次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.021

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (06): 119-124.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.021

次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量评价

梁爽¹,张洁¹,戚继忠^1*,徐程扬²

1.北华大学林学院,吉林吉林 132013;
2.北京林业大学林学院,北京 100083

出版日期:2015-11-30 发布日期:2015-11-30
基金资助:
收稿日期:2014-12-26 修回日期:2015-05-24
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(2011140051)
第一作者:梁爽,硕士生。*通信作者:戚继忠,教授。E-mail: bhqiz@126.com。
引文格式:梁爽,张洁,戚继忠,等. 次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(6):119-124.

The forest landscape quality evaluation of the natural scenic beauty mainly made of secondary forest

LIANG Shuang¹, ZHANG Jie¹, QI Jizhong^1*, XU Chengyang²

1.Forestry College of Beihua University, Jilin 132013, China;
2.College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Online:2015-11-30 Published:2015-11-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量多处于中低状态,而调整改造的主要依据是林内景观质量的评价结果。笔者以吉林市大石门沟森林公园次生风景林为例,以美景度为目的指标,采用SBE法,应用相关分析、方差分析、逐步回归、聚类分析等方法,确定了次生风景林林内景观质量的主要影响因子,建立了质量评价预测模型,并对研究对象进行了景观质量类型划分。结果表明:树木姿态(X₄)、自然程度(X₁₇)、透视距离(X₁₆)和灌木高度(X₈)是影响次生风景林林内景观质量的主导指标,并建立美景度模型:M_SBE=-128.391+15.63X₄-3.615X₈+20.379X₁₆+17.933X₁₇; 美景度随树木姿态、自然程度和透视距离等指标得分值的提高而显著提高(P<0.05),随灌木高度的提高而显著降低(P<0.05)。根据聚类分析结果,将林内景观分为高、中、低美景度景观3种类型。针对研究对象的3种质量类型提出了调整结构、增强自然性、优化林相、适当控制灌木密度与高度等具体林分改造建议。

Abstract: The landscape quality of natural scenic forest mainly made of secondary forest was in a state of medium or low. The main basis of adjustment and transformation was the result of quality evaluation of in-forest landscape. A secondary scenic forest at Corn-growing Ditch Forest Park's in Jilin City, Jilin Province was taken as an example in this study. The beauty degree was objective target and the Scenic Beauty Estimation(SBE)method was adopted in this study. Main factors affecting the landscape quality of the forest were determined through correlation analysis, ANOVA analysis, regression analysis and cluster analysis. At the same time, a prediction model of quality evaluation was established, and the types of landscape quality were devided. The results showed that the tree form(X₄), naturalness degree(X₁₇), perspective distance(X₁₆)and the shrub height(X₈)were the main indicators that influenced on the landscape quality of secondary forest. The beauty degree model was built: M_SBE=-128.391+15.63X₄-3.615X₈+20.379X₁₆+17.933X₁₇. With the improvement of tree form, naturalness degree and perspective distance's scores, the beauty degree improved significantly(P<0.05), and when the height of the shrub got higher, the beauty degree's level reduced significantly(P<0.05). According to the results of cluster analysis, the forest landscape was divided into high, medium and low beauty degree of landscape. On the basis of three quality types of the study objects, the forest stand transformation approach were suggested, such as structure adjust, naturalness degree enhancement, forest form optimization, proper shrub's density and height control.

中图分类号:

S718.55⁺7

梁爽,张洁,戚继忠,等. 次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(06): 119-124.

LIANG Shuang, ZHANG Jie, QI Jizhong, XU Chengyang. The forest landscape quality evaluation of the natural scenic beauty mainly made of secondary forest[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(06): 119-124.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.021.

