帽儿山地区樟子松优良种源的选择

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.010

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 61-68.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.010

帽儿山地区樟子松优良种源的选择

徐静,孙洪志^*,郭滨德

东北林业大学林学院生态研究中心,黑龙江哈尔滨 150040

出版日期:2017-02-18 发布日期:2017-02-18
基金资助:
基金项目:黑龙江省自然科学基金项目(C201210)
第一作者:徐静(1063756466@qq.com)。*通信作者:孙洪志(2458928501@qq.com),研究员。

The superior provenance selection of Mongolian scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)forests at Maoershan area

XU Jing, SUN Hongzhi^*, GUO Binde

Center for Ecological Research, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040,China

Online:2017-02-18 Published:2017-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】进一步揭示不同种源樟子松在帽儿山地区的生长差异性,选择出优良种源。【方法】以1981年采种、1982年育苗、1984年春造林到帽儿山地区的高峰、图强、卡伦山、红花尔基、罕达盖、金山、阿尔山等7个种源31年生樟子松试验林为研究对象,通过对樟子松胸径、树高、材积、冠幅、年轮宽度及保存率等6个生长性状进行方差分析、多重比较、相关性分析、主成分分析等,选择优良种源。【结果】种源间胸径达到极显著差异(P＜0.01),材积和冠幅达到显著差异(P＜0.05),树高没有显著差异(P＞0.05); 区组间各性状均没有显著差异(P＞0.05)。图强种源的年轮宽度最大(3.69 mm),保存率则最小(56.67%); 不同种源胸径、树高、材积、冠幅及年轮宽度与原产地地理气候因子之间没有显著相关性。樟子松种源各性状地理变异模式不明显,而保存率与纬度呈极显著负相关(P＜0.01),与经度呈显著负相关(P＜0.05),与海拔呈显著正相关(P＜0.05); 主成分分析结果发现,图强种源综合指数得分最高(2.972)。【结论】31年生樟子松人工林生长性状不同种源之间存在差异,红花尔基、高峰种源生长较好; 图强种源表现最好,应用潜力大。

Abstract: 【Objective】The experiment was conducted to study the differences of growth traits among seven provenances(GF, TQ, KLS, HHEJ, HDG, JS and AES)and geographic variation to select superior provenances. 【Method】In this study, seeds of Mongolian scotch pine(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)from 7 provenances were collected in 1981, seedlings were cultured in 1982 and planted in 1984 at Maoer Mountain. In 2015, we investigated the DBH, height, volume, crown width, ring width and survival rate of 31-year-old Mongolian scotch pine at Maoershan area. The superior provenance was selected by using variance analysis, multiple comparisons, correlation analysis and principal component analysis. 【Results】The DBH exhibited extremely significant difference(P＜0.01), the volume and crown width exhibited significant difference(P＜0.05), the height exhibited no significant difference among the different provenances. All the investigated traits showed no significant differences among different blocks. The tree ring width from Tuqiang provenance was maximum(3.69 mm)while its survival rate was minimum(56.67%). The DBH, height, volume, crown width and ring width didn’t significantly correlated to latitude and longitude of provenances, except for the survival rate which significantly and negatively correlated to latitude(P＜0.01)and longitude(P＜0.05), and significantly and positively correlated(P＜0.05)to altitude. Therefore the genetic variation of Mongolian scotch pine was not obvious among the various traits. According to the principal component analysis, the composite index score of Tuqiang provenance was the highest(2.972). 【Conclusion】The growth traits of 31 year old Mongolian scotch pine showed differences among different provenances which of the Tuqiang provenance was best, and the HHEJ and GF provenances were better than that of the others. The Tuqiang provenance showed the best application potential at Maoershan area.

中图分类号:

S722.5

徐静,孙洪志,郭滨德. 帽儿山地区樟子松优良种源的选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(01): 61-68.

XU Jing, SUN Hongzhi, GUO Binde. The superior provenance selection of Mongolian scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)forests at Maoershan area[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41(01): 61-68.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.010.

