南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (04): 25-31.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201712010
魏 强, 高志鹏,郭 琳, 胡 佩, 夏苏娟, 丁雨龙
出版日期:
2018-07-27
发布日期:
2018-07-27
基金资助:
WEI Qiang,GAO Zhipeng, GUO Lin,HU Pei, XIA Sujuan, DING Yulong
Online:
2018-07-27
Published:
2018-07-27
摘要: 【目的】阐明矢竹矮秆稳定变异体——平安竹纤维形态学特征并初步阐释其变异机制。【方法】利用石蜡切片及数量统计学方法进行显微观测与数据分析; qRT-PCR分析基因相对表达量; UPLC/GC-MS法测定赤霉素含量。【结果】平安竹竹秆不同部位纤维长度、长宽比及壁腔比显著小于矢竹; 但其宽度与腔径值显著大于矢竹; 而其不同部位纤维壁厚值虽小于矢竹,但差异不显著。平安竹地下茎纤维在长度、长宽比、壁厚及壁腔比上显著小于矢竹,但其宽度与腔径值则显著大于矢竹。形态解剖学分析显示,平安竹地下茎纤维细胞形态变异出现于节间活跃生长阶段。赤霉素及细胞壁与细胞骨架相关基因表达量分析结果表明,赤霉素信号途径在平安竹节间生长起始阶段即受到抑制; 而其细胞壁与细胞骨架相关下游功能基因则在其伸长早期与活跃阶段显著低于矢竹; 赤霉素含量分析也证实各赤霉素含量早在平安竹节间伸长起始阶段就低于矢竹。【结论】赤霉素信号途径受抑导致其下游细胞壁与细胞骨架组织相关基因下调是最终导致平安竹纤维细胞生长异常的原因之一。
中图分类号:
魏强,高志鹏,郭琳,等. 平安竹纤维形态变异特征及其成因分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(04): 25-31.
WEI Qiang,GAO Zhipeng, GUO Lin,HU Pei, XIA Sujuan, DING Yulong. Characterization of fiber morphological variation of Pseudosasa japonica var. tsutsumiana and the underlying mechanism[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 42(04): 25-31.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201712010.
[1] RAI V, GHOSH J S, PAL A, et al. Identification of genes involved in bamboo fiber development[J].Gene, 2011, 478(1/2):19-27.
[2] 甘小洪.毛竹茎杆纤维细胞的发育生物学研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2005. GAN X H.Study on the developmental biology of fiber in Phyllostachys edulis culms[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2005. [3] 甘小洪,陈凤,林树燕,等.慈竹不同变异类型的纤维形态研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(4): 99-104.DOI: 1000-2006(2013)04-0099-06. GAN X H, CHEN F, LIN S Y, et al. Fiber morphology of different variation types of Neosinocalamus affinis(Rendle)Keng f. [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2013, 37(4): 99-104. [4] 王曙光,普晓兰,丁雨龙,等.云南箭竹纤维形态变异规律[J].浙江林学院学报,2009,26(4):528-532. WANG S G, PU X L, DING Y L, et al. Morphological differences of Fargesia yunnanensis fibers [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College,2009, 26(4): 528-532. [5] 普晓兰, 杜凡. 巨龙竹纤维形态及变异规律的研究[J]. 云南林业科技, 2003(1):1-4. DOI: 10.16473/ j. cnki. xblykx1972.2003.01.001. PU X L, DU F. Study of fiber morphology and its variation law of Dendrocalamus sinicus[J]. Yunnan Forestry Science and Technology, 2003(1): 1-4. [6] 马灵飞,朱丽青.浙江省6种丛生竹纤维形态及其组织比量的研究[J].浙江林学院学报,1990, 7(1): 66-71. MA L F, ZHU L Q. Fiber forms and tissue percentage of six species of sympodial bamboos in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 1990, 7(1): 66-71. [7] 贺新强, 王幼群, 胡玉熹, 等. 毛竹茎纤维次生壁形成过程的超微结构观察[J]. 植物学报, 2000,42(10):1003-1008. HE X Q, WANG Y Q, HU Y X, et al. Ultrastructural study of secondary wall formation in the stem fiber of Phyllostachys pubescens[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2000, 42(10): 1003-1008. [8] WEI Q, JIAO C, GUO L, et al. Exploring key cellular processes and candidate genes regulating the primary thickening growth of Moso underground shoots[J]. New Phytologist, 2017, 214(1): 81-96. DOI:10.1111/nph.14284. [9] 何奇江, 童晓青, 叶华琳, 等. 辣韭矢竹的出笋及幼竹生长节律[J]. 林业科学,2007, 43(6): 143-145. DOI: 1001-7488(2007)06-0143-03. HE Q J, TONG X Q, YE H L, et al. Shooting and growth rhythm of Pseudosasa japonica var. tsutsumian [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2007, 43(6): 143-145. [10] 林树燕, 丁雨龙. 平安竹抗旱生理指标的测定[J]. 林业科技开发, 2006, 20(1): 40-41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2006.01.013. LIN S Y, DING Y L. The physiological responds to drought stress of Pseudosasa japonica [J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2006, 20(1): 40-41. [11] 王光萍, 黄敏仁. 日本平安竹的组织培养及快速繁殖[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2002, 38(1): 47. WANG G P, HUANG M R. Tissue culture and rapid propagation of Pseudosasa japonica cv. tsutsumiana [J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2002, 38(1): 47. [12] 林树燕, 丁雨龙. 电导法对7种观赏竹的抗寒性测定[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2008, 23(1): 34-38. DOI: 1001-7461(2008)01-0034-05. LIN S Y, DING Y L. Establishment of cold resistance of 7 ornamental bamboo species by electric conductivity [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2008, 23(1): 34-38. [13] WEI Q, JIAO C, DING Y L, et al. Cellular and molecular characterizations of a slow-growth variant provide insights into the fast growth of bamboo [J]. Tree Physiology, 2017, 38(4):641-654. DOI:10.1093/treephys/tpx129. [14] 魏强, 丁雨龙. 矢竹地下茎转录组测序及节间生长相关基因表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(5):42-48. DOI: 1000-2006(2017)05-0042-07. WEI Q, DING Y L. Transcriptome sequencing, de novo assembly and expression analysis of several genes related to internode development in Pseudosasa japonica [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(5):42-48. [15] LIVAK K J, SCHMITTGEN T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T))method[J]. Methods, 2001, 25(4):402-408. DOI: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [16] ARITE T, IWATA H, OHSHIMA K, et al. DWARF10, an RMS1/MAX4/DAD1 ortholog, controls lateral bud outgrowth in rice[J]. Plant Journal, 2007, 51:1019-1029. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03210.x. [17] BUSOV V B, BRUNNER A M, STRAUSS SH. Genes for control of plant stature and form[J]. New Phytologist, 2008, 177: 589-607. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02324.x. [18] ISHIKAWA S, MAEKAWA M, ARITE T, et al. Suppression of tiller bud activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice[J]. Plant Cell Physiology, 2005, 46: 79-86. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pci022. [19] LUAN W, LIU Y, ZHANG F, et al. OsCD1 encodes a putative member of the cellulose synthase-like D sub-family and is essential for rice plant architecture and growth[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2011, 9: 513-524. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00570.x. [20] THOMAS S G, SUN T P. Update on gibberellin signaling. a tale of the tall and the short[J]. Plant Physiology, 2004, 135: 668-676. DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.040279. [21] YAMAMURO C, IHARA Y, WU X, et al. Loss of function of a rice brassinosteroid insensitive1 homolog prevents internode elongation and bending of the lamina joint[J]. The Plant Cell, 2000, 12: 1591-1606. [22] GRIFFITHS J, MURASE K, RIEU I, et al. Genetic characterization and functional analysis of the GID1 gibberellin receptors in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2006, 18(12): 3399-3414. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.047415. [23] WILLIGE B C, GHOSH S, NILL C, et al. The DELLA domain of GA INSENSITIVE mediates the interaction with the GAINSENSITIVE DWARF1A gibberellin receptor of Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2006, 19: 1209-1220. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.107.051441. [24] LANGE T, KAPPLER J, FISCHER A, et al. Gibberellin biosynthesis in developing pumpkin seedlings[J]. Plant Physiology, 2005, 139(1): 213-223. DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.064162. [25] PHILLIPS A L, WARD D A, UKNES S, et al. Isolation and expression of three gibberellin 20-oxidase cDNA clones from Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiology, 1995, 108(3): 1049-1057. [26] ZHANG Z L, OGAWA M, FLEET C M, et al. Scarecrow-like 3 promotes gibberellin signaling by antagonizing master growth repressor DELLA in Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108(5): 2160-2165. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1012232108. [27] RICHMOND T. Higher plant cellulose synthases[J]. Genome Biology, 2000, 1(4): 1-5. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2000-1-4-reviews3001. [28] SCHEIBLE W R, PAULY M. Glycosyl transferases and cell wall biosynthesis: novel players and insights[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2004, 7(3): 285-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.006. [29]CHO H T, KENDE H. Expression of expansin genes is correlated with growth in deepwater rice[J]. The Plant Cell, 1997, 9(9): 1661-1671. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.9.9.1661. |
[1] | 杨永. 裸子植物的系统分类:历史、现状和展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 14-26. |
[2] | 张瑞, 周正虎, 王传宽, 金鹰. 东北温带森林不同材性树种木质部解剖和水力性状[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 229-236. |
[3] | 黄永健, 荀航, 张保, 尤俊昊, 姚曦, 汤锋. HPLC同时测定竹笋中8种酚酸类物质含量的方法研究及其应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 237-244. |
[4] | 邓云飞. 安息香科的系统学研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 27-35. |
[5] | 李家亮, 巫大宇, 毛康珊. 柏木属的分类地位和物种多样性研究现状与建议[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 36-45. |
[6] | 李涌福, 杨庆华, 陈林, 张敏, 向其柏, 王贤荣, 段一凡. 木犀属内分组关系的分类修订[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 58-62. |
[7] | 杨皓, 刘超, 庄家尧, 张树同, 张文韬, 毛国豪. 不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 81-89. |
[8] | 丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 王宇浩, 陈美玲, 李涛, 刘孝武, 周悦湘, 孙连浩, 廖艺. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 90-98. |
[9] | 武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 99-107. |
[10] | 卜晓婷, 付威, 李淑娴, 徐志标, 彭大庆, 徐林桥. 幼化和外源激素对娜塔栎嫩枝扦插生根的影响及其生根解剖学观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 129-136. |
[11] | 杜晋城, 李欣欣, 王泽亮, 刘偲, 钟毅, 王丽华. 聚乙二醇胁迫下3个油橄榄品种生理指标响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 137-143. |
[12] | 方静, 张书曼, 严善春, 武帅, 赵佳齐, 孟昭军. 两种丛枝菌根真菌复合接种对青山杨叶片抗美国白蛾的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 144-154. |
[13] | 张馨方, 王广鹏, 张树航, 李颖, 郭燕. 不同抗螨性板栗差异次生代谢物筛选与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 234-240. |
[14] | 杨宏, 伊贤贵, 王贤荣, 吴桐, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 朱兆青. 樱花新品种‘元春’[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 275-276. |
[15] | 田梦阳, 朱树林, 窦全琴, 季艳红. 薄壳山核桃-茶间作对‘安吉白茶’速生期光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 86-96. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||