快速城镇化地区耕地景观生态安全格局演变特征及其驱动机制

蔡汉, 朱权, 罗云建, 马坤

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 181-188.

PDF(4068 KB)
PDF(4068 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 181-188. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201907047
研究论文

快速城镇化地区耕地景观生态安全格局演变特征及其驱动机制

作者信息 +

Evolution characteristics and driving mechanisms of cultivated landscape eco-security patterns in rapid urbanization areas

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】探索快速城镇化地区耕地景观生态安全格局演变特征及其驱动机制新方法和新思路,为实施 “18亿亩耕地红线”保护政策提供科学依据。【方法】以江苏扬州耕地景观为对象,运用Fragstas 4.2软件和ArcGIS 10.2软件模拟计算扬州耕地景观安全格局时空演变特征;基于统计年鉴数据,运用地理探测器筛选出主导影响因素,并结合地理加权回归软件分析出影响因素之间的空间差异。【结果】扬州市耕地景观生态安全以市中心周边地区向西北方向逐年降低;社会经济影响因子解释度明显高于自然影响因子;各个主导社会经济因素对扬州市耕地景观生态安全格局的影响存在显著的空间差异。【结论】通过GIS空间模拟、地理探测器筛选和地理加权回归模型分析相结合的方法,可以科学准确地模拟分析出快速城镇化地区耕地景观生态安全格局时空演变特征及其驱动机制和空间差异。

Abstract

【Objective】 The aim of this study is to explore new methods and ideas for determining evolution characteristics of cultivated land landscape ecological security patterns and its driving mechanisms in rapid urbanization areas, and to provide a scientific basis for implementing the “1.8 billion mu arable land” protection policy. 【Method】 Considering the cultivated land landscape of Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, as the object, we used Fragstas4.2 software and ArcGIS10.2 software to simulate the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of the security pattern of the cultivated land landscape in the study area. Based on statistical yearbook data, we used the Geo-detector to screen for the dominant influencing factors and then included the information in the GWR 4.09 software to analyze spatial differences between the influencing factors. 【Result】 The landscape ecological security of cultivated land in Yangzhou City decreased annually from the areas surrounding the city center to the northwest. The explanatory degree of socio-economic impact factors was clearly higher than that of natural impact factors. There were significant spatial differences in the impact of various dominant socio-economic factors on the ecological security pattern of the cultivated land landscape in Yangzhou. 【Conclusion】 Combining the GIS spatial simulation, geo-detector screening, and GWR model analysis, we could scientifically and accurately simulate and analyze the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics, driving mechanisms, and spatial differences in the ecological security pattern of the cultivated land landscape in rapid urbanization areas.

关键词

耕地 / 景观生态安全 / 地理探测器 / 地理加权回归模型 / 江苏扬州

Key words

cultivated land / landscape ecological security / geo-detector / GWR model / Yangzhou City / Jiangsu Province

引用本文

导出引用
蔡汉, 朱权, 罗云建, . 快速城镇化地区耕地景观生态安全格局演变特征及其驱动机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2020, 44(5): 181-188 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201907047
CAI Han, ZHU Quan, LUO Yunjian, et al. Evolution characteristics and driving mechanisms of cultivated landscape eco-security patterns in rapid urbanization areas[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2020, 44(5): 181-188 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201907047
中图分类号: U412.4   