参考文献

[1] 刘青华,张蕊,金国庆,等. 马尾松年轮宽度和木材基本密度的种源变异及早期选择[J]. 林业科学, 2010,46(5):49-54. LIU Q H, ZHANG R, JIN G Q,et al. Variation of ring width and wood basic density and early selection of Pinus massoniana provenances [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(5):49-54.
[2] BAMBER R K, BURLEY J. The wood properties of radiata pine[J]. Wood Properties of Radiata Pine, 1983:1-84.
[3] MEGRAW R A. Wood quality factors in loblolly pine [M]. Georgia: TAPPI Press Atlanta, 1985:1-88.
[4] 赵颖,周志春,吴吉富,等. 马尾松优良种源对磷肥的生长反应和肥效持续性[J]. 林业科学, 2007,43(10):64-70. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2007.10.011. ZHAO Y, ZHOU Z C, WU J F, et al. Growth response of superior provenance of masson pine to phosphorus supply and persistence of phosphorus effect [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2007,43(10):64-70.
[5] 梁一池,邢建宏,刘希华,等. 25年生马尾松种源遗传变异及选择研究[J]. 三明学院学报,2007, 24(2):121-126. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4343.2007.02.001. LIANG Y C, XING J H, LIU X H, et al. Genetic variations and selection of Pinus massoniana provenance in a 25-year-old testing plantation [J]. Journal of Sannming University, 2007, 24(2):121-126.
[6] 毛爱华,李建祥,张超英,等. 19年生侧柏种源变异及选择研究[J]. 北京林业大学报,2010, 32(1):63-68. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.2010.01.020. MAO A H, LI J X, ZHANG C Y, et al. Geographic variation and provenance selection of Platycladus orientalis in a 19-year-old testing plantation [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(1):63-68.
[7] CHUCHALA D, ORLOWSKI K A, SANDAK A, et al. The effect of wood provenance and density on cutting forces while sawing Scots pine(Pinus sylvestris L.)[J]. Bioresources, 2014, 9(3):5349-5361.
[8] DANUSEVI I D, GABRILAVI I R. Variation in juvenile growth rhythm among Picea abies provenances from the baltic states and the adjacent regions [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2001, 16(4):305-317. DOI:10.1080/713785149.
[9] FALKENHAGEN E R. Thirty five-year results from seven Pinus elliottii(Engelman.)and Pinus taeda(L.)provenance trials in South Africa [J]. South African Forestry Journal, 1978, 107:22-36. DOI:10.1080/20702620.1978.10433502.
[10] BLUMENROTHER M, BACHMANN M, MULLER-STARCK G. Genetic characters and diameter growth of provenances of Scots pine(Pinus sylvestris L.)[J]. Silvae Genetica, 2001, 50(5-6):212-222.
[11] SHUTYAEV A M, GIERTYCH M. Genetic subdivisions of the range of Scots pine(Pinus sylvestris L.)based on a transcontinental provenance experiment. [J]. Silvae Genetica, 2000, 49(3):137-151.
[12] TAUER C G, LOO-DINKINS J A. Seed source variation in specific gravity of loblolly pinegrown in a common environment in Arkansas [J]. Forest Science, 1990, 36(4):1133-1145.
[13] 康宏樟,朱教君,许美玲.沙地樟子松人工林营林技术研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(7):799-806. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2005.0044. KANG H Z, ZHU J J, XU M L. Silviculture of Mongolian pine(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)plantations on sandy land [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(7):799-806.
[14] 全国杉木种源试验协作组. 杉木造林区种源选择 [J]. 林业科学研究, 1988, 1(1):1-13. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj. 1988.01.002. National Collaborative Research Group. Provenance trial of Chinese fir(Cunningamia lanceolata(Lamb.))Hook for planting area in China [J]. Forest Research, 1988, 1(1):1-13.
[15] 周志春,傅玉狮,吴天林.马尾松生长和材性的地理遗传变异及最优种源区的划定[J]. 林业科学研究, 1993, 7(5):556-564.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.1993.05.015. ZHOU Z C, FU Y S, WU T L. Geographic variation in growth and wood properties and determination of the optimum provenance region for paper-pulp wood of masson pine[J]. Forest Research,1993, 7(5):556-564.
[16] 李书靖,周建文,刘健.油松地理变异及种源选择的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1991, 4(6):650-655.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.1991.06.012. LI S J, ZHOU J W, LIU J. Geographic variation and provenance selection of Pinus tabulaeformis [J]. Forest Research, 1991, 4(6):650-655.
[17] 杨传平,姜静,唐盛松,等.帽儿山地区21年生兴安落叶松种源试验[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2002, 30(6):1-5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2002.06.001. YANG C P, JIANG J, TANG S S,et al. The provenance test of 21-year old Larix gmelinii at Maoershan area [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2002, 30(6):1-5.
