使用LI-6400便携式光合测定系统,研究了湿地松优良半同胞家系的光和CO2响应情况,结果表明:不同湿地松半同胞家系光响应曲线、CO2响应曲线的特征参数在家系品种间有极显著差异。湿地松各半同胞家系1龄针叶在全年中以3至4月份、2龄针叶以4月份的表观光量子效率为最高,所有针叶以5月份最低, 各家系1龄、2龄针叶的羧化效率以5月最低,8至9月最高。所有家系的1龄针叶、2龄针叶的表观光量子效率、羧化效率均高于普通品种,1龄针叶的表观光量子效率、羧化效率要高于2龄针叶的。具有较高的表观光量子效率、羧化效率、光饱和点、CO2饱和点和较低的光和CO2补偿点,是湿地松优良半同胞家系具有较高生长量和产量的主要生理原因。
Abstract
The responses to light and CO2 of slash pine’s halfsib were studied for establishing reasonable strategy in heredity improvement and planting using LI-6400 portable photosynthetic system. There were significant differences of the character parameters which responded to light and CO2 of slash pine’s halfsib. The apparent quantum yield on March to April of 1 year needle of slash pine’s halfsib and the apparent quantum yield on April of 2 year needle of slash pine’s halfsib was the highest in a year. The apparent quantum yield on May of 1 and 2 year needle of slash pine’s halfsib was the lowest. The carboxylation efficiency on May of 1 and 2 year needle of slash pine’s halfsib was the lowest while the carboxylation efficiency on August to September of 1 and 2 year needle of slash pine’s halfsib was the highest.The apparent quantum yield and carboxylation efficiency of slash pine’s halfsib were higher than that of general variety. The apparent quantum yield and carboxylation efficiency of 1 year needle were higher than that of 2 year needle’s. The main physiological mechanism of fast growth and high yield of slash pine’s halfsib was that it had highest apparent quantum yield, carboxylation efficiency, saturation point of light, saturation point of CO2 and lower compensation point of light , compensation point of CO2.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]成子纯.湿地松的系统经营[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2004.
[2]岳春雷,高智慧,陈顺伟.湿地松等3种树种的光合特性及其与环境因子的关系[J].浙江林学院学报,2002,19(3):1822.
[3]谭芳林,薛建辉,张水松,等.不同混交模式防护林中湿地松的光合特性[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2003,27(4):3538.
[4]庄猛,姜卫兵.金叶女贞与小叶女贞光合特性的比较研究[J].南京农业大学学报,2007,30(2):7578.
[5]龚伟,宫渊波.湿地松幼树冠层光合作用日变化及其影响因素[J].浙江林学院学报,2006,23(1):5861.
[6]梁开明,曹洪麟,徐志防,等.台湾青枣及野生种的光合作用日变化及光响应特征[J].园艺学报,2008,21(6):9599.
[7]许大全.光系统Ⅱ反应中心的失活及其生理意义[J],植物生理学通讯,1999(4):2123.
[8]许大全.叶片表观光合量子效率的测定[C]//中科院植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会.现代植物生理学实验指南.北京:科学出版社,1999.
[9]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
[10]柯世省,金则新.水分胁迫和温度对夏蜡梅叶片气体交换和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,22(1):3437.
[11]刘宇锋.非直线双曲线模型在光合响应曲线数据分析中的应用[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(8):7679.
[12]蹇洪英,邹寿青.地毯草的光合特性研究[J].广西植物,2003,23(2):181184.
[13]Herrick J D. Effects of CO2 enrichment on the photosynthetic light response of sun and shade of canopy sweetgum trees. In a forest ecosystem[J]. Tree Physiology, 1999,19:779786.
[14]Richardson A D, Berlyn G. Spectral reflectance and photosynthetic properties of Betula pabyrifera (Betulaceae) leaves along an elevational gradient on Mt. Mansfield, Vermont,USA[J].American Journal Botany,2002,89(1):8894.
基金
收稿日期:2007-11-06修回日期:2008-08-04 基金项目:湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(05JJ3072) 作者简介:童方平(1964—),研究员,博士,研究方向为工业原料林遗传改良与丰产栽培、植被恢复及生物技术。Email:tongfangping@sina.com 引文格式:童方平,徐艳平,宋庆安,等.湿地松优良半同胞家系光和CO2响应曲线特征参数的变异规律[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(1):5458.