黄山松与马尾松松针挥发性成分对比分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201709022

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (03): 93-98.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201709022

黄山松与马尾松松针挥发性成分对比分析

程满环¹,翟大才²,毕淑峰²

1.黄山学院现代教育技术中心,安徽黄山 245041; 2.黄山学院生命与环境科学学院,安徽黄山 245041

出版日期:2018-06-06 发布日期:2018-06-06
基金资助:
基金项目:安徽省高等学校自然科研研究项目(KJHS2017B14,KJ2007B049); 国家科技基础条件平台工作项目(2005DKA210003) 第一作者:程满环(chengmanhuan@163.com.),实验师。

Contrastive analysis of volatile components from the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis and P. massoniana

1.Modern Educational Technology Center, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245041, China; 2. College of Life and Environment Science, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245041,China

Online:2018-06-06 Published:2018-06-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究黄山松松针挥发性成分,并与马尾松松针对比,以期为黄山松松针的开发利用奠定基础。【方法】采用顶空-固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用技术(HS-SPME-GC-MS)分析黄山松、马尾松松针的挥发性成分,并对两者的分析结果进行比较。【结果】从黄山松和马尾松松针挥发性成分中分别鉴定出59种和42种化合物。两种松针中含有共有成分36种,占各自总峰面积的90.26%(黄山松)和96.09%(马尾松)。含量最高的挥发性成分均为α-蒎烯,黄山松松针中α-蒎烯含量(质量分数)为24.08%,马尾松松针中α-蒎烯含量(质量分数)为36.25%。黄山松松针中鉴定出23种独有成分,其中含量最高的为伞花烃(5.67%)。【结论】两种松针主要挥发性成分种类相似但含量差异明显; 黄山松松针含有更多种类的挥发性成分及活性成分。

Abstract: Abstract: 【Objective】 The volatile components from the pine needles of P. taiwanensis were analyzed and contrasted with those of P. massoniana to aid in the development and utilization of the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis.【Methods】The comparative methods of head-space solid phase micro-extraction and GC-MS have been explored, and were applied for the first time to comparatively analyze the differences in the components of pine needles from the two species.【Results】The results showed that 59 and 42 kinds of compounds were identified from the pine needles of P. taiwanensis and P. massoniana, respectively. The two pine species had 36 components in common, accounting for 90.26%(P. taiwanensis)and 96.09%(P. massoniana)of the total peak area. The compound α-pinene was the highest in content, which was 24.08% for P. taiwanensis and 36.25% for P. massoniana. However, 23 types of components were found only in the needles of P. taiwanensis; of which, p-cymene(5.67%)was the highest in content. 【Conclusion】The types of the main volatile components in the two species were similar, but there were also obvious differences in their contents. Compared with P. massoniana, the pine needles of P. taiwanensis contained more kinds of volatile and active components. This study provided scientific evidence for the development and utilization of the pine needles from P. taiwanensis.

中图分类号:

S713
R284. 1

程满环,翟大才,毕淑峰. 黄山松与马尾松松针挥发性成分对比分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(03): 93-98.

Contrastive analysis of volatile components from the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis and P. massoniana. Contrastive analysis of volatile components from the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis and P. massoniana[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 42(03): 93-98.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201709022.

