缓释肥N/P比及加载量对5种珍贵树种1年生苗生长和养分库构建的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201902007

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 72-80.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201902007

缓释肥N/P比及加载量对5种珍贵树种1年生苗生长和养分库构建的影响

李峰卿¹^,³(), 王秀花², 楚秀丽¹^,^*(), 张东北², 吴小林¹, 周生财², 叶明⁴

1.中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所,浙江省林木育种技术研究重点实验室,浙江杭州 311400
2.浙江省庆元县实验林场,浙江庆元 323800
3.中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业实验中心,江西分宜 336600
4.建德市寿昌林场,浙江建德 311612

收稿日期:2019-02-14 修回日期:2019-04-28 出版日期:2020-02-08 发布日期:2020-02-02
通讯作者: 楚秀丽
作者简介:李峰卿( lfqnjfu@163.com),高级工程师,ORCID(0000-0002-1855-6889)。
基金资助:
浙江省省院合作林业科技项目(2017SY19);浙江省省院合作林业科技项目(2016SY03)

Effects of N/P ratio and loading on growth and construction of nutrients reserves of one-year-old seedlings for five kinds of precious tree species

LI Fengqing¹^,³(), WANG Xiuhua², CHU Xiuli¹^,^*(), ZHANG Dongbei², WU Xiaolin¹, ZHOU Shengcai², YE Ming⁴

1. Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 311400, China
2. Experimental Forest Farm of Qingyuan Country, Zhejiang Province, Qingyuan 323800, China
3. Experimental Center of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fenyi 336600,China
4. Forest Farm of Shouchang in Jiande City, Zhejiang Province, Jiande 311612, China

Received:2019-02-14 Revised:2019-04-28 Online:2020-02-08 Published:2020-02-02
Contact: CHU Xiuli

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 揭示不同缓释肥N与P₂O₅质量比(N/P比)及加载量对浙江楠等5种珍贵树种1年生容器苗生长、N与P素吸收利用及养分库构建的影响,以期为精细化培育珍贵树种容器苗提供科学指导。【方法】 采用4×4两因素析因设计,研究N/P比和加载量对浙江楠等5种珍贵树种1年生容器苗生长发育及N、P库构建的影响。【结果】 缓释肥N/P比、加载量对5树种1年生容器苗生长和干物质积累均有显著或极显著影响。随着N/P比提高,各树种的反应却不一致;当缓释肥加载量为F3(3.5 kg/m³)时, 5树种生长指标和干物质积累均达到最大值。浙江楠、浙江樟和木荷的叶N含量与缓释肥N/P比密切相关,但南方红豆杉和赤皮青冈叶N含量在各N/P比间差异不显著。除浙江楠外,其他4树种的叶P含量在不同N/P比下差异显著,但各树种叶N和P累积量却对N/P比响应均不敏感。较之于N/P比,缓释肥加载量对5种珍贵树种1年生容器苗N、P库构建的影响更明显,叶N、P含量及累积量均在较高的缓释肥加载量F3下达到最高。N、P含量在各树种器官内的变化规律基本一致,说明N、P吸收同步,但不同树种间N、P素在各器官的分配却不同。【结论】 浙江楠容器苗生长及其养分库构建均需高N缓释肥,浙江樟、赤皮青冈和木荷则需要相对高P缓释肥,而南方红豆杉容器苗生长对N/P比要求不严格,但其养分库构建需高N缓释肥;在考虑N/P比的同时,适量(3.5 kg/m³)增施缓释肥,可提高珍贵树种的容器苗质量。

关键词: 浙江楠, 浙江樟, 南方红豆杉, 赤皮青冈, 木荷, 容器苗, N/P比, 缓释肥加载, 养分库

Abstract:

