上海环城林带不同植物群落土壤质量综合评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.014

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (03): 71-77.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.014

上海环城林带不同植物群落土壤质量综合评价

张凯旋¹,商侃侃²,达良俊^3*

1.上海商学院旅游与食品学院,上海 201400;
2 上海辰山植物园,上海 201602;
3.上海市城市化生态过程与生态恢复重点实验室,华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院,上海 200062

出版日期:2015-05-30 发布日期:2015-05-30
基金资助:
收稿日期:2014-04-20 修回日期:2014-09-10
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(31400606); 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(13YZ142)
第一作者:张凯旋,副教授,博士。*通信作者:达良俊,教授。E-mail: ljda@des.ecnu.edu.cn。
引文格式:张凯旋,商侃侃,达良俊. 上海环城林带不同植物群落土壤质量综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(3):71-77.

Soil quality comprehensive assessment of different plant communities in Shanghai green belt

ZHANG Kaixuan¹, SHANG Kankan², DA Liangjun^3*

1. Department of Tourism and Food, Shanghai Business College, Shanghai 201400, China;
2. Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China;
3. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Ecology of Urbanization Process and Eco-restoration, College of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062,China

Online:2015-05-30 Published:2015-05-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨不同类型植物群落改良土壤的功能差异,进而为城市森林的群落构建与管理提供科学依据,以上海环城林带7种典型植物群落为对象,以裸地为对照,分层测定了土壤的密度、毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、有机质、全氮、全磷、铵氮和硝氮等8个理化指标,并采用主成分分析法进行各群落类型间土壤质量的综合评价。结果表明:植物群落对土壤的改良作用主要表现在土壤表层(0～20 cm),不同植物群落改良土壤理化性质的效果存在差异,落叶阔叶林悬铃木群落和落叶针叶林池杉群落的土壤质量指数较高,而落叶阔叶林全缘叶栾树群落的最低,其他类型群落的居中,不同植被类型间并没有表现出明显的规律性。可见,减少人为管护有利于枯枝落叶层的积累及林下草本和幼苗的更新,可以促进土壤质量的综合改善。

Abstract: To explore the soil improvement service of plant communities, and provide a scientific basis for urban forest planning and management, soil samples were collected from seven plant communities in Shanghai green belt with bare lands as the control. Eight soil physical and chemical indicators were measured in different soil depth, including soil bulk density, capillary porosity, total porosity, organic matter, total N, total P, NH⁺₄-N and NO^-₃-N. Principal component analysis was used to assess the comprehensive soil quality based on those indicators. Results showed that soil improvements were mainly on the surface of soil(0-20 cm), with different soil improvement effects of each plant communities. Deciduous broad leaved forest with Platanus×hispanica as dominate species and deciduous coniferous forest with Taxodium distichum var. imbricarium as dominate species had the greatest improvement effect, deciduous broad-leaved forest with Koelreuteria bipinnata var. integrifoliola as dominate species had the least improvement effect, and the other communities were in the middle level. Lower-intense-management was helpful to litter layer accumulating, and facilitate the recruitment of understory seedlings and herbs, which could contribute to the overall improvement of soil quality.

中图分类号:

S714

张凯旋,商侃侃,达良俊. 上海环城林带不同植物群落土壤质量综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(03): 71-77.

ZHANG Kaixuan, SHANG Kankan, DA Liangjun. Soil quality comprehensive assessment of different plant communities in Shanghai green belt[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(03): 71-77.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.014.

