不同施肥模式对杨树人工林土壤微生物功能多样性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.001

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (05): 1-8.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.001

不同施肥模式对杨树人工林土壤微生物功能多样性的影响

张雅坤,彭赛,宋倩云,张文文,郭娇娇,王国兵,阮宏华^*

南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏南京 210037

出版日期:2016-10-18 发布日期:2016-10-18
基金资助:
收稿日期:2015-11-13 修回日期:2016-03-22
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012BC416904); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD); 江苏省自然科学基金青年专项项目(BK20130974); 国家自然科学基金项目(31270489)
第一作者:张雅坤(Yakun.Z@outlook.com)。*通信作者:阮宏华(hhruan@njfu.edu.cn),教授。
引文格式:张雅坤,彭赛,宋倩云,等. 不同施肥模式对杨树人工林土壤微生物功能多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(5):1-8.

Effects of different fertilizers regimes on the functional diversity of soil microbes under poplar plantation

ZHANG Yakun, PENG Sai, SONG Qianyun, ZHANG Wenwen, GUO Jiaojiao, WANG Guobin, RUAN Honghua^*

Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Online:2016-10-18 Published:2016-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土壤微生物多样性是维持人工林土壤生产力的重要组成部分。为了解不同施肥处理对杨树人工林土壤微生物多样性的影响,以苏北沿海地区8年生杨树人工林为对象开展施肥试验,共设置6种施肥处理:CK(对照)、T1(NPK复合肥)、T2(有机肥)、T3(生物炭)、T4(NPK复合肥+生物炭)、T5(有机肥+生物炭),采用Biolog-Eco法测定了土壤微生物的功能多样性。研究结果表明:①各种施肥处理都不同程度地促进了土壤微生物的生长。T4、T5处理增加了土壤pH、TC(全碳)、TC/TN(全碳氮比),它们的土壤微生物量也显著最高。T3处理可能改变了土壤微生物群落结构。②T2、T3、T4、T5处理都增加了土壤微生物整体活性和碳源利用能力,其中T5处理碳源利用能力显著高于其他处理,而T1处理减弱了微生物碳源利用。③土壤微生物对碳源的利用能力存在季节差异,在不同季节从强到弱依次表现为夏季、春季、秋季、冬季; 生物炭配施有机肥改变了微生物对碳源利用能力的季节动态,表现为春季最高。

Abstract: Effects of different fertilizers on the functional diversity of soil microbes under 8 years old poplar plantation in a coastal area of eastern China were investigated using Biolog-Eco method in this study. We fertilized in June 2013 and set up six fertilizing treatments including no fertilizer(CK), NPK chemical fertilizer(T1), Manure fertilizer(T2), Biochar(T3), NPK fertilizer plus biochar(T4), and manure fertilizer plus biochar(T5). We collected soil samples in August 2014, October 2014, December 2014 and March 2015,respectively. The results showed that: ① Fertilizer applications increased SMBC and SMBN, and T4, T5 treatments increased soil pH, TC(total C), TC/TN and the microbial biomass were significantly higher than other treatments. T3 treatment changed microbial structure. ② Fertilizer applications changed the functional diversity of soil microbial community. T2, T3, T4 and T5 treatments improved soil microbial activity and carbon utilization capacity of soil microbial community; carbon utilization ability of T5 treatment was the highest, while NPK treatment decreased carbon utilization ability. ③ The carbon utilization ability was significantly higher in summer than that in autumn and winter, but the carbon utilization ability of T5 treatment in spring was the highest. It was known that fertilizer applications promoted growth of soil microbes. Except for NPK fertilizer, others improved soil microbial activity, and manure plus biochar mostly changed the functional diversity of soil microbes.

中图分类号:

S718
S154

张雅坤,彭赛,宋倩云,等. 不同施肥模式对杨树人工林土壤微生物功能多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 59(05): 1-8.

ZHANG Yakun, PENG Sai, SONG Qianyun, ZHANG Wenwen, GUO Jiaojiao, WANG Guobin, RUAN Honghua. Effects of different fertilizers regimes on the functional diversity of soil microbes under poplar plantation[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 59(05): 1-8.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.001.