【Objective】 To provide scientific guidance for seedling cultivation in containers, the impacts of slow-release fertilizer (SRF) loading were observed for the growth, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) uptake, and nutrient pool construction of five precious tree species, such as Phoebe chekiangensis. 【Method】 A 4 × 4 factorial experimental design was used to compare the impacts of the N/P mass ratio (1.75:1, 2.25:1, 2.75:1 and 3.25:1) and SRF loading levels (1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 kg/m ³) on the growth and N and P nutrient pool construction of one-year-old seedlings.【Result】 Significant effects were detected in the growth and dry matter accumulation between N/P ratios, SRF loading, and their interaction. As the N/P ratio increased, the tree species responded differently. The largest growth and dry matter accumulation of the five precious tree species was detected with 3.5 kg/m³ SRF loading. The N concentration in the leaves of P. chekiangensis, Cinnamomum chekiangense and Schima superba was correlated with the N/P ratio, but there was no difference in the leaf N concentration of Taxus wallichiana and Cyclobalan gilvain. The P concentration in the leaves of all species, except for P. chekiangensis, also significantly differed with varying N/P ratios. However, the N and P accumulation in the leaves of all species were not sensitive to the N/P ratio. The effect of the SRF loading on the nutrient accumulations was more obvious than the N/P ratios; the concentration and accumulation of leaf N and P were highest with 3.5 kg/m³ SRF loading. Changes in the N and P concentrations in the organs of the different species were similar, indicating N/P absorption synchrony, whilst the distribution of N and P among the organs was species-specific. 【Conclusion】 Based on the growth characteristics of the different tree species, seedlings of P. chekiangensis should be loaded with higher N content fertilizer, and the seedlings of Cinnamomum chekiangense, Cyclobalan gilva and S. superba should be loaded with higher P content fertilizer. T. wallichiana seedlings are not sensitive to the N/P ratio, but nutrition construction suggests that it is N/P ratio and adding appropriate amounts of SRF (3.5 kg/m³).

Key words: Phoebe chekiangensis, Cinnamomum chekiangense, Taxus wallichiana var. mairei, Cyclobalanopsis gilva, Schima superba, container seedling, N/P ratio, slow-release fertilizer loading, nutrient pool

中图分类号:

S722

李峰卿,王秀花,楚秀丽,等. 缓释肥N/P比及加载量对5种珍贵树种1年生苗生长和养分库构建的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 72-80.

LI Fengqing, WANG Xiuhua, CHU Xiuli, ZHANG Dongbei, WU Xiaolin, ZHOU Shengcai, YE Ming. Effects of N/P ratio and loading on growth and construction of nutrients reserves of one-year-old seedlings for five kinds of precious tree species[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 44(1): 72-80.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201902007.

图/表 6

图1

表1

缓释肥N/P比及加载量对5种珍贵树种1年生容器苗各器官N含量的影响"

树种 species	器官 organs	N/P(A)				加载量(F) loading force
树种 species	器官 organs	A1	A2	A3	A4	F1	F2	F3	F4
浙江楠 P. chekiangensis	根 root	13.51±1.45	14.46±1.44	15.23±2.41	14.78±1.52	13.64±0.99	15.24±1.72	14.65±2.33	14.42±1.78
	茎 stem	2.91±0.45	3.03±0.66	3.17±0.52	3.29±0.32	2.89±0.72	3.04±0.27	3.28±0.40	3.19±0.49
	叶 leaf	8.49±1.50 b	8.43±1.19 b	8.81±1.54 b	10.15±1.25 a	7.44±1.29 C	8.58±0.99 B	9.78±0.75 A	10.07±1.32 A
浙江樟 Cinnamomum chekiangense	根 root	12.40±1.93 B	13.11±0.80 A	11.11±1.00 C	12.81±1.64 AB	11.37±1.02 B	12.53±1.06 AB	13.45±1.57 A	12.06±1.86 B
	茎 stem	3.02±0.36	2.76±0.48	3.28±0.31	2.91±0.39	2.67±0.34 C	2.87±0.33 BC	3.09±0.48 AB	3.34±0.24 A
	叶 leaf	9.41±0.54 ab	10.02±0.87 a	9.78±1.12 ab	9.27±0.99 b	9.04±0.44 b	9.53±0.74 ab	10.19±0.68 a	9.71±1.32 ab
南方红豆杉 T. wallichiana var. mairei	根 root	7.05±1.47 C	9.98±0.97 B	11.51±1.66 A	10.59±1.48 AB	8.48±1.23 b	9.69±1.23 ab	10.98±1.34 a	9.98±1.59 ab
	茎 stem	3.94±0.69	3.89±0.67	3.84±0.74	3.49±0.33	4.43±0.77 A	3.79±0.39 B	3.66±0.29 BC	3.28±0.37 C
	叶 leaf	9.66±1.07	10.00±0.87	10.44±1.10	10.67±0.93	10.06±1.25	9.59±0.83	10.65±1.21	10.46±1.09
赤皮青冈 Cyclobalanopsis gilva	根 root	8.52±0.62	9.35±1.43	9.72±1.56	8.55±1.23	9.06±1.13	9.44±1.59	9.13±1.17	8.51±1.37
	茎 stem	3.18±0.55	3.14±0.37	2.97±0.26	3.18±0.45	3.14±0.63	3.17±0.29	3.05±0.20	3.11±0.47
	叶 leaf	11.21±0.99	10.70±1.04	11.76±1.04	10.84±1.06	10.89±1.14	11.01±0.88	11.44±0.89	11.18±1.39
木荷 S.superba	根 root	7.17±0.86 B	6.47±1.23 BC	8.04±0.68 A	6.36±0.77 C	6.67±1.53 b	6.68±1.05 b	7.42±1.06 a	7.28±0.71 ab
	茎 stem	2.23±0.45	2.32±0.55	1.92±0.27	2.10±0.33	2.05±0.29 b	2.20±0.22 ab	2.43±0.60 a	1.89±0.34 b
	叶 leaf	7.72±1.02 A	6.45±1.02 B	6.39±0.89 B	6.99±0.82 B	6.11±0.70 B	6.55±0.78 B	7.40±1.07 A	7.49±0.78 A

表1

表2

缓释肥N/P比及加载量对5种珍贵树种1年生容器苗N累积量的影响"

树种 species	器官 organs	N/P				加载量 loading force
树种 species	器官 organs	A1	A2	A3	A4	F1	F2	F3	F4
浙江楠 P.chekiangensis	叶 leaf	14.64±3.32	14.4±3.21	14.62±5.07	16.44±3.34	10.17±1.95 d	13.86±1.73 c	18.8±1.79 a	17.27±1.70 b
	茎 stem	3.89±1.14	4.00±1.39	3.98±0.85	4.18±1.23	2.82±0.68 d	3.66±0.29 c	5.26±0.70 a	4.32±0.99 b
	根 root	15.43±1.58	16.39±2.36	16.42±4.18	15.39±2.58	14.12±1.30 c	16.41±1.81 ab	17.92±3.25 a	15.19±3.00 bc
浙江樟 Cinnamomun chekiangense	叶 leaf	13.19±2.29	13.7±2.66	11.03±2.26	12.22±3.59	9.8±1.33 d	12.94±1.69 b	16.19±1.76 a	11.21±1.51 c
	茎 stem	2.48±0.54	2.21±0.42	2.14±0.45	2.21±0.58	1.65±0.20 d	2.41±0.27 b	2.82±0.39 a	2.15±0.20 c
	根 root	17.54±3.70	18.76±2.27	16.64±1.71	16.85±3.72	14.18±2.35 b	17.87±2.87 a	19.41±3.87 a	14.34±2.77 b
南方红豆杉 T.wallichiana var. mairei	叶 leaf	6.86±1.80	7.21±1.85	6.94±1.96	7.12±1.94	5.14±0.58 d	6.27±0.78 c	9.67±0.89 a	7.05±0.68 b
	茎 stem	2.18±0.38	2.04±0.33	1.98±0.49	1.81±0.48	1.8±0.35b	1.91±0.31 b	2.59±0.24 a	1.71±0.14 b
	根 root	5.68±2.04 b	8.58±1.79 a	9.01±2.72 a	8.08±1.91 a	5.47±0.77 c	7.45±1.98 b	10.54±1.67 a	7.9±2.02b
赤皮青冈 Cyclobalanopsis gilva	叶 leaf	7.83±1.43	8.73±1.87	8.17±0.87	8.96±1.10	7.32±1.01	7.74±0.63	9.89±0.97	8.72±1.32
	茎 stem	1.90±0.45	2.29±0.38	1.93±0.21	2.39±0.31	1.84±0.40	1.95±0.24	2.48±0.40	2.23±0.18
	根 root	11.1±2.79	11.21±2.09	12.01±2.61	10.74±1.59	9.97±1.49	11.42±2.97	12.43±2.2	11.23±1.79
木荷 S.superba	叶 leaf	16.04±2.64	14.62±2.96	15.38±3.71	15.24±2.85	12.23±1.91 c	13.81±1.26 b	17.35±2.50 a	17.9±1.60 a
	茎 stem	4.29±1.40	4.95±1.72	4.12±0.99	4.34±0.7	3.13±0.47 c	4.41±0.51 b	5.81±1.39 a	4.35±0.70 b
	根 root	10.29±2.12 b	9.80±2.55 b	12.27±1.83 a	9.17±1.44 b	9.44±2.76	9.95±2.33	11.06±1.50	11.08±2.19

