Cui G B. Effectiveness of wetlands in removal of non-point pollutants from agricultural source [J]. Agro-environmental Protection,2002, 21(5): 471-473,476.
[5] 马东, 杜志勇, 吴娟, 等. 崂山水库流域不同土地利用类型地表径流的氮磷流失特征[J]. 水土保持学报,2012, 25(6):31-33.Ma D, Du Z Y, Wu J,et al. Losses characters of nitrogen and phosphorus in runoff with different land use pattern in watershed of laoshan reservoir [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 25(6): 31-33.
[6] 周林飞, 郝利朋, 孙中华. 辽宁浑河流域不同土地类型地表径流和壤中流氮、磷流失特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(4): 737-742.Zhou L F, Hao L P, Sun Z H. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus losses through surface flow and interflow on different types of land in Liaoning Hunhe Basin[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2011, 20(4): 737-742.
[7] 宋泽芬, 王克勤, 孙孝龙, 等. 澄江尖山河小流域不同土地利用类型地表径流氮、磷的流失特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2008, 21(4): 109-113.Song Z F, Wang K Q, Sun X L,et al. Phosphorus and nitrogen losses characteristics with runoff on different lands use pattern in small watersheds in Jianshan River, Chengjiang[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2008, 21(4): 109-113.
[8] 陆安祥, 赵云龙, 王纪华, 等. 不同土地利用类型下氮、磷在土壤剖面中的分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(9):3923-3929.Lu A X, Zhao Y L, Wang J H, et al. Distribution characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in agricultural soil profiles under different land use [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007, 27(9):3923-3929.
[9] 吴家森, 陈闻, 姜培坤, 等. 不同施肥对雷竹林土壤氮, 磷渗漏流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(2): 33-37.Wu J S, Chen W, Jiang P K, et al. Effects of different fertilization on seepage loses of nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil under Phyllostacys praecox stand [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 26(2): 33-37.
[10] 谢真越,卓慕宁,李定强,等. 不同施肥水平下菜地径流氮磷流失特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(8): 1423-1427.Xie Z Y, Zhuo M N, Li D Q, et al. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus loss by runoff from vegetable fields under different fertilization levels [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 22(8):1423-1427.
[11] 王静, 郭熙盛, 王允青, 等. 巢湖流域不同耕作和施肥方式下农田养分径流流失特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(1):6-11.Wang J, Guo X S, Wang Y Q, et al. Characteristics of nutrient runoff losses from farmland under different tillage and fertilization methods in Chaohu Lake Region [J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 26(1): 6-11.
[12] 廖义善, 卓慕宁, 李定强, 等. 适当化肥配施有机肥减少稻田氮磷损失及提高产量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(S1): 210-217. Liao Y S, Zhuo M N, Li D Q, et al. Formulated fertilization for reducing nitrogen and phosphorus losses from paddy fields and increasing rice yield[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering:Transactions of the CSAE, 2013, 29(S1): 210-217.
[13] 何晓玲, 郑子成, 李廷轩. 不同耕作方式对紫色土侵蚀及磷素流失的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(12): 2492-2500.He X L, Zheng Z C, Li T X. Effects of tillage practices on soil erosion and phosphorus loss in sloping cropland of purple soil[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2013, 46(12): 2492-2500.
[14] 通乐噶,李成芳,杨金花,等. 免耕稻田田面水磷素动态及其淋溶损失[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2010,29(3):527-533.Tong L G,Li C F,Yang J H,et al. Flood water phosphorus dynamics and losses from no-tillage rice fields[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2010,29(3):527-533.
[15] 李津津, 姚菊祥, 郑洪福, 等. 南太湖区域水浆管理技术与稻田磷素流失控制的研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2009, 29(2):389-396.Li J J, Yao J X, Zheng H F, et al. Minimizing phosphorus transport from paddy fields by innovating irrigation-drainage regime for southern region of the Taihu Basin [J]. Acta Scientiae Circum stantiae, 2009, 29(2): 389-396.
[16] 金圣爱,王恒,刘庆花,等. 山东寿光设施菜地富磷土壤磷素淋溶特征研究[J]. 土壤通报,2010,41(3):577-581.Jin S A,Wang H,Liu Q H,et al. Phosphorus leaching characteristics of the phosphorus-rich soils in protected field production in Shouguang[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2010,41(3):577-581.
