不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃幼树光合特性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703024

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (06): 13-18.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703024

不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃幼树光合特性的影响

韩杰¹,张明²,林苏宝²,商婧¹,李小飞¹,刘壮壮¹,彭方仁^1*

1.南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京林业大学林学院,江苏南京 210037; 2.句容市东进林场,江苏句容 212400

出版日期:2017-12-18 发布日期:2017-12-18
基金资助:
基金项目:国家林业局“948”项目(2015-4-16); 江苏省林业三新工程项目(Lysx [2016]44); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD) 第一作者:韩杰(717571965@qq.com)。*通信作者:彭方仁(frpeng@njfu.edu.cn),教授。

Effects of different pruning measures on the photosynthetic characteristics of pecan seedlings

HAN Jie¹, ZHANG Ming², LIN Subao², SHANG Jing¹, LI Xiaofei¹, LIU Zhuangzhuang¹, PENG Fangren^1*

1. Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2. Dongjin State Forestry Farm of Jurong City, Jurong 212400, China

Online:2017-12-18 Published:2017-12-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探索不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃光合特性的影响,为选择合理的整形修剪技术以及栽培优质高产的薄壳山核桃提供科学依据。【方法】以5年生薄壳山核桃幼树为研究对象,采用环割(T1)、环剥(T2)和摘心(T3)3种修剪措施处理当年生枝条,再对其枝条进行光合作用的测定。【结果】3种修剪措施处理下的光合参数及其日变化曲线、光响应参数(包括表观量子效率(A_QY)、光补偿点(L_CP)、最大净光合速率(P_n,max)和光饱和点(L_SP)、暗呼吸速率(R_d)均有较大差异。3个处理的净光合速率(P_n)、蒸腾速率(T_r)和气孔导度(G_s)日变化整体呈现相似的趋势,日平均大小均为T3>T1>T2,而胞间CO₂浓度呈现相反的日变化。T3处理的P_n,max值、A_QY值最高,而L_CP值显著低于其他处理,L_SP和R_d值相对较低,说明T3处理的薄壳山核桃幼树叶片光合能力最强,对光的适应范围广。【结论】在薄壳山核桃开花初期进行摘心处理,能有效提高叶片的光合能力,而环剥、环割则降低其光合能力。

Abstract: 【Objective】The present study investigated efficient pruning measures in pecan(Carya illinoinensis), in order to provide a theoretical basis for cultivating a high-yield. 【Method】Branches of 5-year-old Carya illinoinensis seedlings were treated with scoring(T1), girdling(T2)or topping(T3)to study the differences between photosynthetic characteristics in the three treatments. 【Results】Photosynthetic parameters and diurnal variation curves and light response parameters(apparent quantum yield(A_QY), light compensation(L_CP), net photosynthetic rate(P_n), light saturation point(L_SP)and dark respiration rate(R_d))were different among treatments. Net photosynthetic rate(P_n), transpiration rate(T_r)and stomatal conductance(G_s)under the three treatments showed similar trends. The average size was T3 > T1 > T2, and the diurnal difference in intercellular CO₂concentration was opposite(T2 > T1 > T3). The maximum net photosynthetic rate(P_n,_max)and A_QY of different treatments were the highest, while the L_CP was significantly lower, in T3 compared to the other treatments. Additionally, L_SP and R_d were relatively low in T3. This showed that the pecan seedlings grafted with T3 treatment had the strongest photosynthetic capacity and better light adaptation. 【Conclusion】 Topping during the early flowering stage of pecan can effectively improve the photosynthetic capacity of leaves, while girdling and scoring can decrease the photosynthetic capacity.

中图分类号:

S664
Q945.11

韩杰,张明,林苏宝,等. 不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃幼树光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(06): 13-18.

HAN Jie, ZHANG Ming, LIN Subao, SHANG Jing, LI Xiaofei, LIU Zhuangzhuang, PENG Fangren. Effects of different pruning measures on the photosynthetic characteristics of pecan seedlings[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41(06): 13-18.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703024.

