
日本红枫春季叶片色彩评价
Evaluation of leaf colors of Japanese maples in spring
【目的】探讨日本红枫品种群间的叶色关系及其时空分布规律,为挖掘和创制日本红枫特异种质以及叶色育种提供参考。【方法】利用英国皇家园艺学会(RHSCC)比色卡和色差仪对28个日本红枫品种的春季叶色进行了动态测定,通过构建L*(色调角)三维动态分布图,聚类分析及色彩参数分析,进行日本红枫春季叶片色彩变化规律分析及叶色综合性评价。【结果】供试各品种叶色在*、C*和h*3个维度皆呈规律性空间分布特点和阶段性变化趋势。叶色聚类分析树状图结果将28个日本红枫品种划分为3大色系和6个子色系类群,色系/子色系类群之间具有明显不同的色彩参数特征,3大色系品种叶色变化程度差异显著。【结论】4月下旬为日本红枫春季最佳观赏时期;在3大色系中,色彩律动程度从大到小依次为紫红色系、绿色系、黄色系;选择特异种质为杂交亲本,对今后高稳定性、高观赏性红枫定向育种具有重要参考价值。
【Objective】The Japanese maple (Acer spp.) is an excellent foliage tree species. The previous research has be focused on the change rule or mechanism of leaf color changes in Acer spp. in autumn. This study explored the relationship between the leaf color and the change rule in Japanese maple cultivars for their spatial and temporal distributions, and aimed to provide a reference for discovering and creating color-specific leaf germplasms.【Method】The colors of 28 Japanese maple cultivars were dynamically measured (S1. April 15; S2. April 30; S3. May 15) by using the Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart (RHSCC) and a colorimeter. The differences between leaf color determination methods were compared through a correlation analysis. Japanese maple spring leaf colors were analyzed via a lightness (L*), chromaticity (C*) and hue (h*) three-dimensional dynamic distribution map and clustering and color parameter analyses were conducted to evaluate the change rule and breeding strategy.【Result】① A significant correlation (P < 0.000 1) was observed between the color parameters measured by the chromatogram and the RHSCC, but the coincidence was not high (R2 = 0.54-0.74). ② During leaf color change (S1-S2-S3), L* and C* rose and then fell, with a peak value in the S2 period. The optimal hue values for ‘best viewing’ [(h* between 20°-40° (red), 70°-80° (yellow), 90°-110° (green)] appeared during the S2 period. ③ The leaf color cluster analysis showed that the 28 Japanese maple varieties were clustered into three major color groups with six sub-groups. There were significant differences in color parameters between groups and sub-groups. Group one, green (A), included the A1 green and A2 dark green sub-groups. The color varieties in A1 were bright and had ornamental values (C*. 51.17±2.01; L*. 62.72±3.76). Group two, yellow (B), only had one sub-group, whose color was bright (C*. 60.60±0.47; L*. 75.79±1.70). Group three, purplish-red (C), included the C1 dark purplish-red, C2 bright red, and C3 deep purplish-red sub-groups. The color of varieties in the C2 sub-group was bright (C*. 26.2 ± 3.36; L*. 38.25 ± 2.08). ④ The leaf color of the three color lines changed from light to thick then back to light. The leaf color of the second stage (S2-S3) was larger than that of the first stage (S1-S2). In different stages of the color systems, the color rhythmicity of the purplish-red was best (ΔE' = 15.33) followed by green (ΔE' = 13.94) then yellow (ΔE' = 9.34). The yellow varieties, ‘Dream of Orange’ and ‘Jingui’, maintained high color saturation and brightness in spring (C* and L* reached 60.61 and 75.79, respectively) and had a high ornamental value. The color intensity of the three color groups showed a trend from light to strong and then to light. The range of leaf color parameters in the second stage (S2-S3) was larger than that in the first stage (S1-S2), but the difference between these stages was not significant and showed a nearly equal changing rate. The color difference of purplish-red color group was the highest (ΔE'=15.33), followed by the green (ΔE'=13.94) then yellow (ΔE'=9.34) color groups. The yellow color group, including A. palmatum ‘Orange Dream’ and A. palmatum ‘Katsura’, maintained high color saturation and brightness (C* and L* values reached 60.61 and 75.79, respectively) and had a high ornamental value.【Conclusion】The best spring viewing period for Japanese maple is late April. The leaf color differences are most pronounced in the purplish-red color group, followed by the green group. Color differences are the least pronounced in the yellow group. The selection of specific germplasms to be used as hybrid parents may play an important role in directional breeding of high-stability and high-ornamental Japanese maple trees. These results indicate that A1 and A2-1 could be used as parents for bright green color breeding and C2 and C1-1 could be used as parents for purplish-red color breeding.
