
越南黄花梨种源家系生长遗传变异及早期选择
洪舟, 杨曾奖, 张宁南, 郭俊誉, 刘小金, 崔之益, 徐大平
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 25-30.
越南黄花梨种源家系生长遗传变异及早期选择
Genetic variation and juvenile selection of growth traits of Dalbergia tonkinensis Prain
【目的】对越南黄花梨幼林阶段生长表现进行研究,为筛选早期生长性状优良的越南黄花梨家系,以及越南黄花梨引种选择提供依据。【方法】对4年生的越南黄花梨10种源46个家系的早期生长性状进行调查,在分析生长性状遗传变异的基础上进行早期优良种源和家系的选择。【结果】越南黄花梨早期生长性状在种源、家系间达到显著以上差异,表型和遗传变异系数分别为10.81%~36.97%和4.20%~10.95%。各性状的种源重复力、家系遗传力和单株遗传力分别为(0.45±0.19)~(0.81±0.06),(0.27±0.16)~(0.59±0.09) 和(0.18±0.13)~(0.35±0.19)。运用综合指数选择,综合生长指标、叶型和冠幅性状选出早期优良种源2个,优良家系6个。优良家系的树高、胸径、地径、叶色值、叶片叶绿素SPAD值以及冠幅的平均遗传增益为6.87%、6.54%、6.77%、2.62%、3.50%和9.43%。【结论】8号(兴安)种源不仅生长优良,而且存在着丰富的遗传变异,可作为越南黄花梨引种栽培的首选种源。
【Objective】 Dalbergia tonkinensis Prain, commonly known as Mai Dou Lai in Vietnam is a semi deciduous tree belonging to the genus Dalbergia, family Papilionoideae. The genetic variability and genetic-phenotypic correlations among growth traits were studied for screening the excellent genetic materials of D. tonkinensis at an juvenile stage. It helped the germplasm introduction of D. tonkinensis and the development of precious timber industry in Guangdong Province. 【Method】 The growth traits include tree height, diameter at breast height, diameter at ground height, crown, leaf chlorophyll SAPD value and leaf area were studied in the 4 years old, provenance/family testing trail in Baishengyuan, Yangjiang City, in west Guangdong Province. The genetic parameters were estimated for each trait using mixed linear model. Further, we selected the excellent provenances and families using exponential equation.【Result】 The average annual growth in height and ground diameter of D. tonkinensis was 1 m and 3 cm, respectively. The coefficient of variation of diameter (26.86%-40.41%) was higher than that of tree height (25.27%-26.35%). There were different phenotypic and genetic variations in the growth characters for D. tonkinensis. The phenotypic variation coefficient ranged from 10.81% (leaf chlorophyll SPAD value) to 36.97% (ground diameter 17). The genetic variation coefficient ranged from 4.20% (leaf chlorophyll SPAD value) to 10.95% (ground diameter 17). The coefficient of variation of tree height was consistent among all the characteristics at juvenile stage. The provenance repeatability, family and individual heritability were recorded as (0.45±0.19) to (0.81±0.06), (0.27±0.16) to (0.59±0.09) and (0.18±0.13) to (0.35±0.19), respectively. Highly significant positive genetic correlation was observed between growth characters (P < 0.01). Significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant genetic positive correlation ( P < 0.01) was observed between growth traits and leaf chlorophyll SPAD value and crown, except leaf area traits. Genetic correlation among leaf chlorophyll SPAD value, leaf area and crown were not observed. Based on phenotypic and genetic variation of growth traits, the early index selection of excellent provenances / families was carried out with tree height, DBH, ground diameter, leaf chlorophyll SPAD value, leaf area and crown diameter (measured in 2018). The provenance index coefficients of tree height, DBH, ground diameter, leaf chlorophyll SPAD, leaf area and crown diameter were 0.78, 0.54, 0.48, 0.11, 0.05 and 0.87, respectively. The average aggregation index of provenance was 17.62±1.88. Two excellent provenances (No.3 and No.8) were selected as their aggregation index of multiple traits was greater than the average value+1 standard deviation (mean+SD = 19.50). The average genetic gain of tree height, DBH and DBH for excellent provenances was 43.06%, 101.46% and 115.84%, respectively. Six excellent families were selected according to the index of family aggregation (11.81) constructed based on population mean values. The selection rate was 13.03%. The genetic gains of tree height, DBH, ground diameter, leaf chlorophyll SPAD value, leaf area and crown diameter of the selected population were 6.87%, 6.54%, 6.77%, 2.62%, 3.50% and 9.43%, respectively. 【Conclusion】 There are abundant provenance and family variations among the early growth characters for D. tonkinensis. The genetic control of growth and wood properties at provenance and families were observed above moderate intensity. The highly genetic variation of the introduced germplasm ofD. tonkinensis provided a basis for genetic breeding, and this can be further used for genetic improvement of D. tonkinensis.