参考文献

[1] 彭方仁, 李永荣, 郝明灼, 等. 我国薄壳山核桃生产现状与产业化发展策略[J]. 林业科技开发, 2012, 26(4): 1-4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2012.04.001. PENG F R, LI Y R, HAO M Z, et al. Pecan production status and development strategy of industry in China[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2012, 26(4): 1-4.
[2] 张日清, 吕芳德. 美国山核桃在原产地分布、引种栽培区划及主要栽培品种分类研究概述[J]. 经济林研究, 2002, 20(3): 53-55. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2002.03.020. ZHANG R Q, LYU F D. Pecan distribution, cultural regionalization and cultivar classification in USA[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2002, 20(3): 53-55.
[3] LOMBARDINI L. One-time pruning of pecan trees induced limited and short-term benefits in canopy light penetration, yield, and nut quality[J]. Hort Science, 2006, 41(6): 1469-1473.
[4] 金磊. 环割、环剥对杨梅树体生长、营养、光合特性及品质的影响[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2007. JIN L. Effects of ring and girdling on growth and nutrition, photosynthetic characteristics in Myrica rubra and major qualities of bayberry fruits[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2007.
[5] 纪晴, 石倩倩, 周军, 等. 环剥与环割处理对冬枣生长结果及果实品质的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2016, 34(4): 80-89. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2016.04.014. JI Q, SHI Q Q, ZHOU J, et al. Effects of girdling and ring cutting treatments on growth, fruiting and fruit quality of Dongzao[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2016, 34(4): 80-89.
[6] 张献辉, 陈奇凌, 王东健, 等. 摘心对垦鲜枣1号生长发育特性及光合特征参数的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(1): 16-19. DOI: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2014.01.037. ZHANG X H, CHEN Q, WANG D J, et al. Effects of pinching on growth and development characteristics and photosynthetic characteristic parameters of Kenxianzao No.1[J].Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 41(1): 16-19.
[7] 翟敏, 徐迎春, 董凤祥, 等. 赤霉素多效唑及摘心对薄壳山核桃容器苗生长的影响[J]. 林业实用技术, 2010(7): 11-12. DOI:13456/j.cnki.lykt.2010.07.005. ZHAI M, XU Y C, DONG F X, et al. Effect of GA, PP333 and pinching on growth of Pecan container seedlings[J]. Practical Forestry Technology, 2010(7): 11-12.
[8] 冯刚,李小飞,彭方仁,等. 环割和摘心对薄壳山核桃枝条生长和叶片碳氮代谢物积累的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(6):8-12. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703025. FENG G, LI X F, PENG F R, et al. Effects of ringing and cutting off growing-tip treatments on pecan shoot growth and carbon-nitrogen metabolite accumulation of leaf[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017,41(6):7-11.
[9] 王荣荣, 夏江宝, 杨吉华, 等. 贝壳砂生境干旱胁迫下杠柳叶片光合光响应模型比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(2): 111-121. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00012. WANG R R, XIA J B, YANG J H, et al. Comparison of light response models of photosynthesis in leaves of Periploca sepium under drought stress in sand habitat formed from seashells[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(2): 111-121.
[10] 高云, 傅松玲. 两个美国山核桃品种的光合生理特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(4): 34-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.04.007. GAO Y, FU S L. Research on the photosynthetic characteristics of the two varieties of pecan[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2011, 35(4): 34-38.
[11] 何海洋, 彭方仁, 张瑞, 等. 不同品种美国山核桃嫁接苗光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(4): 19-25. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.04.004. HE H Y, PENG F R, ZHANG R, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of grafting plants of different pecan varieties[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(4): 19-25.
[12] 孙龙, 彭祚登, 王冲, 等. 干旱胁迫对两种沙地灌木能源树种光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(2): 99-104. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.02.019. SUN L, PENG Z D, WANG C, et al. Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics of two energy resource sandy shrubs[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2014, 38(2): 99-104.
[13] 陈根云, 陈娟, 许大全. 关于净光合速率和胞间CO₂浓度关系的思考[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2010, 46(1): 64-66. DOI:10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2010.01.007. CHEN G Y, CHEN J, XU D Q. Thinking about the Relationship between net photosynthetic rate and intercellular CO₂ concentration[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2010, 46(1): 64-66.
[14] 吴爱姣, 徐伟洲, 郭亚力, 等. 不同水肥条件下达乌里胡枝子的光合-光响应曲线特征[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4): 785-792. DOI:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.04.018. WU A J, XU W Z, GUO Y L, et al. Photosynthetic light-response curves of Lespedeza davurica under different water and fertilization conditions[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(4): 785-792.
[15] 叶子飘. 光合作用对光和CO₂响应模型的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6): 727-740. DOI:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.012. YE Z P. A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO₂[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(6): 727-740.
[16] 俞继红. 3种彩叶植物的光合特性比较[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(4): 21-25. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2014.04.04. YU J H. A comparison of photosynthetic characteristics between three color-leafed plants[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2014, 29(4): 21-25.
[17] 莫伟平, 周琳耀, 张静逸,等. 遮荫和环剥对荔枝枝梢生长和光合生理的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2013, 40(1):117-124. DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2013.01.015. MO W P, ZHOU L Y, ZHANG J Y, et al. Effects of shading and girdling on shoot growth and photosynthesis in litchi[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2013, 40(1):117-124.
[18] 宋润刚, 路文鹏, 沈育杰,等. 葡萄主栽品种结果枝不同时期摘心对坐果率和产量影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2007(2): 21-22. DOI:10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2007.02.006. SONG R G, LU W P, SHEN Y J, et al. Effect of pinching bearing branches in different period on fruit set rate and yield in main-planted varieties of Vitis amurensis Rupr.[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2007(2):21-22.
[19] 张舟, 吕芳德, 王森. 不同枣品种光合特性的比较研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(8): 78-81. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2014.08.012. ZHANG Z, LYU F D, WANG S. Comparative study on photosynthetic characteristics of different varieties of jujube[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(8): 78-81.
[20] 高鹤, 宗俊勤, 陈静波, 等. 7种优良观赏草光合生理日变化及光响应特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 87-93. GAO H, ZONG J Q, CHEN J B, et al. Diurnal change of photosynthetic characteristics and response to light intensity of seven ornamental grasses[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(4): 87-93.
[21] 孙悦燕, 郭跃东, 刘宁, 等. 不同光照条件下华北落叶松更新木的光响应曲线[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 30(5): 404-408. DOI:10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.2010.05.19. SUN Y Y, GUO Y D, LIU N, et al. Light response carves of larix principis-rupprechtii seedlings in different light environments[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2010, 30(5): 404-408.
[22] SHARP R E, MATTHEWS M A, BOYER J S. Kok effect and the quantum yield of photosynthesis: light partially inhibits dark respiration[J]. Plant Physiology, 1984, 75(1): 95-101. DOI: 10.1104/pp.75.1.95.
[23] 刘思祝. 不同光照条件下红鳞蒲桃幼苗生长特性研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2012. LIU S Z. Research in growth characteristics of Syzygium hancei seedlings under different sunlight[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2012.
[24] 尚海琳, 李方民, 林玥, 等. 桃儿七光合生理特性的地理差异研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2008, 28(7): 1440-1447. SHANG H L, LI F M, LIN Y, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of Sinopodophyllum hexandrum from different distribution areas in China[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2008, 28(7): 1440-1447.
[25] 曾小平, 赵平, 蔡锡安, 等. 25种南亚热带植物耐阴性的初步研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(4): 88-95. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.2006.04.017. ZENG X P, ZHAO P, CAI X A, et al. Shade-tolerance of 25 low subtropical plants[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(4): 88-95.
[26] 许大全. 光合作用效率[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2002: 3-9.

