两种类型人为干扰对城市风景林植物多样性的影响

吴思思, 鲁小珍, 王馨悦, 葛之葳

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 128-134.

PDF(1608 KB)
PDF(1608 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 128-134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901043
研究论文

两种类型人为干扰对城市风景林植物多样性的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of two types of artificial interferences on plant diversity of urban landscape forests

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】城市化对城市森林生态系统产生巨大影响,探讨城市化背景下植物群落物种多样性成为城市生态学研究热点。笔者探究了游客活动干扰和城市园林管理干扰对物种多样性的影响,为徐州泉山保护区的生态保护提供理论基础。【方法】于2018年6月,对泉山保护区的泉山、泰山和云龙山进行野外调查,整理统计54个样方物种数据并进行物种多样性分析。【结果】人为干扰加剧了物种数的减少;两种类型人为干扰对不同层物种数影响不同;游客活动干扰对物种多样性影响显著(P<0.05),城市园林管理干扰则无显著影响(P>0.05);两种类型人为干扰对物种丰富度无显著影响(P>0.05),对均匀度影响显著(P<0.05)。两种类型人为干扰对不同层物种数影响不同,游客活动干扰增强会降低乔木层的物种数,城市园林管理干扰增强则降低灌木层的物种数;游客活动干扰对物种多样性影响显著,中度干扰下物种多样性最小,城市园林管理干扰对物种多样性无显著影响;游客活动干扰和城市园林管理干扰均未影响物种丰富度,但均影响物种均匀度,并且影响结果不同。均匀度随着游客活动干扰增强呈先减小后增加的趋势,而随着城市园林管理干扰增强呈增加的趋势。【结论】游客活动干扰较城市园林管理干扰对植物多样性格局产生更直接显著的影响,在保护中更应警惕游客的行为对植物多样性的负面影响,严格规范游客行为。

Abstract

【Objective】 Urbanization has a great impact on urban forest ecosystems and has become a hot topic in urban ecology, with researchers striving to understand the dynamics of biodiversity in urban communities. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of tourist activities and urban garden management on plant species diversity and to develop a theoretical basis for the maintenance of the Quanshan Reserve. 【Method】 In June 2018, field surveys were conducted in 54 plots that were established in the Quanshan, Taishan and Yunlong Mountains in the Quanshan Reserve. 【Result】 Increases in artificial disturbance were related to reductions in species diversity. However, tourist activity and urban gardening affected the species diversity of different vertical layers differently, and tourist activity significantly affected species diversity (P<0.05), whereas urban gardening did not (P>0.05). In addition, neither type of disturbances had a significant effect on species richness (P>0.05), and both had significant effects on uniformity (P<0.05). These two types of artificial disturbance (tourist activity and urban gardening) had different effects on different community layers. Increase in tourist activity reduced the number of species in the arbor layer, whereas increase in urban gardening activity increased the number of species in the shrub layer. In addition, tourist activity significantly affected species diversity, with the lowest species diversity observed under intermediate disturbance, whereas urban gardening had no such effect. Furthermore, neither type of disturbance had a significant effect on species richness, and both had significant effects on uniformity. Interestingly, uniformity decreased and then increased with increasing tourist activity but exhibited a positive linear correlation with urban gardening.【Conclusion】 In this study, two types of human interferences were investigated to explore the effects on plant diversity in urban landscape forest communities, and the results showed that the interference of tourist activities had a more direct and significant impact on the distribution pattern of plant diversity, which could guide the protection of Quanshan Reserve.

关键词

泉山保护区 / 游客活动干扰 / 城市园林管理干扰 / 物种多样性 / 均匀度

Key words

Quanshan Reserve / tourism activity disturbance / urban management activity disturbance / species diversity / uniformity

引用本文

导出引用
吴思思, 鲁小珍, 王馨悦, . 两种类型人为干扰对城市风景林植物多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2019, 43(5): 128-134 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901043
WU Sisi, LU Xiaozhen, WANG Xinyue, et al. Effects of two types of artificial interferences on plant diversity of urban landscape forests[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2019, 43(5): 128-134 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901043
中图分类号: S718   

