洪泽湖地区杨树人工林碳水通量昼夜和季节变化特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806032

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 113-120.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806032

洪泽湖地区杨树人工林碳水通量昼夜和季节变化特征

张悦¹(), 冯会丽¹, 王维枫¹, 薛建辉¹^,²^,^*(), 吴永波¹, 于水强¹

1.南京林业大学生物与环境学院,南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏南京 210037
2.江苏省中国科学院植物研究所,江苏南京 210014

收稿日期:2018-06-25 修回日期:2018-11-05 出版日期:2019-10-08 发布日期:2019-10-08
通讯作者: 薛建辉
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20170927);国家重点研发计划重点专项(2016YFC0502605);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

Diurnal and seasonal changes of fluxes over a poplar plantation in Hongze Lake basin

ZHANG Yue¹(), FENG Huili¹, WANG Weifeng¹, XUE Jianhui¹^,²^,^*(), WU Yongbo¹, YU Shuiqiang¹

1. College of Biology and the Environment, Co-Innovation Center of the Sustainable Forestry in the Southern China, Nanjing Forestry Univeristy, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China

Received:2018-06-25 Revised:2018-11-05 Online:2019-10-08 Published:2019-10-08
Contact: XUE Jianhui

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】通过对洪泽湖地区杨树人工林生态系统碳水通量的昼夜变化和季节变化特征进行分析,为评估该杨树人工林生态系统的固碳能力提供必要的基础数据,揭示杨树人工林生态系统碳循环及对外部气象环境因子的响应,同时为增强森林生态系统固碳能力提供依据。【方法】以洪泽湖地区杨树人工林生态系统为研究对象,利用涡度相关技术和微气象观测系统进行长期且连续的通量以及气象环境观测。选取2017年5月至2018年4月期间的原始观测数据,对异常数据进行剔除和插补处理,同时,利用EddyPro软件中的Express Mode模块对通量数据进行二次坐标旋转、频率损失订正以及WPL密度效应修正,最终转化为30 min数据。分析杨树人工林生态系统与大气间的二氧化碳(CO₂)、甲烷(CH₄)和潜热(latent heat, LE)通量的季节动态变化和昼夜变化特征及其与外部气象环境因子的相互关系。【结果】洪泽湖地区杨树人工林生态系统碳通量均有显著的昼夜和季节变化,净生态系统碳交换(net ecosystem exchange, NEE)白天为较强的碳汇,夜晚为较弱的碳源,整年表现为固碳作用,年通量为-506.9 g/(m²·a)。其日变化在生长季和非生长季均呈“U”形曲线,生长季的碳吸收明显大于非生长季;在生长季白天,NEE与光合有效辐射(photosynthetically active radiation, PAR)呈显著的对数关系;而在非生长季,NEE与夜间土壤温度(soil temperature,T_s)呈显著的指数关系。洪泽湖地区杨树人工林生态系统LE的昼夜和季节变化显著,在生长季和非生长季均呈“单峰型”曲线,且在生长季大于非生长季,LE与饱和水汽压差(vapor pressure deficit, VPD)在生长季和非生长季均呈显著的线性正相关关系。洪泽湖地区杨树人工林生态系统CH₄通量在生长季和非生长季均无显著的昼夜变化,在生长季为较弱的CH₄吸收,非生长季为中性至微弱的CH₄排放,全年可能表现为较微弱的CH₄汇。【结论】洪泽湖地区杨树人工林生态系统整体具有较高的固碳能力,CO₂和LE通量具有显著的昼夜变化和季节变化规律,而CH₄通量季节和昼夜变化并不显著,生态系统碳水通量受环境因子的影响较显著,可以为今后提升杨树人工林的固碳能力提供参考。因此,营造杨树人工林将是短期内吸收大气中的CO₂和CH₄并缓解气候变化的有效途径。

关键词: 杨树人工林, 碳水通量, 环境因子, 日变化, 季节变化, 洪泽湖地区

Abstract:

