基于生态修复视角的上海市黄浦江河岸带景观格局空间特征分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806038

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (04): 125-131.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806038

基于生态修复视角的上海市黄浦江河岸带景观格局空间特征分析

徐海顺¹,杜红玉²,蔡超琳^1,2

(1.南京林业大学风景园林学院,江苏南京 210037; 2. 华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院,上海市城市化生态过程与生态恢复重点实验室,上海 200241)

出版日期:2019-07-22 发布日期:2019-07-22
基金资助:
收稿日期:2018-06-28 修回日期:2019-04-23 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51408315); 中国国家留学基金资助项目(201808320046); 江苏高校品牌专业建设工程项目(PPZY2015A063); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD); 南京林业大学青年科技创新基金项目(CX2016003)。第一作者:徐海顺(nj_xuhaishun@163.com),副教授,博士后,ORCID(0000-0002-8780-4815)。

Spatial characteristics of landscape pattern based on ecological restoration in the riparian zone of Huangpu River, Shanghai City

XU Haishun¹, DU Hongyu², CAI Chaolin^1,2

(1.College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2. Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

Online:2019-07-22 Published:2019-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】通过对上海黄浦江河岸带景观格局空间特征进行分析,找出该河岸带生态修复的重点区域与景观类型,科学规划河岸带的生态恢复重建,为黄浦江周边的土地利用格局优化与景观生态修复建设提供决策支持。【方法】基于地理信息系统(GIS)平台,利用高分辨率航拍图像数据源,构建河岸带土地利用与景观格局数据库,从横向、纵向两个维度,利用景观指数方法,在景观类型和景观格局两个水平,选取不同的景观指数对黄浦江河岸带景观格局空间特征进行定量分析。【结果】①在横向维度上,黄浦江河岸带市区段城市化程度最高,景观多样性最低,绿地和林地所占比例不足且碎片化; 近郊段属于过渡河段,以工业用地为主,景观多样性最高,破碎化程度最严重; 远郊段人为干扰程度最低,土地利用强度最弱,农田生态林网体系建设有待加强。②在纵向维度上,根据距河道边缘的距离(L),0≤L<100 m的河岸带受到重点生态保护,但距河道距离由近至远,人为干扰强度逐渐增强,河岸带景观多样性与破碎化程度呈现先增后减的趋势,在300≤L<400 m的河岸带景观破碎化程度最显著。【结论】城市建设活动的干扰,造成黄浦江河岸带景观格局趋于破碎,存在水陆交错边缘的负效应。在景观类型水平上,工业用地、生产防护林地和旱地是河岸带生态修复应重点关注的景观类型,而在景观格局水平上,近郊段河岸带(横向维度)和300≤L<400 m的河岸带及邻近区域(纵向维度)是生态修复重点区域。

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of this study was to analyze the spatial characteristics of the riparian landscape of Huangpu River in order to find priority areas and landscape typologies for riparian ecological restoration. The outcome of this study can provide decision support for optimization of land use allocation, as well as landscape and ecological restoration around the area of Huangpu River.【Method】Based on high-resolution aerial images, a database of land use and landscape pattern within the riparian zone was constructed on the GIS platform. The spatial characteristics of landscape pattern in the riparian zone were analyzed by applying the quantitative landscape index method to both landscape class and pattern levels in longitudinal or cross-sectional directions.【Result】① In the cross-sectional dimension, urban areas exhibited the highest degree of urbanization and the lowest landscape diversity, as confirmed by spare and fragmented green lands and forests. We found the highest landscape diversity and degree of fragmentation in inner suburban areas; these transitional sections are dominated by industrial land. The outer suburban areas showed the lowest degree of human disturbance and the lowest intensity of land use, with clear intent to improve its agro-ecological and forest network. ② In the longitudinal dimension, L represents the distance from the river edge. While the ecological integrity of 0≤L<100 m riparian buffer zone was well protected, from the river going outwards, the intensity of human disturbance was found to increase gradually. Landscape diversity and degree of fragmentation showed a similar trends of initial increase, then decrease; landscape fragmentation degree of the 300≤L<400 m riparian zone was the most significant.【Conclusion】Owing to disturbances from urban development activities, the landscape pattern of the Huangpu River riparian zone became fragmented, showing adverse edge effects at the water-land interface. The industrial land, production shelter forest land, and dry land are critical landscape typologies. The inner suburban riparian zone in the longitudinal direction, and the 300≤L<400 m riparian zone and its adjacent areas in the cross-sectional direction are priority areas for ecological restoration.