参考文献

[1]
宋小青, 欧阳竹 . 中国耕地多功能管理的实践路径探讨[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012,27(4):540-551.
SONG X Q, OUYANG Z . Route of multifunctional cultivated land management in China[J]. J Nat Resour, 2012,27(4):540-551. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.04.002.
[2]
赵晓丽, 张增祥, 汪潇 , 等. 中国近30a耕地变化时空特征及其主要原因分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014,30(3):1-11.
ZHAO X L, ZHANG Z X, WANG X , et al. Analysis of Chinese cultivated Land’s spatial-temporal changes and causes in recent 30 years[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2014,30(3):1-11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.03.001.
[3]
王让会 . 景观尺度、过程及格局(LSPP)研究的内涵及特点[J]. 热带地理, 2018,38(4):458-464.
WANG R H . Connotation and characteristics of landscape scale,process and pattern(LSPP) research[J]. Trop Geogr, 2018,38(4):458-464. DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003061.
[4]
YUSHANJIANG A, ZHANG F, YU H Y , et al. Quantifying the spatial correlations between landscape pattern and ecosystem service value:a case study in Ebinur Lake Basin,Xinjiang,China[J]. Ecol Eng, 2018,113:94-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.005.
[5]
FJELLSTAD W, DRAMSTAD W . Landscape monitoring as a tool in improving environmental security[M] //Use of Landscape Sciences for the Assessment of Environmental Security. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007: 131-141. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6594-1_9.
[6]
GARTAULA H, PATEL K, JOHNSON D , et al. From food security to food wellbeing:examining food security through the Lens of food wellbeing in Nepal’s rapidly changing agrarian landscape[J]. Agric Hum Values, 2017,34(3):573-589. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-016-9740-1.
[7]
JEFFERY L R . Ecological restoration in a cultural landscape:conservationist and Chagossian approaches to controlling the ‘Coconut Chaos’ on the Chagos Archipelago[J]. Hum Ecol, 2014,42(6):999-1006. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-014-9696-y.
[8]
TURNER M G, GARDNER R H . Quantitative methods in landscape ecology:an introduction[M] New York: Springer, 1991: 3-14. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4244-2_1.
[9]
裴欢, 魏勇, 王晓妍 , 等. 耕地景观生态安全评价方法及其应用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014,30(9):212-219.
PEI H, WEI Y, WANG X Y , et al. Method of cultivated land landscape ecological security evaluation and its application[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2014,30(9):212-219. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.09.026.
[10]
孙丽娜, 杨光, 闫文义 . 基于乡镇尺度的耕地利用景观生态安全测定研究[J]. 环境工程, 2018,36(11):162-165,178.
SUN L N, YANG G, YAN W Y . Research on measurement of ecological security of arable landscape based on the township scale[J]. Environ Eng, 2018,36(11):162-165,178. DOI: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201811032.
[11]
海文静 . 基于景观格局的耕地整治优先度评价[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2018.
HAI W J . Evaluation on priority of cultivated land consolidation based on landscape pattern[D]. Lanzhou:Gansu Agricultural University, 2018.
[12]
宋晓媚, 周忠学, 王明 . 城市化过程中都市农业景观变化及其生态安全评价:以西安市为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2015,37(3):835-844.
SONG X M, ZHOU Z X, WANG M . Evaluation of the change of urban agricultural landscape and its ecological security under urbanization:a case study in Xi’an City[J]. J Glaciol Geocryol, 2015,37(3):835-844. DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2015.0093.
[13]
韩逸, 郭熙, 江叶枫 , 等. 南方丘陵区耕地景观生态安全影响因素及其空间差异[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(17):6522-6533.
HAN Y, GUO X, JIANG Y F , et al. Cultivated land landscape ecological security:influencing factors and spatial differences in the hilly region of South China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019,39(17):6522-6533. DOI: 10.5846/stx6201804210908.
[14]
李晓雅, 郭青霞, 杜轶 . 不同特点村庄撂荒耕地景观格局特征对比分析:以太行山区为例[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019,47(5):916-921.