参考文献

[1] 陈琴,方升佐,田野,等.杨树和桤木落叶混合分解对土壤微生物生物量的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2012,23(8):2121-2128. Doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2012.0290. Chen Q, Fang S Z, Tian Y, et al. Effects of the decomposition of poplar and alder mixed leaf litters on soil microbial biomass[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(8):2121-2128.
[2] 樊奔,包树敏,蒋永丰,等.连栽杨树林对土壤微生物的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 31(5):81-83. Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2007.05.018. Fan B, Bao S M, Jiang Y F, et al. Effects of replanting poplar on soil microorganisms [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2007, 31(5):81-83.
[3] Zhong W, Gu T, Wang W, et al. The effects of mineral fertilizer and organic manure on soil microbial community and diversity [J]. Plant and Soil, 2009, 326(1): 511-522. Doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-9988-y.
[4] Hu J L, Lin X G, Wang J H, et al. Microbial functional diversity, metabolic quotient, and invertase activity of a sandy loam soil as affected by long-term application of organic amendment and mineral fertilizer[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2011, 11(2): 271-280. Doi: 10.1007/s11368-010-0308-1.
[5] Chen X, Li Z, Liu M, et al. Microbial community and functional diversity associated with different aggregate fractions of a paddy soil fertilized with organic manure and/or NPK fertilizer for 20 years [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15(2): 292-301. Doi: 10.1007/s11368-014-0981-6.
[6] Young I M, Crawford J W, Nunan N, et al. Microbial distribution in soils: physics and scaling[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2008, 100: 81-121. Doi: 10.1016/s0065-2113(08)00604-4.
[7] George E, Marschner H, Jakobsen I. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in uptake of phosphorus and nitrogen from soil [J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 1995, 15(3/4): 257-270. Doi: 10.3109/07388559509147412.
[8] Timonen S, Finlay R D, Olsson S, et al. Dynamics of phosphorus translocation in intact ectomycorrhizal systems: non-destructive monitoring using a β-scanner [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 1996, 19(3): 171-180. Doi: 10.1016/0168-6496(96)00002-5.
[9] Jenkinson D S, Andrew S P S, Lynch J M, et al. The turnover of the organic carbon and nitrogen in soil [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 1990, 329(1255): 361-368. Doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0177.
[10] 孙凤霞,张伟华,徐明岗,等.长期施肥对红壤微生物生物量碳氮和微生物碳源利用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(11): 2792-2798. Doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2010.0411. Sun F X, Zhang W H, Xu M G, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and oncarbon source utilization of microbes in a red soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(11): 2792-2798.
[11] Lazcano C, Gómez-Brandón M, Revilla P, et al. Short term effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil microbial community structure and function [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2013, 49(6):723-733. Doi: 10.1007/s00374-012-0761-7.
[12] Michelsen C F, Pedas P, Glaring M A, et al. Bacterial diversity in greenlandic soils as affected by potato cropping and inorganic versus organic fertilization [J]. Polar Biology, 2014, 37(1): 61-71. Doi: 10.1007/s00300-013-1410-9.
[13] Lauber C L, Hamady M, Knight R, et al. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(15): 5111-5120. Doi: 10.1128/AEM.00335-09.
[14] Marris E. Putting the carbon back: black is the new green[J]. Nature, 2006, 442(7103):624-626. Doi: 10.1038/442624a.
[15] Lehmann J, Rillig M C, Thies J, et al. Biochar effects on soil biota-A review[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2011, 43(9), 1812-1836. Doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022.
[16] 姜玉萍,杨晓峰,张兆辉,等. 生物炭对土壤环境及作物生长影响的研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报,2013,25(2):410-415. Doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2013.02.38. Jiang Y P, Yang X F, Zhang Z H, et al. Progress of the effect of biomass charcoal on soil environment and crop growth [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2013, 25(2):410-415.
[17] 徐凯,徐钰,张梦珊,等. 氮添加对苏北沿海杨树人工林土壤活性有机碳库的影响[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(6):1480-1486. Doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.20140327.003. Xu K, Xu Y, Zhang M S, et al. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on soil active organic carbon in poplar plantations along Northern Jiangsu coast[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(6):1480-1486.
[18] Frey S D, Knorr M, Parrent J L, et al. Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 196: 159-171. Doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.018.
[19] 全国农业技术推广服务中心. 土壤分析技术规范[S]. 2版. 北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
[20] 郑华,欧阳志云,方治国,等. Biolog在土壤微生物群落功能多样性研究中的应用[J].土壤学报, 2004,41(3):456-461. Doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2004.03.020. Zheng H, Ouyang Z Y, Fang Z G, et al. Application of biolog to study on soil microbial community functional diversity [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2004, 41(3):456-461.
[21] Rogers B F, Tate Ш R L. Temporal analysis of the soil microbial community along a toposequence in Pineland soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2001, 33(10): 1389-1401. Doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00044-X.
[22] 张燕燕,曲来叶,陈利顶,等. Biolog Eco Plate(TM)实验信息提取方法改进[J].微生物学通报, 2009,36(7):1083-1091. Doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.2009.07.013. Zhang Y Y, Qu L Y, Chen L D, et al. Amendment on information extraction of biolog EcoPlate^TM[J]. Microbiology, 2009, 36(7):1083-1091.