参考文献

[1] 李时珍. 本草纲目 [M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,1982:1917. LI S Z. Compendium of materia medica [M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 1982:1917.
[2] 劳业兴, 张冰若, 苏薇薇. 松针化学成分及药理研究进展 [J]. 中药材, 2003, 26(9):681-683. DOI: 10.13863/j.issn1001-4454.2003.09.035. LAO Y X, ZHANG B R, SU W W. Study progress of chemical composition and pharmacological action of pine needles [J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2003, 26(9):681-683.
[3] FENG S, ZENG W, LUO F, et al. Antibacterial activity of organic acids in aqueous extracts from pine needles(Pinus massoniana Lamb.)[J]. Food Science and Biotechnology, 2010, 19(1):35-41. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-010-0005-2.
[4] WANG C, HE L, YAN M, et al. Effects of polyprenols from pine needles of Pinus massoniana on ameliorating cognitive impairment in a D-galactose-induced mouse model [J]. AGE, 2014, 36:9676-9687. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-014-9676-6.
[5] WANG Q, ZHANG R, JIE T, et al. Two new antitumor diterpenes from Pinus sylvestris[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2008, 19(2):187-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2007.11.028.
[6] 林楚慧, 陈宣伶, 郑文玮, 等. 马尾松松针抗氧化酸奶加工工艺研究 [J]. 中国乳品工业, 2014, 42(6):58-61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2230.2014.06.016. LIN C H, CHEN X L, ZHENG W W, et al. Processing technology of masson pine needles yoghourt with antioxidant function [J].China Dairy Industry, 2014, 42(6):58-61.
[7] 杨丽华, 麦啟彬, 杨小翠, 等. 松针绿茶抗氧化复合茶饮料的加工 [J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2014, 40(3):244-247. DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.2014.03.044. YANG L H, MAI Q B, YANG X C, et al. Processing technology of pine needles and green tea compound antioxidant beverage [J]. Food Fermentation Industry, 2014, 40(3):244-247.
[8] 胡满江, 苏立杰, 李瑞姣, 等. 荔枝松针功能酒加工工艺研究 [J]. 食品与发酵科技, 2016, 52(2):72-81. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-506X.2016.02-017. HU M J, SU L J, LI R J,et al. Study on processing technic of Litchi-Pine needles wine product [J].Food and Fermentation technology, 2016, 52(2):72-81.
[9] 张旭, 及元乔, 李萍, 等. 松针的化学成分研究 [J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2006, 18(4):621-623. DOI: 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2006.04.022. ZHANG X, JI Y Q, LI P, et al. Study on chemical constituents of Pinus massoniana leaf [J].Natural Product Research and Development, 2006, 18(4): 621-623.
[10] 张桂芳, 张东杰, 郭希娟, 等. 三种松针活性成分含量及清除自由基能力的比较 [J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2016, 28(7):1066-1070. DOI: 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2016.7.014. ZHANG G F,ZHANG D J, GUO X J, et al. Comparison of main bioactive components and free radicals scavenging activities of three pine needles [J].Natural Product Research and Development, 2016, 28(7):1066-1070.
[11] 宗芳芳,包怡红,李德海,等. 盐析辅助水蒸气蒸馏法制备红松壳挥发油研究 [J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016, 40(6):122-128.DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2006.2016.06.019. ZONG F F, BAO Y H, LI D H, et al. The preparation and component analysis of pine shell volatile oil by salting out-assisted steam distillation [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(6):122-128.
[12] 杨燕, 杨茂发, 杨再华, 等. 云南松松针的挥发性化学成分 [J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(5):173-177. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.05.028. YANG Y, YANG M F, YANG Z H, et al. Chemical constituents of volatile from pine needles of Pinus yunnanensis[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45(5):173-177.
[13] 郑万钧, 傅立国. 中国植物志:7 [M]. 北京:科学出版社,1978:266. ZHENG W J, FU L G. Flora of China:7 [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1978:266.
[14] 徐丽珊, 张姚杰, 林颖, 等. 黄山松松针挥发油提取、GC-MS分析及与湿地松挥发油的比较 [J]. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 39(2):187-192. DOI: 10.16218/j.issn.1001-5051.2016.02.011. XU L S, ZHANG Y J, LIN Y, et al. GC-MS analysis of volatile oils from the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis and comparison with Pinus elliottii[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 39(2): 187-192.
[15] ZHANG Z, GUO S, LIU X, et al. Synergistic antitumor effect of α-pinene and β-pinene with paclitaxel against non-small-cell Lung Carcinoma(NSCLC)[J]. Drug Research, 2015, 65(4):214-218.
[16] 张秋格, 毕良武, 赵振东, 等. 对伞花烃的制备与应用研究进展 [J]. 现代化工, 2008, 28(2):401-406. DOI: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2008.s2.062. ZHANG Q G, BI L W, ZHAO Z D, et al. Research pogress in peparation and aplication of p-cymene [J].Modern Chemical Industry, 2008, 28(2):401-406.

黄山松与马尾松松针挥发性成分对比分析

Contrastive analysis of volatile components from the pine needles of Pinus taiwanensis and P. massoniana

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	王玥琳, 徐大平, 杨曾奖, 刘小金, 洪舟, 张宁南, 陈文德. 乙烯利对降香黄檀生长和光合生理特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 18-24.
[2]	张琳,郭丽丽,郭大龙,侯小改. 牡丹杂交F₁代性状分离规律及混合遗传分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 51-60.
[3]	刘洋,秦健,周明明,方升佐1,2*,杨万霞,尚旭岚. 光质和基因型对青钱柳叶黄酮类化合物积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(03): 99-104.
[4]	徐静珠,吴彩娥,应瑞峰,李婷婷,范龚健,方升佐. 青钱柳叶多糖不同组分体外降血糖及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(04): 6-12.
[5]	秦健,刘洋,方升佐,杨万霞,管玲玲,尚旭岚. 光质和光强对青钱柳生长和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(04): 13-18.
[6]	杨华,宋绪忠,韩素芳. 刺毛杜鹃花蕾与花的挥发性成分分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(05): 179-182.
[7]	任继巍,周洁,许茜茜,李鑫,郑兆娟,欧阳嘉. 亚硫酸盐蔗渣浆同步糖化发酵法产乙醇的工艺优化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(04): 132-136.
[8]	胡克，李小保，叶菊娣,洪建国. 二甲基亚砜/N-甲基咪唑体系中木质素和半纤维素改性剥离研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(01): 101-104.
[9]	袁广翔，张玉娟，戴红旗，叶春洪，王忠良. 钙离子与钠离子对浆料Zeta电位的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 35(03): 24-.
[10]	高捍东,，蔡伟建,，王章荣，喻正发，罗斯汉. 我国纸浆林树种选择与培育技术研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 34(06): 137-143.