阿尔泰山林区云杉和落叶松生物量分配格局研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.032

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 203-208.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.032

• 研究简报 • 上一篇

阿尔泰山林区云杉和落叶松生物量分配格局研究

张绘芳,朱雅丽,地力夏提·包尔汉,高亚琪^*,丁程锋,王蕾

新疆林业科学院现代林业研究所,新疆乌鲁木齐 830000

出版日期:2017-02-18 发布日期:2017-02-18
基金资助:
基金项目:新疆林业厅新疆林业数表构建项目(新林计字[2014]835号)
第一作者:张绘芳(396930128@qq.com),副研究员。*通信作者:高亚琪(gyq611003@163.com),教授级高工。

Biomass allocation patterns of Picea obovata and Larix sibirica in the Altai Mountains forest area

ZHANG Huifang, ZHU Yali, DILIXIATI·Baoerhan, GAO Yaqi^*, DING Chengfeng, WANG Lei

Modern Forestry Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of forestry, Urumqi 830000, China

Online:2017-02-18 Published:2017-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】为了分析阿尔泰山地针叶主要树种生物量分配格局,【方法】基于2012、2013年研究区西伯利亚云杉(Picea obovata)和西伯利亚落叶松(Larix sibirica)实测样木,从年龄、径阶、林分郁闭度等角度,分析树木各组分器官生物量比例变化规律。【结果】两树种树干占整株树木地上生物量比例分别为48.1%、61.9%; 云杉枝、叶占地上生物量比例均高于西伯利亚落叶松; 两树种地上总生物量占整株生物量比例分别为79.8%和79.5%,平均根冠比为0.268和0.270。西伯利亚云杉树干生物量随径阶增大而提高,树叶和树根生物量随径阶增大而降低,树枝生物量随径阶变化幅度较小。西伯利亚落叶松树干生物量随径阶增大而提高,但在30 cm以上径阶比例稍有降低,树枝、树叶生物量与树干生物量呈相反变化趋势。两树种树干生物量均随年龄增加而提高,树枝、树叶生物量随年龄增加而降低。西伯利亚云杉树根生物量随年龄增加而降低,西伯利亚落叶松树根生物量随年龄增加呈先降后增的趋势。西伯利亚云杉树干生物量随郁闭度增加而提高,树枝、树叶和树根生物量随郁闭度增加而降低。西伯利亚落叶松总体上随郁闭度增加树干生物量呈先降后升趋势,树枝和树根生物量变化趋势与树干相反,树叶生物量随郁闭度增加而降低,但变化幅度很小。【结论】西伯利亚云杉和落叶松各组织器官生物量比例均呈现树干＞树根＞树枝＞树叶的趋势。随径阶、年龄、郁闭度增大,西伯利亚云杉树干生物量所占比例逐渐提高,树叶比例则逐渐降低,树枝与树根生物量此消彼长。西伯利亚落叶松各器官生物量所占比例在不同径阶、年龄和郁闭度条件下虽有变化,但幅度不大,总体趋势不变。

Abstract: 【Objective】In order to understand the biomass allocation pattern of main conifer species in the Altai mountains.【Method】Based on the sample wood data which measured from Picea obovata and Larix sibirica in 2012 and 2013, the changing law of biomass proportion of different organs was analyzed from age, DBH and the forest canopy. 【Result】The proportion of biomass of trunk which accounts for whole tree in Picea obovata and L. sibirica, was 48.1% and 61.9% respectively; The proportion of biomass of branches and leaves which accounts for whole tree in P. obovata was higher than that in L. sibirica. The proportion of aboveground biomass accounts for whole tree in two conifer species was 79.8% and 79.5% respectively, the root shoot ratio of P. obovata and L. sibirica was 0.268 and 0.270 respectively. With the increase of the diameter class, the biomass proportion of the trunks in P. obovata increased, the biomass proportion of leaves and roots decreased and the biomass proportion of branches varied slightly. With the increase of the diameter class, the biomass proportion of the trunks in L. sibirica increased, but it slightly decreased when the diameter was over 30cm, and the biomass proportion of branches and leaves showed an opposite trend to the trunks. With the increase of the age, the biomass proportion of the trunks in the two conifer species increased, the biomass of the branches and leaves decreased. With the increase of the age, the biomass proportion of the roots in P. obovata decreased, and the biomass proportion of the roots in L. sibirica decreased initially and then increased. With the increase of the canopy density, the biomass proportion of the trunks in P. obovata increased and the biomass proportion of branches, leaves and roots decreased. With the increase of the canopy density, the biomass proportion of trunks in L. sibirica decreased initially and then increased, the branches and roots showed an opposite trend to the trunks and the leaves slightly decreased.【Conclusion】 The biomass allocation ratio of P. obovata and L. sibirica showed trunks ＞ roots ＞ branches ＞ leaves trend. With the increase of the diameter class, age and canopy density,the biomass allocation ratio of trunks in P. obovata gradually increased and the biomass proportion of leaves decreased, the ratio of branches and roots presented as one increase with the other’s decrease. The biomass proportion in different organs of L. sibirica slightly varied, and the overall trend was unchanged.

中图分类号:

S718

张绘芳,朱雅丽,地力夏提·包尔汉,等. 阿尔泰山林区云杉和落叶松生物量分配格局研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(01): 203-208.

ZHANG Huifang, ZHU Yali, DILIXIATI·Baoerhan, GAO Yaqi, DING Chengfeng, WANG Lei. Biomass allocation patterns of Picea obovata and Larix sibirica in the Altai Mountains forest area[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41(01): 203-208.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.032.

参考文献

[1] 汪金松, 张春雨, 范秀华, 等. 臭冷杉生物量分配格局及异速生长模型[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(14): 3918-3927. WANG J S,ZHANG C Y,FAN X H. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Abies nephrolepis Maxim[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(14):3918-3927.
[2] LANDSBERG J J,LINDER S,MCMURTRIE R E. Effects of global change on managed forests: a strategic plan for research on managed forest ecosystemsin a globally changing environment[G]∥Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems Report.Canberra: Core Project of the IGBP, 1995: 1-17.
[3] 杨昊天,李新荣,刘立超,等.荒漠草地4种灌木生物量分配特征[J].中国沙漠,2013.33(5):1340-1348. DOI:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694x.2013.00197. YANG H T, LI X R, LIU L C, et al. Biomass allocation patterns of four shrubs in desert grassland[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2013, 33(5): 1340-1348.
[4] 张绘芳,高亚琪,李霞. 新疆西伯利亚云杉生物量模型研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(11): 0115-0120. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.11.021 ZHANG H F, GAO Y Q, LI X. Research on biomass model of Picea obovata in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015,35(11): 0115-0120.
[5] 钟泽兵,周国英,杨路存,等.柴达木盆地几种荒漠灌丛植被的生物量分配格局[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(4):1042-1048. DOI:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694x.2013.00406. ZHONG Z B, ZHOU G Y, YANG L C, et al. The biomass allocation patterns of desert shrub vegetation in the Qaidam Basin,Qing-hai,China[J].Journal of Desert Research,2014,34(4):1042-1048.
[6] 方江平, 项文化. 西藏色季拉山原始冷杉林生物量及其分布规律[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(5): 17-23. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.05.006. FANG J P, XIANG W H. Biomass and its distribution of a primeval Abies georgei var. smithii forest in Sejila Mountain in Tibet Plateau[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(5): 17-23.
[7] 张绘芳, 高亚琪, 朱雅丽, 等. 新疆雪岭杉生物量模型对比研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(6): 52-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.06.09. ZHANG H F, GAI Y Q, ZHU Y L, et al. A comparative study on biomass models for Picea schrenkiana in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015, 30(6): 52-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.06.09.
[8] 丁晓娟,陈蜀江,黄铁成. 阿尔泰山南坡西伯利亚落叶松生长量与气候变化的关系[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(2):098-104. DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.053. DING X J,CHEN S J,HUANG T C. The relationship between growth of Larix sibirica Ledb and the climate change in the south slope of Altai Mountains[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016,30(02):098-104.
[9] 郑路,蔡道雄,卢立华。南亚热带不同树种人工林生物量及其分配格局[J].林业科学研究,2014,27(4): 454-458. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2014.04.002. ZHENG L,CAI D X,LU L H. Biomass allocation of different species plantations in subtropical area of China[J]. Forest Research, 2014,27(4):454-458.
[10] 高成杰, 唐国勇, 孙永玉, 等. 不同恢复模式下干热河谷幼龄印楝和大叶相思生物量及其分配[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(4): 482-490. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.04.002. GAO C J, TANG G Y, SUN Y Y, et al. Biomass and allocation of young Azadirachta indica and a Cacia auriculiformis for different restoration patterns in dry-hot valley[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2012, 29(4): 482-490.
[11] 贾全全,罗春旺,刘琪璟,等. 不同林分密度油松人工林生物量分配模式[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(6):87-93. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.016. JIA Q Q, LUO C W, LIU Q J, et al. Biomass allocation in relation to stand density in Pinus tabuliformis plantation[J]. Journal of nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2015,39(6):87-93.