【Objective】 The frequent exchange of carbon water between forest ecosystems and the atmosphere has a significant effect on carbon sequestration, which plays an important role in the regulation and mitigation of global climate change. It is important to study the carbon water exchange of forest ecosystems, in order to elucidate the carbon water cycle and carbon sequestration capacities of forest ecosystems. Furthermore, few studies have investigated the carbon water flux of poplar plantations in the Hongze Lake basin. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the diurnal and seasonal variations of carbon water flux in the poplar plantation ecosystem of the Hongze Lake basin, in order to establish a basis for evaluating the carbon sequestration capacity of the poplar plantation ecosystem. This study determined the carbon cycle of the poplar plantation ecosystem, as well as the response of the ecosystem to external meteorological factors, and established a basis for enhancing the carbon sequestration capacity of forest ecosystems. 【Method】 The present study investigated the diurnal and seasonal variations of carbon water flux in the poplar plantation ecosystem of the Hongze Lake basin, using the eddy covariance technique and micro-meteorological observation to document the long-term and continuous flux and meteorological environments. The original observation data from May 2017 to April 2018 were selected to remove and interpolate the abnormal data, and two coordinate rotation, frequency loss revision and WPL density effect were carried out on the flux data using the Express Mode module in EddyPro, which is eventually converted to the data of the 30 min. The diurnal and seasonal dynamics of CO₂, CH₄, and latent heat flux between the poplar plantation ecosystem and the atmosphere, as well as their correlation with external meteorological factors, were analyzed. 【Result】 ① The carbon flux of the poplar plantation ecosystem exhibited significant diurnal and seasonal variation, and CO₂ flux was a strong carbon sink and source during the day and night, respectively. The ecosystem was a carbon sink throughout the year, with an annual net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of -506.9 g/(m²·a). The daily changes exhibited a U-shaped curve during both the growing and non-growing seasons, and the carbon absorption during the growing season was significantly greater than that during the non-growing season. During the growing season, the NEE exhibited a significant logarithmic relationship with photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), whereas during the non-growing season, NEE exhibited a significant exponential relationship with nocturnal soil temperature (T_s). ② The latent heat (LE) of the poplar plantation ecosystem exhibited significant diurnal and seasonal variation, with a “single peak-type” curve during both the growing and non-growing seasons, and in the growing season greater than the non-growing season. Both LE and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) exhibited a significant linear positive correlation between the growing and non-growing seasons. ③ There was no significant diurnal or seasonal variation in CH ₄ flux during either the growing or non-growing season; CH₄ was weakly absorbed during the growing season and, at best, weakly emitted during the non-growing season. In addition, the whole year was shown as the weak CH₄ sinks. 【Conclusion】 The poplar plantation ecosystem of the Hongze Lake basin possesses a high carbon sequestration capacity. Indeed, CO₂ and LE flux exhibited significant diurnal and seasonal variation, whereas CH₄ flux was not significant, and the carbon water flux of the ecosystem was significantly influenced by environmental factors. This work provides a reference for improving the carbon sequestration ability of poplar plantations and indicates that the poplar plantation ecosystem of the Hongze Lake basin could continue to function as strong CO₂ sink and weak CH₄ sink here after. Therefore, planting trees, such as poplar, could be an effective way to sequester carbon and to mitigate climate change in the near future.

Key words: poplar plantation, carbon and water flux, environmental factor, diurnal change, seasonal change, Hongze Lake basin

中图分类号:

S718.5

张悦,冯会丽,王维枫,等. 洪泽湖地区杨树人工林碳水通量昼夜和季节变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 113-120.

ZHANG Yue, FENG Huili, WANG Weifeng, XUE Jianhui, WU Yongbo, YU Shuiqiang. Diurnal and seasonal changes of fluxes over a poplar plantation in Hongze Lake basin[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(5): 113-120.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806032.

