基于挂网喷播绿化的岩质边坡植物多样性及影响因素分析

张鑫; 胡海波; 吴秋芳; 马冰

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708035

张鑫,胡海波,吴秋芳,马冰

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (03) : 131-138.

PDF(1627314 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(1627314 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (03) : 131-138. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708035

研究论文

基于挂网喷播绿化的岩质边坡植物多样性及影响因素分析

张鑫¹,胡海波^1*,吴秋芳²,马冰³

作者信息 +

Plant diversity and influencing factors of rocky slope based on net-suspended spray seeding

ZHANG Xin¹, HU Haibo^1*, WU Qiufang², MA Bing³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】通过对江苏省3种岩质边坡植物群落的调查,研究基于挂网喷播绿化技术的岩质边坡植物多样性及影响因素,为岩质边坡生态治理和植被恢复提供科学依据。【方法】利用多元统计分析方法计算岩质边坡土壤养分指数,采用灰色关联度表征边坡植物多样性与土壤因子的耦合程度,借助RDA法分析边坡植物多样性与环境因子的关系。【结果】①在3种岩质边坡植物群落中,蔷薇科、豆科、木犀科、菊科和禾本科植物共占总物种数的54.4%,表明这5科植物在岩质边坡生态修复过程中所起作用最大; ②不同坡位的植物多样性指数差异较大,Margalef指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、Pielou指数、Simpson指数均呈现上坡<中坡<下坡; Margalef指数在坡向上呈现阳坡<阴坡; ③土壤有机质、全氮、速效磷、速效钾是对岩质边坡植被恢复起关键作用的因子; ④3种岩质边坡植物多样性与土壤因子的耦合协调程度以弱协调为主,各种岩质协调关系大小依次为花岗岩边坡<灰岩边坡<砂岩边坡,与边坡土壤肥力变化一致。【结论】通过挂网喷播绿化的岩质边坡自然恢复6 a后,边坡植物多样性逐渐上升但尚未达到稳定状态。绿化施工时应充分考虑乡土植物如蔷薇科、禾本科等作为喷播植物种,适量施肥并加强上坡的人工管护。

Abstract

Abstract: 【Objective】 By means of plant community investigation based on greening technique of net-suspended spray seeding,the plant diversity and its influencing factors on three types of rocky slope were studied to provide scientific references for ecological management and vegetation restoration on rocky slopes in Jiangsu Province.【Method】 The soil nutrient index was calculated using a multivariate statistical analysis method. The gray relational degree was used to characterize the degree of coupling between slope plant diversity and soil factors. The relationships between slope plant diversity and environmental factors were analyzed by RDA.【Result】①In the plant communities of the three rocky slope types, plants from Rosaceae, Leguminosae, Oleaceae, Compositae and Gramineae accounted for 54.4% of the total species, indicating that these five families played the most important role in the eco-restoration. ②Plant diversity indices were significantly different among the different slope positions. The Margalef, Shannon-Wiener, Pielou and Simpson indices all showed a consistent trend, i.e., upper slope < middle slope < lower slope. The Margalef index indicated a sunny slope < shady slope tendency for the slope aspect. ③The organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium were the key indices in the process of eco-restoration. ④The degree of systematic coupling coordination between plant diversity and soil factors was given priority at a weak level, i.e., granite slope < limestone slope < sandstone slope. It was consistent with soil fertility of the slopes.【Conclusion】 After 6 years of natural restoration on the rocky slopes based on net-suspended spray seeding, the plant diversity of slopes increased gradually and had not reached the steady state. Full consideration should be given to local plants when greening project, especially the Rosaceae and Poaceae families, and fertilizer enhances the artificial management of the upper slope.

