观赏海棠花期物候稳定性及其对温度变化的响应

储吴樾, 范俊俊, 张往祥

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 49-54.

PDF(1852 KB)
PDF(1852 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 49-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903010
专题报道Ⅱ(执行主编 方升佐)

观赏海棠花期物候稳定性及其对温度变化的响应

作者信息 +

Phenological stability of ornamental crabapple and its response to temperature change

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】研究多品种海棠初花期物候特征,探究花期与温度的内在联系,并在品种水平上揭示花期稳定性差异及变化规律。【方法】使用67个海棠品种的4年初花期物候数据对多品种海棠初花期稳定性进行分析,并使用多年的气象数据对多品种海棠初花期群组物候标准偏差(σ)的计算结果进行研究。【结果】2014—2016年多品种海棠初花期日期顺序与2013年的初花期均有较高的相关性。晚花期品种的σ值大于早、中花期σ值。早花期品种群与中花期品种群的σ值和开花前一年10月1日至12月1日期间小于6 ℃的天数呈显著负相关(P<0.05),而晚花期品种群σ值与开花前一年10月1日至开花当年2月1日期间小于4 ℃(P<0.05)及开花前一年10月1日至开花当年3月1日期间小于4 ℃(P<0.05)的天数呈显著负相关。【结论】低温对于海棠初花期稳定性有着重要影响:一方面,早、中花期品种相对于晚花期品种而言对低温需求更大,且休眠时间限制更加严格;另一方面,晚花期品种间初花期顺序的稳定性更低。

Abstract

【Objective】We study the phenological characteristics of the early-flowering stage of several varieties of ornamental crabapple, to explore the internal relationship between the flowering stage and temperature, and to reveal the differences and changes in flowering stability at a variety level. 【Method】Four-year phenological data from 67 varieties of ornamental crabapple were analyzed to determine the stability of multiple ornamental crabapple varieties, and the results of standard deviation of phenology (σ) of multiple varieties of ornamental crabapple were studied using temperature data over many years. 【Result】From 2014 to 2016, there was a strong correlation of the date sequence of early flowering with that of 2013. The σ value of late-flowering varieties was higher than that of early-and mid-flowering varieties. There was a significant negative correlation (P<0.05) between the σ value of the early florescence and middle florescence; this correlation was also noted between the σ value of the late florescence and days with temperature below 6 ℃ from October 1st to December 1st in the year before florescence, between the σ value of the late florescence and days with a temperature below 4 ℃ (P<0.05) from October 1st to February 1st in the year before florescence, and between October 1st to March 1st in the year before florescence. 【Conclusion】 A low temperature has an important effect on the stability of ornamental crabapple at the early-flowering stage. The varieties in the early-and mid-flowering stage required a lower temperature than that required at the late-flowering stage, and the time limit for breaking dormancy was more strict. In contrast, the stability of the early-flowering sequence among the late-flowering varieties was lower.

关键词

观赏海棠 / 初花期群组 / 花期物候 / 低温 / 标准偏差

Key words

ornamental crabapple / florescence phenological order / flowering phenology / low temperature / standard deviation

引用本文

导出引用
储吴樾, 范俊俊, 张往祥. 观赏海棠花期物候稳定性及其对温度变化的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2020, 44(5): 49-54 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903010
CHU Wuyue, FAN Junjun, ZHANG Wangxiang. Phenological stability of ornamental crabapple and its response to temperature change[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2020, 44(5): 49-54 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903010
中图分类号: S685.99   