参考文献

[1]
MOFFATT S F, MCLACHLAN S M, KENKEL N C. Impacts of land use on riparian forest along an urban-rural gradient in southern Manitoba[J]. Plant Ecology Formerly ‘Vegetatio’, 2004, 174(1):119-135. DOI: 10.1023/b:vege.0000046055.27285.fd.
[2]
马克明, 傅伯杰, 郭旭东. 农业区城市化对植物多样性的影响:遵化的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(6):837-840. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2001.0199.
MA K M, FU B J, GUO X D. Impact of urbanization in rural areas on plant diversity: a case study in Zunhua City[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 12(6):837-840.
[3]
MCKINNEY M L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization[J]. Biological Conservation, 2006, 127(3):247-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005.
[4]
KÜHN I, KLOTZ S. Urbanization and homogenization-comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany[J]. Biological Conservation, 2006, 127(3):292-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.033.
[5]
郝建锋, 王德艺, 李艳, 等. 人为干扰对川西金凤山楠木次生林群落结构和物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(23):6930-6942. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201401140103.
HAO J F, WANG D Y, LI Y, et al. Effects of human disturbance on species diversity of Phoebe zhennan communitis in Jinfengshan Moutain in western Sichuan [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(23):6930-6942.
[6]
张丽梅. 药泉山土壤动物和土壤微生物群落对旅游踩踏的响应[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2016.
ZHANG L M. Responses of soil fauna and soil microorganism communities to tourism trample[D]. Harbin: Harbin Normal University, 2016.
[7]
FLORY S L, CLAY K. Invasive shrub distribution varies with distance to roads and stand age in eastern deciduous forests in Indiana, USA[J]. Plant Ecology, 2006, 184(1):131-141. DOI: 10.1007/s11258-005-9057-4.
[8]
汤茜, 尤海梅, 王梦君. 徐州市人工侧柏林的群落结构及物种多样性分析[J]. 淮阴师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2006, 5(2):168-172. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6876.2006.02.019.
TANG Q, YOU H M, WANG M J. Study on the community structure and species diversity of the Platycladus orientalis plantation forests in Xuzhou [J]. Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 5(2):168-172.
[9]
阮琳. 徐州云龙山植物群落与土壤理化性质相关分析[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2008.
RUAN L. Study on plant communities and the relevant physicochemical property of soil analysis in Xuzhou Yunlong Shan[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2008.
[10]
葛厚尚. 徐州地区维管植物资源调查及主要森林植被类型研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2013.
GE H S. A Study on vascular plant resources and the main forest vegetation types in Xuzhou[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013.
[11]
卢芳, 刘春海. 徐州市城区地被植物种类及应用[J]. 中国城市林业, 2009, 7(1):18-20. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2009.01.005.
LU F, LIU C H. Application of ground cover plants in gardening and landscaping in Xuzhou City[J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2009, 7(1):18-20.
[12]
杨瑞卿, 杨学民. 徐州市种子植物区系成分研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007(26):8323-8324. DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2007.26.119.
YANG R Q, YANG X M. Study on flora components of seed plants in Xuzhou[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2007(26):8323-8324.
[13]
姚俊宇, 齐锦秋, 张柳桦, 等. 人为干扰对碧峰峡山矾次生林群落物种多样性和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(10):2942-2950. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201810.036.
YAO J Y, QI J Q, ZHANG L H, et al. Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on species diversity and soil physicochemical properties ofSymplocos sumuntia secondary forest in Bifengxia [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(10):2942-2950.
[14]
郝建锋, 张逸博, 王德艺, 等. 人为干扰对雅安莲花山青冈次生林群落结构和物种多样性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(7):1451-1459. DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2015.07.1451.
HAO J F, ZHANG Y B, WANG D Y, et al. Effects of human disturbance on species diversity of Cyclobalanopsis glauca community in Lotus Mmountain in Ya’an [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2015, 35(7):1451-1459.
[15]
何海洋, 龙凱旋, 唐永彬. 人为干扰对雅安莲花山马尾松人工林群落结构和物种多样性的影响[J]. 四川林业科技, 2018, 39(4):59-63. DOI: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.04.015.
HE H Y, LONG K X, TANG Y B. Effects of human disturbance on community structure and species diversity of Pinus massoniana planatation forest in the Lotus Mountain [J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 39(4):59-63.
[16]
SAUNDERS S C, CHEN J Q, DRUMMER T D, et al. The patch mosaic and ecological decomposition across spatial scales in a managed landscape of northern Wisconsin, USA[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2002, 3(1):49-64. DOI: 10.1078/1439-1791-00084.