[23] Preston-Mafham J, Boddy L, Randerson P F. Analysis of microbial community functional diversity using sole-carbon-source utilisation profiles-a critique [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2002, 42(1): 1-14. Doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00990.x.
[24] 田小明,李俊华,王成,等. 连续3年施用生物有机肥对土壤养分、微生物生物量及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤,2014,46(3):481-488. Doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2014.03.016. Tian X M, Li J H, Wang C, et al. Effects of continuous application of bio-organic fertilizer for three years on soil nutrients, microbial biomass and enzyme activity [J]. Soils, 2014, 46(3):481-488.
[25] 张锡洲,王永东,郑子成,等. 氮磷钾肥交互作用对设施土壤盐分含量与离子组成的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2010,28(1):84-89. Doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2650.2010.01.016. Zhang X Z, Wang Y D, Zheng Z C, et al. Effects of interaction among nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on salt content and ion composition in greenhouse soil [J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2010, 28(1):84-89.
[26] 赵晶,冯文强,秦鱼生,等. 不同氮磷钾肥对土壤pH和镉有效性的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2010,47(5):953-961. Doi: 10.16640/j.cnki.37-1222/t.2015.20.236. Zhao J, Feng W Q, Qin Y S, et al. Effects of application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on soil pH and cadmium availability [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(5):953-961.
[27] Huang M, Yang L, Qin H, et al. Quantifying the effect of biochar amendment on soil quality and crop productivity in Chinese rice paddies[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 154(3):172-177. Doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.08.010.
[28] Zwieten V L, Kimber S, Morris S, et al. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010, 327(1-2): 235-246. Doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x.
[29] Asai H, Samson B K, Stephan H M, et al. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield[J]. Field Crops Research, 2009(1), 111:81-84. Doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.10.008.
[30] Lehmann J, Silva J P D, Steiner C, et al. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological anthorosol and a ferralsol of the central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments [J]. Plant and Soil, 2003, 249(2), 343-357. Doi: 10.1023/A: 1022833116184.
[31] Lehmann J, Rondon M. Bio-char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics [C]//Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil System, 2006:517-530. Doi: 10.1201/9781420017113.ch36.
[32] Lehmann J. A handful of carbon [J]. Nature, 2007, 447(7141): 143-144. Doi: 10.1038/447143a.
[33] Liang B, Lehmann J, Bolomon O, et al. Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2006, 70(5): 1719-1730. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0383.
[34] 于镇华,元野,刘居东,等. Biolog-Eco解析垦殖与自然恢复黑土微生物群落代谢功能季节变化[J]. 土壤与作物, 2013, 2(3):105-111. Doi: 10.11689/j.issn.2095-2961.2013.03.001. Yu Z H, Yuan Y, Liu J D, et al. Seasonal variations of microbial community functional diversity in cultivated and natural restored mollisols using biolog-eco method[J]. Soil and Crop, 2013, 2(3):105-111.
[35] 孙瑞,孙本华,高明霞,等.长期不同土地利用方式下土土壤微生物特性的变化[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(3):655-663. Doi: 10.11674 /zwyf.2015. 0312. Sun R, Sun B H, Gao M X, et al. Changes of soil microbial characteristics under long-term different land use patterns on an anthropogenic loess soil [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(3):655-663.
[36] 夏昕,石坤,黄欠如,等.长期不同施肥条件下红壤性水稻土微生物群落结构的变化[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):697-705. Doi: 10.11766/trxb201407260376. Xia X, Shi K, Huang Q R, et al. The changes of microbial community structure in red paddy soil under long-term fertilization [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(3):697-705.
[37] Sohi S P, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil [J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2010, 105, 47-82. Doi: 10.1016/s0065-2113(10)05002-9.
[38] Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W. Amenliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal-a review [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2002, 35(4), 219-230. Doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4.
[39] Chen J H, Liu X Y, Zheng J W, et al. Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from Southwest China[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2013, 71:33-34. Doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.05.003.
[40] Rousk J, Brooks P C, Bääth E. Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(6), 1589-1596.Doi: 10.1128/AEM.02775-08.
[41] Tang J C, Zhu W Y, Kookana R, et al. Characteristics of biochar and its application in remediation of contaminated soil [J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2013, 116(6): 653-659. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.05.035.
[42] Ippolito J A, Laird D A, Busscher W J. Environmental benefits of biochar [J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2012, 41(4): 967-972. Doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0151.
[43] 陈伟,周波,束怀瑞. 生物炭和有机肥处理对平邑甜茶根系和土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2013,46(18):3850-3856. Doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.18.014. Chen W, Zhou B, Shu H R. Effects of organic fertilizer and biochar on root system and microbial functional diversity of Malus hupehensis Rehd [J]. Scientia Agriculture Sinica, 2013, 46(18):3850-3856.
[44] 杨宁,杨满元,雷玉兰,等.紫色土丘陵坡地土壤微生物群落的季节变化[J].生态环境学报, 2015,24(1):34-40. Doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.01.006. Yang N, Yang M Y, Lei Y L, et al. Seasonal variations of soil microbial communities on sloping-land with purple soils[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(1):34-40.