越南黄花梨 / 遗传变异 / 种源选择 / 家系选择 / 早期选择
Dalbergia tonkinensis Prain / genetic variation / provenance selection / family selection / juvenile selection
[1] |
中国科学院中国植物志委员会. 中国植物志全文电子版[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994.
China Flora Editorial Board, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Flora of China [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1994.
|
[2] |
麻永红. 东京黄檀种子生物学及幼苗生长变异研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2016.
|
[3] |
吴师强, 李大周, 陆文, 等. 越南黄花梨形态特性及引种植物名称研究初报[J]. 热带林业, 2013, 41(3):25-26.
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
张礼行, 周丹水, 郭聪颖, 等. 基于GC-MS技术对降香黄檀与其他黄檀属植物挥发油成分的鉴别分析[J]. 广东药科大学学报, 2018, 34(5):579-585.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
杨秀艳, 季孔庶. 林木育种中的早期选择[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014, 17(2):6-8.
|
[8] |
何霞, 李景剑, 王芳, 等. 苦楝种源/家系幼林的性状变异及选择[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(6):1-7.
|
[9] |
程林林, 尹光天, 黄雨芹, 等. 闽楠种源家系种质早期生长评估及选择[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(15):5108-5116.
|
[10] |
王婧, 李培, 陈晓阳, 等. 黄樟种源、家系早期生长性状变异与初步选择[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(2):57-63.
|
[11] |
朱报著, 张卫华, 张方秋, 等. 土沉香早期生长性状遗传变异及选择[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2017, 36(4):24-28.
|
[12] |
陈美红, 刘小金, 徐大平, 等. 越南黄花梨育苗技术[J]. 林业实用技术 2014(7):33-34.
|
[13] |
刘小金, 徐大平, 杨曾奖, 等. 温度对越南黄花梨种子萌发的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2014, 27(5):707-709.
|
[14] |
李桂兰, 徐峰, 罗建举, 等. 海南香枝木与越南香枝木木材构造特征比较解剖研究[J]. 广西农业生物科学, 2008, 27(2):154-157.
|
[15] |
罗真付, 张雪峰, 潘彪, 等. 越南香枝木解剖构造及物理力学性能研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2012, 39(4):493-496.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
林元震, 陈晓阳. R与ASReml-R统计分析教程[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2014.
|
[18] |
洪舟, 刘福妹, 杨曾奖, 等. 5个泰国种源大果紫檀的早期生长及材性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(2):161-167.
|
[19] |
洪舟, 刘福妹, 张宁南, 等. 降香黄檀生长性状家系间变异与优良家系初选[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(4):106-112.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
王亚南, 王军辉, 麻文俊, 等. 34年生华山松生长和材性的种源变异与种源选择[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2013, 41(12):5-7, 12.
|
[22] |
马育华. 植物育种的数量遗传学基础[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1982.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
王丽波. 选择指数的决策分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2006.
|
[25] |
孙晓梅, 张守攻, 王卫东, 等. 日本落叶松自由授粉家系形质性状遗传变异的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2004, 26(3):41-45.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |