为了解雷竹不同施肥水平对林地土壤氮、磷渗漏流失的影响，设置了4个施肥水平的定位试验，即不施肥、减量施肥(比常规施肥减量50%)、常规施肥(施肥量：尿素1 125.0 kg/hm2、复合肥2 250.0 kg/hm2)和增量施肥(比常规施肥增量50%)，于2007年5至10月采集并分析渗漏水样。结果表明：雷竹林土壤渗漏水量的多少与降雨量的大小呈明显的线性关系(p<0.01)。随着施肥量的增加，雷竹林地土壤渗漏水中各形态氮、总磷含量明显提高，渗漏流失负荷也明显增多。5至9月渗漏水中各养分浓度逐渐下降，10月份则明显升高，这与渗漏流失量密切相关。减量、常规和超量施肥处理下，氮素淋失量分别占施肥量的4.22%、4.25%和4.54%，磷素淋失量分别占施肥量的1.07%、0.65%和0.56%。
Abstract
To reveal characteristics of nutrients in leaching water at four different fertilizer levels, controlling with no fertilizer, half of the normal rate, normal rate with 1 125.0 kg/hm2 of urea and 2 250.0 kg/hm2 of compounded fertilizer, and one and half of the normal rate, a field experiment was conducted in Phyllostachys praecox stands. Leaching water was collected and analyzed from May to October in 2007. Results showed that there was a significant linear relationship between the amount of leaching water and the precipitation. The concentrations of different types of nitrogen and total phosphorous were increasing with growing of fertilizer rate, as well as the load of leaching loss. The monthly amount or concentration of all nutrients in leaching water gradually decreased from May to September but increased significantly in October, this trend was closely related to the amount of leaching water. The amount of nitrogen leaching from stands with treatments under half of the normal rate, normal rate and one and half of the normal rate were accounting for 4.22%, 425% and 4.54% of total fertilizer applied respectively, the correspondence data for phosphorus were accounting for 107%, 0.65% and 0.56% respectively.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]朱有为,段丽丽. 浙江省农业面源污染现状与对策[C]//邹瑞苍,王青立. 全国农业面源污染与综合防治学术研讨会论文集,2004.
[2]Di H J, Cameron K C. Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystemssources, factors and mitigating strategies[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2002, 46: 237-256.
[3]周全来,赵牧秋,鲁彩艳,等. P肥施入土壤后的变化及对P淋失的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2006,22(3):80-83.
[4]黄芳,蔡荣荣,孙达,等. 集约经营雷竹林土壤氮素状况及氮平衡的估算[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(6):1193-1196.
[5]姜培坤,俞益武,金爱武,等. 丰产雷竹林地土壤养分分析[J]. 竹子研究汇刊,2000,19(4):50-53.
[6]高志勤,傅懋毅. 毛竹林渗滤水养分的淋溶特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,29(6):95-98.
[7]鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
[8]甘健民,薛敬意,谢寿昌. 云南哀牢山常绿阔叶林土壤渗漏水养分研究[J]. 地理科学,1997,17(3):237-242.
[9]张卓文,汤景明,熊艳平,等. 雷竹引种后地下鞭生长规律研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报,2001,21(1):77-80.
[10]陈敏鹏,陈吉宁. 中国种养系统的氮流动及其环境影响[J]. 环境科学,2007,28(10):2342-2349.
[11]Baker J L, Johnson H P. NitrateNitrogen in tile drainages as affected by fertilizer[J]. Journal of Environment Quality, 1981, 10: 519-522.
[12]Milburn P, Richards J E, Gartley C, et al. Nitrate leaching from systematically tiled potato fields in New Brunswick, Canada[J]. Journal of Environment Quality, 1990, 19: 448-454.
[13]徐泰平,朱波,况福虹,等. 四川紫色土坡耕地磷素渗漏迁移初探[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2006,25(2):464-466.
[14]焦少俊,胡夏民,潘根兴,等. 施肥对太湖地区青紫泥水稻土稻季农田氮磷流失的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2007,26(4):495-500.
[15]单艳红,杨林章,颜廷梅. 水田土壤溶液磷氮的动态变化及潜在的环境影响[J]. 生态学报,2005,25(1):115-121.
[16]潘根兴,焦少俊,李恋卿,等. 低施磷水平下不同施肥对太湖地区黄泥土磷迁移性的影响[J]. 环境科学,2003,24(3):91-95.
基金
收稿日期：2008-08-13修回日期：2008-12-09基金项目：浙江省科技厅资助项目(2005C12032;2005C32046)作者简介：吴家森(1972—)，高级实验师，硕士。*姜培坤(通讯作者)，教授，研究方向为土壤资源与生态环境研究。Email: Jiangpeikun@zjfc.edu.cn。引文格式：吴家森,姜培坤,谢秉楼,等. 不同施肥处理对雷竹林土壤氮、磷渗漏流失的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(3):60-64.
PDF(775220 KB)
