林业生物柴油可持续发展研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811023

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 216-224.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811023

林业生物柴油可持续发展研究进展

刘诗琦(), 贾黎明()

北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室，北京林业大学国家能源非粮生物质原料研发中心，北京 100083

收稿日期:2018-11-16 修回日期:2019-05-08 出版日期:2020-05-30 发布日期:2020-06-11
作者简介:刘诗琦（lsq5330121@163.com），博士生。 *通信作者：贾黎明（jlm@bjfu.edu.cn），教授， ORCID（0000-0002-6680-041X）。|刘诗琦（lsq5330121@163.com），博士生。 *通信作者：贾黎明（jlm@bjfu.edu.cn），教授， ORCID（0000-0002-6680-041X）。
基金资助:
科技部国家国际科技合作专项项目(2014DFA31140);北京林业大学青年教师科学研究中长期项目(2015ZCQ-LX-02)

Review on sustainable development of forest⁃based biodiesel

LIU Shiqi(), JIA Liming()

The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, National Energy R & D Center for Non?Food Biomass, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2018-11-16 Revised:2019-05-08 Online:2020-05-30 Published:2020-06-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

林业生物柴油作为可替代柴油的生物质能源之一，已在中国、印度、马来西亚、印度尼西亚与泰国等国家得到快速发展，其发展是否可持续值得重点关注。在概述主要国家林业生物柴油发展现状的基础上，基于2010年以来的国内外相关研究，分别从经济、环境、社会3个方面分析了当前林业生物柴油发展的可持续性，探讨了影响其可持续发展的关键因素。结果表明：当前林业生物柴油发展的可持续性较弱，绝大多数生产项目经济效益为负值；温室气体（GHG）减排效益明显，与石化柴油相比可减少49% ~ 85%，但SO₂、NO_x等污染物的排放明显高于石化柴油，环境综合影响仍然较大；社会效益尚不明显；原料供应系统决定了当前林业生物柴油发展的经济和环境可持续性。因此，攻克良种选育、高效栽培关键技术体系、高值化副产品开发等关键技术问题，建立多联产产业发展模式是实现林业生物柴油可持续发展的重要途径。此外，提高全生命周期评价（LCA）清单数据质量和建立综合评价指标体系可保证可持续性评价结果的准确性。

关键词: 林业生物柴油, 油棕（Elaeis gunieensis Jacqin.）, 麻疯树（Jatropha curcas L.）, 可持续性, 全生命周期评价

Abstract:

As an essential part of forestry biomass energy, forest-based biodiesel has been developed rapidly in developing countries, such as China, India, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand, etc. We have assessed the economical, environmental and social sustainability pertaining to the two most representative forest-based biodiesels, i.e., palm oil biodiesel and jatropha oil biodiesel. The assessment is based on 50 studies from 2010. Based on the work, we present that the overall sustainability of forest-based biodiesel is weak. It can be explained as follows: ① most of the forest-based biodiesel is economically infeasible, which is closely related to low yield, high cost, high price of feedstock, global change in the price of crude oil and low fiscal subsidies. ② The environmental performances vary across locations and cultivation systems. Most studies indicate significant reduction of 49%-85% in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the use of fossil diesel; however, transforming high-carbon reserve lands such as rainforests into palm or jatropha plantations will cause huge GHG emissions.Furthermore, the use of these two kinds of biodiesel leads to more SO₂ and NO_x emissions than fossil diesel. The key factors for environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) are land-use change, yield, co-products utilization, and fertilization. ③ Energy is mainly consumed during farm and mill stages for forest-based biodiesel. Compared with fossil diesel, over 70% of non-renewable energy consumed can be saved. ④ The social benefit of forest-based biodiesel is not obvious. Social well-being and good working conditions are the factors which have been widely concerned. At present, very few studies quantify social impact of forest-based biodiesel comprehensively. Therefore, the feedstock supply system is a determinate factor for economic and environmental sustainability of forest-based biodiesel. The critical path to promote sustainability of forest-based biodiesel is to solve several key problems, i.e., selective improved variety, technical system of efficient cultivation, and utilization of high-value co-products, to establish poly-generation model. In addition, more researches on LCA are required with high accuracy requirement of data focused on the farm stage.