参考文献

[1] Aerts R, Chapin Ⅲ F S. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns [J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 2000, 30:1-67.
[2] Fitter A H. Darkness visible: reflection on underground ecology [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2005, 93(2): 231-243.
[3] 阎恩荣.常绿阔叶林退化过程中土壤的养分库动态及植物的养分利用策略[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2006.Yan E R. Dynamics of soil nutrient pools, nutrient use strategies of dominant trees in the typical and degraded evergreen broad-leaved forests [D].Shanghai:East China Normal University,2006.
[4] 葛永金, 袁位高, 江波,等.浙江省生态公益林土壤理化性质的初步研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2006, 28(6):828-832.Ge Y J, Yuan W G, Jiang B, et al. Preliminary studies on soil physic-chemical properties of ecological forest in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2006, 28(6): 828-832.
[5] 司志国, 彭志宏, 俞元春, 等. 徐州城市绿地土壤肥力质量评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 37(3): 60-64. Si Z G, Peng Z H, Yu Y C, et al. Fertility quality assessment of urban green space soils in Xuzhou City[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2013, 37(3): 60-64.
[6] 项建光, 方海兰, 杨意, 等.上海典型新建绿地的土壤质量评价[J].土壤, 2004, 36(4): 424-429.Xiang J G,Fang H L, Yang Y, et al. Soil quality evaluation of some typical newly-established green belts in Shanghai[J]. Soils, 2004, 36(4): 424-429.
[7] 包兵, 吴丹, 胡艳燕,等. 重庆主城区市街绿地土壤肥力质量评价及管理对策[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2007, 29(11):100-105.Bao B, Wu D, Hu Y Y, et al. Assessment of soil fertility quality for urban green spaces in Chongqing City and measures for their management[J]. Journal of Southwest University:Natural Science Edition, 2007,29(11):100-105.
[8] 单奇华, 俞元春, 张建锋,等.城市森林土壤肥力质量综合评价[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(4):186-189, 223.Shan Q H, Yu Y C, Zhang J F, et al. Comprehensive estimation of soil fertility in urban forest[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009,29(4):186-189,223.
[9] 刘为华,张桂莲,徐飞,等.上海城市森林土壤理化性质[J].浙江林学院学报,2009, 26(2):155-163.Liu W H, Zhang G L, Xu F, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties in Shanghai’s urban forests[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2009, 26(2):155-163.
[10] 张凯旋,车生泉,马少初,等.城市化进程中上海植被的多样性、空间格局和动态响应(Ⅵ):上海外环林带群落多样性与结构特征[J]. 华东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2011(4):1-14.Zhang K X, Che S Q, Ma S C,et al. Diversity, spatial pattern and dynamics of vegetation under urbanization in Shanghai(Ⅵ):community diversity and its structural characteristics of Shanghai green belt[J]. Journal of East China Normal University:Natural Science, 2011(4):1-14.
[11] 张凯旋,张建华.上海环城林带保健功能评价及其机制[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(13):4189-4198Zhang K X,Zhang J H. Health function evaluation and exploring its mechanisms in Shanghai green belt[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(13):4189-4198.
[12] Yan E R, Wang X H, Guo M, et al. Temporal patterns of net soil N mineralization and nitrification through secondary succession in the subtropical forests of eastern China [J]. Plant Soil, 2009, 320(1-2):181-194.
[13] 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所.LY/T 1215—1999 森林土壤水分-物理性质的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.
[14] 刘世梁, 马克明, 傅伯杰,等.北京东灵山地区地形土壤因子与植物群落关系研究[J].植物生态学报, 2003,27(4): 496-502.Liu S L, Ma K M, Fu B J, et al.The relationship between landform, soil characteristics and plant community structure in the Donglingshan Mountain Region, Beijing[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2003,27(4):496-502.
[15] 孙慧珍, 陈明月, 蔡春菊,等.不同类型城市森林对土壤肥力的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2009,20(12): 2871-2876.Sun H Z, Chen M Y, Cai C J, et al.Effects of different type urban forest plantations on soil fertility [J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009,20(12): 2871-2876.
[16] 吴玉红, 田霄鸿, 同延安,等.基于主成分分析的土壤肥力综合指数评价[J].生态学杂志, 2010, 29(1):173-180.Wu Y H, Tian X H, Tong Y A. Assessment of integrated soil fertility index based on principal components analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2010, 29(1):173-180.
[17] 许明祥, 刘国彬, 赵允格.黄土丘陵区侵蚀土壤质量评价[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2005,11(3): 285-293.Xu M X, Liu G B, Zhao Y G. Quality assessment of erosion soil on hilly Loess Plateau [J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2005,11(3): 285-293.
[18] Logsdon S D, Karlen D L. Bulk density as a soil quality indicator during conversion to no-tillage [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004, 78(2):143-149.
[19] Carter M R. Soil quality for sustainable land management: Organic matter and aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions [J]. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94(1): 38-47.
[20] 曹鹤, 薛立, 谢腾芳,等.华南地区八种人工林的土壤物理性质[J].生态学杂志, 2009, 28(4): 620-625.Cao H, Xue L, Xie T F, et al. Cluster analysis of eight artificial forest stands in south China based on soil physical properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(4): 620-625.
[21] 王震洪, 段昌群, 文传浩,等.滇中三种人工林群落控制土壤侵蚀和改良土壤效应[J].水土保持通报, 2001,21(2):23-27.Wang Z H, Duan C Q, Wen C H, et al. Soil erosion and soil improvement of three artificial forest communities in middle Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001,21(2): 23-27.
[22] 郑思俊, 张庆费, 吴海萍,等.上海外环线绿地群落凋落物对土壤水分物理性质的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2008,27(7):1122-1126.Zheng S J, Zhang Q F, Wu H P, et al. Effects of greenbelt plant communities’ litterfalls in Shanghai outer ring on soil water physical properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(7):1122-1126.
[23] Mishar A, Sharma S D, Khan G H. Improvement in physical and chemical properties of sodic soil by 3, 6 and 9 years old plantation of Eucalyptus tereticornis: Biorejuvenation of sodic soil [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 184(1-3):115-124.
[24] 杨淑贞, 马原, 蒋平,等.浙江西天目山土壤理化性质的海拔梯度格局[J].华东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2009(6):101-107.Yang S Z, Ma Y, Jiang P, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties along altitudes of western Tianmushan, Zhejiang[J]. Journal of East China Normal University:Natural Science, 2009(6):101-107.
[25] 王希华,黄建军,阎恩荣.天童常绿阔叶林若干树种的叶片营养转移研究[J].广西植物, 2004,24(1):81-85.Wang X H, Huang J J,Yan E R. A study on leaf nutrient resorption of some trees in Tiantong National Forest Park [J].Guihaia, 2004,24(1):81-85.

