降香黄檀生长和材性性状种源差异及早期选择

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903018

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 11-17.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903018

所属专题：红木类珍贵树种专题

• 专题报道(执行主编施季森) • 上一篇下一篇

降香黄檀生长和材性性状种源差异及早期选择

洪舟(), 杨曾奖, 张宁南, 郭俊誉, 刘小金, 崔之益, 徐大平^*()

中国林业科学研究院热带林业研究所, 广东广州 510520

收稿日期:2019-03-07 修回日期:2019-04-23 出版日期:2020-02-08 发布日期:2020-02-02
通讯作者: 徐大平
作者简介:洪舟( hzhou1981@sina.com),副研究员。
基金资助:
中国林科院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(CAFYBB2017ZA001-7);国家自然科学基金项目(31500537)

Variation and provenance juvenile selection of growth and wood characters for Dalbergia odorifera

HONG Zhou(), YANG Zengjiang, ZHANG Ningnan, GUO Junyu, LIU Xiaojin, CUI Zhiyi, XU Daping^*()

Research Institute of Tropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, China

Received:2019-03-07 Revised:2019-04-23 Online:2020-02-08 Published:2020-02-02
Contact: XU Daping

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 研究目前收集的濒危树种降香黄檀种源的生长和材性性状差异,为广东地区降香黄檀造林提供优良种源。【方法】 对广东省阳江市11年生降香黄檀种源试验林进行调查分析,观测树高、胸径、单株材积、木材基本密度和心材比率,在生长和材性性状统计分析的基础上,分析性状与产地地理气候因子的相关性,并依据聚类和隶属函数分析结果进行早期速生优质种源选择。【结果】 8个种源降香黄檀各性状间均存在显著差异,其中材积和心材比率在种源间的差异最大。胸径和单株材积在种源间的差异达到极显著(P < 0.01)水平,其余3个性状在种源间的差异均达到显著水平( P < 0.05)。降香黄檀各性状间存在一定的相关性,心材比率与胸径性状呈极显著正相关( P < 0.01)。降香黄檀木材基本密度的种源变异主要受种源地年降雨量和年均气温影响,来自年降雨量较少、气温较低地区的降香黄檀种源,其树高、胸径和材积等生长量较大,木材基本密度较大,心材比率也较高。依据相关分析及聚类分析的结果,可以将8个种源大致划分为具有明显地理格局的两类:一类为东部沿海种源,另一类为中西部山脉种源。 【结论】 降香黄檀的遗传分化与年降雨量和年均气温均有一定的关系。初步挑选出生长快、材质优,心材比率高的白沙种源可作为适宜广东地区造林的降香黄檀优良种源。

关键词: 降香黄檀, 生长, 材性性状, 种源, 早期选择, 红木

Abstract:

【Objective】 Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen, commonly known as Hainan Huanghuali, Jiangxiang or Hualimu, belongs to the genus Dalbergia, family Papilionoideae. It is a unique redwood tree species in China and is used to make high quality furniture. The variation of provenance and provenance division of growth and wood basic density of D. odorifera were studied, and fast-growing, high-quality provenance was selected preliminarily, which provided strong seedlings for afforestation in Guangdong.【Method】 We analyzed growth (height, diameter at breast height (DBH) as well as single tree volume) and wood traits (wood base density and heartwood ratio) in the 11-year provenance test conducted in Yangjiang, Guangdong Province. Furthermore, we explored the correlation between phenotypic and genotypic characters and original geo-climatic factors. Based on the results generated from cluster analysis and membership function method, the provenances with superior growth and wood properties were selected at early stage. 【Result】 Significant or extremely significant provenance variations were observed in height, DBH, volume, wood basic density and heartwood ratio of D. odorifera, suggesting genetic differentiation among provenances. The variation ranges of provenance for DBH and tree volume were 3.07-13.73 cm and 0.002 156-0.050 541 m³, respectively. The maximum value of provenance was 4.47 and 23.44 times of the minimum value, and the coefficients of variation of provenance phenotype for DBH and tree volume were 26.01% and 61.99%, respectively. Compared to the growth character, the provenance differentiation of wood basic density was relatively small, with the values ranging from 0.416-0.768 g/cm³. The maximum value of provenance was 1.84 times of the minimum value, and the phenotypic variation coefficient of provenance was 8.85%. On an average, 33.54% of D. odorifera plants formed heartwood when 10 years old, and the variation range of provenance was 16.67%-50.00%. No significant positive correlation was observed between wood basic density and height, DBH and volume (0.60, 0.54 and 0.50, respectively). The DBH and volume of D. odorifera provenance were positively correlated with the ratio of heartwood. Correlation analysis and cluster analysis showed that the 8 provenances could be classified into 2 groups with clear geographic structure. The first group consisted of the Northeast coastal provenances zoo of Hainan Island, including Haikou, Wenchang and Wanning provenances, and the second group consisted of Midwest mountain provenances zoo of Hainan, including Bawangling, Dongfang, Wuzhishan, Baisha and Jianfeng provenances. Three growth characters and two wood characters ofD. odorifera were selected for comprehensive evaluation by membership function method used in fuzzy mathematics. The comprehensive evaluation of 8 provenances was different, ranging from 0 to 0.90. The highest average subordinate value was Baisha provenance (0.90), followed by Bawangling provenance (0.61). According to the final evaluation of the comprehensive score, the Baisha provenance was the best. The tree height, DBH, volume, basic density, and the proportion of forming heartwood of Baisha provenance were increased 5.61%, 14.04%, 42.78%, 0.33% and 17.23%, respectively.【Conclusion】 The genetic provenance differentiation of D. odorifera was related to location annual rainfall and average temperature. The local annual precipitation and average temperature were the main climatic factors which led to the variation of wood density for D. odorifera. The provenances tested from lower annual precipitation and annual average temperature region were not only higher in height,diameter and tree volume but also exhibited higher wood basic density and heartwood ratio. Baisha provenance from the middle mountain area with fast growing, highly-quality wood and higher heartwood forming ratio was considered to possess high adaptability for afforestation in Guangdong Province.