图/表 5

参考文献 36

[1]	DALAL R C, ALLEN D E, LIVESLEY S J, et al. Magnitude and biophysical regulators of methane emission and consumption in the Australian agricultural, forest, and submerged landscapes: a review[J]. Plant and Soil, 2008, 309(1/2):43-76. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-007-9446-7. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9446-7
[2]	徐小军, 周国模, 杜华强, 等. 缺失数据插补方法及其参数估计窗口大小对毛竹林CO₂通量估算的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(9):141-149. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150918.
	XU X J, ZHOU G M, DU H Q, et al. Effects of interpolation and window sizes in phyllostachys edulis forest for parameter estimation on calculation of CO₂ flux [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(9):141-149.
[3]	张丹丹, 莫柳莹, 陈新, 等. 氮沉降对温带森林土壤甲烷氧化菌的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24):8254-8263. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201701080064.
	ZHANG D D, MO L Y, CHEN X, et al. Effects of nitrogen addition on methanotrophs in temperate forest soil[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(24):8254-8263.
[4]	王瑶. 南岭三种主要森林类型土壤甲烷通量研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2017.
	WANG Y. Study on soil methane fluxes of three forest types in Nanling Mountains[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017.
[5]	邓湘雯, 杨晶晶, 陈槐, 等. 森林土壤氧化(吸收)甲烷研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(3):577-583. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2012.03.031.
	DENG X W, YANG J J, CHEN H, et al. Advances in the research of methane oxidation in forest soils[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2012, 21(3):577-583.
[6]	ANONYMOUS. Peer review report 2 on “methane exchange in a poorly-drained black spruce forest over permafrost observed using the eddy covariance technique”[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016, 217:41. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.01.054. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.01.054
[7]	菊花, 申国珍, 马明哲, 等. 北亚热带地带性森林土壤温室气体通量对土地利用方式改变和降水减少的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(10):1049-1063. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0069. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0069
	JU H, SHEN G Z, MA M Z, et al. Greenhouse gas fluxes of typical northern subtropical forest soils: impacts of land use change and reduced precipitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(10):1049-1063.
[8]	孙向阳. 北京低山区森林土壤中CH₄排放通量的研究[J]. 土壤与环境, 2000, 9(3):173-176. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2000.03.001.
	SUN X Y. CH₄ emission flux of forest soils in lower mountain area, Beijing [J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 2000, 9(3):173-176.
[9]	刘实, 王传宽, 许飞, 等. 4种温带森林非生长季土壤二氧化碳、甲烷和氧化亚氮通量[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(15):4075-4084.
	LIU S, WANG C K, XU F, et al. Soil effluxes of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide during non-growing season for four temperate forests in northeastern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(15):4075-4084.
[10]	张强, 沈燕, 韩天宇, 等. 湖南莽山4种林型甲烷通量及其影响因子[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(9):104-111. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.09.018.
	ZHANG Q, SHEN Y, HAN T Y, et al. Methane fluxes and the effective factors of four forests in Mangshan, Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(9):104-111.
[11]	张丽丽, 印亮, 郑丽丽, 等. 模拟氮沉降对鼎湖山典型森林地表烷烃、烯烃通量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(12):3462-3469. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201712.001.
	ZHANG L L, YIN L, ZHENG L L, et al. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on alkane and alkene fluxes from forest floor at Dinghushan[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(12):3462-3469.
[12]	ZHANG C H, JU W M, CHEN J M, et al. China’s forest biomass carbon sink based on seven inventories from 1973 to 2008[J]. Climatic Change, 2013, 118(3/4):933-948. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-012-0666-3. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0666-3
[13]	方升佐. 中国杨树人工林培育技术研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(10):2308-2316. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2008.0396.
	FANG S Z. Silviculture of poplar plantation in China: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(10):2308-2316.
[14]	李奇, 朱建华, 冯源, 等. 中国主要人工林碳储量与固碳能力[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(4):1-6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.04.01.
	LI Q, ZHU J H, FENG Y, et al. Carbon stocks and carbon sequestration capacity of the main plantations in China[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2016, 31(4):1-6.
[15]	康满春. 北方典型杨树人工林能量分配与碳水通量模拟[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016.
	KANG M C. Energy partitioning and modelling of carbon and water fluxes of a poplar plantation ecosystem in northern China[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016.
[16]	魏远, 张旭东, 江泽平, 等. 湖南岳阳地区杨树人工林生态系统净碳交换季节动态研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(5):656-665. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2010.05.011.
	WEI Y, ZHANG X D, JIANG Z P, et al. Study on the seasonal dynamic of net ecosystem exchange over a poplar plantation of Yueyang City in Hunan Province[J]. Forest Research, 2010, 23(5):656-665.
[17]	彭镇华, 王妍, 任海青, 等. 安庆杨树林生态系统碳通量及其影响因子研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(2):237-242. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2009.02.015.
	PENG Z H, WANG Y, REN H Q, et al. Research on the variation of carbon flux and the relationship of environmental factors and carbon flux of Populus forest ecosystem in the reaches of Yangtze River in Anqing [J]. Forest Research, 2009, 22(2):237-242.
[18]	耿绍波. 河南西平杨树人工林生态系统碳通量及其环境响应研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2011.
	GENG S B. Study on the carbon flux observation over poplar plantation ecosystem of Xiping City in Henan Province of China[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011.