[12] 王宁,王百田,王瑞君. 晋西山杨和油松生物量分配格局及异速生长模型研究[J]. 水土保持通报,2013,33(2):151-156. DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.02.061. WANG N, WANG B T, WANG R J, et al. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Populus davidiana and Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.in west of Shanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(2): 151-155,159.
[13] 赵金龙, 王泺鑫, 韩海荣, 等. 辽河源不同龄组油松天然次生林生物量及空间分配特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(23): 7026-7037. DOI:10.5846/stxb201303060357. ZHAO J L,WANG L X,HAN H R. Biomass and spatial distribution characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis natural secondary forest at different age groups in the Liaoheyuan Nature Reserve,Hebei Province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(23): 7026-7037.
[14] 孙巧玉,刘勇,李国雷. 坡位对油松人工林地上生物量分配格局的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(9): 0102-0105. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2012.09.027 SUN Q Y, LIU Y, LI G L. Effect of slope position on above-ground biomass distribution pattern in Pinus tabulaeformis plantation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2012,32(9): 0102-0105.
[15] 樊后保,李燕燕,苏兵强. 马尾松-阔叶树混交异龄林生物量与生产力分配格局[J].生态学报,2006,26(8):2463-2472. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.08.007. FAN H B, LI Y Y, SU B Q. Allocation pattern of biomass and productivity in the mixed uneven-aged stands of Masson’s pine and hardwood species[J]. Actaecologica Sinica, 2006,26(8):2463-2472.
[16] 赵金龙, 梁宏温, 温远光, 等. 马尾松与红锥混交异龄林生物量分配格局[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011, 31(2): 60-64,71. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2011.02.010. ZHAO J L, LIANG H W, WEN Y G, et al. Distribution pattern of biomass in the mixed uneven-aged stands of Pinus massoniana and Castanopsis hystrix[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2011, 31(2): 60-64,71.
[17] 张治军, 王彦辉, 于澎涛, 等. 不同优势度马尾松的生物量及根系分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(4): 71-75. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2008.04.016. ZHANG Z J, WANG Y H, YU P T, et al. Characteristics of biomass and root distribution of Pinus massoniana with different dominance[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2008, 32(4): 71-75.
[18] 李巍,王传宽,张全智. 林木分化对兴安落叶松异速生长方程和生物量分配的影响[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(6):1679-1687. LI W,WANG C K,ZHANG Q Z.Differentiation of stand individuals impacts allometry and biomass allocation of Larix gmelinii trees[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015, 35(6):1679-1687.
[19] 罗云建, 张小全, 王效科, 等. 华北落叶松人工林生物量及其分配模式[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(1): 13-18. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2009.01.003. LUO Y J, ZHANG X Q, WANG X K, et al. Biornass and its distribution patterns of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations in northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(1): 13-18.
[20] 刘广营, 赵国华, 王广海, 等. 华北落叶松人工林生物量分配格局[J]. 河北林果研究, 2011, 26(3): 222-226. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4961.2011.03.002. LIU G Y, ZHAO G H, WANG G H, et al. Allocation pattern of Larix principis-rupprechtii biomass[J]. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 2011, 26(3): 222-226.
[21] 徐郑周. 燕山山地华北落叶松人工林生物量分配格局及植物多样性的研究[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2010. XU Z Z. Study on spatial distribution pattern of the biomass and plant diversity in Larix princicpis-rupprechtii Mayr. plantation in Yanshan Mountainous Regious[D]. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei, 2010.
[22] 代海燕, 张秋良, 魏强, 等. 不同林分生物量分配格局受密度影响效应的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(11): 4514-4516. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2008.11.063. DAI H Y, ZHANG Q L, WEI Q, et al. Study on effects of density on biomass allocation pattern in different forests[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 36(11): 4514-4516.
[23] 白志强, 刘华, 方岳, 等. 喀纳斯国家自然保护区针叶林生物量分配特征[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2014, 37(4): 14-19,24. DOI:10.13320/j.cnki.jauh.2014.0081. BAI Z Q, LIU H, FANG Y, et al. The biomass distribution pattern of coniferous forest in the Kanas National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2014, 37(4): 14-19,24.
[24] CAIRNS M A, BROWN S, HELMER E H, et al. Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests[J]. Oecologia, 1997, 111(1): 1-11. DOI:10.1007/s004420050201.