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用

张鑫,胡海波,吴秋芳,马冰. 基于挂网喷播绿化的岩质边坡植物多样性及影响因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2018, 42(03): 131-138 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708035

ZHANG Xin, HU Haibo, WU Qiufang, MA Bing. Plant diversity and influencing factors of rocky slope based on net-suspended spray seeding[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2018, 42(03): 131-138 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708035

中图分类号： S718.5

参考文献

[1] 张俊云,周德培,李绍才. 岩石边坡生态护坡研究简介[J].水土保持通报,2000,20(4):36-38. DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2000.04.010. ZHANG J Y, ZHOU D P, LI S C. Brief introduction of study on slope eco-engineering for rock slope protection[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000,20(4):36-38.
[2] 刘春霞,韩烈保. 高速公路边坡植被恢复研究进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(5):2090-2098. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.05.050. LIU C X, HAN L B. Review of researches in vegetation restoration of freeway slopes[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,27(5):2090-2098.
[3] 袁磊,周建伟,温冰,等. 高陡岩质边坡生态修复过程中植物群落与地下生境特征研究[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(2):84-89. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.02.14. YUAN L, ZHOU J W, WEN B, et al. Characters ofvegetation community and below-ground habitats of ecological restoration process on high-steep slope[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2017,32(2):84-89.
[4] 朱兆华,赖涛,陈晓蓉,等. 受损边坡生态修复工艺选择、目标群落设计与效果评价[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(3):78-83. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.03.15. ZHU Z H, LAI T, CHEN X R, et al, Processselection, target community design and effect assessment on ecological restoration engineering of damaged slope[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2017,32(03):78-83.
[5] 潘声旺,胡明成,罗竞红,等. 绿化植物的生活型对边坡植被物种多样性及护坡性能的影响[J].生物多样性,2015,23(3):341-350. DOI:10.17520/biods.2014115. PAN S W, HU M C, LUO J H, et al. Effects of rehabilitation species on slope vegetation diversity and soil and water conservation[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2015,23(03):341-350.
[6] 王太平,杨晓明,高速公路边坡植物群落物种多样性[J].西北林学院学报,2012,37(2):230-234. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2012.02.46. WANG T P, YANG X M. Species diversity of plant community on highway slope[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2012,37(02):230-234.
[7] 赵方莹,郭亚娟,曹波,等. 延庆县公路边坡植被多样性特征与土壤因子灰关联分析[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(6):64-68. DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2010.06.023. ZHAO F Y, GUO Y J, CAO B, et al. Grey incidence analysis of vegetation diversity characteristics and soil factors on highway side slopes in Yanqing County[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010,30(6):64-68.
[8] 朱晓勇,胡海波,鲁小珍,等. 太湖西区公路两侧植物物种多样性的研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(3):85-88. DOI:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2006.03.019. ZHU X Y, HU H B, LU X Z, et al. Study on the plant species diversity along the roadsides in Taihu West zone[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2006,30(3):85-88.
[9] 王倩,艾应伟,裴娟,等. 遂渝铁路边坡草本植物多样性季节动态和空间分布特征[J].生态学报,2010,30(24):6892-6900. WANG Q, AI Y W, PEI J, et al. Seasonal dynamics and spatial distribution of herbage diversity on the slopes of Suiyu railway[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010, 30(24):6892-6900.
[10] 于燕华,辜彬,艾应伟. 四川省铁路路堑边坡植物多样性分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(S1):27-30. DOI:10.16843/j.sswc.2006.s1.007. YU Y H, GU B, AI Y W. Analysis of plant diversity of railway cutting slopes in Sichuan Province[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,4(S1):27-30.
[11] 黄月,鲁小珍,胡海波,等. 不同岩质边坡复绿植物多样性与土壤特性[J].福建林业科技,2015,42(3):70-73. DOI:10.13428/j.cnki.fjlk.2015.03.015. HUANG Y, LU X Z, HU H B. Revegetation plant diversity and soil-property of different rock slope[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology,2015,42(3):70-73.