参考文献

[1]
竺可桢, 宛敏渭 . 物候学[M].增订本, 北京: 科学出版社, 1980.
[2]
FITCHETT J M, GRAB S W, THOMPSON D I . Plant phenology and climate change progress in methodological approaches and application[J]. Prog Phys Geogr, 2015,39(4):460-482. DOI: 10.1177/0309133315578940.
[3]
GIENAPP P, HEMERIK L, VISSER M E . A new statistical tool to predict phenology under climate change scenarios[J]. Glob Chang Biol, 2005,11(4):600-606. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00925.x.
[4]
OHASHI Y, KAWAKAMI H, SHIGETA Y , et al. The phenology of cherry blossom (Prunus yedoensis ‘Somei-yoshino’) and the geographic features contributing to its flowering[J]. Int J Biometeorol, 2012,56(5):903-914. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-011-0496-4.
We investigated relationships between the flowering phenology of Prunus yedoensis
[5]
EL YAACOUBI A, MALAGI G, OUKABLI A , et al. Global warming impact on floral phenology of fruit tree s species in Mediterranean region[J]. Sci Hortic, 2014,180:243-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.041.
[6]
龚春, 王慧, 易金生 , 等. 赣无系列油茶不同品系花期观测[J]. 经济林研究, 2012,30(2):121-124.
GONG C, WANG H, YI J S , et al. Observation on florescence of difference Ganwu clones in Camellia oleifera[J]. Nonwood For Res, 2012,30(2):121-124. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2012.02.031.
[7]
饶红欣, 彭信海, 王萍 , 等. 日本樱花花期观测与规律分析[J]. 经济林研究, 2014,32(2):133-135.
RAO H X, PENG X H, WANG P , et al. Observation and analysis on flowering phase in Prunus yedoensis[J]. Nonwood For Res, 2014,32(2):133-135. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2014.02.020.
[8]
李育农 . 苹果属植物种质资源研究[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001.
[9]
楚爱香, 汤庚国 . 观赏海棠品种分类研究进展[J]. 生物学通报, 2008,43(7):15-17,封4.
CHU A X, TANG G G . Advances in research on classification of ornamental crabapple[J]. Bull Biol, 2008,43(7):15-17,cover 4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2008.07.005.
[10]
郑杨, 曲晓玲, 郭翎 , 等. 观赏海棠资源谱系分析及育种研究进展[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,39(1):152-160.
ZHENG Y, QU X L, GUO L , et al. Advances on ornamental crabapple resources[J]. J Shandong Agric Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2008,39(1):152-160. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.2008.01.033.
[11]
魏宏亮 . 观赏海棠开花节律特征研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2015.
WEI H L . Study on flowering rhythm characteristics of ornamental crabapple[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2015.
[12]
张往祥, 魏宏亮, 江志华 , 等. 观赏海棠品种群的花期物候特征研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2014,41(4):713-725.
摘要
以82个观赏海棠品种为研究对象,进行了始花期(S1)—盛花期(S2)—末花期(S3)3个阶段的花期物候观测,系统地研究了品种群的花期物候特征,旨在为海棠专类园建设及海棠花期物候性状特异种质挖掘与定向育种提供参考。结果表明:根据始花期的候区分布,可将82个品种划分为最早(VE)、早(E)、中(M)、晚(L)和极晚(EL)5大花期时序品种群;最早与最晚开花品种的始花期间隔22 d。根据S1 ~ S3花期持续时间长短,以3 d为级差,可将82个品种划分为超短(VS)、短(S)、中等(M)、长(L)和超长(VL)5大花期长短类群;82个品种平均花期长度为(11.4 ± 2.8)d。基于花期物候频率统计,构建了始花期(S1)、盛花期(S2)和末花期(S3)的品种频度指数动态分布函数(CFI),其动态函数的直线斜率存在显著差异(k1 = 6.312 < k2 = 6.821 < k3 = 9.1557),反应了3个花期阶段物候节奏由慢而快的变化趋势。还构建了观赏多度指数函数(CDI),为品种群花期整体观赏性评价提供了新的参考依据;基于CDI,将品种群的群体观赏期划分为6个阶段,即启动期(P0)、指数快速上升期(P1)、指数高位稳定期(P2)、指数快速下降期(P3)、窗口期(P4)和指数低位持续期(P5);P1 ~ P3期间CDI值 ≥ 13.6%,时间长达21 d;P2时段的CDI值高达75.3% ~ 80.3%,时间达3 d基于82个观赏海棠品种S1 ~ S3的花期长度(L)和开花期间每日最高气温均值(T)的二维源数据,以T = 23 ℃和T = 27 ℃为分界点,拟合了L与T之间的分段耦合函数,不同温度区间耦合度(R2)差异显著:52个品种分布于A区(T = 19.2 ~ 22.9 ℃),21个品种分布于B区(T = 23.0 ~ 26.9 ℃),9个品种分布于C区(T = 27.0 ~ 32.0 ℃);这反应了花期长短的相对性,当T ≤ 23 ℃时,花期长短的主导因子为遗传因素,T ≥ 27 ℃时,花期长短的主导因子为日最高气温,T = 23.0 ~ 26.9 ℃时,花期长短由遗传因素和日最高气温共同主导。
ZHANG W X, WEI H L, JIANG Z H , et al. Studies on flowering phenological characteristics of ornamental crabapple cultivar group[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2014,41(4):713-725. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014.04.015.
