复合性状的QTL定位模型构建

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201702035

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (04): 89-96.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201702035

复合性状的QTL定位模型构建

王静¹,朱嵊²,李佳慧¹,张丽¹,张萌¹,姜立波^1*,黄敏仁²,邬荣领¹

1.北京林业大学生物科学与技术学院,北京 100083; 2.南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏南京 210037

出版日期:2018-07-27 发布日期:2018-07-27
基金资助:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(31700576); 国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201404102) 第一作者:王静(jenneyW163.com)。*通信作者:姜立波(libojiang@bjfu.edu.cn),讲师,博士。

Computational framework for mapping composite traits

WANG Jing¹, ZHU Sheng², LI Jiahui¹, ZHANG Li¹, ZHANG Meng¹, JIANG Libo^1*, HUANG Minren², WU Rongling¹

1. College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; 2. College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Online:2018-07-27 Published:2018-07-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】传统复合性状的QTL(quantitative trait locus)定位方法仅仅利用两个或几个构成性状的计算值作为表型值,未考虑复合性状的生物学内涵,从而影响定位的准确性。因此,发展适合于复合性状的QTL定位模型,对于深入解析控制复合性状的遗传结构,进而提高基因定位准确性显得越来越重要。【方法】针对全基因组重测序数据,构建了一个复合性状QTL定位模型(composite traits mapping model, CTM),利用CTM对复合性状进行分解,把分解后的组分以二元或多元正态分布形式整合到QTL作图的框架内。【结果】应用CTM分析杨树材积生长数据,可成功定位到大量与杨树材积生长相关的基因,并与传统方法进行了比较,定位出较多的显著位点,表现出较好的性能。计算机模拟试验表明,所构建的CTM模型在定位复合性状QTL中具有较高的效力,在达到一定的样本数量和遗传力条件下,CTM模型具有较强的效力,样本量和遗传力的增加都能够增加参数估计的精度。【结论】CTM模型有助于复合性状遗传结构的解析,促进林木分子标记辅助育种的开展。

Abstract: Abstract: 【Objective】Composite traits are widely used in breeding. Currently, QTL(quantitative trait locus)mapping methods of composite traits only use a single phenotypic value, which is simply derived from a mathematical expression of two or more component traits. These approaches ignored the inherent biological mechanism of phenotype formation, which affects the precision of QTL mapping for composite traits.【Method】For the whole genome sequencing data, we present a new statistical infrastructure for QTL mapping that takes into account biological characteristics of composite traits. This method, termed composite traits mapping model(CTM), integrates different components within genetic mapping through mathematical relationships of composite traits.【Result】To validate the applicability of CTM, we applied it to analyze volume growth data of poplar and identified specific loci that were responsible for the volume growth. Compared with traditional methods for QTL mapping of composite traits, more significant loci were detected CTM exhibited a better performance. The computer simulation showed that CTM is a powerful model for mapping composite traits and the increase in sample size and heritability can increase the accuracy of parameter estimation. 【Conclusion】CTM is a useful tool for QTL mapping of composite traits, thus facilitating our understanding of the genetic architecture of composite traits.

中图分类号:

S722

王静,朱嵊,李佳慧,等. 复合性状的QTL定位模型构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(04): 89-96.

WANG Jing, ZHU Sheng, LI Jiahui, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Meng, JIANG Libo, HUANG Minren, WU Rongling. Computational framework for mapping composite traits[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 42(04): 89-96.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201702035.

参考文献

[1] ANDERSON J T, WAGNER M R, RUSHWORTH C A, et al. The evolution of quantitative traits in complex environments[J]. Heredity, 2014, 112(1):4-12.
[2] 莫惠栋. 数量性状遗传基础研究的回顾与思考——后基因组时代数量遗传领域的挑战[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2003, 24(2):24-31. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4652.2003.02.007. MO H D. Look back and reflect on genetic researches of variation for quantitative traits—a challenge for quantitative genetics in post-genome era[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University(Agricultural and Life Sciences Edition), 2003, 24(2):24-31.
[3] SLATE J. From beavis to beak color: a simulation study to examine how much QTL mapping can reveal about the genetic architecture of quantitative traits[J]. Evolution, 2013, 67(5):1251-1262.
[4] LAMDER E S, BOTSTEIN D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps[J]. Genetics, 1989, 121(1):185-199.
[5] 童春发. 林木遗传图谱构建和QTL定位的统计方法[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(1):109. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2004.01.029. TONG C F. Statistical methods for nstructing genetic linkage maps and mapping QTLs in forest trees[J]. Iournal of Naniing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2004, 28(1):109.
[6] KAO C H, ZENG Z B, TEASDALE R D. Multiple interval mapping for quantitative trait loci [J]. Genetics, 1999, 152(3):1203-1216.
[7] WU R, LIN M. Functional mapping-how to map and study the genetic architecture of dynamic complex traits[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2006, 7(3):229-237.
[8] HIRSCHHORN J N, DALY M J. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2005, 6(2): 95-108.
[9] 吕洪超, 张瑞杰, 姜永帅,等. 全基因组数据分析软件PLINK在统计遗传学教学中的应用[J]. 科学中国人,2016(30):27-30.
[10] YU J, PRESSOIR G, BRIGGS W H, et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness[J]. Nature Genetics, 2006, 38(2): 203-208.
[11] KLASEN J R, BARBEZ E, MEIER L, et al. A multi-marker association method for genome-wide association studies without the need for population structure correction[J]. Nature Communications, 2016(7): 13299.
[12] STEPHAN J, STEGLE O, BEYER A. A random forest approach to capture genetic effects in the presence of population structure[J]. Nature Communications, 2015(6):7432.
[13] DAS K, LI J, WANG Z, et al. A dynamic model for genome-wide association studies[J]. Human Genetics, 2011, 129(6):629-639.
[14] HAYES B J, PRYCE J, CHAMBERLAIN A J, et al. Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: Coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in holstein cattle as contrasting model traits[J]. Plos Genetics, 2010,6(9):e1001139.
[15] HUANG X, HAN B. Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2014, 65:531-551.
[16] 段忠取,朱军. 全基因组关联分析研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(4):385-393. DUAN Z Q, ZHU J. Reacher progress of genome-wide association study[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Agricultural and Life Sciences Edition), 2015, 41(4):385-393.
[17] MILES B, WAYNE M. Quantitative trait locus(QTL)analysis[R]. Nature Education, 2008.
[18] MACKAY T F. Epistasis and quantitative traits: Using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2014, 15(1):22-33.
[19] ZHAO K, TUNG C W, EIZENGA G C, et al. Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa[J]. Nature Communications, 2011,467(2):467.
[20] FROVA C, KRAJEWSKI P, FONZO N D, et al. Genetic analysis of drought tolerance in maize by molecular markers I. Yield components[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1999, 99(1):280-288.
[21] 王玉. 利用复合性状开展qtl作图的有效性研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2010. WANG Y. On the use of mathematically-derived composite traits and their efficiency in quantitive trait locus mapping[D]: Shenyang: Shenyang Agricalture University, 2010.
[22] 李斌,陈听宽,崔凝. SIMPLEX算法与其他算法收敛特性的比较[J]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31(3):51-55. LI B, CHEN T K, CUI N.Convergence characteristics of SIMPLEX comparing with other SIMPLEX algorithms[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 31(3):51-55.
[23] 刘光辉,尹红婷. BFGS算法的全局收敛性分析[J]. 曲阜师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1994(1):1-8. LIU G H, YIN H T. Analysis on thglobal convergence of BFGS algorithm[J]. Journal of Qufu Normal University(Natural Sciences Edition), 1994(1):1-8.
[24] XU M, JIANG L, ZHU S, et al. A computational framework for mapping the timing of vegetative phase change[J]. New Phytologist, 2016, 211(2):750-760.
[25] LIU R. Light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins, positively involved in abscisic acid signalling, require a transcription repressor, WRKY40, to balance their function[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(18):2274-2275.
[26] KEITH B, DONG X N, AUSUBEL F M, et al. Differential induction of 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana by wounding and pathogenic attack[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1991, 88(19):8821-8825.
[27] VOSS I, GOSS T, MUROZUKA E, et al. FdC1, a novel ferredoxin protein capable of alternative electron partitioning, increases in conditions of acceptor limitation at photosystem I[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2010, 286(1):50-59.
[28] VOLL L M, JAMAI A, RENNÉ P, et al. The photorespiratory Arabidopsis shm1 mutant is deficient in SHM1[J]. Plant Physiology, 2006, 140(1):59-66.
[29] REN G, AN K, YANG L, et al. Identification of a novel chloroplast protein AtNYE1 regulating chlorophyll degradation during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiology, 2007, 144(3):1429-1441.
[30] HARTUNG F, SUER S, KNOLL A, et al. Topoisomerase 3α and RMI1 suppress somatic crossovers and are essential for resolution of meiotic recombination intermediates in, Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plos Genetics, 2008, 4(12):e1000285.
[31] MOEDER W, DEL P O, NAVARRE D A, et al. Aconitase plays a role in regulating resistance to oxidative stress and cell death in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2007, 63(2):273-287.
[32] KIRIK A, EHRHARDT D W, KIRIK V. TONNEAU2/FASS regulates the geometry of microtubule nucleation and cortical array organization in interphase Arabidopsis cells[J]. Plant Cell, 2012, 24(3):1158-1170.
[33] WANG W, WANG L, CHEN C, et al. Arabidopsis CSLD1 and CSLD4 are required for cellulose deposition and normal growth of pollen tubes[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 62(14):51-61.
[34] HOBBIE L J. Auxin and cell polarity: the emergence of AXR4[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2006(11):517-518.
[35] 邬荣领, 林敏, 赵伟,等. 动态复杂性状遗传结构研究的统计模型[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(3):1-12. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2006.03.001. WU R L, LIN M, ZHAO W, et al. Statistical models for studying the genetic architecture of dynamic complex traits[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2006, 30(3):1-12.
[36] BUCKLER E S, HOLLAND J B, BRADBURY P J, et al. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time[J]. Science, 2009, 325(5941):714-718.
[37] 单保山. 遗传力的概念及其发展 Ⅰ.关于传统遗传力的几个问题[J]. 河北农业大学学报,1988,11(1):39-44. SHAN B S. The concept of heritability and its development Ⅰ. Some views on heritability[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 1988, 11(1):39-44.
[38] 侯志强,吴启富. 抽样调查样本量的确定[J]. 全国商情:经济理论研究, 2007(3):108-109. HOU Z Q, WU Q F. Determination of sample size in sampling survey[J]. China Business: Economic Theory Research, 2007(3):108-109.
[39] 胡文明. 作物复杂性状QTL定位相关的几个问题的探讨[D]. 扬州:扬州大学,2014. HU W M. Discussion of several issues related to QTL[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2014.
[40] POETHIG R S. Heterochronic mutations affecting shoot development in maize[J]. Genetics,1988, 119(4):959-973.
[41] RJE W, POTTS B M, REID J B. Genetic control of reproductive and vegetative phase change in the Eucalyptus risdonii-E. tenuiramis complex[J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 1998(46):45-63.
[42] HUDSON C J, FREEMAN J S, JONES R C, et al. Genetic control of heterochrony in Eucalyptus globulus[J]. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics, 2014, 4(7):359-363.
[43] POETHIG R S. Phase change and the regulation of developmental timing in plants[J]. Science, 2003, 301(5631):334-336.
[44] ROUGVIE A E. Intrinsic and extrinsic regulators of developmental timing: from miRNAs to nutritional cues[J]. Development, 2005, 132(17):3787-3798.
[45] BÄURLE I, DEAN C. The timing of developmental transitions in plants[J]. Cell, 2006, 125(4):655-664.
[46] HUIJSER P, SCHMID M. The control of developmental phase transitions in plants[J]. Development, 2011, 138(19):4117-4129.