[12] 盛茂银,熊康宁,崔高仰,等. 贵州喀斯特石漠化地区植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):434-448. DOI:10.5846/stxb201303220488. SHENG M Y, XIONG K N, CUI G Y, et al. Plant diversity and soil physical-chemical properties in Karst rocky desertification ecosystem of Guizhou, China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(2):434-448.
[13] 李林霞,王瑞君,辜彬,等. 海岛矿区岩质边坡植物群落演替中物种多样性的变化[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(7):1741-1747. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2014.0134. LI L X, WANG R J, GU B et al. Changes in biodiversity during the succession of plant communities on the rocky slopes of mine in islands[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014,33(7):1741-1747.
[14] 栗妍,魏玮,邱扬,等. 黄土丘陵小流域植被恢复驱动下的土壤养分特征[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(6):115-121. DOI:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2014.06.024. LI Y, WEI W, QIU Y, et al. Effects ofdifferent vegetation restoration types on soil nutrient properties in the hill and gully region of Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,21(6):115-121.
[15] 江源,章异平,杨艳刚,等. 放牧对五台山高山、亚高山草甸植被-土壤系统耦合的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(4):837-846. JIANG Y, ZHANG Y P, YANG Y G, et al. Impacts of grazing on the system coupling between vegetation and soil in the alpine and subalpine meadows of Wutai Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(4):837-846.
[16] 方凯凯,张中恺,王志康,等. 渭北果园不同管理措施的土壤水分灰色关联度[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(4):28-32. DOI:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2016.04.004. FANG K K, ZHANG Z K, WANG Z K, et al. Grey relational analysis of soil moisture under different management measures in orchards of Weibei[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,23(4):28-32.
[17] 李香云,王玉杰. 不同植被类型对地表径流影响的灰色关联度分析[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(2):83-86. DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2007.02.019. LI X Y, WANG Y J. Grey rational degree analyses for effects of different vegetation types on overland flow[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007,27(2):83-86.
[18] 薛鸥,魏天兴,刘飞,等. 公路边坡植物群落多样性与土壤因子耦合关系[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(1):91-100. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150235. XUE O, WEI T X, LIU F, et al. Modeling the degree of coupling and interaction between plant community diversity and soil properties on highway slope [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016,38(1):91-100.
[19] 刘旻霞,王刚. 高寒草甸植物群落多样性及土壤因子对坡向的响应[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(2):259-265. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2013.0135. LIU M X, WANG G. Responses of plant community diversity and soil factors to slope aspect in alpine meadow[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013,32(2):259-265.
[20] 潘占兵,余峰,王占军,等. 宁南黄土丘陵区坡向、坡位对苜蓿地土壤含水量时空变异的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(2):141-144. PAN Z B, YU F,WANG Z J,et al. Effects of slope aspect and position on temporal and spatial variation of soil water content on Alfalfa land in loess hilly region of South Ningxia Hui Autonomous region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010,17(2):141-144.
[21] 邹蜜,罗庆华,辜彬,等. 生境因子对岩质边坡生态恢复过程中植被多样性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(1):7-14. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2013.0040. ZOU M, LUO Q H, GU B, et al. Influence of habitat factors on vegetation diversity in the process of eco-restoration on rocky slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013,32(1):7-14.
[22] 程晔,谢瑾荣,周翠英,等. 韶赣高速红砂岩边坡草灌混播防护技术研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(2):181-186. DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.02.024. CHENG Y, XIE J R, ZHOU C Y, et al. Grass-shrub vegetation protection on red sand stone engineering slope in Shaoguan-Ganzhou expressway[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013,33(02):181-186.