Key words: Dalbergia odorifera, growth, wood traits, provenance, juvenile selection, redwood tree

中图分类号:

S722

洪舟,杨曾奖,张宁南,等. 降香黄檀生长和材性性状种源差异及早期选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 11-17.

HONG Zhou, YANG Zengjiang, ZHANG Ningnan, GUO Junyu, LIU Xiaojin, CUI Zhiyi, XU Daping. Variation and provenance juvenile selection of growth and wood characters for Dalbergia odorifera[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 44(1): 11-17.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903018.

图/表 7

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

图1

表6

参考文献 30

[1]	中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
	China Flora Editorial Board, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Flora of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2006.
[2]	麻永红, 贾瑞丰, 杨曾奖, 等. 6年生不同家系降香黄檀早期生长评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(8):42-47.
	MA Y H, JIA R F, YANG Z J, et al. Early growth evaluation on six-year-old Dalbergia odorifera T.Chen families [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(8):42-47. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.08.008. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.08.008
[3]	成俊卿, 杨家驹, 刘鹏, 等. 中国木材志[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1992.
	CHEN J Q, YANG J J, LIU P, et al. Chinese timber[M]. Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishing House, 1992.
[4]	吕金阳. 降香黄檀木材美学价值研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2013.
	LYU J Y. Study on aesthetic value of scented rosewood[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2013.
[5]	刘心纯, 李育浩, 李书渊. 中药降香基原的研究[J]. 中药材, 1996 (11):550-553.
	LIU X C, LI YU H, LI S Y. Original plant of chinese herb Jiangxiang[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 1996 (11):550-553.
[6]	WAMG W, WENG X C, CHENG D L. Antioxidant activities of natural phenolic components from Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen[J]. Food Chemistry, 2000, 71:45-49. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00123-0
[7]	孟慧, 谢彩香, 杨云, 等. 降香黄檀产地适宜性分析[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2010, 21(9):2304-2306.
	MENG H, XIE C X, YANG Y, et al. Suitable producing areas of Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen [J]. Lishizhen Medicine and Material Medica Research, 2010, 21(9):2304-2306. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2010.09.083. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2010.09.083
[8]	邓利和, 钟仕进, 农寿千. 海南岛降香黄檀种质资源调查与分析[J]. 热带林业, 2017, 45(3):42-45.
	DENG L H, ZHONG S J, NONG S Q. Investigation and analysis of germplasm resources of Daberqia odorifera in Hainan island [J]. Tropical Forestry, 2017, 45(3):42-45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0938.2017.03.012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0938.2017.03.012
[9]	李科. 不同种源交趾黄檀种苗变异及初步选择[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2018.
	LI K. Research on seeding phenotypic variation and selection of excellent provenances of Dalbergia cochinchinensis pierre [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2018.
[10]	廖怀建, 邓疆, 杜婷, 等. 引进种源印度黄檀优株选择及优良无性系选择与评价[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(6):916-920.
	LIAO H J, DENG J, DU T, et al. Superior plant and clone selection and evaluation of introduced Dalbergia sissoo provenances [J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(6):916-920. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.06.005. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.06.005
[11]	孙永玉, 李昆, 杨文云, 等. 钝叶黄檀地理种源变异研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2005, 18(3):296-299.
	SUN Y Y, LI K, YANG W Y, et al. Study on geographical provenance variations of Dalbergia obtusifolia Prain [J]. Forest Research, 2005, 18(3):296-299. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2005.03.013. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2005.03.013
[12]	邱国金, 史云光, 蒋泽平, 等. 黄檀不同母树种子育苗试验[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 38(5):40-43,49.
	QIU G J, SHI Y G, JIANG Z P, et al. Seed seedling experiment of different mother trees of Dalbergia hupeana [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 38(5):40-43,49. DOI: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201801020. doi: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201801020
[13]	洪舟, 刘福妹, 张宁南, 等. 降香黄檀生长性状家系间变异与优良家系初选[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(4):106-112.
	HONG Z, LIU F M, ZHANG N N, et al. Growth traits variation among families and preliminary selection of superior families in Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 42(4):106-112. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201711017. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201711017
[14]	陈英强. 降香黄檀不同家系的生长性状测定与初步选择[J]. 福建林业科技, 2015, 42(2):84-89.