LI X Y, GUO Q X, DU Y . Comparative analysis of landscape pattern characteristics of abandoned farmland in different characteristics of villages:taking Taihang Mountain area as an example[J]. J Shanxi Agric Sci, 2019,47(5):916-921. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2019.05.47.
[15]
谈丹, 李萍, 朱红梅 . 基于地形起伏度的耕地景观格局研究:以醴陵市为例[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2018(3):33-38.
TAN D, LI P, ZHU H M . Study on landscape pattern of cultivated land based on relief amplitude:taking Liling City as an exanple[J]. Territ Nat Resour Study, 2018(3):33-38. DOI: 10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.2018.03.011.
[16]
韩逸, 郭熙, 江叶枫 , 等. 南方丘陵区耕地质量与景观格局指数相关性分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2018,34(5):1057-1065.
HAN Y, GUO X, JIANG Y F , et al. Correlation analysis between cultivated land quality and landscape pattern index in south hilly areas[J]. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2018,34(5):1057-1065. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.013.
[17]
张巧英 . 基于耕地景观生态安全评价模型的山区耕地安全格局变化驱动因素研究:以甘肃省陇南市武都区为例[J]. 矿山测量, 2018,46(3):122-126.
ZHANG Q Y . Study on the driving factors of the change of the safety pattern of the cultivated land in mountain area based on the cultivated land landscape ecological security evaluation model:taking Wudu District of Longnan City as the example[J]. Mine Surv, 2018,46(3):122-126. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-358X.2018.03.030.
[18]
彭文君, 舒英格 . 喀斯特山区县域耕地景观生态安全及演变过程[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(3):852-865.
PENG W J, SHU Y G . Analysis of landscape ecological security and cultivated land evolution in the Karst mountain area[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018,38(3):852-865. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201612062513.
[19]
杨斌, 王金生 . 基于GIS的丘陵区耕地景观格局时空演变特征分析[J]. 测绘工程, 2014,23(9):1-4,8.
YANG B, WANG J S . The spatial-temporal evolution of landscape pattern for farmland in the hilly area based on GIS[J]. Eng Surv Mapp, 2014,23(9):1-4,8. DOI: 10.19349/j.cnki.issn1006-7949.2014.09.001. DOI 10.19349/j.cnki.issn1006-7949.2014.09.001.
[20]
潘涛 . 水田扩张中三江平原北部耕地景观演化规律及驱动因素分析[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2015.
PAN T . The process of regional paddy farmland landscape evolution and driving factor analysis[D]. Harbin:Northeast Agricultural University, 2015.
[21]
MÜLLER D, MUNROE D K . Changing rural landscapes in Albania:cropland abandonment and forest clearing in the postsocialist transition[J]. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 2008,98(4):855-876. DOI: 10.1080/00045600802262323.
[22]
VERBURG P H, OVERMARS K P . Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling:exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model[J]. Landscape Ecol, 2009,24(9):1167-1181. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-009-9355-7.
Land use change is the result of interactions between processes operating at different scales. Simulation models at regional to global scales are often incapable of including locally determined processes of land use change. This paper introduces a modeling approach that integrates demand-driven changes in land area with locally determined conversion processes. The model is illustrated with an application for European land use. Interactions between changing demands for agricultural land and vegetation processes leading to the re-growth of (semi-) natural vegetation on abandoned farmland are explicitly addressed. Succession of natural vegetation is simulated based on the spatial variation in biophysical and management related conditions, while the dynamics of the agricultural area are determined by a global multi-sector model. The results allow an exploration of the future dynamics of European land use and landscapes. The model approach is similarly suitable for other regions and processes where large scale processes interact with local dynamics.
[23]