表2

图2

图3

表3

参考文献 31

[1]	赵亚芳, 徐福利, 王渭玲, 等. 华北落叶松针叶碳、氮、磷含量及化学计量比的季节变化[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(5):1328-1335.
	ZHAO Y F, XU F L, WANG W L, et al. Seasonal variations of leaf C, N, P contents and stoichiometry of Larix principis-rupprechtii [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(5):1328-1335. DOI: 10.11674/ zwyf.2015.0528. doi: 10.11674/ zwyf.2015.0528
[2]	SARDANS J, RIVAS-UBACH A, PEÑUELAS J. The elemental stoichiometry of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and its relationships with organismiclifestyle and ecosystem structure and function: a review and perspectives[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 111(1/2/3):1-39. DOI: 10.1007/s10533-011-9640-9. doi: 10.1007/s10533-011-9640-9
[3]	季萌萌, 彭玲, 文炤, 等. 供磷水平对苹果砧木氮、磷吸收和利用特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4):1016-1021.
	JI M M, PENG L, WEN Z, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus absorption and utilization characteristics of apple rootstocks under different phosphorus levels[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(4):1016-1021. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0421. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0421
[4]	沙建川, 夏营, 刘松忠, 等. 供磷水平对梨砧木生长和15N-尿素吸收利用特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(5):1437-1442.
	SHA J C, XIA Y, LIU S Z, et al. Effects of different phosphorus application rates on growth, 15N-urea absorption, and utilization characteristics of pear rootstocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(5):1437-1442. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201805.023. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201805.023
[5]	褚清河, 潘根兴, 李典有, 等. 氮磷等比与以磷定氮条件下玉米的最大施肥量研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(6):1083-1089.
	CHU Q H, PAN G X, LI D Y, et al. Maximum fertilization rates for corn with fixed N/P ratio or with N rate varying with P rate[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007, 44(6):1083-1089. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2007.06.018. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2007.06.018
[6]	BROADLEY M R, BOWEN H C, COTTERILL H L, et al. Phylogenetic variation in the shoot mineral concentration of angiosperms[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004, 55(396):321-336. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh002. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh002
[7]	周志春, 谢钰容, 金国庆, 等. 马尾松种源磷效率研究[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(4):25-30.
	ZHOU Z C, XIE Y R, JIN G Q, et al. Study on phosphorus efficiency of different provenances of Pinus massoniana [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(4):25-30. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 1001-7488.2005.04.005. doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 1001-7488.2005.04.005
[8]	宋平, 张一, 张蕊, 等. 低磷胁迫下马尾松无性系磷效率性状对氮沉降的响应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2):502-511.
	SONG P, ZHANG Y, ZHANG R, et al. Responses of phosphorus efficiency to simulated nitrogen deposition under phosphorus deficiency in Pinus massoniana clones [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(2):502-511. DOI: 10.11674/zwyy.16112. doi: 10.11674/zwyy.16112
[9]	OLIET J A, PLANELLES R, ARTERO F, et al. Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions: relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition[J]. New Forests, 2009, 37(3):313-331. DOI: 10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3. doi: 10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3
[10]	JACOBS D F, ROSE R, HAASE D L. Development of Douglas-fir seedling root architecture in response to localized nutrient supply[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2003, 33(1):118-125. DOI: 10.1139/x02-160. doi: 10.1139/x02-160
[11]	JACOBS D F, TIMMER V R. Fertilizer-induced changes in rhizosphere electrical conductivity: relation to forest tree seedling root system growth and function[J]. New Forests, 2005, 30(2/3):147-166 DOI: 10.1007/s11056-005-6572-z. doi: 10.1007/s11056-005-6572-z
[12]	DAVIS A S, JACOBS D F, OVERTON R P, et al. Influence of irrigation method and container type on northern red oak seedling growth and media electrical conductivity[J]. Native Plants Journal, 2008, 9(1):4-12. DOI: 10.2979/npj.2008.9.1.4. doi: 10.2979/npj.2008.9.1.4
[13]	王艺, 王秀花, 吴小林, 等. 缓释肥加载对浙江楠和闽楠容器苗生长和养分库构建的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(12):57-63.
	WANG Y, WANG X H, WU X L, et al. Effects of slow-release fertilizer loading on growth and construction of nutrients reserves of Phoebe chekiangensis and Phoebe bournei container seedlings [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(12):57-63. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20131209. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20131209
[14]	李峰卿, 王秀花, 楚秀丽, 等. 缓释肥N/P养分配比及加载量对3种珍贵树种大规格容器苗生长的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(5):743-750.
	LI F Q, WANG X H, CHU X L, et al. Effects of N/P ratio and loading on the growth of container seedling of three precious tree species[J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(5):743-750. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.05.006. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.05.006
[15]	姚光刚, 李国雷, 郑永林, 等. 缓释肥施用量对槲栎容器苗苗木质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(1):69-75.
	YAO G G, LI G L, ZHENG Y L, et al. Effects of slow-release fertilizer rate on the quality of Quercus aliena container seedlings [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2019, 43(1):69-75. DOI: 10.3969 / j.issn.1000-2006.201801025. doi: 10.3969 / j.issn.1000-2006.201801025
[16]	楚秀丽, 王秀花, 张东北, 等. 基质配比和缓释肥添加量对浙江楠大规格容器苗质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6):67-73.
	CHU X L, WANG X H, ZHANG D B, et al. Effect of substrate ratio and slow-release fertilizer loading on the quality of large size container seedlings of Phoebe chekiangensis [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(6) :67-73. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.013. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.013