复合性状的QTL定位模型构建

Computational framework for mapping composite traits

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	马坛, 田野, 王书军, 李文昊, 段启英, 张庆源. 不同性别南方型黑杨无性系叶片对土壤短期间歇性干旱的生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 172-180.
[2]	王改萍, 章雷, 曹福亮, 丁延朋, 赵群, 赵慧琴, 王峥. 红蓝光质对银杏苗木生长生理特性及黄酮积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 105-112.
[3]	宋子琪, 卞国良, 林峰, 胡凤荣, 尚旭岚. 流式细胞仪鉴定青钱柳倍性方法的建立及其应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 61-68.
[4]	孙旭高, 陶家璐, 谢微, 石洁, 张宝津, 邓小梅. 米老排优树组培技术体系优化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 69-78.
[5]	顾宸瑞, 袁启航, 姜静, 穆怀志, 刘桂丰. 基于转录组测序的关联分析定位裂叶桦叶形调控基因[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 39-46.
[6]	杨蕴力, 曹俐, 王阳, 顾宸瑞, 陈坤, 刘桂丰. BpGLK1基因干扰表达对裂叶桦叶色及生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 18-28.
[7]	王伟, 邱志楠, 李爽, 白向东, 刘桂丰, 姜静. CRISPR/Cas9核糖核蛋白介导的无T-DNA插入的白桦BpGLK1精准突变[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 11-17.
[8]	国颖, 杨港归, 吴雨涵, 何杰, 何玉洁, 廖浩然, 薛良交. DNA甲基化调控植物组织培养过程的分子机制研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 1-8.
[9]	陈俊娜, 王晓宇, 陈晨, 彭辉武, 陈娟, 黄卫和, 喻方圆. BR对东京野茉莉种子中脂肪酸合成相关酶活性及油脂积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 35-41.
[10]	宫楠, 祖鑫, 解志军, 朱长红, 李淑娴. 紫荆种子吸胀和层积过程中不同相态水分变化的核磁共振检测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 42-50.
[11]	王章荣, 季孔庶, 徐立安, 邹秉章, 林能庆, 林景泉. 马尾松实生种子园营建技术、现实增益及多世代低成本经营新模式探讨[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 9-16.
[12]	欧阳, 欧阳芳群, 孙猛, 王超, 王军辉, 安三平, 王丽芳, 许娜, 王猛. 欧洲云杉无性系幼龄生长节律、年度和密度互作效应及选择策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 95-104.
[13]	罗芊芊, 李峰卿, 肖德卿, 邓章文, 王建华, 周志春. 两个南方红豆杉天然居群的交配系统分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 80-86.
[14]	郭伟, 韩秀, 张利, 王迎, 杜辉, 燕语, 孙忠奎, 张林, 李国华, 罗磊. 青檀扦插苗对不同氮素水平的形态、光合生理响应和转录组分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 87-96.
[15]	刘蓉, 吴德军, 王因花, 任飞, 李丽, 燕丽萍, 周晓锋. 白蜡花粉最佳离体萌发培养基筛选[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 70-76.