神农架巴山冷杉林凋落物量养分归还及分解特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.030

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 194-198.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.030

神农架巴山冷杉林凋落物量养分归还及分解特征

崔鸿侠¹,潘磊¹,黄志霖²,曾立雄²,王晓荣¹,庞宏东¹

1.湖北省林业科学研究院,湖北武汉 430075;
2.中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所,北京 100091

出版日期:2017-02-18 发布日期:2017-02-18
基金资助:
基金项目:国家科技基础性工作专项项目(2014FY120700); 国家林业局生态站监测运行补助项目(2016-LYPT-DW-066)
第一作者:崔鸿侠(chxlky@163.com),副研究员,博士。

Characteristics of litter production dynamic and decomposition process of Abies fargesii forest in Shennongjia, Hubei Province

CUI Hongxia¹, PAN Lei¹, HUANG Zhilin², ZENG Lixiong², WANG Xiaorong¹, PANG Hongdong¹

1.Hubei Academy of Forestry, Wuhan 430075, China;
2.Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, CAF, Beijing 100091, China

Online:2017-02-18 Published:2017-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】掌握森林凋落物产量及组成的动态变化、凋落物养分归还量及凋落物分解特征,了解凋落物在森林生态系统养分循环中的作用。【方法】选择神农架巴山冷杉天然林和人工林,在样地内布置凋落物收集框和凋落物分解袋,通过1 a的连续观测,比较天然林和人工林凋落物产量及分解速率的差异。【结果】巴山冷杉天然林和人工林年凋落物总量分别为6 217.44和4 833.46 kg/hm²,天然林比人工林年凋落物总量高28.63%。凋落物中以落叶为主,天然林和人工林落叶产量分别占凋落物总量的55.24%和54.76%; 其次是落枝,分别占总量的22.18%和19.66%; 树皮及花果等其他组分含量相对较少,分别占总量的22.58%和25.58%。巴山冷杉林凋落模式为双峰型,分别在10月和次年6月具有明显高峰期,而在次年2月凋落量最小。天然林和人工林凋落物养分年归还量分别为77.84和54.47 kg/hm²,天然林比人工林凋落物年养分归还量高42.91%,5种大量元素年归还量大小顺序均为N＞K＞Ca＞P＞Mg。凋落物在初始阶段分解较快,天然林和人工林凋落物在最初2个月失重率分别达18.70%和11.35%。天然林和人工林凋落物分解常数分别为0.303和0.241,凋落物半衰期分别为1.70 a和2.57 a,而凋落物周转期分别为9.30 a和12.12 a。【结论】神农架巴山冷杉林凋落物产量较高,分解速率较慢,天然林凋落物对土壤的改良效果更好。

Abstract: 【Objective】 In order to reveal functions of litter in nutrient cycling of forest ecosystem, the dynamics of litter production and components, nutrient return and characteristics of decomposition process were studied in this paper. 【Method】We choose the natural and plantation forest of Abies fargesii in Shennongjia,and arranged litter collection boxes and decomposition bags in the sample area, to compare the litter production and decomposition rate differences between the natural forest and plantations through one year of continuous observation.【Result】①The total litter production of natural forest and plantation were 6 217.44 kg/hm² and 4 833.46 kg/hm², respectively, which of the natural forest was 28.63% higher than that of the plantation. ②The main litter fractions were leaves which accounted for 55.24%(natural forest)and 54.76%(plantation)to total litters, then the twigs(22.18%, 19.66%), and the barks, fruits and others were less relatively(22.58%, 25.58%). ③The annual dynamics mode of litter production was double peak curve, and the peak occurred in October and next June, and the nadir occurred in next February. ④The annual nutrient returns of natural forest and plantation forest were 77.84 kg/hm² and 54.47 kg/hm² respectively, which of the natural forest was 42.91% higher than that of the plantation, and the order of macro-element return was N＞K＞Ca＞P＞Mg. ⑤The litters were decomposed more fast in the initial phase, as the litter weight loss rate of natural forest and plantation express 18.70% and 11.35%,respectively. The litter decomposition constants of natural forest and plantation forest were 0.303 and 0.241, the half declining were 1.70 and 2.57 years, and the total declining were 9.30 and 12.12 years. 【Conclusion】 The litter production of A. fargesii forest is abundant, the litter decomposition rate of it is slow, and the effect of litters on soil improvement in natural forest is better than that in the plantation forest.

中图分类号:

S718

崔鸿侠,潘磊,黄志霖,等. 神农架巴山冷杉林凋落物量养分归还及分解特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(01): 194-198.

CUI Hongxia, PAN Lei, HUANG Zhilin, ZENG Lixiong, WANG Xiaorong, PANG Hongdong. Characteristics of litter production dynamic and decomposition process of Abies fargesii forest in Shennongjia, Hubei Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41(01): 194-198.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.030.

参考文献

[1] 林波, 刘庆, 吴彦, 等. 森林凋落物研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(1): 60-64. LIN B, LIU Q, WU Y, et al. Advances in the studies of forest litter[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004, 23(1): 60-64.
[2] 向元彬, 黄丛德, 胡庭兴, 等. 不同密度巨桉人工林凋落物分解过程中基质质量的变化[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2015, 42(4): 65-72. DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2015.04.006. XIANG Y B, HUANG C D, HU T X, et al. Changes in masses of substrates during litter decomposition in Eucalyptus grandis plantations with different densities[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University, 2015, 42(4): 65-72.
[3] 葛晓改, 周本智, 肖文发. 马尾松人工林凋落物产量、养分含量及养分归还量特性[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(7): 954-961. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201407009. GE X G, ZHOU B Z, XIAO W F. Study on litter fall, nutrient content and nutrient return of Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(7): 954-961.
[4] 沈海龙, 丁宝永, 沈国舫, 等. 樟子松人工林下针阔叶凋落物分解动态[J]. 林业科学, 1996, 32(5): 393-402. SHEN H L, DING B Y, SHEN G F, et al. Decomposing dynamics of several coniferous and broadleaved litters in Mongolian Scots pine plantation[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1996, 32(5): 393-402.
[5] 郭晋平, 丁颖秀, 张芸香. 关帝山华北落叶松林凋落物分解过程及其养分动态[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(10): 5684-5695. GUO J P, DING Y X, ZHANG Y X. Decomposition process and nutrient dynamic of litterfall in a Larix principis-rupprechtii stand in Guandishan Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(10): 5684-5695.
[6] 肖慈英, 黄青春, 阮宏华. 松、栎纯林及混交林凋落物分解特性研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(5): 763-767. XIAO C Y, HUANG Q C, RUAN H H. Characteristics of decomposition of litter from pine, oak and pine-oak mixed forests[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(5): 763-767.
[7] 杨玉盛, 郭剑芬, 陈银秀, 等. 福建柏和杉木人工林凋落物分解及养分动态的比较[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(3): 19-25. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20040303. YANG Y S, GUO J F, CHEN Y X, et al. Comparatively study on litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics between plantations of Fokienia hodginsii and Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2004, 40(3): 19-25.
[8] 蒋雪琴, 刘艳红, 赵本元. 湖北神农架地区巴山冷杉种群结构特征与空间分布格局[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5): 2211-2218. JIANG X Q, LIU Y H, ZHAO B Y. Structure characteristics and spatial distribution of Abies fargesii population in Shennongjia [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(5): 2211-2218.
[9] 崔鸿侠, 肖文发, 潘磊, 等. 神农架巴山冷杉林土壤碳储量特征[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(11): 107-111. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20121117. CUI H X, XIAO W F, PAN L, et al. Characteristics of soil carbon storage of Abies fargesii forest in Shennongjia[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(11): 107-111.
[10] 刘洋, 张健, 冯茂松. 巨桉人工林凋落物数量、养分归还量及分解动态[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(7): 1-10. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20060701. LIU Y, ZHANG J, FENG M S. Dynamics of litter production, nutrient return and decomposition of four Eucalyptus grandis plantation[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2006, 42(7): 1-10.
[11] 刘增文, 高文俊, 潘开文, 等. 枯落物分解研究方法和模型讨论[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(6): 1993-2000. LIU Z W, GAO W J, PAN K W, et al. Discussion on the study methods and models of litter decomposition[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(6): 1993-2000.
[12] 王凤友. 森林凋落量研究综述[J]. 生态学进展, 1989, 6(2): 82-98. WANG F Y. Review on the study of litter fall[J]. Advances in Ecology, 1989, 6(2): 82-98.
[13] 王建林, 陶澜, 吕振武. 西藏林芝云杉林凋落物的特征研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1998, 22(6): 566-570. WANG J L, TAO L, LYU Z W. Study on the characteristic of litterfall of Picea likiangensis var. linzhiensis forest in Tibet[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 1998, 22(6): 566-570.
[14] 魏永平. 高海拔地区火炬松人工林凋落物量及养分季节动态初步研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2001, 28(3): 62-65. WEI Y P. Seasonal dynamic study on the amount and nutrient of litter of Pinus taeda plantations in the high-elevation area[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2001, 28(3): 62-65.
[15] 张新平, 王襄平, 朱彪, 等. 我国东北主要森林类型的凋落物产量及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5): 1031-1040. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.008. HANG X P, WANG X P, ZHU B, et al. Litter fall production in relation to environmental factors in northeast China’s forests[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(5): 1031-1040.
[16] 罗辑, 程根伟, 宋孟强, 等. 贡嘎山峨眉冷杉林凋落物的特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(1): 59-65. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2003.0009. LUO J, CHENG G W, SONG M Q, et al. The characteristics of litterfall of Abies fabri forests on the Gongga Mountain[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2003, 27(1): 59-65.
[17] AERTS R. Climate leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship[J]. Oikos, 1997, 79: 439-449. DOI: 10.2307/3546886.
[18] BERG B. Litter decomposition and organic turnover in northern forest soils[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 133: 13-22. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00294-7.
[19] FINZI A C, SCHLESINGER W H. Species control variation in litter decomposition in a pine forest exposed to elevated CO₂[J]. Global Change Biology, 2002(8): 1217-1229.

