
城市河道开放空间景观修复后评价研究——以南京内秦淮河东段为例
曹加杰, 王杰, 吴向崇, 丁昌辉, 王伟希, 王浩
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3) : 195-201.
城市河道开放空间景观修复后评价研究——以南京内秦淮河东段为例
Post⁃evaluation of urban river open space landscape restoration:a case study of the eastern part of the Inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing
将定量评价和定性评价相结合,分析南京内秦淮河东段各项指标的适宜性,构建后评价体系模型,明确城市河道修复的重点方向。
以南京内秦淮河东段为研究对象,从生态因素、社会因素、景观因素3方面入手,对城市河道开放空间景观修复后的景观现状、历史文化和人文特征等进行调研。利用专家问卷所得数据,通过层次分析法(AHP)确定各指标权重,构建城市河道开放空间景观修复后评价模型,结合群众问卷调查所得数据,通过距离指数法得到南京内秦淮河东段景观修复后评价等级。
准则层中生态因素的权重最高,为0.521 4,占总比例的52.14%;其次为社会因素,权重为0.253 7;最后是景观因素,权重为0.224 9。在指标层,生态因素中水质的权重值最高,为0.221 8;社会因素中可达性的权重最高,为0.102 1;景观因素中休闲娱乐功能的权重值最高,为0.118 4;南京内秦淮河东段景观修复后评价等级为适宜(距离指数为0.23),其中生态因素的距离指数(0.19)为适宜,社会因素的距离指数(0.14)为适宜,景观因素的距离指数(0.42)为基本适宜。通过指标因子权重的排序,可以看出水质的改善是城市河道开放空间的关键因素,南京内秦淮河东段景观修复总体上取得了良好的成果,但河道的亲水性有待进一步改善。通过对不同年龄结构人群评价结果的数据分析得出,在安全性、休闲娱乐功能与亲水及近水驳岸3个指标上,青壮年、中老年两个年龄层次人群评价结果有显著差异。
本研究所构建的城市河道开放空间景观修复后评价模型,给城市河道开放空间景观修复的评价工作提供了一种客观、准确的评价方法,可为不同条件下的城市河道开放空间景观修复后评价提供理论依据。
The aim of this study was to clarify the key direction of urban river rehabilitation by evaluating the applicability of various indicators in the eastern section of the Inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing, combining quantitative evaluation with qualitative evaluation, and constructing a post-evaluation system model.
Three aspects of the eastern section of the inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing were examined: ecological factors, social factors and landscape factors. We investigated the landscape status, historical culture and human characteristics of urban river open space landscape restoration. Using the data obtained from the expert questionnaire, we determined the weight of each index through the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and constructed a post-rehabilitation evaluation model of urban river open space landscape restoration. Combined with the data obtained from the field questionnaire survey, the post-rehabilitation evaluation of the eastern section of the inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing was obtained via the distance index method.
The ecological factor had the highest weight value in the criterion layer with a weight of 0.521 4, accounting for 52.14% of the total proportion, followed by the social factor with a weight of 0.253 7, and finally the landscape factor with a weight of 0.224 9. In the indicator layer, the weight value of water quality in ecological factors was up to 0.221 8, the weight value of accessibility in social factors was up to 0.102 1, and the weight value of recreational functions in landscape factors was up to 0.118 4. The post-rehabilitation evaluation level of the eastern section of the inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing (distance index was 0.23), the distance index of ecological factors (0.19), the distance index of social factors (0.14), and the distance index of landscape factors (0.42) were all appropriate. By ordering the weights of the index factors, it becomes clear that improvement of water quality is the most critical factor for the open space of urban rivers. The landscape restoration of the eastern section of the inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing has achieved good results in general, but the hydrophilicity of the rivers needs to be further improved. Based on the analysis of the evaluation results of people in different age groups, it is concluded that there are significant differences in the evaluation results of young and middle-aged people on the three indicators of safety, recreational function, and hydrophilicity and near-water bank.
The post-recovery evaluation model of urban river open space landscape restoration constructed by this research provides an objective and accurate evaluation method for urban river open space landscape restoration. This can provide a theoretical basis for post-rehabilitation evaluation of urban river open space landscape under different conditions in the future.
城市河道开放空间 / 景观修复 / 后评价 / 层次分析法 / 南京秦淮河
urban river open space / landscape restoration / post-evaluation / analytic hierarchy process(AHP) / inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing
1 | 陈丹,任翔宇,杨凯,等.上海苏州河滨水空间的社会服务功能探讨[J].世界地理研究,2016,22(1):151-158. |
1 | CHEN D,REN X Y,YANG K,et al. Discussion on social service function of Suzhou Creek waterfront in Shanghai[J].World Reg Stud,2016,22(1):151-158.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479. 2016. 01.016. |
2 | 刘滨谊.现代景观规划设计[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1999. |
2 | LIU B Y. Modern landscape planning and design[M].Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 1999. |
3 | DE VRIES S,DILLEN S M E VAN, GROENEWGEN P P, et al. Streetscape greenery and health: stress,social cohesion and physical activity as mediators[J].Soc Sci & Med,2013,94(5):26–33. |
4 | 乔文黎.城市滨水区景观的评价研究[D].天津:天津大学,2008. |
4 | QIAO W L. Evaluation of urban waterfront landscape[D].Tianjin: Tianjin University,2008. |
5 | 何志明.城市滨河绿道使用状况评价研究——以杭州主城区为例[D].杭州:浙江大学,2013. HE Z M. Urban riverside greenway post occupancy evaluation research: taking main urban area of Hangzhou for example[D].Hangzhou: Zhejiang University,2013. |
6 | 刘艺平,仝向,赵亚楠, 等.周口淮阳龙湖湿地滨水景观分析与评价[J].上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2017,35(1):9-14. |
6 | LIU Y P, TONG X, ZHAO Y N, et al. Analysis and evaluation of waterfront landscape of Huaiyang Long Lake Wetland in Zhoukou,Henan[J].J of Shanghai JiaoTong Univ(Agri Sci),2017,35(1):9-14.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1671-9964.2017.01.002. |
7 | 宋为威,逄勇.不同行政区入秦淮河污染物通量分担率研究[J].水资源保护,2018,34(3):91?95. |
7 | SONG W W,PANG Y.Study on pollutant flux sharing rate of different administrative areas in Qinhuai Rive[J].Water Resources Protection,2018,34(3):91?95.DOI:10.3880/j.issn.1004?6933.2018.03.15. |
8 | 郭金玉,张忠彬,孙庆云.层次分析法的研究与应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(5):148-153. |
8 | GUO J Y, ZHANG Z B, SUN Q Y. Study and applications of analytic hierarchy hrocess[J].China Safety Science Journal,2008,18(5):148-153.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2008.05.025. |
9 | 涂小萍.成都沙河滨水空间景观综合评价研究[D].成都:四川师范大学,2009. |
9 | TU X P.Research on comprehensive evaluation of waterfront landscape of Chengdu’s Sha River[D].Chengdu: Sichuan Normal University,2009. |
10 | 郭潇,方国华,章哲恺.跨流域调水生态环境影响评价指标体系研究[J].水利学报,2008,39(9):1125-1130, 1135. |
10 | GUO X, FANG G H, ZHANG Z K. Index system of eco?environment impact assessment for inter basin water transfer[J]. J of Hydraul Eng,2008,39(9):1125-1130, 1135.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2008.09.015. |
11 | 王越,丁艳荣,徐建华.中小河流治理技术研究及生态修复探讨[J].中国水利,2012(6):42-44. |
11 | WANG Y,DING Y R,XU J H.Technology for medium and small river harness and ecological restoration[J].China Water Resou,2012(6):42-44.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1123.2012.06.018. |
12 | 刘奇志,杜遂.滨水驳岸的环境功能解析[J].规划师,2015,31(3):140-143. |
12 | LIU Q Z,DU S.Analysis of environmental function of waterfront revetment[J].Planners,2015,31(3):140-143.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2015.03.023. |
13 | 蒋旸,徐宏新.基于地域文脉的商丘日月湖滨水景观设计研究[J].浙江农业学报,2015,27(8):1408-1413. |
13 | JIANG Y,XU H X.Waterfront landscape design of the Sun Moon Lake in Shangqiu based on territorial context[J].Acta Agric Zhejiangensis,2015,27(8):1408-1413.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2015. 08.17. |
14 | 叶萌.基于开放式公园管理运行现状及其发展策略研究[J].中国园林,2015,31(8):120-124. |
14 | YE M. Research on the development strategy of open park based on the current status of operation and management[J].Chinese Landsc Archite,2015,31(8):120-124.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2015.08.028. |
15 | 赵鹏.园林夜景景观规划设计方法与模式构建研究[D].济南:山东建筑大学,2016. |
15 | ZHAO P.Research on landscape planning and design method and model construction of Night Landscape Architecture[D].Ji’nan:Shandong Jianzhu University,2016. |
16 | 宋兰兰. 南方地区生态环境需水研究[D] .南京:河海大学, 2004. |
16 | SONG L L. Research on ecological environment water demand in southern China [D].Nanjing: Hohai University, 2004. |
17 | 李博,宋云,俞孔坚.城市公园绿地规划中的可达性指标评价方法[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2008,44(4):618-624. |
17 | LI B, SONG Y,YU K J.Evaluation method for measurement of accessibility in urban public green space planning[J].Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekin,2008,44(4):618-624.DOI:10.13209/j.issn:0479-8023.2008.096. |
18 | 张梦嫚,吴秀芹.近20年白洋淀湿地水文连通性及空间形态演变[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4205-4213. |
18 | ZHANG M M, WU X Q.Changes in hydrological connectivity and spatial morphology of Baiyangdian wetland over the last 20 years[J].Acta Ecol Sin,2018,38(12):4205-4213. DOI:10.5846/stxb201801280224. |
19 | SABBION P. Urban river restoration[C]//PERINI K, SABBION P.Urban sustainability and river restoration:green and blue infrastructure. London: Wiley Blackwell,2016:76-92. |
20 | PALMER M A, HONDULA K L, KOCH B J, et al. Ecological restoration of streams and rivers:shifting strategies and shifting goals[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics,2014,45(1):247-269. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |