不同浓度CO2对马尾松幼苗光合特性及单萜烯释放的影响

叶思源, 尚鹤, 陈展, 曹吉鑫

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 71-78.

PDF(1751 KB)
PDF(1751 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 71-78. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903034
研究论文

不同浓度CO2对马尾松幼苗光合特性及单萜烯释放的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of elevated CO2 on photosynthetic characteristics and monoterpene emissions in Pinus massoniana seedlings

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】研究CO2浓度升高对马尾松(Pinus massoniana)幼苗光合特性和单萜烯释放的影响,以了解马尾松挥发性有机物(BVOCs)排放对气候变化的响应机制。【方法】利用开顶式气室(OTC),依据政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第5次评估报告,设置1 000、750、550 μmol/mol 3个CO2熏气浓度梯度,并与未经CO2熏气处理的OTCs中CO2平均浓度(437 μmol/mol,CK)进行对比,研究了中国南方主要造林树种马尾松幼苗净光合速率、叶绿素含量、气孔导度及单萜烯释放的变化规律。【结果】经过60 d的浓度为750及1 000 μmol/mol CO2熏气处理,马尾松幼苗的叶绿素总含量下降约 17.54%和29.82%;60 d高浓度CO2处理的马尾松幼苗在环境大气中净光合速率及气孔导度显著低于对照组,且浓度为1 000 μmol/mol CO2处理组最低;相较于对照组,CO2浓度升高使马尾松幼苗的单萜烯释放速率下降,在60 d时达到显著水平。马尾松幼苗的单萜烯释放速率与叶片净光合速率及气孔导度呈显著正相关。【结论】高CO2浓度条件下,马尾松幼苗叶片光合速率和气孔导度的下降可能是单萜烯释放速率降低的原因。

Abstract

【Objective】Biogenic volatile organic compounds(BVOCs)are the main components of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere and one of the key compounds of vegetation that affect the environment and climate. With the intensification of the global climate change, the research on BVOCs emission by plants under increasing CO2 levels has gained a considerable interest. Effects of the elevated CO2 concentrations on photosynthetic characteristics and monoterpene emission rate in Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) seedlings were studied to improve the understanding of the response mechanism of plant BVOC emissions to the climate change.【Method】According to the atmospheric CO2 concentrations in different carbon emission scenarios reported in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fifth assessment report, 1-year-old Masson pine seedlings were fumigated with CO2 concentration gradients, consisting of ambient air (437 μmol/mol,CK), 550 μmol/mol, 750 μmol/mol, and 1 000 μmol/mol in 12 open-top chambers (three replicated chambers for each), from September 10th to November 20th, 2017. The elevated CO2 concentrations were maintained for 9 hours per day from 08:00 to 17:00. In the middle of October and November, the net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of Masson pine seedlings were measured in ambient air from 09:00 to 11:30. Pine needles were collected for a chlorophyll determination. Monoterpene emissions of Masson pine seedlings were also sampled in the middle of October and November using a dynamic headspace adsorption sampling method with 200 mL/min for 30 min; all sampling experiments were carried out during 09:00-11:30 and 13:30-15:30. Monoterpene samples were collected through Tenax-TA glass tubes (Mesh 60/80) and analyzed using TDS-GC/MS. 【Result】Chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b of the plant seedlings exposed to 750 μmol/mol and 1 000 μmol/mol CO2 for 60 days were both significantly lower than those under CK, and the total chlorophyll content decreased by 17.54% and 29.82%, respectively. However, the difference was not significant when fumigation was performed for 30 days. When measured in ambient air, the net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of Masson pine seedlings treated with 60-day CO2 enrichment was significantly lower than those under CK; however, there was also no significant difference when treated for 30 days. In addition, the total chlorophyll content of Masson pine seedlings was positively correlated with the leaf net photosynthetic rate significantly. Monoterpene emissions by Pinus massoniana were decreased by the elevated CO2 after 60-day fumigation; the emission rate reached the lowest at the concentration of 1 000 μmol/mol, with a decrease of 19.43% (fumigated for 30 days) and 59.62% (fumigated for 60 days). After 60-day treatment, the monoterpene emission rate of P. massoniana seedlings was significantly and positively correlated to the leaf net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance.【Conclusion】With the extension of fumigation time,the photosynthetic acclimation of P. massoniana was revealed; the decline in monoterpene emissions may be attributed to the decrease in stomatal conductance under the condition of elevated CO2 concentration.

