
基于语义分析法的城市滨水景观质量评价研究——以南京市秦淮河中华门段为例
曹加杰, 张梦凡
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 221-227.
基于语义分析法的城市滨水景观质量评价研究——以南京市秦淮河中华门段为例
Evaluation of urban waterfront landscape quality based on semantic differential method:a case of Zhonghuamen section of Qinhuai River in Nanjing
【目的】基于使用者的心理感知,定量评估影响城市滨水景观质量的关键因素,为城市滨水景观质量的优化提供参考。【方法】以南京市秦淮河中华门段为研究对象,运用语义分析(SD)法从使用者的心理角度出发,对秦淮河中华门段的滨水景观进行质量评价。从景观、生态、人文3个方面制定评价因子,针对各评价因子对使用者进行问卷调查收集数据,并运用SPSS软件进行分析。【结果】使用者对秦淮河中华门段滨水景观的亲水性、岸线形态、景观美感度、环境整洁度以及历史文化延续性的评价较高,对视域宽广度、环境视觉趣味性、植被覆盖率和娱乐活动多样性的评价较低。基于评价结果认为,影响滨水景观质量的重要因素为公众参与度、植物多样性和河流水质,结合秦淮河中华门段景观现状,提出:①提高秦淮河中华门段滨水景观与地域文化的融合,突出秦淮河景观的独特性,增强游人的归属感;②重视公共参与度,加强公众参与的主动性和有效性,同时丰富秦淮河中华门段的空间功能,增强滨水景观的活力;③进一步加强对秦淮河水质的保护与治理,提高植被覆盖率,并充分利用水生植物来营造滨水生态景观,给游人近自然的生态体验。【结论】通过对感知对象的评价,引入SD法分析游人心理感知为评价城市滨水景观质量提供了可参考的研究路径,有助于聚焦城市滨水景观效能的科学分析,推动城市滨水生态景观的可持续发展,也为未来城市滨水景观的优化提供了参考思路。
【Objective】Based on the psychological perception of users, the key factors affecting the quality of the urban waterfront landscape are evaluated by quantitative methods, so as to provide a reference direction for the optimization of the urban waterfront landscape quality. 【Method】This paper took Zhonghuamen section of the Qinhuai River in Nanjing as the research object, and uses Semantic Differential (SD) method to evaluate the quality of the waterfront landscape of Zhonghuamen section of the Qinhuai River from the psychological perspective of users. Evaluation factors were developed from three aspects of landscape, ecology and humanity. Questionnaires were conducted on users for each evaluation factor to collect data and SPSS software was used for a further analysis of the data. 【Result】The results show that the waterfront landscape in Zhonghuamen section of the Qinhuai River is highly evaluated by the users for its hydrophilicity, coastline form, landscape aesthetic degree, cleanliness of the environment and historical and cultural continuity, but less evaluated for its visual range, environmental visual interest, vegetation coverage rate and recreational activity diversity. Based on the evaluation results, it is concluded that the important factors affecting the waterfront landscape quality are public participation, plant diversity and river water quality. In combination with the landscape status of Zhonghuamen Section of the Qinhuai River, it is proposed to improve the integration of the waterfront landscape and regional culture, highlight the uniqueness of the Qinhuai River landscape and enhance the sense of belonging of visitors. Secondly, it is proposed to attach importance to public participation, strengthen the initiative and effectiveness of public participation, enrich the space function of Zhonghuamen section of the Qinhuai River and enhance the vitality of the waterfront landscape. Thirdly, it is proposed to strengthen the protection and treatment of the Qinhuai River water quality, improve the vegetation coverage, and make full use of aquatic plants to create the waterfront ecological landscape in order to give visitors ecological experience of getting close to nature. 【Conclusion】Through the evaluation of perceived objects, the introduction of SD method to analyze visitors’ psychological perception provides a reference path for the quality evaluation of the urban waterfront landscape, which is helpful to focus on the scientific analysis of urban waterfront landscape efficiency and promote the sustainable development of the urban waterfront landscape. This evaluation method can provide a reference for the optimization of the urban waterfront landscape in the future.
滨水景观 / 景观质量 / 语义分析法 / 景观评价 / 秦淮河
waterfront landscape / landscape quality / semantic differential (SD) method / landscape evaluation / the Qinhuai River
[1] |
邓慧. 城市滨水景观质量评估方法研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2008.
|
[2] |
曹加杰, 王杰, 吴向崇, 等. 城市河道开放空间景观修复后评价研究——以南京内秦淮河东段为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,44(3):195-201.
|
[3] |
秦书茜. 长沙市湘江滨水区景观评价与优化研究[D]. 长沙:湖南师范大学, 2015.
|
[4] |
王珊珊. 基于地域文化的哈尔滨群力新区滨水景观评价及优化[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2019.
|
[5] |
朱润钰, 甄峰. 城市滨水景观评价研究初探:以南京市莫愁湖滨水区为例[J]. 四川环境, 2008,27(1):5-11.
|
[6] |
姚玉敏, 朱晓东, 徐迎碧, 等. 城市滨水景观的视觉环境质量评价:以合肥市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(18):5836-5845.
|
[7] |
赵烨, 王建国. 滨水区城市景观的评价与控制:以杭州西湖东岸城市景观规划为例[J].城市规划学刊, 2014(4):80-87.
|
[8] |
达婷. 城市滨水区再开发的生态、社会功能及文脉三维连接性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(3):129-134.
|
[9] |
章俊华. 规划设计学中的调查分析法16:SD法[J]. 中国园林, 2004,20(10):54-58.
|
[10] |
王亚娟 . 基于SBE和SD法的北京市郊野公园视觉景观质量研究[D]. 北京:首都师范大学, 2013.
|
[11] |
王建伟, 魏淑敏, 姚瑞, 等. 园林空间类型划分及景观感知特征量化研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012,27(2):221-225,229.
|
[12] |
乔文黎. 城市滨水区景观的评价研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2008.
|
[13] |
徐慧. 城市景观水系规划模式研究——以江苏省太仓市为例[J]. 水资源保护, 2007,23(5):25-27.
|
[14] |
张佳娴. 城市线性滨水空间景观设计研究:以郴州中心城区为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015,43(29):165-167.
|
[15] |
王菁, 王雪松, 覃琳, 等. 基于SD法的重庆滨水空间活力评价研究[J]. 重庆建筑, 2019,18(1):28-31.
|
[16] |
邓春艳. 城市滨水开放空间的场所性塑造研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2010.
|
[17] |
白晓丹. 基于SD法的天河山风景区景观评价与优化研究[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2019.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |