近自然化改造对桂南马尾松和杉木人工林结构特征的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201606040

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (04): 101-107.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201606040

近自然化改造对桂南马尾松和杉木人工林结构特征的影响

刘志龙^1,2,明安刚¹,贾宏炎^1*,蔡道雄¹,马跃¹,王亚南¹,孙冬婧¹

1.中国林业科学研究院热带林业实验中心,广西凭祥 532600;
2. 广西友谊关国家森林生态系统定位观测研究站,广西凭祥 532600

出版日期:2017-08-18 发布日期:2017-08-18
基金资助:
收稿日期:2016-06-25 修回日期:2016-10-28
基金项目:中国林科院基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CAFYBB2014QA033); 广西林业科技项目(桂林科字[2014]第41号); 广西自然科学基金项目(2014GXNSFBA118084)
第一作者:刘志龙(liuzhilong@caf.ac.cn)。*通信作者:贾宏炎(rlzxjhy@126.com),高级工程师。
引文格式:刘志龙,明安刚,贾宏炎,等. 近自然化改造对桂南马尾松和杉木人工林结构特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(4):101-107.

Effects of close-to-nature transformation on structure characteristics of Pinus massoniana and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations

LIU Zhilong^1,2, MING Angang¹, JIA Hongyan^1*, CAI Daoxiong¹, MA Yue¹, WANG Yanan¹, SUN Dongjing¹

1. Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, CAF, Pingxiang 532600,China;
2. Guangxi Youyiguan Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Pingxiang 532600,China

Online:2017-08-18 Published:2017-08-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】为提升人工林质量及培育珍贵树种大径材,研究近自然化改造对林分结构变化的影响,通过近自然化改造改变林分组成和结构,进而调整林木生长和林分稳定性。【方法】以广西凭祥地区1993年造林并于2008年开始近自然化改造的马尾松和杉木人工林为研究对象,运用混交度、大小比数和角尺度参数分析近自然化改造后林分结构特征的变化。【结果】①对照林分的直径结构遵从正态分布,近自然化改造林分表现出向倒“J”形过渡的特征,对照林分的树高结构呈单峰型,而近自然化改造林分则呈双峰型; ②近自然化改造明显提高了林分混交度,马尾松和杉木对照林分的平均混交度由0.00和0.16分别提高到自然化改造林分的0.82和0.89; ③近自然化改造对林分角尺度影响较小,杉木林从均匀分布状态向团状分布转变,但马尾松林一直处于随机分布状态; ④近自然化改造增加了优势和亚优势的个体比例,对照林分总体处于中庸生长状态,马尾松和杉木近自然化改造林分的平均大小比数分别为0.40和0.46。【结论】从林分非空间结构角度看,近自然化改造林分提高了林分树种组成,径级结构向异龄林直径分布倒“J”形的特征过渡; 从林分空间结构角度看,近自然化改造林分逐步摆脱了人工纯林零度或弱度混交、水平分布均匀和中庸状态的结构特征。研究区补植树种和天然更新树种已成功地在林分中更新和生长,促进了林分混交度、树种多样性的提高和林分空间结构的优化,林分向异龄复层混交林方向发展。

Abstract: 【Objective】The close-to-nature transformation changes the forest composition and stand structure and thus, affects the tree growth and stand stability. Therefore, a study on the effects of close-to-nature transformation on stand structure has important significance in improving the quality of degrading plantations and producing large-diameter timber. 【Method】This study focused on Pinus massoniana and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations, afforested in 1993 and close-to-nature transformated in 2008. Three parameters(mingling, uniform angle index, and neighborhood comparison)were considered to compare the changes in stand spatial structure before and after close-to-nature transformation. 【Results】① The diameter of control stands followed normal distribution, while the close-to-nature transformation stands showed the reversal “J” type. The tree height of control stands was a single peak type, whereas that of close-to-nature transformation plantations showed a double peak. ② The close-to-nature transformation improved stand mingling significantly, the average mingling increased from 0.00 and 0.16 to 0.82 and 0.89 in the P. massoniana and C. lanceolata control stands and their close-to-nature stands respectively. ③ Close-to-nature transformation has little effect on the uniform angle index, it changed from uniform distribution to reunion distribution in C. lanceolata stands; however, it has been in a random distribution state in P. massoniana stands. ④ The number of dominant and sub-dominant individuals were increased after close-to-nature transformation. The average neighborhood comparison of P. massoniana and C. lanceolata close-to-nature stands was 0.40 and 0.46 respectively, whereas there were generally medium individuals in the control stands. 【Conclusion】 In the perspective of non-spatial structure, close-to-nature transformation improves the composition of forest species, and the diameter of trees is transferred to an inverted “J” type as uneven aged forest. In terms of the stand spatial structure, the characteristic of artificial pure forests which were zero or less mixed with uniformly and evenly distributed tree species has been weakened by the transformation. In the close-to-nature forests, interplanted and natural regenerated species are growing well to increase the stand mingling, biodiversity, and optimize the forest spatial structure, where could become different-aged multilayer compound forests.

中图分类号:

S725

刘志龙,明安刚,贾宏炎,等. 近自然化改造对桂南马尾松和杉木人工林结构特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(04): 101-107.

LIU Zhilong, MING Angang, JIA Hongyan, CAI Daoxiong, MA Yue, WANG Yanan, SUN Dongjing. Effects of close-to-nature transformation on structure characteristics of Pinus massoniana and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41(04): 101-107.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201606040.

参考文献

[1] 陈幸良, 巨茜, 林昆仑. 中国人工林发展现状、问题与对策[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014, 27(6): 54-59. DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2014.06.008. CHEN X L, JU Q, LIN K L. Development status, issues and countermeasures of China's plantation[J]. World Forestry Research, 2014, 27(6): 54-59.
[2] 杨承栋, 孙启武, 焦如珍, 等. 大青山一二代马尾松土壤性质变化与地力衰退关系的研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40(2): 267-273. YANG C D, SUN Q W, JIAO R Z, et al. Studies on the relationship between soil property changes and soil degradation under 1^st and 2^nd rotaion masson pine plantaion at Daqingshan[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2003, 40(2): 267-273.
[3] 田大伦, 沈燕, 康文星, 等.连栽第1和第2 代杉木人工林养分循环的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(17): 5025-5032. TIAN D L, SHEN Y, KANG W X, et al. Characteristics of nutrient cycling in first and second rotations of Chinese fir plantations[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(17): 5025-5032.
[4] 丁应祥, 田野, 戚玲. 连栽杉木人工林生产力的模拟与预测[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2000, 24(3): 21-25. DOI:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2000.03.006. DING Y X, TIAN Y, QI L. Modeling of Chinese fir plantation productivities in different rotations[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 2000, 24(3): 21-25.
[5] 罗云建, 张小全. 杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata)连栽地力退化和杉阔混交林的土壤改良作用[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(2): 715-724. LUO Y J, ZHANG X Q. The assessment of soil degradation in successive rotations of Chinese fir plantation and the soil amelioration of mixed plantation of Chinese fir and broad-leaved[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(2): 715-724.
[6] 杨玉盛, 陈光水, 黄宝龙. 杉木多世代连栽的土壤水分和养分变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2000, 24(2): 25-28. DOI:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2000.02.008. YANG Y S, CHENG G S, HUANG B L. Variation in soil water and nutrients between different rotation stands of Chinese fir[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 2000, 24(3)24(2): 25-28.
[7] 侯元兆, 陈统爱. 我国结合次生林经营发展珍贵用材树种的战略利益[J]. 世界林业研究, 2008, 21(2): 49-52. DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2008.02.014. HOU Y Z, CHEN T A. The strategic benefits of developing precious commercial tree species integrated with secondary forest management in China[J]. World Forestry Research, 2008, 21(2): 49-52.
[8] 曾祥谓, 樊宝敏, 张怀清, 等. 我国多功能森林经营的理论探索与对策研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013(2): 10-16. ZENG X W, FAN B M, ZHANG H Q, et al. Study on the theory and strategy of multifunctional forest management in China[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2013(2): 10-16.
[9] MOSTAFA M, MOHAMMAD R. MARVIE M, et al. Over-mature beech trees(Fagus orientalis Lipsky)and close-to-nature forestry in northern Iran[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2012, 23(2): 289-294.
[10] LARSEN J B, NIELSEN A B. Nature-based forest management: where are we going? elaborating forest development types in and with practice[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 238: 107-117.
[11] KEVIN L O. What is close-to-nature silviculture in a changing world[J]. Forestry, 2016, 89(1): 1-6.
[12] 陆元昌. 近自然森林经营的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
[13] 林思祖, 黄世国. 论中国南方近自然混交林营造[J]. 世界林业研究, 2001, 14(2): 73-78. DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2001.02.013. LIN S Z, HUANG S G. A establishment and management of nature-approximating mixed forests in south China[J]. World Forestry Research, 2001, 14(2): 73-78.
[14] 何友均, 梁星云, 覃林, 等. 南亚热带人工针叶纯林近自然改造早期对群落特征和土壤性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(8): 2484-2495. HE Y J, LIANG X Y, QIN L, et al. Community characteristics and soil properties of coniferous plantation forest monocultures in the early stages after close-to-nature transformation management in southern subtropical China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(8): 2484-2495.
[15] 罗应华, 孙冬婧, 林建勇, 等. 马尾松人工林近自然化改造对植物自然更新及物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2013, 33(19): 6154-6162. LUO Y H,SUN D J,LIN J Y,et al. Effect of close-to-nature management on the natural regeneration and species diversity in a masson pine plantation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(19): 6154-6162.
[16] 赵中华. 基于林分状态特征的森林自然度评价研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2009. ZHAO Z H. Evaluation forest natrualness based on stand state characteristics[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2009.
[17] 刘于鹤, 林进. 新形势下森林经营工作的思考[J]. 林业经济, 2013(1): 3-9. DOI:10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2013.11.009. LIU Y H, LIN J. Thinking of forest management in the new situation[J]. Forestry Economics, 2013(1): 3-9.
[18] 王宏, 陆元昌. 木材储备基地及其多功能森林经营建设对策[J]. 世界林业研究, 2013, 26(1): 12-17. DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2003.01.003. WANG H, LU Y C. Timber reserve production base and its role in multi-functional forest management[J]. World Forestry Research, 2013, 26(1): 12-17.
[19] 赵良平. 森林生态系统健康理论的形成与实践[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 31(3): 1-7. DOI:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2007.03.001. ZHAO L P.Development and application of forest ecosystem health theory in forest ecological construction of China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2007, 31(3): 1-7.
[20] 惠刚盈, 胡艳波, 赵中华. 再论“结构化森林经营”[J]. 世界林业研究, 2009, 22(1): 14-19. DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2009.01.003. HUI G Y, HU Y B, ZHAO Z H.Further discussionon “structure-based forest management”[J]. World Forestry Research, 2009, 22(1): 14-19.
[21] 惠刚盈, 赵中华, 胡艳波. 结构化森林经营技术指南[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2010.
[22] 惠刚盈, KLAUSVON G, 胡艳波, 等. 结构化森林经营[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2007.
[23] 赵中华, 惠刚盈, 胡艳波, 等. 结构化森林经营方法在阔叶红松林中的应用[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(4): 467-472. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2013.04.018. ZHAO Z H, HUI G Y, HU Y B, et al. Application of structure-based forest management in broadleaved Korean pine mixed forest[J]. Forest Research, 2013, 26(4): 467-472.
[24] 赵中华, 袁士云, 惠刚盈, 等. 经营措施对林分空间结构特征的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(7): 135-142. ZHAO Z H, YUAN SY, HUI G Y, et al. Impacts of different management measures on spatial structure characteristics[J]. Journal of Northwest A &F University(Nat Sci Ed), 2008, 36(7): 135-142.
[25] 巫志龙, 周成军, 周新年, 等. 杉阔混交人工林林分空间结构分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(5): 609-615. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2013.05.013. WU Z L, ZHOU C J, ZHOU X N, et al. Analysis of stand spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata broad-leaved mixed plantation[J]. Forest Research, 2013, 26(5): 609-615.
[26] 万丽, 刘昀东, 丁国栋, 等. 密度调控对油松人工林空间结构的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2013, 31(1): 27-31. WAN L, LIU J L, DING G D, et al. Effects of density control on the spatial structure of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2013, 31(1): 27-31.
[27] 张连金, 胡艳波, 赵中华, 等. 北京九龙山侧柏人工林空间结构多样性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(1): 60-69. ZHANG L J, HU Y B, ZHAO Z H, et al. Spatial structure diversity of Platycladus orientalis plantation in Beijing Jiulong Mountain[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(1): 60-69.
[28] 胡艳波. 基于结构优化森林经营的天然异龄林空间结构优化模型研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2010. HU Y B. Structure-based spatial optimization management model for natural uneven-aged forest[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2010.
[29] 惠刚盈, 胡艳波. 混交林树种空间隔离程度表达方式的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(1): 23-27. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2001.01.005. HUI G Y, HU Y B. Measuring species spatial isolation in mixed forests[J]. Forest Research, 2001, 14(1): 23-27.
[30] 惠刚盈, 胡艳波. 角尺度在林分空间结构调整中的应用[J]. 林业资源管理, 2006, 4(2):31-35. HUI G Y, HU Y B. Application of neighborhood pattern in forest spatial structure regulation[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2006, 4(2):31-35.
[31] 惠刚盈, KLAUSVON G, MATTHIAS A. 一个新的林分空间结构参数—大小比数[J]. 林业科学研究, 1999, 12(1): 1-6. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.1999.01.001. HUI G Y, KLAUSVON G, MATTHIAS A. A new parameter for stand spatial structure neighbourhood comparison[J]. Forest Research, 1999, 12(1): 1-6.
[32] 于洪光, 高海涛, 张义涛. 结构化森林经营技术要点与应用[J]. 吉林林业科技, 2014, 43(6): 16-19. YU H G, GAO H T, ZHANG Y T. The essential and application of structuring forest management technology[J]. Journal of Jilin Forestry Science and Technology, 2014, 43(6): 16-19.
[33] 姜鹏, 孟京辉, 陆元昌, 等. 马尾松近自然改造初期的混交度与分布格局[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2014, 30(5): 147-150. JIANG P, MENG J H, LU Y C, et al. Minglings and sptial distribution of Pinus massoniana plantation in the initial stage of near-to mature transformation[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2014, 30(5):147-150.
[34] 郝云庆, 王金锡, 王启和, 等. 柳杉人工林近自然改造过程中林分空间的结构变化[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2008, 26(1): 48-52. HAO Y Q, WANG J X, WANG Q H, et al. Spatial structure dynamic of the close-to-nature forestry management of Cryptomeria fortunei plantation[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2008, 26(1): 48-52.

近自然化改造对桂南马尾松和杉木人工林结构特征的影响

Effects of close-to-nature transformation on structure characteristics of Pinus massoniana and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	陆启帆, 林上平, 刘胜辉, 郑翔, 毕毓芳, 肖子璋, 姜姜, 王安可, 杜旭华. 施肥对毛竹林产量影响的Meta分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 88-96.
[2]	刘泽茂, 晏昕, 吴文, 张于卉, 喻方圆. 竹炭添加对大叶榉树容器苗生长和营养状况的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 111-118.
[3]	郑颖, 冯健, 于世河, 陆爱君, 王琴, 王骞春. 初植密度对4个落叶松无性系生长与干形的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 72-80.
[4]	王福根, 卫星杓, 赵国春, 贾黎明. 无患子细根形态及垂直分布特征对配方施肥措施的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 58-66.
[5]	刘俊涛, 仲静, 刘济铭, 罗水晶, 王冕之, 范嘉霖, 贾黎明. 无患子初果期人工林土壤和叶片C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 67-75.
[6]	郑玉琳, 刘济铭, 史双龙, 贾黎明, 翁学煌, 罗水晶, 盛克寨. 无患子果实成熟过程及其油脂、皂苷动态变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 76-82.
[7]	熊光康, 厉月桥, 熊有强, 段爱国, 曹德春, 孙建军, 聂林芽, 盛炜彤. 低密度造林对杉木生长、形质和材种结构的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 165-173.
[8]	刘浩, 刘璨, 刘俊昌. 中国退耕还林工程对农户收入和消费不平等的影响测度[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 227-234.
[9]	王琪, 于水强, 王维枫, 詹龙飞, 王静波. 不同密度和植株配置形状的杨树人工林细根生物量特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 179-185.
[10]	张银荣, 兰再平, 秘洪雷, 彭晶晶, 马鑫, 秦杏宇. 滴灌施肥条件下氮磷钾对‘龙脑香樟’幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(6): 39-45.
[11]	倪超, 张云, 高捍东. 基于NIRS的马尾松苗木根部含水量预测模型[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(6): 91-96.
[12]	唐继新,贾宏炎,王科,曾冀,郑路,王亚南,杨保国. 密度调控对米老排中龄人工林生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(01): 45-53.
[13]	陈燕琼,沈,范佳露,陈茜,许欣玥,张迪,钱钢,陈颖. 茉莉酸甲酯对干旱及复水下落叶冬青苗叶片抗氧化水平的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 35-43.
[14]	樊梓鸾,柳雅馨,杨蕾玉,张华,绰尔鹏,李娜. 3种浆果-藕复合果丹皮体外消化物抗氧化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(03): 86-92.
[15]	张银荣,兰再平,彭晶晶,秘洪雷,马鑫,贺新,楼杰. 地面滴灌龙脑香樟人工林的土壤水分运动规律[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(01): 120-126.