Key words: forest-based biodiesel, Elaeis gunieensis Jacqin., Jatropha curcas L., sustainability, life cycle assessment

中图分类号:

S216.2

刘诗琦,贾黎明. 林业生物柴油可持续发展研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 216-224.

LIU Shiqi, JIA Liming. Review on sustainable development of forest⁃based biodiesel[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 44(3): 216-224.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811023.

参考文献 52

1	吴谋成.生物柴油[M].北京：化学工业出版社, 2008.
	WU M C. Biodiesel[M]. Beijing：Chemical Industry Press, 2008.
2	钱能志, 费世民, 韩志群. 中国林业生物柴油[M]. 北京：中国林业出版社, 2007.
	QIAN N Z，FEI S M，HAN Z Q. China forest⁃based biodiesel[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing Housc, 2007.
3	李昌珠, 蒋丽娟, 程树棋.生物柴油——绿色能源[M]. 北京：化学工业出版社, 2005. LI C Z, JIANG L J, CHENG S Q. Biodiesel: green energy[M]. Beijing：Chemical Industry Press, 2005.
4	LIANG S，XU M，ZHANG T Z. Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production in China[J]. Bioresour Technol，2013，129：72-77. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.037.
5	国家林业和草原局. 林业生物质能源树种目录（第一批）[R/OL]. 北京:2017. .
6	USDA. Indonesia biofuels annual 2016 [R/OL]. 2016 [2019-10-11]. .
7	吴伟光. 我国西南地区生物柴油原料麻疯树发展潜力研究[M]. 北京：中国农业出版社, 2010.
	WU W G. Study on the development potential of Jatropha curcas in southwest China[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2010.
8	YEE K F，TAN K T，ABDULLAH A Z，et al．Life cycle assessment of palm biodiesel：revealing facts and benefits for sustainability[J]．Appl Energy，2009，86：S189-S196．DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.014.
9	ONG H C，MAHLIA T M I，MASJUKI H H，et al．Life cycle cost and sensitivity analysis of palm biodiesel production[J]．Fuel，2012，98：131-139．DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.031.
10	YANG C Y，FANG Z，LI B，et al．Review and prospects of Jatropha biodiesel industry in China[J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev，2012，16(4)：2178-2190．DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.043.
11	EIJCK J VAN，ROMIJN H，BALKEMA A，et al．Global experience with Jatropha cultivation for bioenergy：an assessment of socio⁃economic and environmental aspects[J]．Renew Sustain Energy Rev，2014，32：869-889．DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.028.
12	吴伟光，仇焕广，徐志刚．生物柴油发展现状、影响与展望[J]．农业工程学报，2009，25(3)：298-302．
	WU W G，QIU H G，XU Z G．Biodiesel development：current status，potential impacts and perspectives[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng，2009，25(3)：298-302．
13	邢爱华，马捷，张英皓，等. 生物柴油环境影响的全生命周期评价[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版)，2010，50(6)：917-922.
	XING A H，MA J，ZHANG Y H，et al．Life cycle assessment of biodiesel environmental effects[J]. J Tsinghua Univ Sci Technol，2010，50(6)：917-922. DOI:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2010.06.012.
14	MATA T M，MARTINS A A，SIKDAR S K，et al. Sustainability considerations of biodiesel based on supply chain analysis[J]．Clean Techn Environ Policy，2011，13(5)：655-671. DOI:10.1007/s10098-010-0346-9.
15	DALE V H，EFROYMSON R A，KLINE K L，et al．Indicators for assessing socioeconomic sustainability of bioenergy systems：a short list of practical measures[J]. Ecol Indic，2013，26：87-102．DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.10.014.
16	OU X M，ZHANG X L，CHANG S Y，et al．Energy consumption and GHG emissions of six biofuel pathways by LCA in (the) People's Republic of China[J]. Appl Energy，2009，86：S197-S208．DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.045.
17	HOU J，ZHANG P D，YUAN X Z，et al．Life cycle assessment of biodiesel from soybean，Jatropha and microalgae in China conditions[J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev，2011，15(9)：5081-5091．DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.048.
18	WANG Z X，CALDERON M M，LU Y. Lifecycle assessment of the economic，environmental and energy performance of Jatrophacurcas L. biodiesel in China[J]. Biomass Bioenergy，2011，35(7)：2893-2902. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.03.031.