[23] 李裕元邵明安. 子午岭植被自然恢复过程中植物多样性的变化[J].生态学报,2004,24(2):252-260. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2004.02.013 LI Y Y, SHAO M A.The change of plant diversity during natural recovery process of vegetation in Ziwuling area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,24(2):252-260.
[24] 杨少红,邹文涛,尹光天,等. 广东顺德人工林群落物种多样性与影响因子[J].生态科学,2010,29(5):427-431. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2010.05.005. YANG S H, ZOU W T, YIN G T, et al. Study on the relation betweenspecies diversity of forest plantation communities and affecting factors in Guangdong[J]. Ecological Science,2010, 29(5):427-431.
[25] CHEN S,AI X,DONG T,et al. The physico-chemical properties and structural characteristics of artificial soil for cut slope restoration in Southwestern China[J]. Scientific reports,2016,6. DOI:10.1038/srep20565.
[26] KHAN F,HAYAT Z,AHMAD W,et al. Effect of slope position on physico-chemical properties of eroded soil[J]. Soil Environ,2013,32(1):22-28.
[27] MARTINEZ-RUIZ C,MARRS R H. Some factors affecting successional change on uranium mine wastes:insights for ecological restoration[J].Applied Vegetation Science,2007,10(3):333-342. DOI:10.1111/j.1654-109x.2007.tb00432.x.
[28] 李成俊,孙琦,陈璋,等. 道路边坡坡度对植被恢复中物种多样性的影响研究[J].植物研究,2013,33(4):477-483. DOI:10.7525/j.issn.1673-51023.2013.04.015. LI C J, SUN Q, CHEN Z, et al. Effects of roadside slope gradient on plant diversity during revegetation[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2013,33(4):477-483.
[29] FENG C,AI Y,CHEN Z,et al. Spatial variation of soil properties and plant colonisation on cut slopes: a case study in the semi-tropical hilly areas of China[J]. Plant Ecology & Diversity,2015(1):81-88. DOI:10.1080/17550874.2015.1060544.
[30] 张林静,岳明,顾峰雪,等. 新疆阜康绿洲荒漠过渡带植物群落物种多样性与土壤环境因子的耦合关系[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(6):658-662. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2002.0156. ZHANG L J, YUE M, GU F X, et al. Coupling relationship between plant communities' species diversity and soil factors in ecotone between desert and oasis in Fukang, Xinjiang[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2002,13(6):658-662.
[31] 周玮,苏春花,严敏. 喀斯特地区不同土层厚度下土壤微生物数量与植物多样性的关系[J].广东农业科学,2017,44(2):112-117. DOI:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2017.02.017. ZHOU W, SU C H, YAN M. Relationship between plant diversity and soil microbial under quantity different soil layer-depths in Karst area[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2017,44(2):112-117.
[32] 秦松,樊燕,刘洪斌,等. 地形因子与土壤养分空间分布的相关性研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(1):46-49. QIN S, FAN Y, LIU H B, et al.Study on the relations between topographical factors and the spatial distributions of soil nutrients[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(1):46-49.
[33] 孙永秀,严成,徐海量,等. 受损矿区草原群落物种多样性和地上生物量对覆土厚度的响应[J].草业学报,2017,26(1):54-62. DOI:10.11686/cyxb2016072. SUN Y X, YAN C, XU H L, et al. Grassland community species diversity and aboveground biomass responses to difference in cover soil [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017,26(1):54-62.
[34] 李程程,程星,杨士超. 岩溶山区植物生长的土壤厚度因素研究——以贵州相宝山为例[J].贵州师范学院学报,2012,28(9):38-41. DOI:10.13391/j.cnki.issn.1674-7798.2012.09.006. LI C C, CHENG X, YANG S C. Study on the soil thickness factor of plant growth in Karst mountains: take the Guizhou Xiangbao Mountain as an example[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal College, 2012,28(9):38-41.
[35] 王兴,宋乃平,杨新国,等. 荒漠草原弃耕恢复草地土壤与植被的RDA分析[J].草业学报,2014,23(2):90-97. DOI:10.11686/cyxb20140211. WANG X, SONG N P, YANG X G, et al. Redundancy analysis of soil and vegetation of recovered grassland on abandoned land in the desert steppe[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014,23(2):90-97.
[36] WICK A F, MERRILL S D, TOY T J, et al. Effect of soil depth and topographic position on plant productivity and community development on 28-year-old reclaimed mine lands[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011,66(3):201-211.DOI:10.2489/jswc.66.3.201.

基金

基金项目:江苏省“三新”工程项目(Lysx[2013]10); 国家林业局研究项目(2017-LYPT-DW-155); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD) 第一作者:张鑫(zhangxin342201@163.com)。*通信作者:胡海波(huhb2000@aliyun.com),教授。