中图分类号:

X171.1
S732

徐海顺,杜红玉,蔡超琳. 基于生态修复视角的上海市黄浦江河岸带景观格局空间特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(04): 125-131.

XU Haishun, DU Hongyu, CAI Chaolin. Spatial characteristics of landscape pattern based on ecological restoration in the riparian zone of Huangpu River, Shanghai City[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(04): 125-131.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806038.

参考文献

[1] 岳隽, 王仰麟. 国内外河岸带研究的进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(5): 33-40. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2005.05.004. YUE J, WANG Y L. Progresses and perspectives in the study of riparian zone [J]. Progress in Geography, 2005, 24(5): 33-40.
[2] 张建春, 彭补拙. 河岸带研究及其退化生态系统的恢复与重建[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(1): 56-63. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2003.01.008. ZHANG J C, PENG B Z. Study on riparian zone and the restoration and rebuilding of its degraded ecosystem [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(1): 56-63.
[3] GREGORY S V, SWANSON F J, MCKEE W A, et al. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones [J]. BioScience, 1991, 41(8): 540-551. DOI: 10.2307/1311607.
[4] O’NEILL M P, SCHMIDT J C, DOBROWOLSKI J P, et al. Identifying sites for riparian wetland restoration: application of a model to the upper Arkansas River basin[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2008, 5(4S): 85-102. DOI:10.1111/j.1526-100x.1997.tb00208.x.
[5] BüRGI M, HERSPERGER A M, SCHNEEBERGER N. Driving forces of landscape change-current and new directions [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19(8): 857-868. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-004-0245-8.
[6] 赵霏, 郭逍宇, 赵文吉, 等. 城市河岸带土地利用和景观格局变化的生态环境效应研究:以北京市典型再生水补水河流河岸带为例[J]. 湿地科学, 2013, 11(1): 100-107. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5948.2013.01.015. ZHAO F, GUO X Y, ZHAO W J, et al. Ecological and environmental effect of changes of land use and landscape pattern of urban riparian zone: a case study on riparian zones of typical rivers replenished with recycled water in Beijing [J]. Wetland Science, 2013, 11(1): 100-107.
[7] 周婷, 彭少麟, 任文韬, 等. 东江河岸带各区段景观格局对水体恢复的影响[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 48(4): 78-83. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0529-6579.2009.04.017. ZHOU T, PENG S L, REN W T, et al. The influence of landscape pattern changes on the restoration of stream in the upper, middle and down reaches of Dongjiang River riparian [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2009, 48(4): 78-83.
[8] 毕晓丽, 周睿, 刘丽娟, 等. 泾河沿岸景观格局梯度变化及驱动力分析[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(5): 1041-1047. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.05.015. BI X L, ZHOU R, LIU L J, et al. Gradient variations in landscape pattern along the Jinghe River and their driving forces [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(5): 1041-1047.
[9] 杨久春, 张树文, 张宇博. 嫩江河岸带景观格局变化对水体恢复的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011, 31(3): 239-244. YANG J C, ZHANG S W, ZHANG Y B. Influence of landscape pattern changes of Nenjiang River riparian zone on stream restoration [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 31(3): 239-244.
[10] 国土资源部. 土地利用现状分类:GB/T 21010—2007[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2007. Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Current land use classification: GB/T 21010—2007[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2007.
[11] 邬建国.景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:99-110. WU J G. Landscape ecology pattern, process, scale and hierarchy[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000: 99-110.
[12] 李秀珍, 布仁仓, 常禹, 等. 景观格局指标对不同景观格局的反应[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(1): 123-134. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2004.01.019. LI X Z, BU R C, CHANG Y, et al. The response of landscape metrics against pattern scenarios [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(1): 123-134.
[12] SAURA S. Effects of remote sensor spatial resolution and data aggregation on selected fragmentation indices [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19(2): 197-209. DOI:10.1023/b:land.0000021724.60785.65.
[14] LI X Z, HE H S, BU R C, et al. The adequacy of different landscape metrics for various landscape patterns [J]. Pattern Recognition, 2005, 38(12): 2626-2638. DOI:10.1016/j.patcog.2005.05.009.
[15] WU J G, JELINSKI D E, LUCK M, et al. Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics [J]. Annals of GIS, 2000, 6(1): 6-19. DOI: 10.1080/10824000009480529.
[16] 许木启, 黄玉瑶. 受损水域生态系统恢复与重建研究[J]. 生态学报, 1998, 18(5): 547-558. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.1998.05.015. XU M Q, HUANG Y Y. Restoration and reestablishment of the damaged ecosystem of inland waters [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1998, 18(5): 547-558.
[17] 陈利顶, 齐鑫, 李芬, 等. 城市化过程对河道系统的干扰与生态修复原则和方法[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(4): 805-811. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2010.0105. CHEN L D, QI X, LI F, et al. Disturbances of urbanization to river course system and related ecological restoration principles and approaches [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2010, 29(4): 805-811.
[18] 刘怡娜, 孔令桥, 肖燚, 等. 长江流域景观格局变化对生态系统水质净化服务的影响[J]. 环境保护科学, 2018, 44(4):6-13. DOI:10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.2018.04.002. LIU Y N, KONG L Q, XIAO Y, et al. Effects of landscape pattern changes on ecosystem water purification service in the Yangtze River basin [J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2018, 44(4):6-13.
[19] 魏雯, 李哲惠, 黄贞珍. 城市河岸带土地利用和景观格局演变研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(11):2127-2133. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2018.11.020. WEI W, LI Z H, HUANG Z Z. Study on the evolution of land use and landscape patterns in urban riparian zones [J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2018, 27(11):2127-2133.
[20] 夏继红, 鞠蕾, 林俊强, 等. 河岸带适宜宽度要求与确定方法[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(3): 229-234. DOI:10.3876/j.issn.1000-1980.2013.03.007. XIA J H, JU L, LIN J Q, et al. Requirements for suitable width of riparian zone and determination methods[J]. Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences), 2013, 41(3): 229-234.