不同施肥模式对杨树人工林土壤微生物功能多样性的影响

Effects of different fertilizers regimes on the functional diversity of soil microbes under poplar plantation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	卜晓婷, 付威, 李淑娴, 徐志标, 彭大庆, 徐林桥. 幼化和外源激素对娜塔栎嫩枝扦插生根的影响及其生根解剖学观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 129-136.
[2]	杜晋城, 李欣欣, 王泽亮, 刘偲, 钟毅, 王丽华. 聚乙二醇胁迫下3个油橄榄品种生理指标响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 137-143.
[3]	方静, 张书曼, 严善春, 武帅, 赵佳齐, 孟昭军. 两种丛枝菌根真菌复合接种对青山杨叶片抗美国白蛾的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 144-154.
[4]	张馨方, 王广鹏, 张树航, 李颖, 郭燕. 不同抗螨性板栗差异次生代谢物筛选与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 234-240.
[5]	杨宏, 伊贤贵, 王贤荣, 吴桐, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 朱兆青. 樱花新品种‘元春’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 275-276.
[6]	田梦阳, 朱树林, 窦全琴, 季艳红. 薄壳山核桃-茶间作对‘安吉白茶’速生期光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 86-96.
[7]	张文旭, 林晓越, 毛岭峰, 伊理孝, 李垚, 应建平, 唐超和. 浙江绿葱湖省级湿地公园小麂活动节律和集群行为研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 81-87.
[8]	董玉洁, 毛岭峰, 张敏, 鲁旭东, 吴秀萍. 华东地区亚热带典型常绿阔叶林地上生物量与环境因子的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 74-80.
[9]	鲁旭东, 董禹然, 李垚, 毛岭峰. 中国亚热带杉木人工林不同林分发育阶段的群落构建机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 67-73.
[10]	邢冰冰, 李垚, 毛岭峰. 植物功能性状系统发育保守性的类群和地理分异研究——以中国被子植物最大株高为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 59-66.
[11]	范明阳, 胡萌, 杨园, 方炎明. 中国东部地区马尾松与黄山松群落分类及群落结构和物种多样性特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 47-58.
[12]	赵亚楠, 孙天骅, 王利峰, 许强, 刘军侠, 高宝嘉, 周国娜. 油松抗性相关激素与代谢物对油松毛虫取食与剪叶刺激的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 219-226.
[13]	李秋洁, 李相程. 基于移动激光扫描的行道树树冠点云逐点检测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 205-213.
[14]	萨如拉, 王子瑞, 滑永春, 呼日查, 刘磊, 高明龙, 于晓雨. 基于结构方程模型的大兴安岭北部天然林森林生态系统恢复能力评价研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 196-204.
[15]	彭仲韬, 郭嘉兴, 王艺璇, 王磊, 金光泽, 刘志理. 小兴安岭3种槭树不同生长期叶性状变异及相关性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 131-139.