	CHEN Y Q. Research on introduction experiment of Dalbergia odorifera T.Chen superior families selection [J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 42(2):84-89. DOI: 10.13428/j.cnki.fjlk.2015.02.019. doi: 10.13428/j.cnki.fjlk.2015.02.019
[15]	毛红, 姚元池, 陈波涛, 等. 杉木两种交配子代生长性状变异及优良家系选择[J]. 林业科技开发, 2015, 29(4):21-26.
	MAO H, YAO Y C, CHEN B T, et al. The variation of growth properties and screening on superior families among two mating progenies in Chinese fir[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 29(4):21-26. DOI: 10.13360/j.issn.1000-8101.2015.04.004. doi: 10.13360/j.issn.1000-8101.2015.04.004
[16]	中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所. 木材密度测定方法:GB/T 1933-2009[S]. 北京: 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2009.
	Research institute of wood industry, Chinese academy of forestry. Method for determination of the density of wood: GB/T 1933-2009[S]. Beijing: National Standard Press, 2009.
[17]	林元震, 陈晓阳. R与ASReml-R统计分析教程[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2014.
	LIN Y Z, CHEN X Y. R &ASReml-R statistical analysis tutorial[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2014.
[18]	麦宝莹, 洪舟, 徐大平, 等. 不同家系交趾黄檀种子萌发及幼苗生长差异[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(2):153-160.
	MAI B Y, HONG Z, XU D P, et al. Variation of seed germination and seedling growth among different familiesof Dalbergia cochinchinensis [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2019, 43(2):153-160. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201807048. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201807048
[19]	沈熙环. 油松、华北落叶松良种选育实践与理论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
	SHEN X H. Selection and breeding of Pinus tabulaeformis and Larix principis-rupprechtii: practice and theory[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015.
[20]	WRIGHT J W. Introduction to forest genetics[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1976: 427-438.
[21]	沈熙环. 林木育种学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1990.
	SHEN X H. Forest genetics[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1990.
[22]	BERGIN D O, KIMBERLEY M O, LOW C B. Provenance variation in Podocarpus totara (D. Don): Growth, tree form and wood density on a coastal site in the north of the natural range, New Zealand[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255(5/6):1373-1378. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.053 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.053
[23]	齐名. 参试子代样本数对数量性状遗传分析结果的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 1997, l0(6):629-633.
	QI M. Influence of sample numbers of offspring tested on genetic analysis of quantitative traits[J]. Forest Research, 1997, l0(6):629-633.
[24]	王秀花, 陈柳英, 马丽珍, 等. 7年生木荷生长和木材基本密度地理遗传变异及种源选择[J]. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(3):307-313.
	WANG X H, CHEN L Y, MA L Z, et al. Geographical provenance variation of growth and wood basic density of 7-year-old Schima superba and its provenance selection [J]. Forest Research, 2011, 24(3):307-313.
[25]	何霞, 廖柏勇, 王芳, 等. 苦楝种源幼林期生长性状地理变异的研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2016, 37(4):75-81.
	HE X, LIAO B Y, WANG F, et al. Geographic variations in growth traits of different Melia azedarach provenances in the young forest period [J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(4):75-81. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.04.013. doi: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.04.013
[26]	ZOBEL B, TALBERT J. Applied forest tree improvement[M]. New Jersey: The Blackburn Press, 2003.
[27]	王明庥. 林木遗传育种学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001.
	WANG M X. Forest genetics and tree breeding [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2001.
[28]	KRAKAU U K, LIESEBACH M, ARONEN T, et al. Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forest tree breeding in Europe[M/OL]. ( 2013) [2014-10-06] https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-94-007-6146-9.pdf.
[29]	张伟红, 王润辉, 郑会全, 等. 乐昌含笑种源地理变异研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2015(2):24-29.
	ZHANG W H, WANG R H, ZHENG H Q, et al. Geographic variation pattern for provenances of Michelia chapensis [J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2015(2):24-29. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.02.004. doi: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.02.004
[30]	刘宇, 徐焕文, 尚福强, 等. 16年生白桦种源变异及区划[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(09):48-56.
	LIU Y, XU H W, SHANG F Q, et al. Variation and zoning of 16-year-old Betula platyphylla provenance [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(9):48-56. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160906. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160906