19	SILALERTRUKSA T，BONNET S，GHEEWALA S H. Life cycle costing and externalities of palm oil biodiesel in Thailand‍[J]. J Clean Prod，2012，28：225-232. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.022.
20	NAVARRO⁃PINEDA F S，PONCE⁃MARBÁN D V，SACRAMENTO⁃RIVERO J C，et al. An economic model for estimating the viability of biodiesel production from Jatrophacurcas L[J]．J Chem Technol Biotechnol，2017，92(5)：971-980. DOI:10.1002/jctb.5058.
21	DENG X Z，HAN J Z，YIN F．Net energy，CO₂ emission and land⁃based cost⁃benefit analyses of Jatropha biodiesel：a case study of the Panzhihua region of Sichuan Province in China[J]．Energies，2012，5(7)：2150-2164．DOI:10.3390/en5072150.
22	GRAHAM VM, AXANDROS G, CHRISTO F．The rise，fall and potential resilience benefits of Jatropha in southern Africa[J]. Sustainability，2014，6(6)：3615-3643. DOI:10.3390/su6063615.
23	HENNY R, SANNE H, JOUKE R L， et al. Economic and social sustainability performance of Jatropha projects：results from field surveys in Mozambique，Tanzania and Mali[J]. Sustainability，2014，6(9)：6203-6235. DOI:10.3390/su6096203.
24	PORTUGAL⁃PEREIRA J，NAKATANI J，KURISU K，et al．Life cycle assessment of conventional and optimised Jatropha biodiesel fuels[J]. Renew Energy，2016，86：585-593. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.046.
25	ACHTEN W M J，ALMEIDA J，FOBELETS V，et al. Life cycle assessment of Jatropha biodiesel as transportation fuel in rural India[J]. Appl Energy，2010，87(12)：3652-3660. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.003.
26	ACHTEN W M J，VANDENBEMPT P，ALMEIDA J，et al．Life cycle assessment of a palm oil system with simultaneous production of biodiesel and cooking oil in Cameroon[J]. Environ Sci Technol，2010，44(12)：4809-4815. DOI:10.1021/es100067p.
27	ESHTON B，KATIMA J H Y．Carbon footprints of production and use of liquid biofuels in Tanzania[J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev，2015，42：672-680. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.040.
28	SIMON G, SING R, PFISTER S, et al. Environmental impacts of Jatropha curcas biodiesel in India[J]. Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2012, 2012: 623070-623070. DOI: 10.1155/2012/623070.
29	JULIO S R, AMARELLA E S, BECERRIL G J，et al. A three⁃dimensional sustainability evaluation of Jatropha plantations in Yucatan，Mexico[J]. Sustainability，2016，8(12)：1316.DOI:10.3390/su8121316.
30	STICHNOTHE H，SCHUCHARDT F．Life cycle assessment of two palm oil production systems[J]. Biomass Bioenergy，2011，35(9)：3976-3984．DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.001.
31	ACHTEN W M J，TRABUCCO A，MAES W H，et al．Global greenhouse gas implications of land conversion to biofuel crop cultivation in arid and semi⁃arid lands⁃lessons learned from Jatropha[J]. J Arid Environ，2013，98：135-145．DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.06.015.
32	HANSEN S B，OLSEN S I，UJANG Z．Carbon balance impacts of land use changes related to the life cycle of Malaysian palm oil⁃derived biodiesel[J]. Int J Life Cycle Assess，2014，19(3)：558-566．DOI:10.1007/s11367-013-0672-3.
33	MAHARJAN S，WANG W C，TEAH H Y．Life cycle assessment of palm⁃derived biodiesel in Taiwan[J]. Clean Techn Environ Policy，2017，19(4)：959-969. DOI:10.1007/s10098-016-1290-0.
34	CASTANHEIRA É G，ACEVEDO H，FREIRE F. Greenhouse gas intensity of palm oil produced in Colombia addressing alternative land use change and fertilization scenarios[J]. ‍Appl Energy，2014，114：958-967. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.010.
35	ESHTON B，KATIMA J H Y，KITUYI E. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of Jatropha biodiesel as an alternative fuel in Tanzania[J]. Biomass Bioenergy，2013，58：95-103．DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.020.
36	PANDEY K K，PRAGYA N，SAHOO P K. Life cycle assessment of small⁃scale high⁃input Jatropha biodiesel production in India[J]. Appl Energy，2011，88(12)：4831-4839. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.026.