基于生态修复视角的上海市黄浦江河岸带景观格局空间特征分析

Spatial characteristics of landscape pattern based on ecological restoration in the riparian zone of Huangpu River, Shanghai City

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	赵志强, 许晓龙, 袁青, 吴妍. 哈尔滨段松花江湿地景观格局演变及驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 219-226.
[2]	戚丽萍, 栾兆擎, 魏勉, 闫丹丹, 李静泰, 么秀颖, 刘垚, 谢思荧, 盛昱凤. 基于土地利用的江苏省各市生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 200-208.
[3]	姚楠, 刘广全, 姚顺波, 贾磊, 林颖, 邓元杰, 侯孟阳. 基于坡度视角的黄土高原退耕还林(草)工程碳汇效应分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 180-188.
[4]	贾艳艳, 唐晓岚, 唐芳林, 杨阳. 1995—2015年长江中下游流域景观格局时空演变[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 185-194.
[5]	韩会庆,张娇艳,马庚,张新鼎,白玉梅. 气候变化对生态系统服务影响的研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(02): 184-190.
[6]	陈瑶,蔡广鹏,韩会庆,罗绪强,王后阵. 居民对城市湿地公园生态系统服务功能认知的分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(06): 147-152.
[7]	刘翔,韩建刚,李兰海,朱咏莉. 生物炭添加对土壤冻融过程中温室气体排放的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(03): 15-21.
[8]	陈积敏,温作民. 城市生态环境用水量的测算与调整[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(02): 123-128.
[9]	权伟，余少娜，王国兵，阮宏华*，方燕鸿，汪家社. 武夷山不同海拔植被土壤细根比根长季节动态[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 35(06): 139-142.
[10]	王国兵，金裕华，王丰，汪家社，阮宏华. 武夷山不同海拔植被带土壤微生物量磷的时空变异[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 35(06): 44-48.
[11]	徐侠1,3，权伟1，汪家社2，方燕鸿2，阮宏华1*，叶镜中1. 武夷山不同海拔植被带土壤活性有机碳的季节变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2009, 33(03): 55-59.
[12]	王德炉1,朱守谦1,黄宝龙2. 喀斯特石漠化的形成过程及阶段划分[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2005, 29(03): 103-106.