With 82 ornamental crabapple cultivars as the research object,the flowering phenology at initial flowering stage(S1),full blooming stage(S2)and end flowering stage(S3)was observed and studied systemly to provide references for the building and maintenance of crabapple gardens,for the excavation and development of special crabapple traits,and for the oriented breeding of crabapple with special flowering phenology. The results were as follows:According to the‘Hou’area distribution(five days is a‘Hou’in Chinese)of S1,82 ornamental crabapple cultivars were divided into five major flowering sequence groups:Very early group(VE),early group(E),medium group(M),late group(L),and extremely late group(EL),and flowering days interval between the earliest and the latest flowering variety was as long as 22days. According to flowering days from S1 to S3,with three days as level differential,82 crabapple cultivars,of which average flowering days was(11.4 ± 2.8)d,were divided into five major groups:Very short group(VS),short group(S),medium group(M),long group(L)and very long group(VL). Based on flowering phenology frequency statistics,cumulative cultivar frequency index(CFI)functions at S1,S2 and S3 were constructed respectively. It is found that the function linear slope values(i.e. k values)of S1,S2 and S3 were different significantlyk1(6.312)< k2(6.821)< k3(9.1557),which reflected a slow to fast rhythm changing trend in flowering phenology from S1 to S2 to S3. Also,Ornamental cultivar diversity index(CDI)function was constructed,which provided a new reference frame for evaluating the whole flowering appreciation value of the 82 cultivars. Based on CDI function,the whole flowering appreciation period of 82 cultivars were divided into six typical phases:start-up period(P0),fast rising period(P1),high and stable period(P2),fast falling periodP3),window period(P4)and low index period(P5). It is worth mentioning that in P1–P3,CDI ≥ 12.4% and the lasting time was up to 21 days,and in P2,CDI ranges from 75.4% to 80.2%,and the lasting time was 3 days.Based on the two-dimensional data of flowering days(L)of 82 cultivars and its respective mean daily maximum air temperature(T)during the flowering period(S1–S3),and with T = 23 ℃ and T = 27 ℃ as critical air temperature points,the three piecewise coupling functions between L and T were fitted respectively. It is found that the coupling coefficient(R2)between L and T were different significantly for the three cultivar groups distributed in different air temperature zones. Fifty-two cultivars distributed in air temperature zone A(T = 19.2–22.9 ℃),21 cultivars distributed in air temperature zone B(T = 23.0–26.9 ℃),and 9 cultivars distributed in temperature zone C(T = 27.0–32.0 ℃). That indicated the relativity of flowering days,which depends on both genetic and air temperature factors. When T ≤ 23 ℃,the genetic base was the dominant factor for flowering days,whereas when T ≥ 27 ℃,the daily maximum air temperature turned into the dominant factor. Also,when T = 23.0–26.9 ℃,the genetic base and the daily maximum air temperature both were the dominant factors for flowering days.
[13]
孙凡雅, 沈向, 康鸾 , 等. 观赏海棠杂交后代萌芽期观察及花期预测的灰色关联度分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2008,17(4):51-54.
SUN F Y, SHEN X, KANG L , et al. Observation of sprouting stage and grey relational degree analysis on flowering stage forecast of hybrid progenies of crabapple (Malus spp.)[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2008,17(4):51-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2008.04.010
[14]
SHI P J, CHEN Z H, REDDY G V P , et al. Timing of cherry tree blooming: contrasting effects of rising winter low temperatures and early spring temperatures[J]. Agric For Meteorol, 2017,240/241:78-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.04.001.
[15]
宛敏渭, 刘秀珍 . 中国物候观测方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979.
[16]
JOSE E, N O E, NEZ-GO M P M , et al. Chilling and heat requirements of almond cultivars forflowering[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2003(50):79-85.
[17]
BRODY A K . Effects of pollinators,herbivores,and seed predators on flowering phenology[J]. Ecology, 1997,78(6):1624-1631. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1624:EOPHAS]2.0.CO;b2.
[18]