[17] 王静, 丁树文, 李朝霞, 等. 丹江库区典型土壤磷的淋溶模拟研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(2): 692-697.Wang J, Ding S W, Li Z X, et al. Simulated study on phosphorus leaching of typical soils in danjiang reservoir area[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2008, 27(2): 692-697.
[18] 陈金林,潘兴根,张爱国,等. 林带对太湖地区农业非点源污染的控制[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2002,26(6):17-20.Chen J L,Pan X G,Zhang A G,et al. The controlling effects of shelter forest on non-point source pollution of agricultural lands in Taihu Lake area[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2002,26(6):17-20.
[19] 吴殿鸣,薛建辉,罗英,等.杨麦间作系统硝态氮淋失的原位研究[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(2):111-116.Wu D M, Xue J H, Luo Y, et al. Study on nitrate nitrogen leaching in poplar-wheat intercropping ecosystem by in situ analysis[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2012,36(2): 111-116.
[20] 国家环境保护总局,水和废水监测分析方法编委会. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[21] 张翠荣,吕家珑,潘杨,等. 冬麦不同施磷水平下土壤磷素淋溶试验[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(3): 105-109.Zhang C R,Lv J L,Pan Y,et al. Simulate of winter wheat phosphorus leaching in potted plant[J]. Agriculture Research in the Arid Areas,2007,25(3):105-109.
[22] 周彬, 韩海荣, 康峰峰, 等. 太岳山不同郁闭度油松人工林降水分配特征[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(5): 1645-1653.Zhou B, Han H R, Kang F F, et al. Characteristics of precipitation distribution in Pinus tabulaeformis plantations under different canopy coverage in Taiyue Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(5): 1646-1653.
[23] Makumba W,Akinnifesi F K,Janssen B,et al. Long-term impact of a gliricidia-maize intercropping system on carbon sequestration in southern Malawi[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2007,118(1): 237-243.
[24] 王宇蕴,任家兵,郑毅,等. 间作小麦根际和土体磷养分的动态变化[J]. 云南农业大学学报,2011,26(6): 851-855.Wang Y Y,Ren J B,Zheng Y,et al. Dynamics of available phosphorus in rhizosphere and bulk soil of wheat under intercropping[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University,2011,26(6): 851-855.
[25] 薛立, 何跃君, 屈明, 等. 华南典型人工林凋落物的持水特性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(3): 415-421.Xue L, He Y J, Qu M, et al. Water holding characteristics of litter in plantations in south China[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2005, 29(3): 415-421.
[26] 李勇,张晴雯,万国江,等. 植物根系控制黄土土层风化淋溶机制的初步研究[J]. 中国科学D辑:地球科学2006,36(2): 195-200.
[27] 孙守家,桑玉强,孟平,等.华北低山丘陵区农林间作系统中小麦根系时空分布及边行效应研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2011,45(6):641-646.Sun S J,Sang Y Q,Meng P,et al. Spatiotemporal distribution and edge effects of intercropping winter wheat root in low mountain and hill regions of North China[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University,2011,45(6):641-646.
[28] 朱首军,张卫. 渭北旱塬花椒-小麦复合系统中林木及作物根系空间分布特征研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,2005,20(1):16-19.Zhu S J,Zhang W. Study on the spatial distribution root system of Chinese prickly ash and wheat agroforestry in Weibei arid plain area[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2005,20(1):16-19.
[29] 贾秀红,毕俊亮,周志祥,等. 鄂中低丘区主要纯林凋落物持水与土壤贮水能力研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报,2013,32(3):39-44.Jia X H,Bi J L,Zhou Z X,et al. Water-holding capacity of litter and soil under major pure plantation in hilly region of central Hubei[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,2013,32(3):39-44.
[30] 孙增富,孔令刚,韩新英. 农林复合杨树土壤养分的根际效[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2013,11(3):91-95.Sun Z F,Kong L G,Han X Y. The rhizosphere effects of soil nutrients on Populus agroforestry systems[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013,11(3):91-95.