种源 provenance	经度 (E)/ (°) longitude	纬度 (N)/ (°) latitude	海拔/m altitude	7月平均气温/℃ average temperature in July	1月平均气温/℃ average temperature in January	年降水量/mm annual precipitation	年均气温/℃ annual average temperature
文昌Wenchang	110.7	19.6	30	28.6	18.2	1 777	24.3
海口Haikou	110.3	20.1	61	28.7	17.3	1 790	24.1
白沙Baisha	109.4	19.2	173	27.3	17.6	1 341	23.4
五指山Wuzhishan	109.6	18.8	146	24.6	16.2	1 395	21.2
东方Dongfang	108.6	19.1	63	29.3	19.1	1 515	24.9
尖峰Jianfeng	109.1	18.6	57	27.8	19.1	1 310	24.2
万宁Wanning	110.7	18.8	60	28.8	20	1 826	25.2
霸王岭Bawanglin	109.1	19.1	166	25.7	16.4	1 495	21.9

性状 traits	均值 mean	变幅 range	表型变异系数/% PCV	变异来源source of variation
性状 traits	均值 mean	变幅 range	表型变异系数/% PCV	种源provenance	区组block	误差error
树高/m height	4.7	2.7~7.2	13.09	0.697 000^*	6.363 000^**	0.318 000
胸径/cm DBH	7.42	3.07~13.73	26.01	11.833 000^**	2.020 000^ns	3.560 000
材积/m³tree volume	0.013 201	0.002 156~0.050 541	61.99	0.000 266^**	0.000 076 ^ns	0.000 061
基本密度/(g·cm^-3) base density	0.596	0.416~0.768	8.85	0.007 139^*	0.002 436 ^ns	0.002 749
心材比率/% heartwood ratio	35.54	16.67~50.00	27.88	198.330 000^*	-	54.360 000

种源 provenance	树高/m height	胸径/cm DBH	材积/m³ tree volume	基本密度/(g·cm^-3) base density	心材比率/% heartwood ratio
文昌Wenchang	4.7±0.7 ab	6.77±0.90 bc	0.010 619±0.003 986 bc	0.586±0.051 a	28.97±4.18 bc
海口Haikou	4.6±0.6 b	7.22±1.56 bc	0.012 108±0.005 874 bc	0.590±0.044 a	35.81±5.49 ab
白沙Baisha	5.0±0.9 a	8.46±2.69 a	0.018 848±0.011 539 a	0.598±0.048 a	41.67±8.33 ab
五指山Wuzhishan	4.8±0.6 ab	7.13±1.56 bc	0.012 094±0.006 087 bc	0.614±0.053 a	34.05±12.30 abc
东方Dongfang	4.7±0.6 ab	7.79±2.45 ab	0.014 150±0.011 219 b	0.594±0.054 a	35.87±10.70 ab
尖峰Jianfeng	4.6±0.4 b	7.23±1.51 bc	0.011 933±0.006 118 bc	0.598±0.055 ab	40.33±5.15 ab
万宁Wanning	4.5±0.5 b	6.33±1.06 c	0.008 894±0.003 624 c	0.561±0.049 b	20.56±4.19 c
霸王岭Bawanglin	4.7±0.6 ab	7.59±1.83 ab	0.013 670±0.007 390 b	0.591±0.057 ab	47.04±2.80 a

指标 index	树高 height	胸径 DBH	材积 tree volume	基本密度 base density
胸径 DBH	0.82^**
材积 tree volume	0.86^**	0.98^**
基本密度 base density	0.60	0.54	0.50
心材比率 heartwood ratio	0.49	0.77^**	0.70^*	0.62