关键词

CO2浓度 / 马尾松 / 净光合速率 / 气孔导度 / 单萜烯释放速率 / 开顶式气室

Key words

CO2 concentration / Pinus massoniana / net photosynthetic rate / stomatal conductance / monoterpene emission rate / Open-Top Chamber (OTCs)

引用本文

导出引用
叶思源, 尚鹤, 陈展, . 不同浓度CO2对马尾松幼苗光合特性及单萜烯释放的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2020, 44(6): 71-78 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903034
YE Siyuan, SHANG He, CHEN Zhan, et al. Effects of elevated CO2 on photosynthetic characteristics and monoterpene emissions in Pinus massoniana seedlings[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2020, 44(6): 71-78 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903034
中图分类号: S718.5   

参考文献

[1]
WMO Greenhouse Gas Bulletin. The state of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere based on global observations through 2017 [R]. Genewa:World Meteorological Organization, 2018.
[2]
IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synreport report. Contribution of working groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ to the fifth assessment Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[R]. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 2014.
[3]
张振花, 孙胜, 刘洋, 等. 增施CO2对温室番茄结果期叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018,37(5):1398-1402.
ZHANG Z H, SUN S, LIU Y, et al. Effects of CO2 enrichment on photosynthetic characteristics of greenhouse tomato during fruiting stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018,37(5):1398-1402. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201805.010.
[4]
毛子军, 赵溪竹, 刘林馨, 等. 3种落叶松幼苗对CO2升高的光合生理响应[J]. 生态学报, 2010,30(2):317-323.
MAO Z J, ZHAO X Z, LIU L X, et al. Photosynthetic physiological characteristics in response to elevated CO2 concentration of three larch (Larix) species seedlings[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(2):317-323.
[5]
汤文华, 窦全琴, 潘平平, 等. 不同薄壳山核桃品种光合特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,44(3):81-88.
TANG W H, DOU Q Q, PAN P P, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of grafted plants of different Carya illinoinensis varieties[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2020,44(3):81-88. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903004.
[6]
郑凤英, 彭少麟. 植物生理生态指标对大气CO2浓度倍增响应的整合分析[J]. 植物学报, 2001,43(11):1101-1109.
ZHENG F Y, PENG S L. Meta-analysis of the response of plant ecophysiological variables to doubled atmospheric CO2 concentrations[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2001,43(11):1101-1109. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-9072.2001.11.001.
[7]
GAMAGE D, THOMPSON M, SUTHERLAND M, et al. New insights into the cellular mechanisms of plant growth at elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2018,41(6):1233-1246. DOI: 10.1111/pce.13206
[8]
PEÑUELAS J, LLUSIÀ J. Plant VOC emissions: making use of the unavoidable[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2004,19(8):402-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.06.002.
[9]
THEIS N, LERDAU M. The evolution of function in plant secondary metabolites[J]. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2003,164(S3):S93-S102. DOI: 10.1086/374190.
[10]
PEÑUELAS J, STAUDT M. BVOCs and global change[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2010,15(3):133-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.005.
[11]
PACIFICO F, HARRISON S P, JONES C D, et al. Isoprene emissions and climate[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2009,43(39):6121-6135. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.002.
[12]
HALLQUIST M, WENGER J C, BALTENSPERGER U, et al. The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009,9(14):5155-5236. DOI: 10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009.
[13]
GUENTHER A, HEWITT C N, ERICKSON D, et al. A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995,100(D5):8873-8892. DOI: 10.1029/94jd02950.
[14]
HEYWORTH C J, IASON G R, TEMPERTON V, et al. The effect of elevated CO2 concentration and nutrient supply on carbon-based plant secondary metabolites in Pinus sylvestris L[J]. Oecologia, 1998,115(3):344-350. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050526.
[15]