FORREST J, MILLER-RUSHING A J . Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution[J]. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci, 2010,365(1555):3101-3112. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0145.
[19]
KORNER C, BASLER D . Phenology under global warming[J]. Science, 2010,327(5972):1461-1462. DOI: 10.1126/science.1186473.
[20]
仲舒颖, 葛全胜, 郑景云 , 等. 近30年北京自然历的主要物候期、物候季节变化及归因[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012,36(12):1217-1225.
ZHONG S Y, GE Q S, ZHENG J Y , et al. Changes of main phenophases of natural calendar and phenological seasons in Beijing for the last 30 years[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012,36(12):1217-1225. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.01217.
[21]
GUO L, DAI J H, RANJITKAR S , et al. Chilling and heat requirements for flowering in temperate fruit trees[J]. Int J Biometeorol, 2014,58(6):1195-1206. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-013-0714-3.
[22]
GUO L, DAI J H, WANG M C , et al. Responses of spring phenology in temperate zone trees to climate warming:a case study of apricot flowering in China[J]. Agric For Meteorol, 2015,201:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.10.016.
[23]
HARRINGTON C A, GOULD P . Tradeoffs between chilling and forcing in satisfying dormancy requirements for Pacific Northwest tree species[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2015,6:120. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00120.
Many temperate and boreal tree species have a chilling requirement, that is, they need to experience cold temperatures during fall and winter to burst bud normally in the spring. Results from trials with 11 Pacific Northwest tree species are consistent with the concept that plants can accumulate both chilling and forcing units simultaneously during the dormant season and they exhibit a tradeoff between amount of forcing and chilling. That is, the parallel model of chilling and forcing was effective in predicting budburst and well chilled plants require less forcing for bud burst than plants which have received less chilling. Genotypes differed in the shape of the possibility line which describes the quantitative tradeoff between chilling and forcing units. Plants which have an obligate chilling requirement (Douglas-fir, western hemlock, western larch, pines, and true firs) and received no or very low levels of chilling did not burst bud normally even with long photoperiods. Pacific madrone and western redcedar benefited from chilling in terms of requiring less forcing to promote bud burst but many plants burst bud normally without chilling. Equations predicting budburst were developed for each species in our trials for a portion of western North America under current climatic conditions and for 2080. Mean winter temperature was predicted to increase 3.2-5.5 degrees C and this change resulted in earlier predicted budburst for Douglas-fir throughout much of our study area (up to 74 days earlier) but later budburst in some southern portions of its current range (up to 48 days later) as insufficient chilling is predicted to occur. Other species all had earlier predicted dates of budburst by 2080 than currently. Recent warming trends have resulted in earlier budburst for some woody plant species; however, the substantial winter warming predicted by some climate models will reduce future chilling in some locations such that budburst will not consistently occur earlier.
[24]
HARRINGTON C A, GOULD P J, STCLAIR J B . Modeling the effects of winter environment on dormancy release of Douglas-fir[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2010,259(4):798-808. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.018.
[25]
LINKOSALO T, HANNAK L, PERTTI H . A comparison of phenological models of leaf bud burst and floweringof boreal trees using independent observations[J]. Tree Physiology, 2008(28):1873-1882.

基金

国家林业和草原局知识产权转化运用项目([2019]14号)
江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目(CX183076)

编辑: 李燕文

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(1852 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/