神农架巴山冷杉林凋落物量养分归还及分解特征

Characteristics of litter production dynamic and decomposition process of Abies fargesii forest in Shennongjia, Hubei Province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	杨永. 裸子植物的系统分类:历史、现状和展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 14-26.
[2]	张瑞, 周正虎, 王传宽, 金鹰. 东北温带森林不同材性树种木质部解剖和水力性状[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 229-236.
[3]	黄永健, 荀航, 张保, 尤俊昊, 姚曦, 汤锋. HPLC同时测定竹笋中8种酚酸类物质含量的方法研究及其应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 237-244.
[4]	邓云飞. 安息香科的系统学研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 27-35.
[5]	李家亮, 巫大宇, 毛康珊. 柏木属的分类地位和物种多样性研究现状与建议[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 36-45.
[6]	李涌福, 杨庆华, 陈林, 张敏, 向其柏, 王贤荣, 段一凡. 木犀属内分组关系的分类修订[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 58-62.
[7]	杨皓, 刘超, 庄家尧, 张树同, 张文韬, 毛国豪. 不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.
[8]	丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 王宇浩, 陈美玲, 李涛, 刘孝武, 周悦湘, 孙连浩, 廖艺. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 90-98.
[9]	武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 99-107.
[10]	卜晓婷, 付威, 李淑娴, 徐志标, 彭大庆, 徐林桥. 幼化和外源激素对娜塔栎嫩枝扦插生根的影响及其生根解剖学观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 129-136.
[11]	杜晋城, 李欣欣, 王泽亮, 刘偲, 钟毅, 王丽华. 聚乙二醇胁迫下3个油橄榄品种生理指标响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 137-143.
[12]	方静, 张书曼, 严善春, 武帅, 赵佳齐, 孟昭军. 两种丛枝菌根真菌复合接种对青山杨叶片抗美国白蛾的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 144-154.
[13]	张馨方, 王广鹏, 张树航, 李颖, 郭燕. 不同抗螨性板栗差异次生代谢物筛选与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 234-240.
[14]	杨宏, 伊贤贵, 王贤荣, 吴桐, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 朱兆青. 樱花新品种‘元春’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 275-276.
[15]	田梦阳, 朱树林, 窦全琴, 季艳红. 薄壳山核桃-茶间作对‘安吉白茶’速生期光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 86-96.