STAUDT M, JOFFRE R, RAMBAL S, et al. Effect of elevated CO2 on monoterpene emission of young Quercus ilex trees and its relation to structural and ecophysiological parameters[J]. Tree Physiology, 2001,21(7):437-445. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/21.7.437.
[16]
LORETO F, FISCHBACH R J, SCHNITZLER J P, et al. Monoterpene emission and monoterpene synthase activities in the Mediterranean evergreen oak Quercus ilex L. grown at elevated CO2 concentrations[J]. Global Change Biology, 2001,7(6):709-717. DOI: 10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00442.x.
[17]
花圣卓, 陈俊刚, 余新晓, 等. 温带典型森林树种的萜烯类化合物排放及其与环境要素的相关性[J]. 林业科学, 2016,52(11):19-28.
HUA S Z, CHEN J G, YU X X, et al. Correlation between terpenes emission from typical forest tree species and environmental elements in temperate zone[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016,52(11):19-28. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161103.
[18]
王志辉, 张树宇, 陆思华, 等. 北京地区植物VOCs排放速率的测定[J]. 环境科学, 2003,24(2):7-12.
WANG Z H, ZHANG S Y, LU S H, et al. Screenings of 23 plant species in Beijing for volatile organic compound emissions[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2003,24(2):7-12. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2003.02.002.
[19]
陈颖, 史奕, 何兴元. 沈阳市四种乔木树种BVOCs排放特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009,28(12):2410-2416.
CHEN Y, SHI Y, HE X Y. Emission characteristics of biogenic volatile organic compounds from four tree species in Shenyang, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009,28(12):2410-2416. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2009.0420.
[20]
张莉, 王效科, 欧阳志云, 等. 中国森林生态系统的异戊二烯排放研究[J]. 环境科学, 2003,24(1):8-15.
ZHANG L, WANG X K, OUYANG Z Y, et al. Estimation of isoprene emission from forest ecosystems in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Enviromental Science, 2003,24(1):8-15. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2003.01.002.
[21]
蒋跃林, 张庆国, 杨书运, 等. 28种园林植物对大气CO2浓度增加的生理生态反应[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2006,15(2):1-6.
JIANG Y L, ZHANG Q G, YANG S Y, et al. Ecophysiological responses of 28 species of garden plants to atmospheric CO2 enrichment[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2006,15(2):1-6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2006.02.001.
[22]
LONG S P, AINSWORTH E A, ROGERS A, et al. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2004,55(1):591-628. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610.
[23]
CHEN G Y, YONG Z H, LIAO Y, et al. Photosynthetic acclimation in rice leaves to free-air CO2 enrichment related to both ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylation limitation and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate regeneration limitation[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2005,46(7):1036-1045. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pci113.
Net photosynthetic rates (Pns) in leaves were compared between rice plants grown in ambient air control and free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE, about 200 micromol mol(-1) above ambient) treatment rings. When measured at the same CO2 concentration, the Pn of FACE leaves decreased significantly, indicating that photosynthetic acclimation to high CO2 occurs. Although stomatal conductance (Gs) in FACE leaves was markedly decreased, intercellular CO2 concentrations (Ci) were almost the same in FACE and ambient leaves, indicating that the photosynthetic acclimation is not caused by the decreased Gs. Furthermore, carboxylation efficiency and maximal Pn, both light and CO2-saturated Pn, were decreased in FACE leaves, as shown by the Pn-Ci curves. In addition, the soluble protein, Rubisco (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate caboxylase/oxygenase), and its activase contents as well as the sucrose-phosphate synthase activity decreased significantly, while some soluble sugar, inorganic phosphate, chlorophyll and light-harvesting complex II (LHC II) contents increased in FACE leaves. It appears that the photosynthetic acclimation in rice leaves is related to both ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylation limitation and RuBP regeneration limitation.
[24]