DAN Y, GEEL B V . Abandonment of farmland and vegetation succession following the Eurasian plague pandemic of ad 1347-52[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 2010,34, 575-582. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01674.x.
[24]
YELOFF D, VAN GEEL B . Abandonment of farmland and vegetation succession following the Eurasian plague pandemic of ad 1347?52[J]. J Biogeography, 2007,34(4):575-582. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01674.x.
[25]
辛良杰, 李秀彬, 谈明洪 , 等. 近年来我国普通劳动者工资变化及其对农地利用的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2011,30(8):1391-1400.
摘要
利用农村固定观察点数据、《全国农产品成本收益资料汇编》、全国农业统计数据等,对近年来我国普通劳动者工资的变化特征及其对我国农地利用的影响进行了分析。结果表明:近年来我国普通劳动者工资的增长速度和幅度明显要快于农产品和农业生产资料价格的增长速度。我国东部发达地区的部分省份,其复种指数已经出现了明显的下降趋势,物质和服务投入中,省工性投入比重增加,农业种植结构向蔬菜作物和茶果园转变明显。这种趋势有逐渐蔓延全国之势。从原因上分析,主要是面对非农工资的上升,农户只有提高农业劳动生产率才能达到与非农工资匹配的目标。要保证农业生产的稳定和持续,提高农业生产效益和劳动生产率是唯一途径,其具体的政策建议是:持续增加农业补贴,继续鼓励劳动力非农迁移,以扩大农业生产规模。
XIN L J, LI X B, TAN M H , et al. The rise of ordinary labor wage and its effect on agricultural land use in present China[J]. Geogr Res, 2011,30(8):1391-1400. DOI: 10.11821/yj2011080005.
China is one of the most populous countries in the world. Like other developing countries, huge population and its rapid growth are intensifying food insecurity. Cropland intensification driven by the government and rural households plays a key role in food production and provision at national level. However, since the implementation of reform and opening up, more and more rural workers have shifted to non-agricultural industries. Meanwhile, the wage increase rate of the ordinary labor in China is much higher than that of the prices of farm produce and also faster that of agricultural means of production. The increasing off-farm migration and rising wage make the shares of farm income in the total family income decline even further. So farmers' pursuance has turned from maximizing the output of land to maximizing the income of labor force with the development of market economy. The wage rise and the change of farmers' goal have exerted a great effect on agricultural land use in some parts of China, especially in the developed provinces of eastern China, which is mainly embodied in two aspects: decreases of multi-cropping index and labor input. Meanwhile, due to the high labor productivity, the agricultural restructuring with more vegetables, tea and fruit trees has been very apparent. And the spatial-temporal expansion of this trend will continue for a long time. To ensure grain production, the national grain subsidy programme introduced in 2004 has achieved initial targets, so future work and potential development in this field should be done to encourage scale management of farmland.
[26]
VAN DOORN A M, BAKKER M M . The destination of arable land in a marginal agricultural landscape in South Portugal:an exploration of land use change determinants[J]. Landscape Ecol, 2007,22(7):1073-1087. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9093-7.
This research attempts to investigate what drives three conversions of arable land during the period 1985–2000 in a marginal agricultural landscape in Southern Portugal: afforestation of arable land, abandonment of arable land and regeneration of the agro-silvo-pastoral system. This was done by exploring the associations between these changes and a selection of both biophysical and socio-economic variables in a study area of 44 square km. For each conversion of arable land into one of the three other land use types the descriptive power of the various independent variables were evaluated using logistic regression. By comparing different statistical models (one containing only the biophysical attributes, another model containing only the socio-economic variables and finally a model containing both types of variables) the relative importance of socio-economic and biophysical variables was evaluated. The results show that both the biophysical and socio-economic variables were significantly associated with the occurrences of the land use changes. However, the models containing only the socio-economic variables were stronger related to occurrences of afforestation and regeneration of the montado, whereas the biophysical variables were more related to land abandonment. The landowner type was a significant descriptive variable across all land use change models. The results suggest that local socio-economic factors are significant in explaining the pattern of the conversion of arable land in the study area and for this reason the variety of landowners’ response to the physical conditions deserves more attention in land use change modelling.
[27]
李鑫, 欧名豪, 马贤磊 . 基于景观指数的细碎化对耕地利用效率影响研究:以扬州市里下河区域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011,26(10):1758-1767.
摘要
从中观尺度研究细碎化对耕地利用效率影响,探寻遏制细碎化水平降低因素,以为高效农地利用政策制定提供依据。选取景观指数量化耕地细碎化水平,用数据包络分析(DEA)法对耕地利用效率进行评价,最后采用计量经济模型检验细碎化对耕地利用效率影响。结果表明:研究区扬州市里下河区域30个乡镇的耕地利用综合效率、纯技术效率与规模效率的平均值分别是0.949 3、0.972 2和0.977 0,具有一定提升空间;表征细碎化的第一主成分与地块平均面积、地块密度、面积加权形状指数和面积加权分维数的载荷值大于88%,第二主成分与边界密度指数载荷值大于91%;第一主成分对纯技术效率与规模效率的影响弹性是-0.002 7和-0.085 6,第二主成分对纯技术效率与规模效率的影响弹性是-0.001 1和-0.002 4。细碎化对耕地利用规模效率与纯技术效率产生显著负影响,且对规模效率影响大于对纯技术效率影响;应从地块面积、分布与形状等方面来降低细碎化程度以提高耕地生产能力。
LI X, OU M H, MA X L . Analysis on impact of fragmentation based on landscape index to cultivated land use efficiency:a case on Lixiahe District in Yangzhou City[J]. J Nat Resour, 2011,26(10):1758-1767. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.10.012.
The purpose of this paper is to study the impact of fragmentation on cultivated land use efficiency from meso-scale point of view, to explore factors reducing the level of fragmentation, so as to provide the basis for the formulation of efficient agricultural land use policy. The paper first selects landscape index to quantify the cultivated land fragmentation level, and then evaluates the efficiency of cultivated land using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model, based on this, it can test the impact which fragmentation exerts with econometrics models. The results show that: the average of the overall efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of cultivated land use were 0.9493, 0.9722 and 0.9770 respectively in the study area, so there is a certain room to improve efficiency in most towns; the correlation coefficient between the first principal component and the average area of land, land density, area weighted shape index and area weighted fractal dimension is separately more than 88%, the second principal component and the edge density index is more than 91%; the flexibility affect coefficient between the first and pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency are -0.0027 and -0.08561, between the second and pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency are -0.0011 and -0.0024 respectively. It can be drawn: fragmentation has negative effect both on pure technical efficiency and on scale efficiency, and the impact on scale efficiency is greater than on pure technical efficiency; the level of fragmentation should be reduced from land area, distribution and shape in order to improve cultivated land productivity.
[28]
徐斌 . “扬州行动”争创现代交通示范城[N]. 中国交通报, 2019-05-07(8).
[29]
李秀芝 . 北戴河新区耕地景观生态安全时空变化研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017,38(3):59-64.
LI X Z . The temporal and spatial changes of cultivated land landscape ecological security in Beidaihe new district[J]. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan, 2017,38(3):59-64. DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20170310.
[30]
郭泺, 薛达元, 余世孝 , 等. 泰山景观生态安全动态分析与评价[J]. 山地学报, 2008,26(3):331-338.
GUO L, XUE D Y, YU S X , et al. Assessment and dynamic analysis of landscape ecological security of Taishan Mountain[J]. J Mt Sci, 2008,26(3):331-338. DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.2008.03.001.
[31]
王娟, 崔保山, 姚华荣 , 等. 纵向岭谷区澜沧江流域景观生态安全时空分异特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008,28(4):1681-1690.
摘要