[18] 王殿金,徐树堂,宋晓东,等. 樟子松沙地种源试验[J]. 防护林科技,2008(2):9-11.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2008.02.004. WANG D J, XU S T, SONG X D, et al. Provenances test of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica on sand land [J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2008(2):9-11.
[19] 周文飞,李继有,白子红,等.榆林沙区樟子松造林技术[J].防护林科技, 2012(6):111-112. DOI:10.3969 /j.issn.1005-5215.2012.06.050. ZHOU W F, LI J Y, BAI Z H,et al. Study on afforestation techniques of Pinus sylvestris Linn.var.mongolica Litv. in Yulin sandy land [J]. Protection Forest Science and Technolog, 2012(6):111-112.
[20] ZHU J J, FAN Z P, ZENG D H, et al. Comparison of stand structure and growth between artificial and natural forests of Pinus sylvestiris var. mongolica on sandy land [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2003, 14(2):103-111. DOI:10.1007/BF02856774.
[21] 焦树仁.科尔沁沙地针叶树造林技术研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2001(3):31-36.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4066.2001.03.011. JIAO S R. Afforestation technology of needle leaved trees in Keerqin sandy land [J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science& Technology, 2001(3):31-36.
[22] 焦树仁,宋保民,王明智,等. 内蒙古奈曼旗兴隆沼林场针叶树引种造林试验[J].内蒙古林业科技, 2000(2):23-25. JIAO S R, SONG B M, WANG M Z,et al. Experiments on afforestation by introduction coniferous trees in Xinglongzhao Forest Farm, Naiman Banner, Inner Mongolia [J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science& Technology, 2000(2):23-25.
[23] 焦树仁.樟子松人工林蒸腾耗水量的初步研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 1984, 3(4): 15-18.DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.1984.0084. JIAO S R. A preliminary study on the evapotranspiration intensity of artificial Mongolian pine forest [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 1984, 3(4):15-18.
[24] 曾德慧,姜凤岐,范志平,等. 樟子松人工固沙林稳定性的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 1996, 7(4): 337-343.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.1996.0067. ZENG D H, JIANG F Q, FAN Z P, et al. Stability of Mongolian pine plantation on sandy land [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 7(4):337-343.
[25] 吴祥云,姜凤岐,李晓丹,等. 樟子松人工固沙林衰退的主要特征[J].应用生态学报,2004, 15(12):2221-2224.DOI: 10.13287/ j.1001-9332.2004. 0458. WU X Y, JIANG F Q, LI X D, et al. Major features of decline of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation on sandy land [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 7(4): 337-343.
[26] 杨金艳,王传宽.东北东部森林生态系统土壤碳贮量和碳通量[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(11):2875-2882.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.11.012. YANG J Y, WANG C K. Soil carbon storage and flux of temperate forest ecosystems in northeastern China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(11):2875-2882.
[27] WANG C K, HAN Y, CHEN J, et al. Seasonality of soil CO₂ efflux in a temperate forest: biophysical effects of snowpack and spring freeze-thaw cycles [J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 2013, 177(15):83-92. DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.008.
[28] 刘桂丰,褚延广,时玉龙,等. 17年生帽儿山地区樟子松种源试验[J].东北林业大学学报,2003, 31(4):1-3. LIU G F, CHU Y G, SHI Y L, et al. The provenance test of 17-year-old Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica at Maoershan area [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2003, 31(4):1-3.
[29] 朱宇,刘兆刚,金光泽. 大兴安岭天然落叶松林单木健康评价[J].应用生态学报,2013, 24(5):1320-1328. DOI:10.13287/j. 1001-9332.2013.0294. ZHU Y, LIU Z G, JIN G Z. Health assessment of individual trees in natural Larix gmelinii forest Great Xing’an Mountains of China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(5):1320-1328.
[30] 张桂芹,刘跃杰,姜秀煜,等.蒙古栎种源生长性状的遗传变异及优良种源选择[J].东北林业大学学报, 2015,43(4):5-7. DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2015.04.001. ZHANG G Q, LIU Y J, JIANG X Y, et al. Genetic variation of growth traits in Mongolian oak provenance and its excellent provenance selection [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2015,43(4):5-7.