[19]	王妍, 彭镇华, 江泽慧, 等. 长江滩地杨树林生态系统的碳通量特征[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(11):156-160. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.11.025.
	WANG Y, PENG Z H, JIANG Z H, et al. Characteristics of carbon flux of Populus forest in the reaches of Yangtze River in Hunan [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45(11):156-160.
[20]	KOCHENDORFER J, CASTILLO E G, HAAS E, et al. Net ecosystem exchange, evapotranspiration and canopy conductance in a riparian forest[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011, 151(5):544-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.12.012. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.12.012
[21]	徐自为, 刘绍民, 宫丽娟, 等. 涡动相关仪观测数据的处理与质量评价研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(4):357-370. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2008.04.005.
	XU Z W, LIU S M, GONG L J, et al. A study on the data processing and quality assessment of the eddy covariance system[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2008, 23(4):357-370.
[22]	柳媛普, 李锁锁, 吕世华, 等. 几种通量资料修正方法的比较[J]. 高原气象, 2013, 32(6):1704-1711. DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00127.
	LIU Y P, LI S S, LV S H, et al. Comparison of flux correction methods for eddy-covariance measurement[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2013, 32(6):1704-1711.
[23]	张法伟, 李英年, 曹广民, 等. 青海湖北岸高寒草甸草原生态系统CO₂通量特征及其驱动因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(3):187-198. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00187. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00187
	ZHANG F W, LI Y N, CAO G M, et al. CO₂ fluxes and their driving factors over alpine meadow grassland ecosystems in the northern shore of Qinghai Lake, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(3):187-198.
[24]	韩帅. 涡度相关法估算长江中下游滩地杨树人工林生产力[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2008.
	HAN S. Productivity estimation of the poplar plantations on the beaches in middle and low reaches of Yangtze River using eddy covariance measurement[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2008.
[25]	JASSAL R S, BLACK T A, AREVALO C, et al. Carbon sequestration and water use of a young hybrid poplar plantation in north-central Alberta[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2013, 56:323-333. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.023. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.023
[26]	VERLINDEN M S, BROECKX L S, ZONA D, et al. Net ecosystem production and carbon balance of an SRC poplar plantation during its first rotation[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2013, 56:412-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.033. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.033
[27]	ZHOU J, ZHANG Z Q, SUN G, et al. Response of ecosystem carbon fluxes to drought events in a poplar plantation in Northern China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 300:33-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.007. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.007
[28]	徐勇峰, 季淮, 韩建刚, 等. 洪泽湖湿地杨树林生长季碳通量变化特征及其影响因子[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(2):322-331. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201802.016.
	XU Y F, JI H, HAN J G, et al. Variation of net ecosystem carbon flux in growing season and its driving factors in a poplar plantation from Hung-tse Lake wetland[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(2):322-331.
[29]	牛晓栋, 江洪, 张金梦, 等. 浙江天目山老龄森林生态系统CO₂通量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1):1-8. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.010.
	NIU X D, JIANG H, ZHANG J M, et al. Characteristics of CO₂ flux in an old growth mixed forest in Tianmu Mountain, Zhejiang, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1):1-8.
[30]	赵仲辉, 张利平, 康文星, 等. 湖南会同杉木人工林生态系统CO₂通量特征[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(11):6-12. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20111102.
	ZHAO Z H, ZHANG L P, KANG W X, et al. Characteristics of CO₂ flux in a Chinese fir plantation ecosystem in Huitong County, Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(11):6-12.
[31]	李小梅, 张秋良. 环境因子对兴安落叶松林生态系统CO₂通量的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(8):31-39. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150020.
	LI X M, ZHANG Q L. Impact of climate factors on CO₂ flux characteristics in a Larix gmelinii forest ecosystem [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(8):31-39.
[32]	凌威. 长沙市三种林型甲烷通量研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2015.
	LING W. Research of methane (CH₄) flux from three types of forest in Changsha City, Hunan Province[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015.
[33]	杨晶晶. 亚热带4种典型森林生态系统地表甲烷通量研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2012.
	YANG J J. Variations of soil methane (CH₄) flux in 4 typical subtropical forest ecosystems[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2012.
[34]	SHOEMAKER J K, KEENAN T F, HOLLINGER D Y, et al. Forest ecosystem changes from annual methane source to sink depending on late summer water balance[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2014, 41(2):673-679. DOI: 10.1002/2013gl058691. doi: 10.1002/2013GL058691
[35]	UEYAMA M, HAMOTANI K, NISHIMURA W, et al. Continuous measurement of methane flux over a larch forest using a relaxed eddy accumulation method[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2012, 109(3/4):461-472. DOI: 10.1007/s00704-012-0587-0. doi: 10.1007/s00704-012-0587-0
[36]	谭丽萍, 刘苏峡, 莫兴国, 等. 华北人工林水热碳通量环境影响因子分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(8):773-784. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0074. doi: 10.17521/ cjpe.2015.0074
	TAN L P, LIU S X, MO X G, et al. Environmental controls over energy, water and carbon fluxes in a plantation in Northern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(8):773-784.

洪泽湖地区杨树人工林碳水通量昼夜和季节变化特征

Diurnal and seasonal changes of fluxes over a poplar plantation in Hongze Lake basin

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	颜铮明, 阮宏华, 廖家辉, 石珂, 倪娟平, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 丁学农, 赵小龙, 庄鑫. 不同林龄杨树人工林地表甲虫群落多样性特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 236-242.
[2]	曹林青, 钟秋平, 邹玉玲, 田丰, 贺义昌. 油桐种质资源叶片结构变异及与环境因子的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 95-102.
[3]	韩淑敏, 闫伟, 杨雪栋, 胡博, 于凤强, 高润红. 白榆在我国的潜在分布格局及未来变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 103-110.
[4]	竹磊, 徐军亮, 章异平, 罗鹏飞, 师志强, 候佳玉, 翟乐鑫. 河南洛阳马尾松树干液流昼夜变化特征及其影响因子分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 92-100.
[5]	王碧霞, 杜小奇, 邓燕, 蔡晓梅, 苏光灿. 凉山油橄榄主栽品种叶中营养物质和酚类含量的季节性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 169-176.
[6]	刘倩倩, 彭孝楠, 刘鑫, 王舒甜, 戴康龙, 徐海兵, 董丽娜, 张金池. 踩踏干扰下紫金山土壤质量季节变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 185-193.
[7]	董京京, 陈洁, 杨宏, 李蒙, 王贤荣, 伊贤贵. 华中樱桃适生区模拟和生态特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 213-221.
[8]	崔皓, 韩建刚, 郭俨辉, 季淮, 朱咏莉, 李萍萍. 洪泽湖河湖交汇区典型杨树人工林碳通量月尺度变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 19-26.
[9]	龚茂佳, 王娟, 付小勇, 寇卫利, 鲁宁, 王秋华, 赖虹燕. 云南广西蒜头果适生区预测及环境影响因子[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 44-52.
[10]	王润松, 徐涵湄, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 阮宏华. 施用沼液对杨树人工林细根形态特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 119-124.
[11]	王润松, 孙源, 徐涵湄, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 阮宏华. 施用沼液对杨树人工林细根生物量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 123-129.
[12]	马永春, 佘诚棋, 方升佐. 不同修枝方法对杨树人工林生长、光合叶面积和主干饱满度的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 137-142.
[13]	王瑞, 王国兵, 徐瑾, 徐晓. 凋落物与蚯蚓对杨树人工林土壤团聚体分布及其碳氮含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 25-29.
[14]	王国兵, 徐瑾, 徐晓, 阮宏华, 曹国华. 蚯蚓与凋落物对杨树人工林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 8-14.
[15]	许中秋, 隋德宗, 谢寅峰, 王俊毅. 两个乌桕新品种苗木光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 93-100.