不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃幼树光合特性的影响

Effects of different pruning measures on the photosynthetic characteristics of pecan seedlings

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	魏溪杏, 胡渊渊, 朱光夏, 喻卫武, 张祖瑛, 吴家胜, 宋丽丽. 不同脱蒲时间对香榧种仁特征性香气和营养成分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 51-60.
[2]	樊晓芸, 郭素娟, 李艳华, 江锡兵. 板栗果实褐变度与总酚和总黄酮的相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 159-166.
[3]	张赟齐, 董宁光, 郝艳宾, 陈永浩, 张俊佩, 侯智霞, 苏淑钗, 吴佳庆, 齐建勋. 109份丰产核桃单株坚果表型多样性分析及性状评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 87-96.
[4]	唐敏, 杨开宇, 张赛男, 陈利英, 刘洋, 张雪梅, 齐国辉. 硒对核桃种仁抗氧化酶活性及果实品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 127-134.
[5]	王艳娜, 孟学成, 赵荻, 吴家胜, 宋丽丽, 胡渊渊, 张祖瑛, 喻卫武. 四个香榧品种种仁炒制加工后香气物质分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 169-176.
[6]	季艳红, 汤文华, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰. 施肥对薄壳山核桃容器苗生长及养分积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 47-56.
[7]	蒋瑶, 魏海林, 高昌虎, 王大故, 冯楠可, 李睿, 刘榕榕, 吕芳德. 湖南低山丘陵区薄壳山核桃的开花物候期观测及品种配置[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 53-62.
[8]	张亦弛, 郭素娟. 植物生长延缓剂对板栗苗枝条生长及叶片非结构性碳水化合物的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 85-93.
[9]	周晓峰, 莫正海, 尚杨娟, 骆敏, 苏文川, 谭鹏鹏, 韩明慧, 邓秋菊, 田朝霞, 彭方仁. 薄壳山核桃CiDGAT1基因的克隆及表达模式分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(4): 55-62.
[10]	王敏, 席东, 莫正海, 陈于, 赵玉强, 朱灿灿. 薄壳山核桃CiAGL6基因的克隆、亚细胞定位及表达[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(4): 63-69.
[11]	耿树香,宁德鲁,陈海云,贺娜. 云南主栽核桃品种功能成分综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 209-215.
[12]	勒栋梁,李永荣,彭方仁,刘壮壮. 薄壳山核桃采穗圃的构建与质量评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(02): 134-140.
[13]	耿树香,宁德鲁,李勇杰,陈海云,肖良俊. 云南省主栽核桃与美国山核桃品种营养成分分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(06): 193-198.
[14]	韩明慧,彭方仁,邓秋菊,谭鹏鹏. 薄壳山核桃雌雄花芽分化外部形态与内部结构的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(06): 1-7.
[15]	冯刚,裴文,吴亚云,曲开军,李小飞,彭方仁. 环割和摘心对薄壳山核桃枝条生长和叶片碳氮代谢物积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(06): 8-12.