参考文献

[1] Buhyoff G J, Leusehner W A. Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands[J]. Forest Science, 1978, 24(3): 242-432.
[2] 翟明普, 张荣, 阎海平. 风景评价在风景林建设中应用研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2003, 16(6): 16-19. Zhai M P, Zhang R, Yan H P. Review on the studies on scenic evaluation and its application in scenic forest construction both at home and abroad[J]. World Forestry Research, 2003, 16(6): 16-19.
[3] Rilbe R G. The aesthetics of forestry:what has empirical preference research taught us[J]. Environmental Management, 1989, 13(1): 55-74.
[4] 邓送求, 闫家锋, 关庆伟. 南京紫金山枫香风景林空间结构分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 34(4): 117-122. Deng S Q, Yan J F, Guan Q W. Spatial structure of scenic forest of Liquidamabar formosana in Nanjing Zijing Mountain[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2010, 34(4): 117-122.
[5] 李明阳, 申世广, 吴翼, 等. 南京紫金山风景林多情景规划方法研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 31(5): 29-33. Li M Y, Shen S G, Wu Y, et al. A study on scenario planning of scenic forest in Zijingshan Mountain of Nanjing[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2007, 31(5): 29-33.
[6] 赵德海. 风景林美学评价方法的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报,1999,14(4):50-54. Zhao D H.Study on method of scenic aesthetics evaluation[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 1999, 14(4):50-54.
[7] Lothian A. Amenity value of scattered and isolated trees[R]. Report to South Australian Native Vegetation Council. Scenic Solutions, Unley, 2004.
[8] 毛斌, 徐程阳, 李乐, 等. 人工油松风景林的林木分级技术[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10): 49-58. Mao B, Xu C Y, Li L, et al. Tree classification for pinus tabulaeformis scenic plantation[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10): 49-58.
[9] 章志都. 京郊低山风景游憩林质量评价及调控关键技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010. Zhang Z D. Quality assessing and key adjusting technologies for scenic-recreational forests in the lower mountains of suburbans in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010.
[10] 毛斌, 徐程扬, 李翠翠, 等. 不同修枝强度对侧柏、油松人工林林内景观美景度的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(3): 123-125. Mao B, Xu C Y, Li C C, et al. Effects of pruning intensity on in-forest landscape of Platycladus orientalis and Pinus tabulaeformis plantations[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2013, 28(3): 123-125.
[11] Arthur L M. Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments: some empirical tests[J]. Forest Science, 1977, 23(2):151-160.
[12] Buhyoff G J, Wellman J D, Daniel T C. Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas[J]. Forest Science, 1982, 28(4): 827-838.
[13] 黄广远. 北京市城区城市森林结构及景观美学评价研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2012. Huang G Y. Studies on species composition and landscape aesthetics evaluation of urban forest in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012.
[14] 李翠翠. 京郊典型风景游憩林林内景观质量评价技术研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2010. Li C C. Assessment on landscape quality in stands of typical scenic and recreation forests in suburbs in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010.
[15] 欧阳勋志, 廖为明, 彭世揆. 天然阔叶林景观质量评价及其垂直结构优化技术[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(6): 1388-1392. Ouyang X Z, Liao W M, Peng S K. Landscape quality evaluation and vertical structure optimization of natural broadleaf forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(6): 1388-1392.
[16] 杨鑫霞, 亢新刚, 杜志, 等. 基于SBE法对长白山森林景观美学评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2012,40(6): 86-90. Yang X X, Kang X G, Du Z, et al. SBE method-based forest landscape aesthetic quality evaluation of Changbai Mountain[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University:Natural Science Edition, 2012,40(6): 86-90.
[17] 王鹏, 陈丽华, 卞西陈,等. 北沟林场天然次生林群落结构与种群分布格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(7):1668-1674. Wang P, Chen L H, Bian X C, et al. Community structure and distribution pattern of a natural secondary forest in Beigou Forest Farm[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(7):1668-1674.
[18] 金永焕, 李敦求, 姜好相,等. 长白山区次生林恢复过程中天然更新的动态[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,29(5):65-68. Jin Y H, Li D Q, Jiang H X, et al. Quantitative dynamics on natural regeneration of secondary forest during the restoration period in Changbai Mountain area[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2005, 29(5):65-68.
[19] 吴光辉. 景德镇市天然次生林经营管理的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2005. Wu G H.Study on the natural secondary forest management of Jingdezhen[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2005.
[20] 李杰,宁杨翠,郑小贤. 金钩岭林场杨桦次生林健康评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(2):191-195. Li J, Ning Y C, Zhen X X. Health assessment of Polar-Birch secondary forest in Jingouling[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2013, 28(2):191-195.
[21] 李俊英, 闫红伟, 唐强, 等. 天然次生林林内景观评价模型[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27(6): 923-927. Li J Y, Yan H W, Tang Q, et al. A scenic beauty estimation model for a natural secondary forest[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2010, 27(6): 923-927.
[22] 牛君丽. 北京风景游憩林质量评价的指标体系研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008. Niu J L. Study on attribute system of quality assessment for scenic and recreational forest in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2008.
[23] 董建文, 翟明普, 徐程杨. 京郊侧柏刺槐混交林植物物种组成特征对林内景观美景度的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2007, 29(5): 756-761. Dong J W, Zhai M P, Xu C Y. Effect of the characters of species composition on scenic beauty of in-forest landscape of Platycladus orientalis-Robinia pseudoacacia plantation forest in the suburbs of Beijing[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2007, 29(5): 756-761.
[24] 顾亚春, 卢建国. 南京郊野公园地被植物调查与分析[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2012, 39(2): 15-20. Gu YC, Lu J G. Investigation and application analysis of ground cover plants of suburban parks around Nanjing[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2012, 39(2):15-20. (责任编辑郑琰燚)

次生林为主的自然风景林林内景观质量评价

The forest landscape quality evaluation of the natural scenic beauty mainly made of secondary forest

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