37	BAUMERT S，KHAMZINA A，VLEK P L G. Greenhouse gas and energy balance of Jatropha biofuel production systems of Burkina Faso[J]. Energy Sustain Dev，2018，42：14-23. DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2017.09.007.
38	LIU L，ZHUANG D F，JIANG D，et al．Assessment of the biomass energy potentials and environmental benefits of Jatrophacurcas L．in southwest China[J]. Biomass Bioenergy，2013，56：342-350．DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.030.
39	ÉRICA G C，FREIRE F. Environmental life cycle assessment of biodiesel produced with palm oil from Colombia[J]. Int J Life Cycle Assess，2017，22(4)：587-600. DOI:10.1007/s11367-016-1097-6.
40	HANSEN S B，OLSEN S I，UJANG Z. Greenhouse gas reductions through enhanced use of residues in the life cycle of Malaysian palm oil derived biodiesel[J]. Bioresour Technol，2012，104：358-366．DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.069.
41	SILALERTRUKSA T，GHEEWALA S H. Environmental sustainability assessment of palm biodiesel production in Thailand[J]. Energy，2012，43(1)：306-314．DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.025.
42	SAJID Z，KHAN F，ZHANG Y. Process simulation and life cycle analysis of biodiesel production[J]. Renew Energy，2016，85：945-952．DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.046.
43	KALAIVANI K，RAVIKUMAR G，BALASUBRAMANIAN N．Environmental impact studies of biodiesel production from Jatrophacurcas in India by life cycle assessment[J]. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy，2014, 33(4)：1340-1349. DOI:10.1002/ep.11913.
44	PRAPASPONGSA T，MUSIKAVONG C，GHEEWALA S H．Life cycle assessment of palm biodiesel production in Thailand：Impacts from modelling choices，co⁃product utilisation，improvement technologies，and land use change[J]. ‍J Clean Prod，2017，153：435-447．DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.130.
45	NILSALAB P，GHEEWALA S H，MUNGKUNG R，et al．Water demand and stress from oil palm⁃based biodiesel production in Thailand[J]. Int J Life Cycle Assess，2017，22(11)：1666-1677．DOI:10.1007/s11367-016-1213-7.
46	SILALERTRUKSA T，GHEEWALA S H，PONGPAT P，et al．Environmental sustainability of oil palm cultivation in different regions of Thailand：greenhouse gases and water use impact[J]．J Clean Prod，2017，167：1009-1019．DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro. 2016.11.069.
47	KUMAR S，SINGH J，NANOTI S M，et al. A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of Jatropha biodiesel production in India[J]. Bioresour Technol，2012，110：723-729. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.142.
48	MANIK Y，LEAHY J，HALOG A. Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel：a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia[J]. Int J Life Cycle Assess，2013，18(7)：1386-1392. DOI:10.1007/s11367-013-0581-5.
49	LIM C，BISWAS W. An evaluation of holistic sustainability assessment framework for palm oil production in Malaysia[J]. Sustainability，2015，7(12)：16561-16587. DOI:10.3390/su71215833.
50	刘济铭，孙操稳，何秋阳，等. 国内外无患子属种质资源研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究，2017，30(6)：12-18．
	LIU J M，SUN C W，HE Q Y，et al．Research progress in Sapindus L. germplasm resources[J]. World For Res，2017，30(6)：12-18. DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2017.0071.y.
51	BESSOU C，BASSET⁃MENS C，TRAN T，et al. LCA applied to perennial cropping systems：a review focused on the farm stage[J]. Int J Life Cycle Assess，2013，18(2)：340-361. DOI:10.1007/s11367-012-0502-z.
52	BESSOU C，BASSET⁃MENS C，LATUNUSSA C，et al. Partial modelling of the perennial crop cycle misleads LCA results in two contrasted case studies[J]. Int J Life Cycle Assess，2016，21(3)：297-310. DOI:10.1007/s11367-016-1030-z.

林业生物柴油可持续发展研究进展

Review on sustainable development of forest⁃based biodiesel

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 52

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