[31] 方晓雨,张宏琴,姜超,等.3种乔木叶片反射光谱与光合特性随树高的变化[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2013(2): 383-388. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00383. FANG X Y, ZHANG H Q, JIANG C, et al. Changes in leaf spectral reflectance and photosynthetic characteristics with tree height in three tree species [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2013(2):383-388.
[32] 赵俊卉,亢新刚,张慧东,等. 长白山主要针叶树种胸径和树高变异系数与竞争因子的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(8):1832-1837. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2009.0300. ZHAO J H, KANG X G, ZHANG H D, et al. Relationships between coefficient of variation of diameter and height and competition index of main coniferous trees in Changbai Mountains [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(8):1832-1837.
[33] 杨书文,夏德安,孙洪志,等.长白落叶松遗传参数的估算及优良家系的综合选择[J].东北林业大学学报, 1991, 19(S2):46-53. DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.1991.s2.008. YANG S W, XIA D A, SUN H Z, et al. Estimation on genetic paraneter and comprehensive selection for superior families of Larix olgensis [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 1991, 19(S2):46-53.
[34] 杨亚莉,蒋丽娟,向祖恒,等. 龙山县八面山华榛人工林造林成效分析[J].湖南林业科技,2014, 41(3):46-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1003-5710.2014.03.011. YANG Y L, JIANG L J, XIANG Z H, et al. Analysis of plantation of Corylus chinensis at Bamian Mountain in Longshan County [J]. Hunan Forestry Science & Technology,2014, 41(3):46-50.
[35] 叶晓霞,徐肇友,王帮顺,等. 不同枫香种源造林实验及优良种源选择[J].浙江林业科技, 2013, 33(2):71-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2013.02.017. YE X X, XU Z Y, WANG B S, et al. Genetic variations of growth traits in different Liquidambar formosana provenances and selection [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science & Technology, 2013, 33(2):71-74.
[36] 刘彦辉. 半干旱地区植苗造林深浅度对造林成活率影响的分析[J]. 防护林科技, 2002(3):21-22. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2002.03.008. LIU Y H. Effect of planting depth on survival rate in semi-arid area [J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2002(3):21-22.
[37] 夏德安,许忠志,侯丹,等. 胡桃楸种源遗传变异规律的研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(31):10956-10958. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.31.046. XIA D A, XU Z Z, HOU D, et al. Study on genetic variation law of Juglans mandshurica provenances [J]. Journal of Anhui agriculture Science, 2014, 42(31):10956-10958.
[38] 徐立安,陈天华. 马尾松种源子代材性变异与制浆造纸材优良种源选择[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 21(2):1-6.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.1997.02.01. XU L A, CHEN T H. Variation of provenance progenies in wood property and provenance selection for pulpwood of masson pine [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 1997, 21(2):1-6.
[39] 谢虎风,何其智,龙作义. 光周期对塑料大棚樟子松育苗的效应[J].东北林业大学学报,1983, 11(4):57-63. DOI:10.13759/j.cnki. dlxb.1983.04.008. XIE H F, HE Q Z, LONG Z Y. Function of photoperiodism for seedlings of Scotch pine(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)in glass-house [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University,1983, 11(4):57-63.
[40] 尤文忠,苑辉,云丽丽,等. 沙地樟子松天然更新与降水因子的灰色关联度分析[J].辽宁林业科技,2002(2):4-5. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2002.02.002. YOU W Z, YUAN H, YUN L L, et al. The gray correlative analysis on the relationship between the natural regeneration and the precipitation for Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation in sandy land [J]. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science & Technology, 2002(2):4-5.
[41] 曾德慧,尤文忠,范志平,等. 樟子松人工固沙林天然更新障碍因子分析[J].应用生态学报,2002, 13(3):257-261. DOI:10.13287/j. 1001-9332.2002.0061. ZENG D H, YOU W Z, FAN Z P, et al. Analysis of natural regeneration barriers of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation on sandy land [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(3):257-261.
[42] 周凤艳,王国晨. 沙地樟子松不同切根密度育苗的研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2000(4):7-8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1005-5215. 2000. 04. 003. ZHOU F Y, WANG G C. Density-test on root cutting of seedlings of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica in sandy nursery [J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2000(4):7-8.