[17]	姜宗庆, 李成忠, 汤庚国. 薄壳山核桃光合生理特性对磷素响应的研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(1):19-22.
	JIANG Z Q, LI C Z, TANG G G. Effects of phosphorus on photosynthetic characteristics of Carya illinoensis [J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(1):19-22. DOI: 10.11937/bfyy.20172405. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20172405
[18]	于钦民, 徐福利, 王渭玲. 氮、磷肥对杉木幼苗生物量及养分分配的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(1):118-128.
	YU Q M, XU F L, WANG W L. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on biomass and nutrient distribution of Cunninghamia lanceolata seedlings [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(1):118-128.DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0113. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0113
[19]	陈义强, 刘国顺, 习红昂. 烟草栽培中氮、磷、钾肥及水分因子与产值的经验模型[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(2):480-487.
	CHEN Y Q, LIU G S, XI H A. Empirical model of the relation of output value to nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and water during tobacco cultivation[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(2):480-487. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.02.022. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.02.022
[20]	尹鹏达, 朱文旭, 赵丽娜, 等. 填充型烤烟栽培中氮磷钾肥与产量的施肥模型[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43(6):924-929.
	YIN P D, ZHU W X, ZHAO L N, et al. Fertilization model of N, P, K fertilizers and production in filled flue-cured tobacco[J]. Soils, 2011, 43(6):924-929. DOI: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2011.06.025. doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2011.06.025
[21]	丁博锐, 杨焕文, 李佛琳, 等. 氮磷钾互作对烤烟主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2011, 26(4):499-505.
	DING B R, YANG H W, LI F L, et al. Interaction effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on agronomic characters of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2011, 26(4):499-505. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X (n).2011.04.012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X (n).2011.04.012
[22]	孙晓娥, 孟宪法, 刘兆普, 等. 氮磷互作对菊芋块茎产量和品质的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(2):363-367.
	SUN X E, MENG X F, LIU Z P, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus interaction on the tuber yield and its quality of Jerusalem artichoke [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(2):363-367. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2013.0124. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2013.0124
[23]	马雪红, 胡根长, 冯建国, 等. 基质配比、缓释肥量和容器规格对木荷容器苗质量的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(4):505-509.
	MA X H, HU G C, FENG J G, et al. Comparison on the substrate and container size of container nursery of Schima superba [J]. Forest Research, 2010, 23(4):505-509. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2010.04.010. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2010.04.010
[24]	何贵平, 麻建强, 冯建民, 等. 珍贵用材树种柏木轻基质容器育苗试验研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(1):134-137.
	HE G P, MA J Q, FENG J M, et al. Study on container seedlings cultural techniques with light medium for precious timber tree species, Cupressus funebris [J]. Forest Research, 2010, 23(1):134-137. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2010.01.004. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2010.01.004
[25]	HAASE D L, ALZUGARAY P, ROSE R, et al. Nutrient-release rates of controlled-release fertilizers in forest soil[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2007, 38(5/6):739-750. DOI: 10.1080/ 00103620701220692. doi: 10.1080/ 00103620701220692
[26]	SALIFU K F, JACOBS D F, BIRGE Z K D. Nursery nitrogen loading improves field performance of bareroot oak seedlings planted on abandoned mine lands[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2009, 17(3):339-349. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00373.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00373.x
[27]	魏红旭, 徐程扬, 马履一, 等. 氮磷供给比例对长白落叶松苗木磷素吸收和利用效率的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(2):659-667.
	WEI H X, XU C Y, MA L Y, et al. The effect of N:P supply ratio on P uptake and utilization efficiencies inLarix olgensis Henry. seedlings [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(2):659-667. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201112071876. doi: 10.5846/stxb201112071876
[28]	祝燕, 马履一, 刘勇, 等. 控释氮肥对长白落叶松苗木生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(1):24-28.
	ZHU Y, MA L Y, LIU Y, et al. Application of controlled-release fertilizer in the cultivation of Larix olgensis seedling [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2011, 35(1):24-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.01.006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.01.006
[29]	郭延平, 陈屏昭, 张良诚, 等. 不同供磷水平对温州蜜柑叶片光合作用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(2):186-191.
	GUO Y P, CHEN P Z, ZHANG L C, et al. Effects of different phosphorus nutrition levels on photosynjournal in satsuma mandarin(Citrus unshiu Marc.) leaves [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2002, 8(2):186-191. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.02.011. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.02.011
[30]	钱燕萍, 祝遵凌. 氮素营养对欧洲鹅耳枥幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(6):71-78.
	QIAN Y P, ZHU Z L. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Carpinus betulus seedlings [J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Nat Sci Ed), 2016, 44(6):71-78. DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2016.06.011. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2016.06.011
[31]	陈永亮, 李修岭, 周晓燕. 低磷胁迫对落叶松幼苗生长及根系酸性磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(6):46-50.
	CHEN Y L, LI X L, ZHOU X Y. Effects of phosphate deficiency on the growth and acid phosphatase activity of Larix gmelini seedlings [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(6):46-50. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2006.06.008. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2006.06.008

树种 species	因素 factor	苗高 seedling height	地径 ground diameter	干物质质量 dry mass	N浓度 N concentration	N累积量 N accumulation	P浓度 P concentration	P累积量 P accumulation
浙江楠 P.chekiangensis	A	7.24^**	9.92^**	0.70	11.70^**	2.37	3.597^*	74.35^**
	F	181.6^**	53.03^**	15.76^**	9.47^**	128.92^**	11.24^**	285.51^**
	A×F	13.21^**	4.77^**	0.89	3.11	10.91^**	4.36^**	24.66^**
浙江樟 Cinnamomum chekiangense	A	30.96^**	12.82^**	12.16^**	4.39^*	52.46^**	2.17	35.96^**
	F	27.13^**	7.71^**	25.85^**	8.40^**	115.66^**	157.3^**	4.58^**
	A×F	5.63^**	5.39^**	1.42	1.56	5.33^**	11.73^**	3.35^*
南方红豆杉 T.wallichiana var. mairei	A	1.43	2.86	1.08	23.04^**	14.61^**	0.63	9.36^**
	F	62.95^**	28.12^**	31.78^**	4.50^*	124.24^**	6.98^**	85.06^**
	A×F	11.65^**	8.03^**	0.75	1.33	2.86^*	4.83^**	14.96^**
赤皮青冈 Cyclobalanopsis gilva	A	30.56^**	34.48^**	2.53	5.42^**	1.95	38.41^**	16.91^**
	F	21.27^**	7.88^**	5.60^**	4.33^*	25.28^**	51.32^**	32.37^**
	A×F	5.39^*	1.74	1.23	2.49	8.25^**	13.01^**	30.04^**
木荷 S.superba	A	16.32^**	4.47^**	2.21	10.36^**	5.40^*	57.35^**	24.04^**
	F	160.62^**	51.66^**	10.69^**	5.65^**	59.15^**	52.03^**	119.13^**
	A×F	10.75^**	3.70^**	1.21	1.60	7.89^**	17.48^**	37.04^**