日本红枫 / 叶色 / 色彩参数 / CIELCH色空间 / 鸡爪槭
Japanese maple / leaf color / colorimetric parameter / CIELCH / Acer palmatum
[1] |
张毅, 刘伟, 李桂祥. 世界各国的日本枫树垂枝型园艺品种资源[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(10):73-82.
|
[2] |
陈继卫, 沈朝栋, 贾玉芳, 等. 鸡爪槭转色期叶色变化生理研究[J]. 核农学报, 2010,24(1):171-175,180.
|
[3] |
谢瑛, 曾虹. 美国红枫引种栽培初报[J]. 四川林业科技, 2016,37(3):142-144.
|
[4] |
方忠品, 江琪芳. 红枫嫁接育苗技术[J]. 宁波农业科技, 2005,23(2):31-32.
|
[5] |
[6] |
洪丽 .茶条槭(Acer ginnala Maxim.)幼树叶色变化的生理特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2008.
|
[7] |
陈继卫, 沈朝栋, 贾玉芳, 等. 红枫秋冬转色期叶色变化的生理特性[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2010,36(2):181-186.
|
[8] |
冯立娟, 苑兆和, 尹燕雷, 等. 美国红枫叶色表达期间相关物质的研究[J]. 山东林业科技, 2008,38(4):9-11.
|
[9] |
高焕章, 赵振军, 王斌成, 等. 美国红枫不同品种秋色叶变化过程的观察[J].北方园艺, 2013(19):83-86.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
张往祥, 江志华, 裘靓, 等. 观赏海棠花色时序动态分布格局研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2013,40(3):505-514.
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
文习成. 桃不同品种花瓣和叶片呈色变化过程中花色苷合成途径的相关基因表达差异性研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2012.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
张晶, 浦静, 赵聪, 等. 3个观赏海棠半同胞家系子代叶色动态分析与初选[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,42(3):37-44.
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
向其柏, 刘玉莲. 中国桂花品种图志[M]. 北京: 中国园林出版社, 2008: 96-96.
|
[26] |
颉刚刚, 欧阳丽婷, 谢军, 等. 新疆地区欧洲李叶片表型性状多样性及亲缘关系分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2018,27(3):72-78.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
徐廷志. 槭属的系统演化与地理分布[J]. 云南植物研究, 1998,20(4):383-393.
|
[30] |
杨鹏鸣, 李家美. 槭树科分类研究进展[J].河南科技学院学报, 2010(1):36-39.
|
[31] |
戴思兰, 洪艳. 基于花青素苷合成和呈色机理的观赏植物花色改良分子育种[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(3):529-542.
|
[32] |
陈红, 吴昌琦, 高若诚, 等. 金边杂种胡颓子叶色突变体叶色变化机理的初步研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2019,46(4):49-53.
|
[33] |
唐东芹, 徐怡倩, 袁媛, 等. 理化因素对风信子花色苷稳定性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,40(4):69-73.
|
[34] |
田野, 张会慧, 张秀丽, 等. 紫丁香叶片发育过程中花色素苷含量与叶绿素荧光和激发能分配的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,38(1):59-64.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |