庙山坞自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能评估

修珍珍; 王斌; 杨校生; 余超; 张龙; 格日乐图

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.04.014

修珍珍,王斌,杨校生,余超,张龙,格日乐图

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (04) : 81-87.

PDF(3122586 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(3122586 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (04) : 81-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.04.014

研究论文

庙山坞自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能评估

修珍珍,王斌^*,杨校生,余超,张龙,格日乐图

作者信息 +

Assessment on forest ecosystem services in Miaoshanwu Nature Reserve of Zhejiang Province

XIU Zhenzhen, WANG Bin^*, YANG Xiaosheng, YU Chao, ZHANG Long, GERI le Tu

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

依据《森林生态系统服务功能评估规范》(LY/T 1721—2008),对位于浙江富阳的庙山坞自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能进行定量评估,通过ArcGIS软件定量可视化其服务功能,揭示了生态系统服务功能的价值。结果表明,保护区森林生态效益巨大,对当地及周边人们的生活和生产起着重要的作用。经测算,保护区森林生态系统服务功能总价值量为4.19×10⁸ 元/a,各项贡献大小依次为净化大气环境>涵养水源>固碳释氧>生物多样性保护>保育土壤>积累营养物质。保护区不同林分类型生态服务功能价值量不同,单位面积价值量高低依次为杉木林>木荷林>栎类=硬阔>毛竹林>马尾松林。不同的生态系统服务功能价值量可视化结果显示,栎类林的涵养水源、保育土壤和生物多样性保护功能突出,毛竹林在积累营养物质和净化大气环境的服务功能方面具有优势。

Abstract

According to the Standard of People’s Republic of China-Specifications for Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services(LY/T 1721—2008), the value of forest ecosystem services of Miaoshanwu Nature Reserve were evaluated by distributed measurement methodology and the services were quantitatively visualized by appling ArcGIS sofware to reveal their value. The results showed that the nature reserve had yielded enormous forest ecological benefits, it played an important role in local and surrounding people’s life and production. The total value of forest ecosystem services in Miaoshanwu Nature Reserves was 4.19×10⁸ yuan/a. The value of different ecosystem services was: atmosphere environment purification > water conservation > carbon fixation and oxygen releas > biodiversity conservation > soil conservation > nutrient accumulation. The value of the ecological services of different forest types in reserve was different and the value of per unit area ranked as follows: Cunninghamia lanceolata > Schima superba > oak = hardwood > Phyllostachys heterocycla > Pinus massoniana. The visualization of different ecosystem service value indicated that oak was out standing in water conservation, soil conservation, and biodiversity conservation, and Phyllostachys heterocycla was superior in nutrient accumulation and atmosphere environment purification.

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用

修珍珍,王斌,杨校生,余超,张龙,格日乐图. 庙山坞自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2015, 39(04): 81-87 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.04.014

XIU Zhenzhen, WANG Bin, YANG Xiaosheng, YU Chao, ZHANG Long, GERI le Tu. Assessment on forest ecosystem services in Miaoshanwu Nature Reserve of Zhejiang Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2015, 39(04): 81-87 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.04.014