缓释肥N/P比及加载量对5种珍贵树种1年生苗生长和养分库构建的影响

Effects of N/P ratio and loading on growth and construction of nutrients reserves of one-year-old seedlings for five kinds of precious tree species

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	罗芊芊, 李峰卿, 肖德卿, 邓章文, 王建华, 周志春. 两个南方红豆杉天然居群的交配系统分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 80-86.
[2]	欧建德. 杈干现象对南方红豆杉树冠形态、生长和形质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 87-94.
[3]	孙薇, 王斌, 楚秀丽, 王秀花, 张东北, 吴小林, 周志春. 马尾松容器苗生长和养分性状对磷添加和接种菌根菌的响应及关联[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 226-233.
[4]	刘泽茂, 晏昕, 吴文, 张于卉, 喻方圆. 竹炭添加对大叶榉树容器苗生长和营养状况的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 111-118.
[5]	季艳红, 潘平平, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰. 不同泥炭替代基质对薄壳山核桃幼苗生长及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 145-155.
[6]	季艳红, 汤文华, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰. 施肥对薄壳山核桃容器苗生长及养分积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 47-56.
[7]	陈黎, 刘成功, 钱莹莹, 唐晓蝶, 王生树, 李志东, 李燕, 崔珺. 南方红豆杉人工林针叶C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 53-61.
[8]	倪铭, 高振洲, 吴文, 张于卉, 喻方圆. 不同氮素施肥方法对纳塔栎容器苗生长及非结构性碳水化合物积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 107-113.
[9]	王云鹏, 张蕊, 周志春, 华斌, 黄少华, 马丽珍, 范辉华. 10年生木荷生长和材性性状家系变异及选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 85-92.
[10]	潘平平, 窦全琴, 汤文华, 谢寅峰. 缓释肥用量对薄壳山核桃容器苗生长及养分含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 163-168.
[11]	欧建德,吴志庄. 幼龄南方红豆杉人工林树冠形态特征与生长形质通径分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 62(04): 185-191.
[12]	姚光刚,李国雷,郑永林,薛敦孟,李世安,袁启华. 缓释肥施用量对槲栎容器苗苗木质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 62(01): 69-75.
[13]	白欢欢,王雪峰,徐建国. 天然黄山松群落主要树种营养生态位特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(02): 81-88.
[14]	孙巧玉,刘勇,陈闯,史文辉,王巍伟,陈晓. 栓皮栎容器育苗方式对其造林效果的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(01): 188-192.
[15]	肖遥,张蕊,刘建慧,梁朔,周志春. 不同产地南方红豆杉育种亲本叶绿素含量及荧光参数差异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 60(03): 57-64.