以1985年、1995年和2000年纵向岭谷区的核心区-澜沧江流域的土地利用数据为基础,在GIS软件的支持下,以破碎度、分离度、优势度等景观格局指数和景观类型的脆弱度为评价指标研究澜沧江流域景观生态安全的时空分异特征。研究表明,在这16a期间,景观结构变化导致景观生态安全指数在时空分异性较强,生态安全程度呈下降趋势,由于研究区特殊的地形、地貌特征,澜沧江流域的上、中、下游的生态安全指数分布形态及其下降幅度存在较大的差异,较低的生态安全指数(ES≤0.5)主要分布于该流域的下游呈东北-西南近“Y”形并沿江扩展,而较高的生态安全指数(ES≥0.6)主要分布于流域的中游呈东南-西北方向并沿江萎缩。人类的经济开发活动主要是在景观层次上进行,景观也是区域生态环境管理的基础单元之一,应用景观方法研究生态安全,揭示不同景观类型间的迁移转化特征并进一步识别区域生态环境的变化趋势及其内在因素,对区域生态建设和资源开发具有指导意义。
WANG J, CUI B S, YAO H R , et al. The temporal and spatial characteristic of landscape ecological security at Lancang River watershed of longitudinal range gorge region in southwest China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2008,28(4):1681-1690. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.04.039.
[32]
杨青生, 乔纪纲, 艾彬 . 快速城市化地区景观生态安全时空演化过程分析:以东莞市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(4):1230-1239.
YANG Q S, QIAO J G, AI B . Landscape ecological security dynamics in a fast growing urban district:the case of Dongguan City[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013,33(4):1230-1239. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201203010274.
[33]
王劲峰, 徐成东 . 地理探测器:原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017,72(1):116-134.
WANG J F, XU C D . Geodetector:principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2017,72(1):116-134. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201701010.
[34]
LI X W, XIE Y F, WANG J F , et al. Influence of planting patterns on fluoroquinolone residues in the soil of an intensive vegetable cultivation area in northern China[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2013,458/459/460:63-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.002.
[35]
龙奋杰, 郑思齐, 王轶军 , 等. 基于空间计量经济学模型的城市公共服务价值估计[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2009,49(12):2028-2031.
LONG F J, ZHENG S Q, WANG Y J , et al. Value estimates of local public services using a spatial econometric model[J]. J Tsinghua Univ(Sci Technol), 2009,49(12):2028-2031. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2009.12.028.
[36]
覃文忠 . 地理加权回归基本理论与应用研究[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2007.
QIN W Z . The basic theoretics and application research on geographically weighted regression[D]. Shanghai:Tongji University, 2007.
[37]
隋雪艳, 吴巍, 周生路 , 等. 都市新区住宅地价空间异质性驱动因素研究:基于空间扩展模型和GWR模型的对比[J]. 地理科学, 2015,35(6):683-689.
SUI X Y, WU W, ZHOU S L , et al. Drive pattern on the spatial heterogeneity of residential land price in urban district:a comparison of spatial expansion method and GWR model[J]. Sci Geogr Sin, 2015,35(6):683-689. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.06.003.
[38]
喻红, 曾辉, 江子瀛 . 快速城市化地区景观组分在地形梯度上的分布特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2001,21(1):64-69.
YU H, ZENG H, JIANG Z Y . Study on distribution characteristics of landscape elements along the terra in gradient[J]. Sci Geogr Sin, 2001,21(1):64-69. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2001.01.012.
[39]
李晓斐 . 城乡一体化:小城镇理论的反思与扩展[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,18(3):131-140.
LI X F . Urban-rural integration and rethinking of small towns theory[J]. J South China Agric Univ(Soc Sci Ed), 2019,18(3):131-140. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1672-0202.2019.03.012.
[40]
周应堂 . 20世纪苏中农业与农村变迁研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2007.
ZHOU Y T . Transition of agriculture and countryside in mid-Jiangsu Province in the 20th century[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University, 2007.
[41]
周觅 . 土地征收对农民生计影响的研究[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2011(6):106-110.
ZHOU M . Study on the impact of land expropriation on farmers’ livelihoods[J]. Hunan Soc Sci, 2011(6):106-110.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(31500388)
中国城市与区域生态国家重点实验室开放基金项目(SKLURE 2016-2-3)
中国博士后科学基金(2016M601144)
江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX18_0979)

编辑: 郑琰燚

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(4068 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/