陈根云, 廖轶, 蔡时青, 等. 水稻田稗草叶片光合作用对开放式空气CO2浓度增高(FACE)的适应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002,13(10):1201-1204.
CHEN G Y, LIAO Y, CAI S Q, et al. Leaf photosynthetic acclimation of Echinochloa crusgalli grown in rice field to free air CO2 enrichment (FACE)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002,13(10):1201-1204. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2002.0279
[25]
AINSWORTH E A, DAVEY P A, HYMUS G J, et al. Is stimulation of leaf photosynjournal by elevated carbon dioxide concentration maintained in the long term? A test with Lolium perenne grown for 10 years at two nitrogen fertilization levels under Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE)[J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2003,26(5):705-714. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01007.x.
[26]
AINSWORTH E A, ROGERS A, NELSON R, et al. Testing the “source-sink” hypojournal of down-regulation of photosynjournal in elevated [CO2] in the field with single gene substitutions in Glycine max[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2004,122(1-2):85-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.09.002.
[27]
韩文军, 廖飞勇, 何平. 大气二氧化碳浓度倍增对闽楠光合性状的影响[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2003,23(2):62-65.
HAN W J, LIAO F Y, HE P. The photosynthetic response of Phoebe bournei to doubled CO2 concentration in air[J]. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 2003,23(2):62-65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2003.02.009.
[28]
TEGELBERG R, JULKUNEN-TIITTO R, VARTIAINEN M, et al. Exposures to elevated CO2, elevated temperature and enhanced UV-B radiation modify activities of polyphenol oxidase and guaiacol peroxidase and concentrations of chlorophylls, polyamines and soluble proteins in the leaves of Betula pendula seedlings[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2008,62(3):308-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.003.
[29]
李萍, 郝兴宇, 杨宏斌, 等. 大气CO2浓度升高对绿豆生长发育与产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2011,25(2):358-362, 396.
LI P, HAO X Y, YANG H B, et al. Effects of air CO2 enrichment on growth and yield of mung bean[J]. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica, 2011,25(2):358-362, 396.
[30]
翟晓朦, 王铁梅, 关潇, 等. 3种秋眠类型苜蓿对不同CO2浓度的生理响应[J]. 草业科学, 2016,33(8):1550-1559.
ZHAI X M, WANG T M, GUAN X, et al. Effect of different CO2 concentrations on physiological responses of fall-dormant alfalfa[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016,33(8):1550-1559. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0128.
[31]
BLOOM A J, BURGER M, RUBIO-ASENSIO J S R,, et al. Carbon dioxide enrichment inhibits nitrate assimilation in wheat and Arabidopsis[J]. Science, 2010,328(5980):899-903. DOI: 10.1126/science.1186440.
[32]
张振, 金国庆, 丰忠平, 等. 马尾松年轮稳定碳同位素比率(δ~(13)C)变化特征及影响因子分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2019,28(4):24-31.
ZHANG Z, JIN G Q, FENG Z P, et al. Analyses on variation characteristics and influence factors of ring stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13) of Pinus massoniana[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2019,28(4):24-31.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2019.04.03.
[33]
郭世伟, 冉炜, 周毅, 等. 试论大气CO2浓度升高条件下水稻碳氮代谢变化及其调控途径[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2006,20(5):560-566.
GUO S W, RAN W, ZHOU Y, et al. On carbon and nitrogen metabolism of rice plants under elevated CO2 conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2006,20(5):560-566. DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2006.05.019.
[34]
AINSWORTH E A, ROGERS A. The response of photosynjournal and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions[J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2007,30(3):258-270. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x.
[35]
ENGINEER C B, HASHIMOTO-SUGIMOTO M, NEGI J, et al. CO2 sensing and CO2 regulation of stomatal conductance: advances and open questions[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2016,21(1):16-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.08.014.
[36]
YUAN J S, HIMANEN S J, HOLOPAINEN J K, et al. Smelling global climate change: mitigation of function for plant volatile organic compounds[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2009,24(6):323-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.01.012.
[37]
MOCHIZUKI T, WATANABE M, KOIKE T, et al. Monoterpene emissions from needles of hybrid larch F1 (Larix gmelinii var. japonica × Larix kaempferi) grown under elevated carbon dioxide and ozone[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2017,148:197-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.041.
[38]
TIIVA P, JING T, MICHELSEN A, et al. Monoterpene emissions in response to long-term night-time warming, elevated CO2 and extended summer drought in a temperate heath ecosystem[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,580:1056-1067. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.060.
[39]
KLAIBER J, NAJAR-RODRIGUEZ A J, PISKORSKI R, et al. Plant acclimation to elevated CO2 affects important plant functional traits, and concomitantly reduces plant colonization rates by an herbivorous insect[J]. Planta, 2013,237(1):29-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-012-1750-7.
[40]
NIINEMETS Ü. Stomatal constraints May affect emission of oxygenated monoterpenoids from the foliage of Pinus pinea[J]. Plant Physiology, 2002,130(3):1371-1385. DOI: 10.1104/pp.009670.
Dependence of monoterpenoid emission and fractional composition on stomatal conductance (G(V)) was studied in Mediterranean conifer Pinus pinea, which primarily emits limonene and trans-beta-ocimene but also large fractions of oxygenated monoterpenoids linalool and 1,8-cineole. Strong decreases in G(V) attributable to diurnal water stress were accompanied by a significant reduction in total monoterpenoid emission rate in midday. However, various monoterpenoids responded differently to the reduction in G(V), with the emission rates of limonene and trans-beta-ocimene being unaffected but those of linalool and 1,8-cineole closely following diurnal variability in G(V). A dynamic emission model indicated that stomatal sensitivity of emissions was associated with monoterpenoid Henry's law constant (H, gas/liquid phase partition coefficient). Monoterpenoids with a large H such as trans-beta-ocimene sustain higher intercellular partial pressure for a certain liquid phase concentration, and stomatal closure is balanced by a nearly immediate increase in monoterpene diffusion gradient from intercellular air-space to ambient air. The partial pressure rises also in compounds with a low H, but more than 1,000-fold higher liquid phase concentrations of linalool and 1,8-cineole are necessary to increase intercellular partial pressure high enough to balance stomatal closure. The system response is accordingly slower, and the emission rates may be transiently suppressed by low G(V). Simulations further suggested that linalool and 1,8-cineole synthesis rates also decreased with decreasing G(V), possibly as the result of selective inhibition of various monoterpene synthases by stomata. We conclude that physicochemical characteristics of volatiles not only affect total emission but also alter the fractional composition of emitted monoterpenoids.
[41]
NIINEMETS Ü, LORETO F, REICHSTEIN M. Physiological and physicochemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2004,9(4):180-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.02.006.
[42]
LORETO F, CICCIOLI P, CECINATO A, et al. Evidence of the photosynthetic origin of monoterpenes emitted by Quercus ilex L. leaves by 13C labeling [J]. Plant Physiology, 1996,110(4):1317-1322. DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.4.1317.
[43]
JARDINE A B, JARDINE K J, FUENTES J D, et al. Highly reactive light-dependent monoterpenes in the Amazon[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2015,42(5):1576-1583. DOI: 10.1002/2014gl062573.
[44]
PE Ñ UELAS J, LLUSIA J. Seasonal emission of monoterpenes by the Mediterranean tree Quercus ilex in field conditions: Relations with photosynthetic rates, temperature and volatility[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1999,105(4):641-647. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.105407.x.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0600202-3)

编辑: 李燕文

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(1751 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/