阿尔泰山林区云杉和落叶松生物量分配格局研究

Biomass allocation patterns of Picea obovata and Larix sibirica in the Altai Mountains forest area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	丛明珠, 刘琪璟, 孙震, 董淳超, 钱尼澎. 长白山北坡植物群落β多样性及其组分驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 99-106.
[2]	曹荔荔, 阮宏华, 李媛媛, 倪娟平, 王国兵, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 徐亚明. 不同林龄水杉人工林地表大型土壤动物群落特征比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 91-98.
[3]	张怡婷, 夏念和, 林树燕, 丁雨龙. 我国寒竹属空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 107-114.
[4]	胡衍平, 刘卫东, 张珉, 陈明皋, 程勇, 魏志恒, 庞文胜, 吴际友. 山乌桕家系叶片叶色参数和色素含量及其解剖结构研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 123-133.
[5]	王一洁, 王璐冕, 丁真慧, 钱程, 曹加杰. 城市滨水绿地空间夏季微气候效应研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 233-241.
[6]	赵国扬, 洪波, 高俊平, 赵鑫, 黄洪峰, 徐彦杰. 菊属新品种‘雀欢’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 254-255.
[7]	任佳辉, 高捍东, 陈哲楠, 李浩, 刘强, 陈澎军. 杂交新美柳苗对盐涝胁迫的生长和生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 57-66.
[8]	董亚文, 陈双林, 谢燕燕, 郭子武, 张景润, 汪舍平, 徐勇敢. 林下植被演替过程中毛竹和主要优势树种叶片建成成本变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 179-186.
[9]	徐薪璐, 孔淑鑫, 吕卓, 江帅君, 赵婉琪, 林树燕. 靓竹叶色表型叶片形态、结构与光合特性相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 145-154.
[10]	曹永慧, 陈庆标, 周本智, 葛晓改, 王小明. 不同截雨干旱时间对毛竹叶片氮含量时空分布的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 155-161.
[11]	隋夕然, 李军, 陈娟, 华军, 沈谦, 杨洪胜, 何前程, 李由, 王伟, 彭冶, 葛之葳, 张增信. 徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 171-178.
[12]	尹华康, 张晋东, 黄金燕, 蒲冠桦, 毛泽恩, 周材权, 黄耀华, 付励强. 四川马边大风顶自然保护区大熊猫主食竹空间分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 187-193.
[13]	孔凡斌, 金晨涛, 徐彩瑶. 罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 245-254.
[14]	龚霞, 吴银明, 王海峰, 曾攀, 唐亚, 温铿, 焦文献. 花椒新品种‘蜀椒1号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 265-266.
[15]	吴桐, 王贤荣, 伊贤贵, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 陈祥珍, 高书成. 樱花新品种‘胭脂雪’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 267-268.