中图分类号： S718.5

参考文献

[1] Ninan K N, Makoto Inoue.Valuing forest ecosystem services: Case study of a forest reserve in Japan[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013(5): 78-87.
[2] Ma.Ecosystems and human well-being[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
[3] Ruijs A, Wossink A, Kortelainen M, et al.Trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in eastern Europe[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013(4): 82-94.
[4] Llael M Cox, Andrew L Almeter, Kathryn A Saterson.Protecting our life support systems: An inventory of U.S. federal research on ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013(5):163-169.
[5] Claire A Jantz, James J Manuel. Estimating impacts of population growth and land use policy on ecosystem services: A community-level case study in Virginia, U.S.A[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013(5): 110-123.
[6] 李文杰, 张时煌, 王辉民. 基于GIS和遥感技术的生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(12): 3358-3364.Li W J, Zhang S H, Wang H M. Ecosystem services evaluation based on geographic information system and remote sensing technology: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011,22(12): 3358-3364.
[7] 欧阳志云, 王如松. 生态系统服务功能, 生态价值与可持续发展[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2000, 22(5): 45-50.Ouyang Z Y, Wang R S. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation[J]. World Sci-tech R & D, 2000, 22(5): 45-50.
[8] 赵金龙,王泺鑫,韩海荣,等.森林生态系统服务功能价值评估研究进展与趋势[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(8):2229-2237.Zhao J L, Wang L X, Han H R, et al.Research advances and trends in forest ecosystem services value evaluation[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(8): 2229-2237.
[9] Brown G. The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: An empirical analysis[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013(5): 58-68.
[10] McPhearson T, Kremer P, Hamstead Z A. Mapping ecosystem services in New York City: Applying a social-ecological approach in urban vacant land[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013(5):11-26.
[11] 房学宁, 赵文武. 生态系统服务研究进展——2013年第11届国际生态学大会(INTECOL Congress)会议述评[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(20): 6736-6740.Fang X N, Zhao W W. A review of ecosystem services Conference review of the 11^th INTECOL Congress on 2013[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(20): 6736-6740.
[12] 王兵, 鲁绍伟, 尤文忠, 等. 辽宁省森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010(7): 1792-1798.Wang B, Lu S W, You W Z, et al. Evaluation of forest ecosystem services value in Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010,21(7): 1792-1798.
[13] 张春茹, 陈波, 张伟, 等. 冀北山区森林生态系统服务价值评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013(1): 49-52.Zhang C R, Chen B, Zhang W, et al. Evaluation of the forest ecosystem service values in the mountainous areas of North Hebei Province[J] Forest Resources Management, 2013(1):49-523.
[14] 杜振宇, 刘方春, 马丙尧, 等. 黄河三角洲盐碱地长期人工林生态服务价值评估[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(34):17-23.Du Z Y, Liu F C, Ma B Y, et al, Evaluation of ecosystem service value for long-term plantations in Saline-alkali soils of the Yellow River Delta[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(34): 17-23.
[15] 李振, 李浩, 曾宪曙, 等. 广东鹤山三种南亚热带人工林的生态系统服务价值动态[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(6):967-975.Li Z, Li H, Zeng X S, et al. Dynamics in ecosystem service values of three lower subtropical forest plantations in Heshan, Guangdong Province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 22(6): 967-975.
[16] 孔维健, 周本智, 安艳飞, 等. 庙山坞自然保护区次生常绿阔叶林水文生态特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 34(4): 87-92.Kong W J, Zhou B Z, An Y F, et al. A study on the eco-hydrological characteristics of the secondary evergreen broad-leave forest in Miaoshanwu Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2010, 34(4):87-92.
[17] 陈绍栓, 陈淑容. 杉木木荷混交林涵养水源功能和土壤肥力[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(4): 599-603.Chen S Q, Chen S R. Function of the mixed forest of Cunninghqmia lanceolata and Schima superb in water conservation and soil fertility buildup[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(4):599-603.
[18] 李跃林, 胡成志, 张云, 等. 几种人工林土壤碳储量研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2004, 31(4): 4-7.Li Y L, Hu C Z, Zhang Y, et al. Studies of the carbon storages of soils under the different kinds of plantations[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2004, 31(4): 4-7.
[19] 韩永刚. 木荷、杉木人工林水文效应的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2005.Han Y G. Hydrological effect of Schima superb and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in subtropical China[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University, 2005.
[20] 孔维健, 周本智, 傅懋毅, 等. 不同土地利用类型水土保持特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 33(4): 57-61.Kong W J, Zhou B Z, Fu M Y, et al. Effects of different land-use on characteristics of soil and water conservation[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2009, 33(4): 57-61.
[21] 张丽娜. 氮沉降对不同年龄木荷-马尾松林土壤和林木养分的影响[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2009.Zhang L N. Impact of nitrogen deposition on soil and plant nutrients of Schima superb and Pinus massiniana forest[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University, 2009.
[22] 王斌, 刘某承, 张彪. 基于森林资源清查资料的森林植被净生产量及其动态变化研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2009(1):35-43.Wang B, Liu M C, Zhang B. Dynamics of net production of Chinese forest vegetation based on forest inventory data[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2009(1): 35-43.
[23]张永利,杨锋伟,王兵,等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2010.
[24] 王建阳. 杉木萌条伴生木荷混交林可持续经营研究[J]. 林业实用技术, 2010(6): 15-17.Wang J Y. A study on sustainable management to the mixed forest of stump plant of Cunninghqmia lanceolata and associated Schima superb [J]. Practical Forestry Technology, 2010(6): 15-17.
[25] 国家林业局.LY/T 1721—2008. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[26] 薛沛沛,王兵,牛香,等. 武宁县、江山市和邵武市森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(5):249-254.Xue P P, Wang B, Niu X, et al. Forest ecosystem service and its evaluation in Wuning County, Jiangshan City and Shaowu City[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(5):249-254.
[27] 刘丹. 基于SEM的森林生态系统服务功能影响因素实证研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012.Liu D. Research on the impact factor analysis of forest ecosystem service function based on the structural equation modeling[J]. Beijing: Beijing Forest University, 2012.
[28] 王玉华.江苏省重要生态功能保护区区划研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学,2008.Wang Y H. The study on division planning of key ecological function protected area in Jiangsu Province[D]. Najing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2008.
[29] Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2012(1): 31-39.
[30] García-Nieto A P, García-Llorente M, Iniesta-Arandia I, et al. Mapping forest ecosystem services: From providing units to beneficiaries[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013(4): 126-138.
[31] Hauck J, G?rg C, Varjopuro R, et al. “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013(4): 25-32.

基金

收稿日期:2014-08-20 修回日期:2014-12-12基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201404301); “十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2012BAC13B02) 第一作者:修珍珍,硕士生。*通信作者:王斌,副研究员。E-mail: ylwangbin@sina.com。引文格式:修珍珍,王斌,杨校生,等. 庙山坞自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(4):81-87.