[31] 王艳红, 宋维峰, 李财金. 不同森林类型林冠截留效应研究[J]. 亚热带水土保持, 2008, 20(3): 5-10.Wang Y H, Song W F, Li C J. Study on crown interception effect of different forest canopies [J]. Subtropical Soil and Water Conservation,2008, 20(3): 5-10.
[32] 程伟, 隋跃宇, 焦晓光, 等. 土壤有机质含量与磷酸酶活性关系研究[J]. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2008, 24(3):305-307.Chen W, Sui Y Y, Jiao X G, et al. Relationship between soil organic matter content and phosphatase activity [J]. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture,2008, 24(3): 305-307.
[33] 谢莉. 苏北地区主要林粮间作模式的土壤性状及林木对农作物影响状况的研究 [D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2005.Xie L. Study on Soil Characteristics and effects on planted crops of different agroforestry types in the nort part of Jiangsu Province [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2005.
[34] 吕军峰, 张国宏, 郭天文, 等. 西北半干旱区大豆不同间作模式效益分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2011, 30(2): 234-237.Lv J F, Zhang G H, Guo T W, et al. Benefit analysis of different soybean intercropping models in semi-arid area [J]. Soybean Science,2011, 30(2): 234-237.
[35] 张桂国, 董树亭, 杨在宾. 苜蓿+玉米间作系统产量表现及其种间竞争力的评定[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 22-30.Zhang G G, Dong S T, Yang Z B. Production performance Alfalfa+Maize intercropping systems and evaluation of interspecies competition [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2011, 20(1): 22-30.
[36] Hansen N C,Gupta S C, Moncrief J F. Snowmelt runoff, sediment and phosphorus losses under three different tillage systems[J]. Soil Till Res,2000,57(1-2):93-100.
[37] 吕家珑. 农田土壤磷素淋溶及预测[J]. 生态学报,2003,23(12):2689-2701.Lü J L. Phosphorus leaching from agricultural soils and its prediction[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2003,23(12):2689-2701.

杨麦间作系统中树木对土壤3种形态磷淋溶的影响

Effects of poplar-wheat intercropping systems on three forms of phosphorus in soil eluvial water

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	杨永. 裸子植物的系统分类:历史、现状和展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 14-26.
[2]	张瑞, 周正虎, 王传宽, 金鹰. 东北温带森林不同材性树种木质部解剖和水力性状[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 229-236.
[3]	黄永健, 荀航, 张保, 尤俊昊, 姚曦, 汤锋. HPLC同时测定竹笋中8种酚酸类物质含量的方法研究及其应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 237-244.
[4]	邓云飞. 安息香科的系统学研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 27-35.
[5]	李家亮, 巫大宇, 毛康珊. 柏木属的分类地位和物种多样性研究现状与建议[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 36-45.
[6]	李涌福, 杨庆华, 陈林, 张敏, 向其柏, 王贤荣, 段一凡. 木犀属内分组关系的分类修订[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 58-62.
[7]	杨皓, 刘超, 庄家尧, 张树同, 张文韬, 毛国豪. 不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.
[8]	丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 王宇浩, 陈美玲, 李涛, 刘孝武, 周悦湘, 孙连浩, 廖艺. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 90-98.
[9]	武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 99-107.
[10]	卜晓婷, 付威, 李淑娴, 徐志标, 彭大庆, 徐林桥. 幼化和外源激素对娜塔栎嫩枝扦插生根的影响及其生根解剖学观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 129-136.
[11]	杜晋城, 李欣欣, 王泽亮, 刘偲, 钟毅, 王丽华. 聚乙二醇胁迫下3个油橄榄品种生理指标响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 137-143.
[12]	方静, 张书曼, 严善春, 武帅, 赵佳齐, 孟昭军. 两种丛枝菌根真菌复合接种对青山杨叶片抗美国白蛾的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 144-154.
[13]	张馨方, 王广鹏, 张树航, 李颖, 郭燕. 不同抗螨性板栗差异次生代谢物筛选与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 234-240.
[14]	杨宏, 伊贤贵, 王贤荣, 吴桐, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 朱兆青. 樱花新品种‘元春’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 275-276.
[15]	田梦阳, 朱树林, 窦全琴, 季艳红. 薄壳山核桃-茶间作对‘安吉白茶’速生期光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 86-96.