[17]
郭晨晓. 基于植物群落类型的北京奥林匹克森林公园土壤空间变异性研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015.
GUO C X. Study on the variability of soil properties upon different plant communities in Beijing Olympic Forest Park[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015.
[18]
徐远杰, 林敦梅, 米湘成, 等. 古田山不同干扰程度森林的群落恢复动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(3):358-365. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13202.
摘要
森林采伐后次生林的恢复过程对于生物多样性的保护和生态系统功能的重建具有重要意义。作者以古田山不同干扰程度的12个1 ha 森林样地为研究对象, 运用群落多元统计方法, 探讨了自然恢复过程中森林群落组成及物种多样性的动态变化及趋势。结果表明: 不同恢复阶段森林样地的群落组成存在显著性差异, 而同一恢复阶段的样地具有高度的相似性。物种丰富度随恢复进程有增加的趋势, 但各阶段差异并不显著; 物种均匀度除人工林较低以外, 其他恢复阶段之间无显著性差异。不同恢复阶段研究样地的群落组成及物种多样性的差异主要存在于林冠层。灌木及更新层具有各自的指示种, 人工林的指示种为落叶灌木或阳性乔木, 幼龄次生林的指示种为常绿灌木或小乔木, 老次生林的指示种为亚乔木层常绿树种, 老龄林的指示种为林冠层树种。上述结果表明古田山不同人为干扰程度森林群落的物种多样性具有较强的自我恢复能力。尽管物种组成难以预测, 但处于同一恢复阶段的森林, 其幼树的生活型组成呈现出一致的变化趋势。
XU Y J, LIN D M, MI X C, et al. Recovery dynamics of secondary forests with different disturbance intensity in the Gutianshan National Nature Reserve[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2014, 22(3):358-365.
[19]
鲁庆彬, 游卫云, 赵昌杰, 等. 旅游干扰对青山湖风景区植物多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(2):295-302. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0051.
LU Q B, YOU W Y, ZHAO C J, et al. Effects of tourism disturbance on plant diversity in Qingshan Lake scenic area of Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(2):295-302.
[20]
BARNES B, RODERICK M L. An ecological framework linking scales across space and time based on self-thinning[J]. Theoretical Population Biology, 2004, 66(2):113-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2004.04.004.
[21]
BARNES B, SIDHU H S, ROXBURGH S H. A model integrating patch dynamics, competing species and the intermediate disturbance hypojournal[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 194(4):414-420. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.040.
[22]
ARONSON R B, PRECHT W F. Landscape patterns of reef coral diversity: a test of the intermediate disturbance hypojournal[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1995, 192(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(95)00052-s.
[23]
伍炫蓓, 姚俊宇, 孙千惠, 等. 人为干扰对碧峰峡山矾次生林群落主要植物种群生态位的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(8):1616-1626. DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2017.08.1616.
WU X B, YAO J Y, SUN Q H, et al. Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on the niche of the main populations in a Symplocos sumuntia secondary forest community in Bifengxia, Sichuan [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2017, 37(8):1616-1626.
[24]
郝建锋, 张逸博, 李艳, 等. 人为干扰对川西碧峰峡山矾次生林群落结构和物种多样性的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2016, 24(5):559-567. DOI: 10.11926/j.issn.1005-3395.2016.05.012
HAO J F, ZHANG Y B, LI Y, et al. Effects of human disturbance on species diversity and community structure of Symplocos sumuntia secondary forest in Bifengxia in western Sichuan [J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2016, 24(5):559-567.
[25]
巩劼, 陆林, 晋秀龙, 等. 黄山风景区旅游干扰对植物群落及其土壤性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5):2239-2251. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.05.008.
GONG J, LU L, JIN X L, et al. Impacts of tourist disturbance on plant communities and soil properties in Huangshan Mountain scenic area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(5):2239-2251.
[26]
彭羽, 刘雪华, 薛达元, 等. 城市化对本土植物多样性的影响: 以廊坊市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3):723-729. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201102140170.
PENG Y, LIU X H, XUE D Y, et al. Effects of urbanization on indigenous plant diversity: a case study of Langfang City, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(3):723-729.
[27]
彭羽, 刘雪华. 城市化对植物多样性影响的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2007, 15(5):558-562. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2007.05.014.
摘要
本文综述了城市化对植物多样性影响的研究进展。随着全球特别是发展中国家城市化水平的提高, 城市化对生物多样性的影响逐渐引起了人们的重视。城市化造成了本土植物物种的丢失和外来物种的增加。在空间分布上, 城市化还常使城区本土植物多样性沿着远郊农区–城郊–城区梯度性下降; 但是由于引进大量外来物种, 总体植物多样性反而升高, 沿着远郊农区–城郊–城区梯度性升高。城市化对植物种类组成也有很大影响,优势种在远郊农区、城郊和城区呈现不同。城市化对植物多样性影响的机制主要有人为引入外来物种、小生境改变以及景观格局的变化三个方面。以下四个研究方向将越来越重要: (1) 不同区域、不同方法、不同学科的系统整合研究;(2) 城市化扩张与植物多样性变化过程的定位监测研究; (3) 本土植物多样性丢失以及性状改变的内在机制研究, 特别是外来物种与本地物种的相互作用过程和机制的研究; (4) 城市植物多样性保护研究。
PENG Y, LIU X H. Research progress in effects of urbanization on plant biodiversity[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2007, 15(5):558-562.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0502703)
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

编辑: 李燕文

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(1608 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/