帽儿山地区樟子松优良种源的选择

The superior provenance selection of Mongolian scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)forests at Maoershan area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	欧阳, 欧阳芳群, 孙猛, 王超, 王军辉, 安三平, 王丽芳, 许娜, 王猛. 欧洲云杉无性系幼龄生长节律、年度和密度互作效应及选择策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 95-104.
[2]	郭伟, 韩秀, 张利, 王迎, 杜辉, 燕语, 孙忠奎, 张林, 李国华, 罗磊. 青檀扦插苗对不同氮素水平的形态、光合生理响应和转录组分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 87-96.
[3]	王文月, 张振, 金国庆, 孙林山, 邱勇斌, 周志春, 杨涛. 两地点8年生柏木生长性状家系变异及选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 42-48.
[4]	贾庆彬, 刘庚, 赵佳丽, 李奎友, 孙文生. 红松半同胞家系生长性状变异分析与优良家系选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 109-116.
[5]	王紫阳, 徐建华, 殷云龙, 杨颖, 於朝广. 落羽杉属新品种‘中山杉111’和‘中山杉125’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 243-244.
[6]	高景斌, 徐六一, 叶建仁. 马尾松松材线虫病抗性无性系的筛选和遗传多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 109-118.
[7]	刘桂丰, 张姝慧, 李慧玉, 姜静, 陈肃, 黄海娇, 李长海. 彩叶桦‘紫霞1号’新品种[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 245-246.
[8]	田力, 徐骋炜, 尚旭岚, 洑香香. 青钱柳药用优良单株评价与选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 21-28.
[9]	张馨, 马苗苗, 吕婉秋, LEE Joobin, 杨静莉. 大青杨PuZFP103基因的序列特征及逆境胁迫的表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 36-44.
[10]	王云鹏, 张蕊, 周志春, 华斌, 黄少华, 马丽珍, 范辉华. 10年生木荷生长和材性性状家系变异及选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 85-92.
[11]	乔东亚, 王鹏, 王淑安, 李林芳, 高露璐, 杨如同, 汪庆, 李亚. 基于SNP标记的紫薇遗传多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(4): 18-25.
[12]	朱显亮, 兰俊, 王建忠, 翁启杰, 周长品, 甘四明, 李发根. 中大径材尾细桉杂种无性系选择研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 43-50.
[13]	张毅, 敖妍, 刘觉非, 赵磊磊, 张永明. 文冠果物候期对环境因子的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 30-36.
[14]	孟德恺, 徐志鹏, 刘宁宁, 王萌, 王楚, 刘桂丰. 白桦转BpGH3.5基因叶片早衰突变株的光合特性及生长分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 37-43.
[15]	吕东林,林琳,郭译文,韩锐,姜静. 紫雨桦耐盐性及花色苷合成相关基因的表达特性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(02): 25-32.