相关文章 15

[1]	谢燕燕, 郭子武, 林树燕, 左珂怡, 杨丽婷, 徐森, 谷瑞, 陈双林. 毛竹林下植被演替过程中土壤颗粒组成与水分入渗特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 108-116.
[2]	武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 99-107.
[3]	左壮, 张韫, 崔晓阳. 火烧对兴安落叶松林土壤氮形态和含量的初期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 147-154.
[4]	孙劲伟, 王圣燕, 范弟武, 朱咏莉. C源与NP添加对Cd胁迫下林地土壤呼吸作用的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 140-146.
[5]	陈明, 刘亮. 采样间隔对城市表土剖面磁化率变化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 61-69.
[6]	张相, 丁鸣鸣, 林杰, 李卓远, 崔琳琳, 郭赓, 杨皓. 水蚀作用下红壤丘陵区土壤特性的空间分异特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 77-84.
[7]	杨瑞, 吴朝明, 朱骊, 胡海波. 苏南丘陵区坡面经济林土壤侵蚀特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 70-76.
[8]	徐子涵, 王磊, 崔明, 刘玉国, 赵紫晴, 李嘉豪. 南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 173-181.
[9]	杜志琦, 孟庆繁, 冯立超, 葛佳荣, 黄劲斌, 史晶晶, 李洪锐, 岑祖才. 冷藏条件下土样保存时间对甲螨(甲螨亚目)和跳虫(弹尾纲)类物种分离的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 213-218.
[10]	卢伟伟, 胡嘉欣, 陈思桦, 陈玮铃, 冯思宇. 苏北滨海土壤无机碳含量的测定方法比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 76-82.
[11]	杨永超, 段文标, 陈立新, 曲美学, 王亚飞, 王美娟, 石金永, 潘磊. 模拟氮磷沉降和凋落物处理对两种林型红松林土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 57-66.
[12]	薛建辉, 周之栋, 吴永波. 喀斯特石漠化山地退化土壤生态修复研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 135-145.
[13]	林杰, 张相, 姜姜, 蒯杰, 郭赓, 孟苗婧, 李肖. 水力侵蚀过程中土壤有机碳循环研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 187-194.
[14]	李惠芝, 关庆伟, 赵家豪, 李俊杰, 王磊, 李凤凤, 左兴平, 陈斌. 地形对麻栎人工林土壤肥力质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 161-168.
[15]	赵凯歌, 周正虎, 金鹰, 王传宽. 长期氮添加对落叶松和水曲柳人工林土壤碳、氮、磷含量和胞外酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 177-184.

上海环城林带不同植物群落土壤质量综合评价

Soil quality comprehensive assessment of different plant communities in Shanghai green belt

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