性状 traits	经度 longitude	纬度 latitude	海拔 altitude	7月平均气温 average temperature in July	1月平均气温 average temperature in January	年降水 annual precipitation	年均气温 annual average temperature
树高 height	-0.35	0.22	0.59	-0.28	-0.50	-0.47	-0.50
胸径 DBH	-0.71^*	0.06	0.62	-0.18	-0.35	-0.67	-0.36
材积 tree volume	-0.60	0.06	0.67	-0.2	-0.35	-0.64	-0.36
基本密度 base density	-0.57	-0.09	0.46	-0.62	-0.67	-0.74^*	-0.76^*
心材比率 heartwood ratio	-0.74^*	0.01	0.61	-0.44	-0.58	-0.70^*	-0.53

降香黄檀生长和材性性状种源差异及早期选择

Variation and provenance juvenile selection of growth and wood characters for Dalbergia odorifera

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

排序 rank	种源 provenance	树高 height	胸径 DBH	材积 tree volume	基本密度 base density	心材比率 heartwood ratio	平均值 mean
1	白沙Baisha	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.70	0.80	0.90
2	霸王岭Bawanglin	0.45	0.59	0.48	0.57	1.00	0.61
3	东方Dongfang	0.55	0.69	0.53	0.62	0.58	0.59
4	五指山Wuzhishan	0.57	0.37	0.32	1.00	0.51	0.55
5	尖峰Jianfeng	0.19	0.42	0.31	0.70	0.75	0.47
6	海口Haikou	0.35	0.42	0.32	0.55	0.58	0.44
7	文昌Wenchang	0.52	0.21	0.17	0.47	0.32	0.33
8	万宁Wanning	0	0	0	0	0	0

[1]	王改萍, 章雷, 曹福亮, 丁延朋, 赵群, 赵慧琴, 王峥. 红蓝光质对银杏苗木生长生理特性及黄酮积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 105-112.
[2]	韩新宇, 高露双, 秦莉, 庞荣荣, 刘鸣谦, 朱一泓, 田益雨, 张金. 林分密度对兴安落叶松径向生长-气候关系的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 182-190.
[3]	尹增芳, 欧香, 陈瑶, 杨爱香, 孙李勇. 望春玉兰生物学基础研究进展与展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 256-262.
[4]	魏绪英, 张瑶, 马美霞, 姜雪茹, 陈慧婷, 吴靖, 杨玉, 蔡军火. 石蒜年生长周期内NSC及其代谢酶活性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 106-114.
[5]	张曦文, 陈旭, 吴军, 孙国飞, 吴力国, 赵长海, 代伟昭, 刘桂丰. 彩叶桦新品种幼龄期生长适应性早期分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 124-130.
[6]	魏静, 谭星, 王昌盛, 闫瑞, 李林珂, 宁月, 刘芸. 引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 97-105.
[7]	欧阳, 欧阳芳群, 孙猛, 王超, 王军辉, 安三平, 王丽芳, 许娜, 王猛. 欧洲云杉无性系幼龄生长节律、年度和密度互作效应及选择策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 95-104.
[8]	梁文超, 步行, 罗思谦, 谢寅峰, 胡加玲, 张往祥. 施肥对增温促花后‘长寿冠’海棠叶片生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 114-120.
[9]	李建新, 徐森, 杨丽婷, 陈双林, 郭子武. 毛竹林下多花黄精构件生物量分配特征的年际效应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 121-128.
[10]	魏亚娟, 郭靖, 党晓宏, 解云虎, 汪季, 李小乐, 吴慧敏. 吉兰泰荒漠绿洲过渡带不同生境下白刺灌丛沙堆形态特征与影响机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 172-180.
[11]	邓家珍, 叶绍明, 林铭业, 蓝雅惠, 燕羽, 樊容源, 潘彩玲. 降香黄檀根瘤以及根瘤菌形态和超微结构特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 259-267.
[12]	贾瑞瑞, 祝艳艳, 杨秀莲, 付钰, 岳远征, 王良桂. 不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 97-106.
[13]	盖军鹏, 陈东升, 贾炜玮, 王政. 基于种源和气候效应的日本落叶松树高生长模型研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 51-60.
[14]	何潇, 雷相东, 段光爽, 丰庆荣, 张逸如, 冯林艳. 气候变化对落叶松人工林生物量生长的影响模拟[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 120-128.
[15]	孙荣喜, 潘昕昊, 仲小茹, 李桂盛. 不同种源米槠种子形态特征与营养成分变异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 27-34.